In My Opinion—Interview with the Expert

Use of spacers for patients treated with pressurized metered dose inhalers: focus on the VENTOLIN™ Mini Spacer

INTRODUCTION

Spacers offer a multitude of benefits by reducing the requirement to coordinate inhalation with actuation and improving inhaler technique in patients using a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). Spacers improve drug targeting by retaining within the spacer large particles normally deposited in the oropharynx, and by creating a prolonged aerosol cloud of fine particles to give the user increased time to inhale after actuation. This is particularly important in young children and the elderly to effectively deliver medication to the airways.

AREAS COVERED

By investigating the history and features of spacers, we demonstrate that the advantages of using spacers far outweigh their limitations. We also discuss the optimal characteristics of spacers in terms of shape, volume, presence of valve and static charge, and present a detailed discussion of the VENTOLIN™ Mini Spacer.

EXPERT OPINION

Generally, the shape and size of spacers makes them inherently inconvenient. Consideration of human factors and modern design may make them more attractive to patients. However, the incentive to use spacers should be their ability to help patients correctly use inhaled medications delivered by pMDIs. Understanding of these principles through education is key to their acceptance by patients.

Clinically Relevant In Vitro Testing of Orally Inhaled Products-Bridging the Gap Between the Lab and the Patient

Current pharmacopeial methods for in vitro orally inhaled product (OIP) performance testing were developed primarily to support requirements for drug product registration and quality control. In addition, separate clinical studies are undertaken in order to quantify safety and efficacy in the hands of the patient. However, both laboratory and clinical studies are time-consuming and expensive and generally do not investigate either the effects of misuse or the severity of the respiratory disease being treated. The following modifications to laboratory evaluation methodologies can be incorporated without difficulty to provide a better linkage from in vitro testing to clinical reality: (1) examine all types of OIP with patient-representative breathing profiles which represent normal inhaler operation in accordance with the instructions for use (IFU); (2) evaluate OIP misuse, prioritizing the importance of such testing on the basis of (a) probability of occurrence and (b) consequential impact in terms of drug delivery in accordance with the label claim; and (3) use age-appropriate patient-simulated face and upper airway models for the evaluation of OIPs with a facemask. Although it is not necessarily foreseen that these suggestions would form part of future routine quality control testing of inhalers, they should provide a closer approximation to the clinical setting and therefore be useful in the preparation for in vivo studies and in improving guidance for correct use.

Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing

The design of methods in the pharmaceutical compendia for the laboratory-based evaluation of orally inhaled product (OIP) performance is intentionally aimed for simplicity and robustness in order to achieve the high degree of accuracy and precision required for the assurance of product quality in a regulated environment. Consequently, performance of the inhaler when used or even misused by the patient or care-giver has often not been assessed. Indeed, patient-use-based methodology has been developed in a somewhat piecemeal basis when a need has been perceived by the developing organization. There is, therefore, a lack of in-use test standardization across OIP platforms, and often important details have remained undisclosed beyond the sponsoring organization. The advent of international standards, such as ISO 20072:2009, that focus specifically on the OIP development process, together with the need to make these drug delivery devices more patient-friendly as an aid to improving compliance, is necessitating that clinically appropriate test procedures be standardized at the OIP class level. It is also important that their capabilities and limitations are well understood by stakeholders involved in the process. This article outlines how this process might take place, drawing on current examples in which significant advances in methodology have been achieved. Ideally, it is hoped that such procedures, once appropriately validated, might eventually become incorporated into the pharmacopeial literature as a resource for future inhaler developers, regulatory agencies, and clinicians seeking to understand how these devices will perform in use to augment ongoing product quality testing which is adequately served by existing methods.

Considerations for Designing In Vitro Bioequivalence (IVBE) Studies for Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) with Spacer or Valved Holding Chamber (S/VHC) Add-on Devices

BACKGROUND

The choice of analytical test methods and associated statistical considerations are considered for the laboratory testing of pressurized metered dose inhaler-spacer/valved holding chamber (pMDI-S/VHC) combinations for in vitro bioequivalence (IVBE).

METHODS

Four scenarios are presented for comparing TEST ("second entry" or "generic") versus REF ("innovator"): (1) innovator and second entry product pMDI alone without any S/VHC (baseline comparison); (2) innovator and second entry pMDI product with the same S/VHC; (3) innovator pMDI product with existing S/VHC and second entry product with a different S/VHC; and (4) introduction of a second, different S/VHC to be used with a given innovator pMDI product. The following aspects should be reviewed in the preparatory stage of designing experiments to establish IVBE: (a) the inclusion of delayed inhalation; (b) the utilization of age-appropriate flow rates; and (c) the use of anatomically appropriate face models for evaluation of devices with a facemask. Statistical considerations that fit in with such experimental methods include: selection of pMDI batches and S/VHC lots; choice of sample size and acceptance criteria; bracketing or worst case approaches; and balanced/paired designs. A stepwise approach for selection of impactor stage groupings is presented, and an approach to determine realistic acceptance criteria based on REF product characteristics is suggested.

RESULTS

An example of an efficient statistical design of experiment is provided for each scenario, together with alternate approaches for calculation of confidence intervals for the mean TEST/REF relationship. It is important to appreciate that the optimal design depends on balancing numerous considerations and will thus likely differ from case to case; hence, the designs presented here should be seen as illustrations rather than the only option available. More effective approaches may be found that suit a particular case at hand.

CONCLUSIONS

The information provided will assist in developing correlations in support of IVBE for these add-on devices.

Improved laboratory test methods for orally inhaled products

Existing pharmacopeial methods for the in vitro testing of orally inhaled products (OIPs) are simplified representations of clinical reality, as their objective is to provide metrics that are discriminating of product quality. Attempts to correlate measures such as fine particle fraction <5 µm aerodynamic diameter with in vivo measures of lung deposition have therefore been notoriously difficult to achieve. Although particle imaging-based techniques may be helpful to link in vitro to in vivo data as surrogates for clinical responses, a reappraisal of the purposes for laboratory-based testing of OIPs is required. This article provides guidance on approaches that may be helpful to develop clinically appropriate methods to assess OIP performance in the laboratory, with the ultimate goal of developing robust in vitro–in vivo relationships for the major inhaled drug classes.

Development of new spacer device geometry: a CFD study (part I)

Asthma is a widespread disease, affecting more than 300 million individuals. The treatment in children is based upon an administration of a pressurised metered-dose inhaler added with a spacer. The efficiency of drug delivery to the patient is strongly affected by the transient airflow pattern inside the spacer device. This paper presents a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of airflow inside a commercially available spacer device with wide application. This study, carried out in Fluent™, was the basis of an optimisation procedure developed to improve the geometry of the spacer and develop a more efficient product. The results show that an appropriate control of the boundary layer development, by changing the spacer shape, reduces the length of the recirculation zones and improves the flow. It can be concluded that CFD is a powerful technique that can be successfully applied to optimise the geometry of such medical devices.

Personalizing aerosol medicine: development of delivery systems tailored to the individual

Inhalation of drugs for therapeutic effects is not a recent innovation as illicit drugs have been ‘smoked’ for millennia. Nicotine delivery ‘devices’ in convenient packaged cartons of cigarettes are simple to use, inexpensive per dose and accessible to people of most ages and lung function, but of course their use leads to increased cancer, emphysema, heart disease and other medical and societal problems. In contrast, many inhalation pharmaceutical medical devices are expensive, nonportable, inconvenient, and/or are used improperly thus leading to poor therapeutic benefit. We review the current state of the art with respect to aerosol delivery, inhalation devices and the ability to personalize the treatment and management of lung disease. The confluence of many drivers will lead to more programmable and flexible devices in the future: the transition from the blockbuster model to customized therapy, technological advancements (e.g., smartphones) and cultural changes including social networking.

Appropriate face models for evaluating drug delivery in the laboratory: the current situation and prospects for future advances

The laboratory evaluation of inhalers with facemasks for patient interface is so complex that testing without a facemask is generally undertaken, a practice that has been advocated in one standard. However, the facemask itself can profoundly influence medication delivery. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to establish the development history of face models for the evaluation of facemasks used with inhalers and accessories. Initial attempts to simulate the facemask-face boundary employed a circular, firm rubber flange plate upon which the facemask was located. However, such models did not represent dead volume accurately, which is particularly important when assessing infant use. Subsequent developments included the creation of more realistic facial features, enabling the aerosol leaving the inhaler to be quantified at the facemask. In one instance (SAINT model), an anatomically correct nasopharyngeal cavity has been combined with a model face, enabling assessment of medication delivery to be extended to the lower respiratory tract. However, it is necessary either to apply sealants or to compress the facemask beyond normal to eliminate leakage with the rigid facial structure that is incomplete above the bridge of the nose. An oral-breathing infant full-face model (ADAM) intended to be used to quantify emitted mass at the patient interface incorporates flexible facial features to overcome this limitation. There is a need to extend the flexible face approach to other models that may be developed in the future for testing facemasks, whether or not they incorporate anatomically correct realizations of the upper respiratory tract.

Design of Facemasks for Delivery of Aerosol-Based Medication via Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler with Valved Holding Chamber: Key Issues that Affect Performance

Valved holding chambers (VHCs) are widely prescribed for use with pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) for the treatment of respiratory disease by aerosol therapy. The facemask is the preferred patient interface for use by infants and small children, as well as by geriatric patients, due primarily to poor coordination skills. However, care is required in the design of the facemask-VHC system to optimize the delivery of medication. In particular, it is essential to achieve an effective mask-to-face seal and to minimize the volume of dead space. It is also important to ensure that the fit of the facemask is comfortable to the patient when applied with sufficient force to create a seal. We review each of these design principles and their application in the evolution of a range of VHCs from the same family of devices during the past fifteen years. We also examine the various methods available for evaluating VHC-facemasks as a system, recommending where future work might be directed.