1
|
Maino C, Cereda M, Franco PN, Boraschi P, Cannella R, Gianotti LV, Zamboni G, Vernuccio F, Ippolito D. Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12:100544. [PMID: 38304573 PMCID: PMC10831502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Marco Cereda
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Paolo Niccolò Franco
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Piero Boraschi
- Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Vittorio Gianotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20100 Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- University Hospital of Padova, Institute of Radiology, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20100 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gaballah AH, Kazi IA, Zaheer A, Liu PS, Badawy M, Moshiri M, Ibrahim MK, Soliman M, Kimchi E, Elsayes KM. Imaging after Pancreatic Surgery: Expected Findings and Postoperative Complications. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230061. [PMID: 38060424 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is considered one of the most technically challenging surgical procedures, despite the evolution of modern techniques. Neoplasms remain the most common indication for pancreatic surgery, although inflammatory conditions may also prompt surgical evaluation. The choice of surgical procedure depends on the type and location of the pathologic finding because different parts of the pancreas have separate vascular supplies that may be shared by adjacent organs. The surgical approach could be conventional or minimally invasive (laparoscopic, endoscopic, or robotic assisted). Because of the anatomic complexity of the pancreatic bed, perioperative complications may be frequently encountered and commonly involve the pancreatic-biliary, vascular, lymphatic, or bowel systems, irrespective of the surgical technique used. Imaging plays an important role in the assessment of suspected postoperative complications, with CT considered the primary imaging modality, while MRI, digital subtraction angiography, and molecular imaging are considered ancillary diagnostic tools. Accurate diagnosis of postoperative complications requires a solid understanding of pancreatic anatomy, surgical indications, normal postoperative appearance, and expected postsurgical changes. The practicing radiologist should be familiar with the most common perioperative complications, such as anastomotic leak, abscess, and hemorrhage, and be able to differentiate these entities from normal anticipated postoperative changes such as seroma, edema and fat stranding at the surgical site, and perivascular soft-tissue thickening. In addition to evaluation of the primary operative fossa, imaging plays a fundamental role in assessment of the adjacent organ systems secondarily affected after pancreatic surgery, such as vascular, biliary, and enteric complications. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Test Your Knowledge questions are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Winslow in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayman H Gaballah
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Irfan A Kazi
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Atif Zaheer
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Peter S Liu
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Mohamed Badawy
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Mariam Moshiri
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Mohamed K Ibrahim
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Moataz Soliman
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Eric Kimchi
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390 (A.H.G.); Departments of Radiology (I.A.K.) and Surgery (E.K.), University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo; Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Md (A.Z.); Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (P.S.L.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (M.B., K.M.E.); Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (M.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (M.K.I.); and Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takagi K, Umeda Y, Yoshida R, Fuji T, Yasui K, Yagi T, Fujiwara T. Innovative suture technique for robotic hepaticojejunostomy: double-layer interrupted sutures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:284. [PMID: 37468703 PMCID: PMC10356881 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03020-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Biliary reconstruction remains a technically demanding and complicated procedure in minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries. No optimal hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) technique has been demonstrated to be superior for preventing biliary complications. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of our unique technique of posterior double-layer interrupted sutures in robotic HJ. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database. Forty-two patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy using this technique between September 2020 and November 2022 at our center were reviewed. In the posterior double-layer interrupted technique, sutures were placed to bite the bile duct, posterior seromuscular layer of the jejunum, and full thickness of the jejunum. RESULTS The median operative time was 410 (interquartile range [IQR], 388-478) min, and the median HJ time was 30 (IQR, 28-39) min. The median bile duct diameter was 7 (IQR, 6-10) mm. Of the 42 patients, one patient (2.4%) had grade B bile leakage. During the median follow-up of 12.6 months, one patient (2.4%) with bile leakage developed anastomotic stenosis. Perioperative mortality was not observed. A surgical video showing the posterior double-layer interrupted sutures in the robotic HJ is included. CONCLUSIONS Posterior double-layer interrupted sutures in robotic HJ provided a simple and feasible method for biliary reconstruction with a low risk of biliary complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosei Takagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Yuzo Umeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Fuji
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kazuya Yasui
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takahito Yagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-Cho, Kita-Ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|