Is Procalcitonin Biomarker-Guided Antibiotic Therapy a Cost-Effective Approach to Reduce Antibiotic Resistant and Clostridium difficile Infections in Hospitalized Patients?

Impact of including productivity costs in economic analyses of vaccines for C. difficile infections and infant respiratory syncytial virus, in a UK setting

OBJECTIVES

It has been estimated that vaccines can accrue a relatively large part of their value from patient and carer productivity. Yet, productivity value is not commonly or consistently considered in health economic evaluations of vaccines in several high-income countries. To contribute to a better understanding of the potential impact of including productivity value on the expected cost-effectiveness of vaccination, we illustrate the extent to which the incremental costs would change with and without productivity value incorporated.

METHODS

For two vaccines currently under development, one against Cloistridioides difficile (C. difficile) infection and one against respiratory syncytial disease (RSV), we estimated their incremental costs with and without productivity value included and compared the results.

RESULTS

In this analysis, reflecting a UK context, a C. difficile vaccination programme would prevent £12.3 in productivity costs for every person vaccinated. An RSV vaccination programme would prevent £49 in productivity costs for every vaccinated person.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering productivity costs in future cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccines for C. difficile and RSV will contribute to better-informed reimbursement decisions from a societal perspective.

Diagnostic Testing for Sepsis: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations

Introduction: Sepsis is a serious and expensive healthcare problem, when caused by a multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria mortality and costs increase. A reduction in the time until the start of treatment improves clinical results. The objective is to perform a systematic review of economic evaluations to analyze the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic methods in sepsis and to draw lessons on the methods used to incorporate antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in these studies. Material and Methods: the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to extract the information from the texts. Results: A total of 16 articles were found. A decision model was performed in 14. We found two ways to handle resistance while modelling: the test could identify infections caused by a resistant pathogen or resistance-related inputs, or outcomes were included (the incidence of AMR in sepsis patients, antibiotic use, and infection caused by resistant bacterial pathogens). Conclusion: Using a diagnostic technique to detect sepsis early on is more cost-effective than standard care. Setting a direct relationship between the implementation of a testing strategy and the reduction of AMR cases, we made several assumptions about the efficacy of antibiotics and the length-of-stay of patients.

Defining the decision problem: A scoping review of economic evaluations for Clostridioides difficile interventions

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of health care-associated infectious diarrhoea. Several preventative and treatment interventions exist, however, decisions for their use are typically made independent of other interventions along the care pathway.

AIM

To assess how the scope of the decision problem is defined in economic evaluations of C. difficile interventions.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework using a comprehensive literature search with C. difficile and economic evaluation as key search concepts. Study selection and extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. We conducted an in-depth analysis of all cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses. Care pathway domains (i.e., infection prevention and control, antimicrobial stewardship programs, prevention, diagnostics, treatment) were defined iteratively, and each study was classified according to the scope of the decision problem: a) one intervention, one domain; b) one intervention, multiple domains; c) multiple interventions, one domain; d) multiple interventions, multiple domains.

RESULTS

A total of 3,886 studies were identified, 116 included in our descriptive overview, and 46 included in our in-depth analysis. Most studies limited the scope of the decision problem to one intervention (43/46; 93%). Only three studies (3/46; 7%) assessed multiple interventions - either as bundled versus standalone interventions for prevention (i.e., a single domain), or as sequences of treatments for initial and recurrent infection (i.e., multiple domains). No study assessed multiple interventions across prevention and treatment domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Economic evaluations for CDI assess narrowly defined decision problems which may have implications for optimal healthcare resource allocation.

Procalcitonin and antibiotics in moderate-severe acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: to use or not to use

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are major driver for healthcare utilization with each exacerbation begetting the next exacerbation. It is, therefore, important to treat each episode effectively to prevent the next. However, this can be challenging as AECOPD result from complex interactions between host, environment and infective agents. The benefits of starting antibiotics in AECOPD, which are not life-threatening (e.g. not requiring mechanical ventilation) or not complicated by pneumonia remain controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic therapy in AECOPD has gained interest in recent years. The main advantage of this approach is a safe reduction in antibiotic use in a large group of patients, which may potentially translate to several other benefits. These include reduced antibiotic-related side-effects, reduced risk of developing antibiotic-resistant organisms and cost savings. This approach is associated with no increase in mortality or morbidity such as treatment failure, re-admission, admission to ICU.

SUMMARY

Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in AECOPD is a promising and safe approach, which may be ready for the prime time.