Low Beta-Adrenergic Sweat Responses in Cystic Fibrosis and Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator-Related Metabolic Syndrome Children

Effect of reflex and mechanical decreases in skin perfusion on thermal- and agonist-induced eccrine sweating in humans

In humans, skin blood flux (SkBF) and eccrine sweating are tightly coupled, suggesting common neural control and regulation. This study was designed to separate these two sympathetic nervous system end-organ responses via nonadrenergic SkBF-decreasing mechanical perturbations during heightened sudomotor drive. We induced sweating physiologically via whole body heat stress using a high-density tube-lined suit (protocol 1; 2 women, 4 men), and pharmacologically via forearm intradermal microdialysis of two steady-state doses of a cholinergic agonist, pilocarpine (protocol 2; 4 women, 3 men). During sweating induction, we decreased SkBF via three mechanical perturbations: arm and leg dependency to engage the cutaneous venoarteriolar response (CVAR), limb venous occlusion to engage the CVAR and decrease perfusion pressure, and limb arterial occlusion to cause ischemia. In protocol 1, heat stress increased arm cutaneous vascular conductance and forearm sweat rate (capacitance hygrometry). During heat stress, despite decreases in SkBF during each of the acute (3 min) mechanical perturbations, eccrine sweat rate was unaffected. During heat stress with extended (10 min) ischemia, sweat rate decreased. In protocol 2, both pilocarpine doses (ED50 and EMAX) increased SkBF and sweat rate. Each mechanical perturbation resulted in decreased SkBF but minimal changes in eccrine sweat rate. Taken together, these data indicate that a wide range of acute decreases in SkBF do not appear to proportionally decrease either physiologically- or pharmacologically induced eccrine sweating in peripheral skin. This preservation of evaporative cooling despite acutely decreased SkBF could have consequential impacts for heat storage and balance during changes in body posture, limb position, or blood flow restrictive conditions.

β-adrenergic sweat test in children with inconclusive cystic fibrosis diagnosis: Do we need new reference ranges?

BACKGROUND

Investigating inconclusive cystic fibrosis (CF) diagnosis in children is difficult without advanced cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function tests. This study investigated the utility of beta (β)-adrenergic sweat test to exclude CF in participants with inconclusive diagnosis (CF suspects) in South Africa.

METHODS

β-adrenergic sweat test and sweat chloride tests (SCT) were performed simultaneously in CF suspects and adult controls (healthy, CFTR heterozygotes and CF). Cholinergic and β-adrenergic induced sweat rate was measured by evaporimetry (transepithelial water loss [TEWL]: g H₂ O/m² /h) following intradermal injections. Next-generation sequencing of CFTR was performed in CF suspects. CF diagnosis was defined by genotype.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven controls (10 healthy, 14 CF, 13 CFTR heterozygotes) and 32 CF suspects (26 children; 6 adults) were enrolled. Six were excluded from formal analyses due to β-adrenergic sweat test failure. In adults, evaporimetry was superior to SCT for diagnosis of CF with β-adrenergic:cholinergic ratio TEWL ≤ 0.05 achieving 100% sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-two CF suspect children (age range: 3.4-15.6 years) completed β-adrenergic sweat testing of which none had CF confirmed by genotyping: β-adrenergic:cholinergic ratio > 0.05 successfully excluded CF in all but one child who was CFTR heterozygous. Median peak β-adrenergic TEWL and β-adrenergic:cholinergic ratio in CFTR negative and CFTR heterozygous children was significantly lower than adult controls.

CONCLUSION

β-adrenergic sweat test is more accurate than SCT for excluding CF in children with inconclusive diagnosis. Established reference ranges for β-adrenergic sweat test may not be suitable for children due to lower β-adrenergic sweat secretion compared to adults.

Current clinical opinion on CFTR dysfunction and patient risk of pancreatitis: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations

INTRODUCTION

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-mediated chloride and bicarbonate secretion is integral to the pancreas' ability to produce the alkaline pancreatic juice required for proper activation of enzymes for digestion. Disruption in this process increases the risk for pancreatitis.

AREAS COVERED

Using original basic and clinical research, as well as clinical case reports and recent reviews indexed in PubMed, we discuss why patients with CFTR dysfunction are at risk for pancreatitis. We also discuss diagnostic modalities for assessing CFTR function, as well as new therapeutic advancements and the impact these are having on pancreatic function, pancreatitis in particular.

EXPERT OPINION

CFTR-related pancreatitis occurs in the presence of monallelic or biallelic mutations and/or from toxin-mediated channel disruption. Research-based CFTR diagnostics have been expanded, yet all current methods rely on measuring CFTR chloride transport in non-pancreatic cells/tissue. Newer CFTR-directed therapies ('CFTR modulators') are both improving pancreatitis (pancreatic-sufficient CF patients) and increasing the risk for pancreatitis (previously pancreatic-insufficient CF patients). Our experiences with these drugs are enlightening us on how CFTR modulation can affect pancreatitis risk across a wide spectrum of pancreatic disease, and represents an opportunity for therapeutic relief from pancreatitis in those without CF, but who suffer from CFTR-related pancreatitis.

Assays of CFTR Function In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo

Cystic fibrosis, a multi-organ genetic disease, is characterized by abnormal function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride channel at the apical membrane of several epithelia. In recent years, therapeutic strategies have been developed to correct the CFTR defect. To evaluate CFTR function at baseline for diagnosis, or the efficacy of CFTR-restoring therapy, reliable tests are needed to measure CFTR function, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. In vitro techniques either directly or indirectly measure ion fluxes; direct measurement of ion fluxes and quenching of fluorescence in cell-based assays, change in transmembrane voltage or current in patch clamp or Ussing chamber, swelling of CFTR-containing organoids by secondary water influx upon CFTR activation. Several cell or tissue types can be used. Ex vivo and in vivo assays similarly evaluate current (intestinal current measurement) and membrane potential differences (nasal potential difference), on tissues from individual patients. In the sweat test, the most frequently used in vivo evaluation of CFTR function, chloride concentration or stimulated sweat rate can be directly measured. Here, we will describe the currently available bio-assays for quantitative evaluation of CFTR function, their indications, advantages and disadvantages, and correlation with clinical outcome measures.

Cholinergic- rather than adrenergic-induced sweating play a role in developing and developed rat eccrine sweat glands

Both cholinergic and adrenergic stimulation can induce sweat secretion in human eccrine sweat glands, but whether cholinergic and adrenergic stimulation play same roles in rat eccrine sweat glands is still controversial. To explore the innervations, and adrenergic- and cholinergic-induced secretory response in developing and developed rat eccrine sweat glands, rat hind footpads from embryonic day (E) 15.5-20.5, postanal day (P) 1-14, P21 and adult were fixed, embedded, sectioned and subjected to immunofluorescence staining for general fiber marker protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5), adrenergic fiber marker tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and cholinergic fiber marker vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and cholinergic- and adrenergic-induced sweat secretion was detected at P1-P21 and adult rats by starch-iodine test. The results showed that eccrine sweat gland placodes of SD rats were first appeared at E19.5, and the expression of PGP 9.5 was detected surrounding the sweat gland placodes at E19.5, TH at P7, and VIP at P11. Pilocarpine-induced sweat secretion was first detected at P16 in hind footpads by starch-iodine test. There was no measurable sweating when stimulated by alpha- or beta-adrenergic agonists at all the examined time points. We conclude that rat eccrine sweat glands, just as human eccrine sweat glands, co-express adrenergic and cholinergic fibers, but different from human eccrine sweat glands, cholinergic- rather than adrenergic-induced sweating plays a role in the developing and developed rat eccrine sweat glands.

The relative contribution of α- and β-adrenergic sweating during heat exposure and the influence of sex and training status

While human eccrine sweat glands respond to adrenergic agonists, there remains a paucity of information on the factors modulating this response. Thus, we assessed the relative contribution of α- and β-adrenergic sweating during a heat exposure and as a function of individual factors of sex and training status. α- and β-adrenergic sweating was assessed in forty-eight healthy young men (n = 35) and women (n = 13) including endurance-trained (n = 12) and untrained men (n = 12) under non-heat exposure (temperate, 25°C; n = 17) and heat exposure (hot, 35°C; n = 48) conditions using transdermal iontophoresis of phenylephrine (α-adrenergic agonist) and salbutamol (β-adrenergic agonist) on the ventral forearm, respectively. Adrenergic sweating was also measured after iontophoretic administration of atropine (muscarinic receptor antagonist) or saline (control) to evaluate how changes in muscarinic receptor activity modulate the adrenergic response to a heat exposure (n = 12). α- and β-adrenergic sweating was augmented in hot compared with temperate conditions (both P ≤ .014), albeit the relative increase was greater in β (~5.4-fold)- as compared to α (~1.5-fold)-adrenergic-mediated sweating response. However, both α- and β-adrenergic sweating was abolished by atropinization (P = .001). Endurance-trained men showed an augmentation in α- (P = .043) but not β (P = .960)-adrenergic sweating as compared to untrained men. Finally, a greater α- and β-adrenergic sweating response (both P ≤ .001) was measured in habitually active men than in women. We show that heat exposure augments α-and β-adrenergic sweating differently via mechanisms associated with altered muscarinic receptor activity. Sex and training status modulate this response.

Image-based β-adrenergic sweat rate assay captures minimal cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function

BACKGROUND

There is a need to prognosticate the severity of cystic fibrosis (CF) detected by newborn screening (NBS) by early assessment of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein function. We introduce novel instrumentation and protocol for evaluating CFTR activity as reflected by β-adrenergically stimulated sweat secretion.

METHODS

A pixilated image sensor detects sweat rates. Compounds necessary for maximum sweat gland stimulation are applied by iontophoresis, replacing ID injections. Results are compared to a validated β-adrenergic assay that measures sweat secretion by evaporation (evaporimetry).

RESULTS

Ten healthy controls (HC), 6 heterozygous (carriers), 5 with CFTR-related metabolic syndrome (CRMS)/CF screen-positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID), and 12 CF individuals completed testing. All individuals with minimal and residual function CFTR mutations had low ratios of β-adrenergically stimulated sweat rate to cholinergically stimulated sweat rate (β/chol) as measured by either assay.

CONCLUSIONS

β-Adrenergic assays quantitate CFTR dysfunction in the secretory pathway of sweat glands in CF and CRMS/CFSPID populations. This novel image-sensor and iontophoresis protocol detect CFTR function with minimal and residual function and is a feasible test for young children because it is insensible to movement and it decreases the number of injections. It may also assist to distinguish between CF and CRMS/CFSPID diagnosis.