Systemic Activity of Inhaled Hydrofluoroalkane-134a Metered Dose Inhaler with Beclomethasone Dipropionate in Children with Asthma

Short-Term Growth During Treatment with Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate/Formoterol, Fluticasone and Beclomethasone Treatment

BACKGROUND

Fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM) is a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI; Flutiform^®) approved for use in adolescents and adults and under development for pediatric use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term growth in asthmatic children treated with FP/FORM, FP pMDI with valved holding chamber, and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in a breath-actuated device.

METHODS

Children with persistent asthma (n = 48; 5 to <12 years) participated in an assessor-blinded, randomized, three-way crossover trial with run in, wash out, and active treatment periods, each of 2 weeks duration. Interventions were FP/FORM 100/10 μg b.i.d. with an AeroChamber Plus^® Flow-Vu^® Spacer, FP pMDI (Flixotide^®) 100 μg b.i.d. with a Volumatic^® spacer, and extra-fine BDP breath-actuated inhaler (Aerobec^®/QVAR^® Autohaler^®) 100 μg b.i.d. Lower leg growth rate (LLGR) was measured by knemometry.

RESULTS

The least square (LS) mean difference in LLGR between FP/FORM and FP (per protocol population) was -0.006 mm/week (95% CI: -0.095 to 0.084; p < 0.001 for noninferiority [noninferiority margin -0.200 mm/week]). Both treatments elicited no change from baseline off-treatment growth rate. The LS mean treatment difference of FP/FORM versus BDP was 0.116 mm/week (95% CI: -0.004 to 0.235; p = 0.057) and of FP versus BDP 0.163 mm/week (95% CI: 0.078-0.249; p < 0.001). Results in the full analysis population were: FP/FORM versus FP -0.012 mm/week (95% CI: -0.080-0.056; p < 0.001); FP/FORM versus BDP 0.143 mm/week (95% CI: 0.064-0.222; p < 0.001); FP versus BDP 0.163 mm/week (95% CI: 0.093-0.233; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FP/FORM pMDI with AeroChamber and FP pMDI with Volumatic spacer did not affect lower leg growth, measured by knemometry, in asthmatic children. Conversely, extra-fine BDP from a breath-actuated inhaler resulted in short-term growth suppression.

Extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids, pharma-cokinetics and systemic activity in children with asthma

During recent years, extra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids with a median aerodynamic diameter ≤2 μm have been introduced in the treatment of asthma. The aim of this paper was to review pharmacokinetics and systemic activity of extra-fine particle hydroalkane pressurized metered dose inhaled (pMDI) ciclesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate in children. A literature review was performed. Systemic bioavailability of oral and pulmonary deposition of extra-fine ciclesonide and beclomethasone dipropionate was 52% and 82%, the half-life in serum 3.2 and 1.5 h and first-pass hepatic metabolism >99% and 60%, respectively. Secondary analyses of urine cortisol/creatinine excretion found no effects of ciclesonide pMDI between 40 and 320 μg/day or of beclomethasone dipropionate pMDI between 80 and 400 μg/day. Ciclesonide pMDI 40, 80 and 160 μg/day caused no effects on short-term lower leg growth rate as assessed by knemometry. Ciclesonide 320 μg/day was associated with a numerically short-term growth suppression equivalent to 30% which was similar to 25% and 36% suppression caused by beclomethasone dipropionate HFA and CFC 200 μg/day, respectively. Consistent with the differences in key pharmacokinetic features, beclomethasone dipropionate is associated with a systemic activity detected by knemometry at a lower dose than ciclesonide. Whether that correlates with a clinically important difference remains to be explored. Assessments of systemic activity of beclomethasone dipropionate <200 μg/day and of ciclesonide >180 μg/day as well as head-to-head comparisons are warranted. Preferably, such studies should apply the sensitive method of knemometry.

A Comparison of Short-Term Growth During Treatment with Two Dry Powder Combinations of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Long-Acting β₂-Agonists

BACKGROUND

A combination of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide and the long-acting β2-agonist formoterol has been formulated in a novel dry powder inhaler, Spiromax(®). The objective was to compare lower leg growth in children with asthma treated with inhaled budesonide+formoterol (BF) delivered from the Spiromax inhaler with BF from the Symbicort Turbohaler(®).

METHODS

Prepubescent children with persistent asthma (n=75, aged 6-11 years) were included in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study with active treatment and placebo periods of 2 weeks duration. Lower leg length was measured every second week. As a secondary outcome parameter, 24-hr urine was collected for assessment of free cortisol. Interventions were dry powder BF 160+9 μg twice daily (b.i.d.; delivered dose) from the Spiromax inhaler and dry powder BF 200+12 μg b.i.d. (metered dose) from the Symbicort Turbohaler.

RESULTS

The least squares mean difference in lower leg growth rates (LLGR) between BF Spiromax and Symbicort Turbohaler was -0.086 mm/week [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.203, 0.032]. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was -0.200 mm/week, so the lower limit of the 95% CI was just outside this margin. The difference between BF Spiromax and placebo was -0.20 mm/week (95% CI: -0.322, 0.086); p<0.001), between Symbicort Turbohaler and placebo -0.118 mm/week (95% CI: -0.236, -0.001; p=0.048). No statistically significant differences were seen in urine free cortisol assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

As the lower limit of the CI of LLGR was marginally outside of the pre-specified non-inferiority margin between BF Spiromax 160+9 μg b.i.d. and Symbicort Turbohaler 200+12 μg b.i.d., non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. Further studies may be needed for comparison of systemic activity of BF Spiromax and Symbicort Turbohaler in children before firm conclusions about their comparability may be drawn.

Systemic activity of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate: a double-blind comparison of volume spacers

BACKGROUND

To which extent volume spacers may influence systemic activity of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) has not been evaluated.

AIM

To assess whether the AeroChamber Plus™ spacer is equivalent to the Volumatic™ spacer for administration of inhaled hydroflouroalkane 134a propelled BDP in terms of lower leg growth rate (LLGR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prepubertal children with mild asthma (n = 26, aged 6-14 years) were included in a 3-time periods of 2 weeks duration randomized double-blind cross-over study with a single-blind placebo run-in and two washout periods. LLGR was measured with the knemometer. Interventions were inhaled BDP hydroflouroalkane 134a pressurized metered dose inhaler 100 μg and 200 μg b.i.d. with the AeroChamber Plus and 200 μg b.i.d. with the Volumatic spacer.

RESULTS

Beclomethasone dipropionate 200 μg b.i.d. from the AeroChamber Plus was non-inferior to BDP 200 b.i.d. from the Volumatic spacer as the lower margin of confidence interval of the difference between treatments (-0.18 to 0.13 mm/week) was greater than the prespecified lower limit for non-inferiority (-0.20 mm/week). UFC/creatinine data showed no statistically significant variations.

CONCLUSION

The systemic activity of BDP, via the Volumatic™, and AeroChamber Plus™ spacers is similar. The AeroChamber Plus spacer may be used in children without risk of increasing systemic activity of BDP.

Short-term lower leg growth in 5- to 11-year-old asthmatic children using beclomethasone dipropionate inhalers with chlorofluorocarbon or hydrofluoroalkane propellants: a 9-week, open-label, randomized, crossover, noninferiority study

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate-hydrofluoroalkane (BDP-HFA) is a non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-propelled metered dose inhaler. Data is needed to support the registration of BDP-HFA in pediatric populations for countries in the European Union.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess short-term lower leg growth in children with asthma during treatment with BDP-HFA 100 μg BID compared with BDP-CFC 200 μg BID.

METHODS

Children with asthma were included in this open-label, randomized, crossover study with 2-week run-in, active treatment, and washout periods. Lower leg length was measured every second week. As a secondary outcome parameter, 24-hour urine was collected for assessment of free cortisol. Interventions were inhaled BDP-HFA 100 μg BID with AeroChamber Plus spacer and BDP-CFC 200 μg BID with Volumatic spacer.

RESULTS

In 63 patients with asthma aged 5 to 11 years, BDP-HFA 100 μg BID was noninferior to BDP-CFC 200 μg BID, as the lower margin of CI (-0.03 to 0.10 mm/wk) of the estimated difference (0.03 mm/wk) was greater than the prespecified lower limit for noninferiority of -0.12 mm/wk. Mean (SD) lower leg growth rate during run-in, BDP-HFA 100 μg BID, and BDP-CFC 200 μg BID was 0.36 (0.17), 0.27 (0.21), and 0.23 (0.18) mm/wk, respectively (BDP-HFA estimate of difference, -0.09 [95% CI, -0.16 to -0.03 mm/wk; P < 0.01]; BDP-CFC estimate of difference, -0.13 [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.06 mm/wk; P < 0.001]). No statistically significant differences were seen in urinary free cortisol assessments. Eight and 6 mild to moderate adverse events in 10 children were reported during treatment with BDP-HFA and BDP-CFC, respectively. One event in each group was judged to be probably related to the study medication; no others were judged to be related.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were found in lower leg growth between BDP-HFA 100 μg BID with AeroChamber Plus spacer and BDP-CFC 200 μg BID with Volumatic spacer during 2-week treatment. Evidence of differences in systemic activity between the treatments was not found. EudraCT registration: 2007-007455-14.

Methodology and implications of knemometry in growth assessment of inhaled glucocorticoids

When validated recommendations for standardization and measurement procedures are used short-term assessment of lower leg growth by knemometry is a highly accurate and reproducible method for assessment of systemic activity of inhaled glucocorticoids. Crossover and parallel designs applying consistent measurement intervals can be used. Crossover designs with a single-blind run in and washout and double-blind active periods are as sensitive as designs using randomized placebo periods. In populations of children, short-term knemometry appears to be capable of defining specific glucocorticoids, application devices and doses that do not suppress long-term height growth. Although no specific cut-off level can be identified in individuals from the available randomized, double-blind short-term knemometry and intermediate-term height growth rate studies, good evidence have been provided that if the short-term lower leg growth suppression in populations of children is higher than approximately 25%, the risk of intermediate-term growth suppression becomes significant with a mean height growth rate retardation in the range of approximately 0.5-1.5 cm during the first year of treatment. Short-term knemometry should be performed as an integral part of the safety assessments of new inhaled glucocorticoids and inhalation devices in children with asthma, before intermediate-term height growth evaluations are initiated.