Transmission of Er:YAG laser through different dental ceramics

Effect of Er:YAG laser on debonding zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns bonded with 2- and 1-bottle adhesive resin cements

INTRODUCTION

Erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser debonding of zirconia and lithium disilicate restorations is increasingly used for a range of clinical applications. Using rotary instruments to remove such restorations for any purpose has proven to be challenging. Erbium laser has been reported to be a conservative method for removing ceramic restorations. There is little data in the literature about the effect of adhesive resin cement type on the debonding time of the ceramic restoration using the Er:YAG laser.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the time required for the Er:YAG laser to debond zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns bonded with a 2- and 1-bottle adhesive resin cement systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty extracted premolar teeth were prepared and scanned for milled 40 CAD/CAM crowns. Teeth were randomly assigned into groups (n = 10 per group): 3 mol% yttria-partially stabilized zirconia crowns 3Y-PSZ (G1a) bonded with Panavia™ V5 (2-bottle adhesive resin cement), Zirconia 3Y-PSZ crowns (G1b) bonded with RelyX™ Ultimate (1-bottle adhesive resin cement), and for the lithium disilicate crowns bonded with the two types of cements (G2a, G2b). Each specimen was irradiated with an Er:YAG laser at 335 mJ, 15 Hz, 5.0 W, and 50-ms pulse duration (super short pulse mode). The irradiation time required for crowns to be successfully debonded was recorded for each specimen. Data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05), at the 95 percent level of confidence. The intaglio surface of the debonded crown was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation times needed for crown debonding were 5.75 ± 2.00 min for the G1a group, 4.79 ± 1.20 min for group G1b, 1.69 ± 0.49 min for group G2a, and 1.12 ± 0.17 for group G2b. There was no statistically significant difference in debonding time between the 2- and 1- bottle adhesive resin cement within the groups G1a and b (p = 0.2914), or between groups G2a b (p = 0.7116). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between groups G1a and G2a and b and between groups G1b and G2a and b were SEM analysis showed no changes in the microstructure of the ceramic surface after Er:YAG laser irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Zirconia and lithium disilicate restorations can be debonded using Er:YAG lasers in a safe and efficient manner. There is no significant difference in the debonding time between the 2- and 1- bottle adhesive resin cement systems used in this study.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Retrieving zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics can be a challenging process when using diamond rotary instruments. ER:YAG lasers may efficiently debond these ceramics from the tooth structure, independent of the bonding process used for bonding them.

Laser debonding of ultrathin occlusal veneers fabricated from different CAD/CAM ceramic materials

BACKGROUND

Erbium lasers safely offer the possibility of reuse for debonded restorations. Since these lasers have a high affinity for water molecules, they are absorbed by resin cement causing explosive ablation of the cement and thus, the restoration debonds. The efficiency of this process depends on many factors, including the ceramic type, its chemical composition and thickness. Therefore, this study was designed to test the time taken to debond ultrathin occlusal veneers made of three types of milled ceramic materials and evaluate the integrity of these restorations after debonding.

METHODS

Three ceramic types were evaluated in this study: lithium disilicate (IPS Emax CAD), highly condensed lithium disilicate (GC initial®LiSi), and translucent zirconia (Katana zirconia STML). Each group consisted of 8 occlusal veneers of 0.5 mm thickness. The samples were cemented to the occlusal surfaces of the upper molar teeth. An Er; Cr: YSGG laser was applied to the occlusal veneers using the scanning method, and time until debonding was calculated. The debonded samples were then inspected under a stereomicroscope for possible damage. Numerical data are presented as the mean with 95% confidence interval (CI), standard deviation (SD), minimum (min.) and maximum (max.) values. Normality and variance homogeneity assumptions were confirmed using Shapiro-Wilk's and Levene's tests, respectively. Data were normally distributed and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. Statistical analysis was performed with R statistical analysis software version 4.3.2 for Windows (R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in debonding time between the different materials (p = 0.995). The longest debonding time was found for Katana STML (87.52 ± 20.45) (seconds), followed by Emax (86.94 ± 20.63) (seconds), while the lowest value was found for LiSi initial (86.14 ± 25.16) (seconds). In terms of damage to the debonded veneers, The Emax and zirconia samples showed no damage. However, 40% of the LiSi samples fractured during debonding, and 20% exhibited cracks. Only 40% of the LiSi samples were sound after debonding.

CONCLUSION

Er; Cr: YSGG laser can be used efficiently to remove ceramic occlusal veneers. However, its effect on LiSi restorations needs further research.

Safety and Efficacy of the Erbium Laser in Debonding Dental Accessories: A Narrative Review

Objective: This article aims to review the safety and efficacy of the Er:YAG laser in debonding dental accessories. Methods: This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Articles published between 2010 and 2022 on the removal of dental accessories using erbium laser were searched. The selected articles were then classified according to the accessories used: adhesives, brackets, restorations, or implant crowns. Enamel surface roughness, shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, duration time (t), pulp chamber temperature (T), morphology (M), and other variables were then noted. Results: The dental accessories and adhesives used were described along with the laser parameters used, such as frequency, pulse width, irradiation time, scanning mode, water-air cooling, and other variables. Conclusions: Laser removal using Er:YAG laser of dental accessories such as brackets, crowns, and veneers is fundamentally safe, time-saving, and does not cause damage to the enamel nor the underlying dentin. However, there was no distinct advantage with laser removal seen, such as those residual adhesives of brackets on the tooth surface and temporary adhesives of restorations.

Efficacy of Lasers in Debonding Ceramic Brackets: Exploring the Rationale and Methods

The development of ceramic brackets in orthodontics three decades ago emerged as a response to the increasing patient demand for less visible orthodontic appliances. While these brackets provide superior aesthetics, they are characterized by lower fracture toughness and higher bond strength in contrast to metal brackets. These properties present challenges during the debonding step, including the risk of enamel micro-fractures and cracks. Historically, various strategies have been developed to address challenges associated with debonding, reduce patient discomfort, and ensure that the bond failure site is confined to the bracket-adhesive interface. This included the use of specially designed debonding pliers, electrothermal debonding, ultrasonic technique, and chemical agents. Recently, there has been a shift towards utilizing different types of laser irradiation for this purpose. The burgeoning strategy, however, requires diligent scientific scrutiny to establish a standardized protocol with particular laser parameters and ultimately achieve the goal of enhancing the patient experience by reducing discomfort. This article offers a narrative review of laser-aided debonding of ceramic brackets, aimed at comparing different laser types, presenting their benefits and downsides, validating the efficiency of each method, and summarizing the published literature on this subject. It also provides insights for orthodontists on reducing patient discomfort that usually accompanies debonding ceramic brackets by delving into the science behind the use of lasers for this purpose.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and practicality of erbium lasers for ceramic restoration removal: A retrospective clinical analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and practicality of erbium lasers in the removal of ceramic restorations and appliances from natural teeth and dental implant abutments in clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted, involving 29 clinical cases with a total of 52 abutments requiring the removal of various ceramic restorations. The analysis evaluated the clinical procedures performed, including the type and material of the prosthetic, the type of cement used, laser setting parameters, retrieval time, and retrieval success.

RESULTS

Out of the 52 abutments, 50 were successfully retrieved without causing any damage (>95%) using either an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (N = 6) or an Er:YAG laser (N = 46). In one case, a crown was partially sectioned to prevent any negative impact of laser irradiation on the adhesive strength between the post and tooth, and in another case, a fracture occurred during debonding. The restorations consisted of 13 lithium disilicate and 39 zirconia units, including six veneers, 38 single crowns, and three fixed partial dentures (FPDs). The retrieval time varied depending on the restoration type, material thickness, cement type, retention form/fitting of the abutment and restoration, ranging from 2.25 ±0.61 minutes for veneers, 6.89 ±8.07 minutes for crowns, to 25 ±10 minutes per abutment for FPDs. Removal of a zirconia crown required more time, 7.12±8.91 minutes, compared to a lithium disilicate crown, 5.86 ±2.41 minutes. The debonding time was influenced by the laser settings as well as materials and types of prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Erbium lasers present a safe and effective alternative to invasive methods for removing ceramic restorations, without causing harm to the abutment or prosthesis. Laser-assisted debonding allows for recementation of the restorations during the same appointment, making it a conservative and viable option for ceramic crown retrieval in clinical settings.

Evaluation of Er:YAG laser energy transmitted through novel dental zirconia ceramics

Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser debonding is a promising removal method in prosthodontics. This study aimed to assess Er:YAG laser energy transmission through novel zirconia ceramics. Five types of ceramic samples: lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC), self-glazed zirconia (SGZ), 3 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (3Y-TZP), 4Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP with 5 thicknesses (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mm) and 2 shades (A1, A3), 50 specimens total, were made. Fourier transformation infrared absorption spectra were obtained for each ceramic type, and Er:YAG laser energy transmission tests were conducted for each specimen. The novel zirconia ceramic (SGZ, 4Y-TZP, 5Y-TZP) transmission ranged from 40%-60%. The transmitted laser energy decreased with increasing ceramic thickness, and the differences between different shades were significant (p<0.05). The novel zirconias had a higher translucency than 3Y-TZP at any given thickness and shade, and when the thickness was >1.5 mm, the novel zirconias had a higher translucency than LDC.

Do erbium lasers promote changes in the tooth enamel during debonding of ceramic laminate veneers? A systematic review

The longevity of ceramic laminate veneers can be influenced by several factors, which can result in the need for a removal process. Laser removal has emerged as a good alternative to facilitate the procedure, and its repercussions on tooth enamel have been investigated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of erbium lasers for debonding ceramic laminate veneers without damaging the tooth enamel. This systematic review based on the PICOS model adhered to the PRISMA statement. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched until December 1, 2022, and 2902 studies were retrieved. After screening, four in vitro studies that analyzed the dental morphology using scanning electron microscopy, optical analysis, stereomicroscopy, or x-ray dispersion spectroscopy were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Our findings suggest that erbium lasers are useful for ceramic laminate veneer removal without damaging the tooth enamel. However, the removal is influenced by the type and thickness of ceramic and type of cement used. It could be concluded that the application of Erbium laser did not promote superficial changes in the dental enamel. This effect was observed in all analysis performed.

Optimized Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Parameters for the Removal of Dental Ceramic Restorations

OBJECTIVES

The use of lasers for debonding adhesively luted ceramic restorations is a rather recent oral laser application in dentistry. The removal of all-ceramic restorations in the mouth can often be a troublesome task. A novel method for the debonding of ceramic restorations without damaging the restorations is Er:YAG laser irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Er:YAG laser for debonding procedures of different dental ceramics and to identify appropriate laser settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Lithium disilicate, zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate, feldspatic ceramic, and zirconium dioxide were investigated. Ten ceramic rectangular-shaped specimens with 1 and 2 mm thickness were produced from each material. All specimens were irradiated with four different power settings 1.5; 2.5; 3.5; 4.5 W, pulse duration 50 μs, laser repetition rate 10 Hz, time of irradiation 10 s. The transmitted energy was measured with a powermeter. Additionally the suitability of the Er:YAG laser to remove the adhesively bonded ceramic and the time until loss of retention was evaluated.

RESULTS

The transmission rate for 1 and 2 mm platelets was determined for zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate at 54.6%/35.6%, lithium disilicate at 53.2%/35.7%, zirconium dioxide at 40.6%/32.4%, and for the feldspathic ceramic at 19.4%/10.1%. For zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate and zirconium dioxide 2.5 W (250 mJ/10 Hz) was an appropriate energy level for effective debonding. Whereas for lithium disilicate and for feldspathic ceramic, 4.5 W (450 mJ/10 Hz) is required for efficient debonding.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences regarding transmission rates between ceramic types for the Er:YAG laser light and additionally depending on the type of ceramic different energy settings should be used for adequate debonding. Based on our in-vitro experiments we recommend 2.5 W for zirconium-reinforced lithium silicate and zirconium dioxide and 4.5 W for lithium disilicate and feldspatic ceramic. Transmission rates of different ceramic types and varying influences of thicknesses and bonding materials should be considered to adjust the laser parameters during laser debonding of adhesively luted all-ceramic restorations.

Do different protocols affect the success rate or bond strength of glass-ceramics repaired with composite resin? A systematic review and meta-analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Intraoral repair techniques prevent unnecessary replacement of ceramic restorations, thereby increasing the survival rate. However, adhesion between ceramics and the composite resin is challenging and how different protocols influence adhesion is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the influence of different protocols on repairing glass-ceramic surfaces with composite resins.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases were searched to select studies comparing bond strength values or survival rates of glass-ceramic repaired with composite resins using different surface treatment protocols. No publication year or language restriction was applied. Data sets were extracted from all included studies, and the mean differences calculated. A 95% confidence interval was calculated by using the random effect model (Rev Man 5.4).

RESULTS

The search identified 5037 studies, and 165 were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 123 in vitro studies were included in the systematic review and 48 in the meta-analysis. Considering different glass-ceramics, bond strength tests, and aged or not aged specimens, 37 meta-analyses found the effect of repair protocols: only adhesive, silane plus adhesive alone or preceded by hydrofluoric (HF) acid, airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with Al2O3 particles, silica-coated APA (SCAPA), diamond rotary instrument (DRI), and laser irradiation (LI).

CONCLUSIONS

For feldspathic porcelain, HF acid, APA, SCAPA, or DRI improved the repair micromechanical retention; applying silane is essential to HF-conditioned surfaces but the use of adhesive is optional when silane is applied. Results for leucite and lithium disilicate were inconclusive in terms of suggesting a treatment other than HF acid plus silane and adhesive applications.

The influence of pulse duration and exposure time of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on lithium disilicate laminate debonding, an in vitro study

Problem statement

Grinding restorations, such as veneers, with rotary instruments, is the conventional removal approach. It may be accompanied by micro-fractures that affect the adjacent healthy dental structures. Differentiation of the veneer from the dental structure, as well as the resin cement, is not a highly selective procedure when rotary instruments are used. Moreover, the rotary instruments may lead to scratches and overheating of the enamel. Patient discomfort is another disadvantage, due to the noise of the drill.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to examine the effectiveness of a 2790 nm Er,Cr:YSGG laser to debond lithium disilicate laminate, utilizing two distinct pulse durations and various exposure times. The shear bond strength, intrapulpal temperature, and adhesive remaining index were evaluated.

Methods and materials

This study included three groups of 75 extracted permanent mandibular incisors: G1, G2 (laser-treated groups were classified according to the pulse duration) and C (control group). Twenty five samples were regarded for each group. Both test groups were irradiated with a 3 W output power of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, for a variety of time intervals (20 s, 30 s, 40 s, 50 s, and 60 s). Five samples were tested for each time interval. During irradiation, the temperature in the pulp chamber was monitored using a K-type thermocouple connected to a digital multilogger thermometer that was introduced into the prepared sample pulp chamber. Subsequently, the shear bond strength was measured for G1 and G2, in addition to the control group (no irradiation). The adhesive remaining index was examined microscopically. The area was measured and analysed, and then, transformed into scores for comparisons. Finally, One untreated sample and two other samples of the highest power value from laser-treated groups were examined for their surface morphology by scanning electron microscope (SEM).

Results

The debonding protocols were safe relative to the intrapulpal protocol. The temperature rise after an exposure time of 50 s and 60 s was significantly different from an exposure time of 20 s, 30 s, and 40 s, in both groups (p < 0.05). Both G1 and G2 significantly outperformed the control group in shear bond strength. There was no significant difference between G1 and G2 at any of the tested exposure times (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, the 60 s exposure time showed the lowest shear bond strength.

Conclusion

Regarding intralpulpal temperature, both modes can be safely used to remove laminate veneers. In sum, an exposure time of 50 s and a pulse duration of 60 μs demonstrated superior results for SBS, adhesive remaining index, and temperature values.

Clinical implication

Lithium disilicate laminate veneers may be removed quickly, safely, and comfortably. Laser-assisted debonding of porcelain laminate veneer is recommended and does not cause any damage to the veneer or enamel surface.

Comparative Study of Transmission of 2940 nm Wavelength in Six Different Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets

Background: Previous studies have confirmed the superiority of using erbium lasers (2940, 2780 nm) over other lasers in the debonding of ceramic brackets due to their safety and effectiveness. The most important factor in the debonding of aesthetic brackets is the transmission of the erbium laser through the aesthetic bracket to the adhesive resin. Objective: To identify the transmission of the 2940 nm wavelength through different types of aesthetic brackets. Materials and methods: A total of 60 aesthetic brackets were divided into six equal groups (10 monocrystalline sapphire brackets—Radiance, AO; 10 monocrystalline sapphire brackets—Absolute, Star Dentech; 10 polycrystalline brackets—20/40, AO; 10 polycrystalline brackets—3M Unitek Gemini Clear Ceramic; 10 silicon brackets—Silkon Plus, AO; 10 composite brackets—Orthoflex, OrthoTech). The aesthetic brackets were mounted in a Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR IRPrestige-21, SHIMADZU) following the typical spectroscopy lab procedure for such samples. The transmission ratio for the 2940 nm wavelength was obtained using IRsolution software. The mean transmission values of the tested groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by a Bonferroni test (post-hoc test). Results: The highest transmission ratio was observed for the Radiance sapphire brackets (64.75%) and the lowest was observed for the 3M polycrystalline brackets (40.48%). The differences among the Aesthetic brackets were significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The thick polycrystalline and composite brackets have the lowest transmissibility, whereas the monocrystalline sapphire brackets have the highest transmissibility for the 2940 nm wavelength, meaning that there is a higher possibility of debonding them with a hard tissue laser through thermal ablation.

The effect of Er, Cr:YSGG laser debonding on the bond strength of two ceramic materials to dentin

OBJECTIVES

Evaluating the bond strength of two ceramic materials to dentin after Er,Cr:YSGG laser debonding. Would laser debonding affect the bond strength of ceramic to dentin?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Recently extracted human molars were ground to expose dentin. Forty square shaped samples were prepared from CAD/CAM ceramic blocks. Samples were divided into two groups according to the type of ceramic material; group E: Lithium disilicate and group T: Ultra-translucent Zirconia (n = 20) Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the laser debonding effect (subgroup B: bonded samples, subgroup R: re-bonded samples after laser debonding). Ceramic samples were bonded to dentin using dual cure self-adhesive resin cement. Laser debonding of ceramic samples of subgroups R using Er, Cr:YSGG laser, were then re-bonded again to dentin surface with same resin cement. The Shear bond strength test using Universal testing machine was done. The failure mode was analyzed. Two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the mean bond strength and re-bond strength of two materials. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Two-Way ANOVA showed that ceramic type had a significant effect on the re-bond strength to dentin. The predominant failure mode was adhesive.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser debonding of Lithium disilicate and Ultra translucent Zirconia decreased the re-bond strength to dentin. Deterioration in re-bond strength for Lithium disilicate ceramics was more pronounced than for Ultra translucent Zirconia. Clinical Relevance Deterioration in the bond strength between ceramics & dentin after laser debonding still needs improvement to allow its clinical use.

Removal of lithium disilicate veneers with Er,Cr:YSGGL laser: now? Or after ageing?

This study was purposed to assess the impact of ageing and resin cements polymerized with different modes on the removal time of lithium disilicate (LiSi) ceramics using Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Ninety LiSi slabs (6 × 6 × 1 mm) were cemented to freshly extracted bovine teeth using cements polymerized with different modes (light-curing (LC), dual-curing (DC), self-curing (SC)). The specimens were divided into subgroups according to ageing conditions (no thermal cycling, 5000 or 30,000 thermal cycling). After that, Er,Cr:YSGG laser was applied until LiSi slabs were debonded; the removal time was recorded. Vickers microhardness test, SEM and EDS analyses were performed for specimens with the longest exposure time to laser application in the groups. One uncemented sample was also used as a control. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Ageing and cement polymerization mode significantly affected the removal time of LiSi specimens. The removal time for the self-curing resin cement group (22.67 ± 12.68 s) was significantly longer than for cements polymerized with other methods (LC = 10.833 ± 7.28 s, DC = 12.0 ± 7.96 s). Removal time was significantly reduced after ageing in all polymerization modes; however, there were no significant differences between 5000 (11.83 ± 7.52 s) and 30,000 (11.83 ± 7.26 s) thermal cycling groups. Self-curing resin cements had prolonged the laser-aided removal time for LiSi ceramics. It can be concluded that Er,Cr:YSGG laser-aided removal of LiSi veneers after clinical use can be done more faster than its immediate removal.

Erbium laser-assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Removal of ceramic restorations and appliances can be time consuming, invasive, and inconvenient. Erbium lasers offer an alternative noninvasive method for debonding of ceramic appliances. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of current literature on the effectiveness of erbium lasers for removal of ceramic restorations and appliances from natural teeth and dental implants.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of 7 databases, including Medline (Ovid), Embase, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (DOSS), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses was performed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were agreed prior to the literature search. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract. A third reviewer then broke the tie, if any. The selected articles then underwent full text review and the data was extracted.

RESULTS

The search identified 4117 unique articles published through June 10, 2021. Studies were assessed and categorized based on the type of restoration/appliance, type of abutment, type of laser, laser settings, efficacy of debonding, and pulpal temperature rise. Thirty-eight full-text articles were reviewed for inclusion. Time for ceramic debonding varies depending on the type of restorations and materials. Removal of zirconia crowns from teeth and implant abutments requires a longer period of time compared to lithium disilicate crowns. Temperature increases were reported as 5.5 degrees or less. Laser setting and laser type affect the debonding time and the increase in temperature. Examinations of debonded ceramics demonstrated no known structural damages resulting from laser applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Erbium lasers are effective noninvasive tools to remove all ceramic restorations/appliances from natural teeth and implant abutments without causing harm to abutments. Laser-assisted debonding should be considered as a viable alternative to rotary instrumentation for ceramic crowns; however, clinical studies of erbium-assisted ceramic retrieval are needed.

The efficiency of ErCr:YSGG laser on the debonding of different thicknesses of ceramic veneers

Aims: To verify the efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser for debonding of lithium disilicate (LD) reinforced glass ceramic veneers of different thicknesses. Methods: Forty bovine teeth were prepared and randomly divided into four groups (n=10/group) according to the ceramic disc thickness: C0.5 (Control group) and L0.5 (Laser irradiated group) in which LD discs had a thickness of 0.5mm and 5mm diameter; C1 and L1 in which LD discs had a thickness of 1mm and 5mm diameter. The lithium disilcate discs (IPS E.max®, shade HTA2) were fabricated following the manufacturer’s recommendations and cemented to the prepared tooth surface. The Er,Cr:YSGG laser was applied to the laser groups at 2.5W and 25Hz for 60seconds. Universal testing machine was used to evaluate the shear bond strength for all samples at a cross head speed of 1mm/min in an inciso-gingival direction parallel to the sample surface. After debonding, the samples were examined under stereoscope to evaluate the mode of failure according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI). Results: Laser irradiation significantly diminishes the shear bond strength from 10.868 MPa to 3.778 MPa for C0.5 and L0.5 groups respectively (p=0.00) and from 14.711 MPa to 4.992 MPa for C1 and L1 groups respectively (p=0.00). The shear bond strength required for debonding increased with increasing thickness of discs, but without significant difference (p=0.110). Higher ARI scores were seen in the laser groups (more cement remaining adhered to the tooth) when compared to the control groups. Conclusions: The Er,Cr:YSGG laser could be an effective and useful tool in debonding of lithium disilicate ceramic veneers as it decreases the shear bond strength required for veneer debonding.

In Vitro Study of Laser-Assisted Prefabricated Ceramic Crown Debonding as Compared to Traditional Rotary Instrument Removal

This study compared the laser and rotary removals of prefabricated zirconia crowns in primary anterior and permanent posterior teeth. Sixty-two extracted teeth were prepared for prefabricated zirconia crowns cemented with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Specimens underwent crown removals by a rotary handpiece, or erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser. Pulpal temperatures, removal times, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examinations were compared. The average crown removal time for rotary and laser methods was 80.9 ± 19.36 s and 353.3 ± 110.6 s, respectively, for anterior primary teeth; and 114.2 ± 32.1 s and 288.5 ± 76.1 s, respectively, for posterior teeth (p < 0.001). The maximum temperature for the rotary and laser groups was 22.2 ± 8.5 °C and 27.7 ± 1.6 °C for anterior teeth, respectively (p < 0.001); and 21.8 ± 0.77 °C and 25.8 ± 0.85 °C for the posterior teeth, respectively (p < 0.001). More open dentinal tubules appeared in the rotary than the laser group. The rotary handpiece removal method may be more efficient than the laser with lower pulpal temperature changes. However, the laser method does not create noticeable tooth or crown structural damage compared to the rotary method.

Effect of Er,Cr: YSGG Laser on Bonding of Laminate Veneers using CAD/CAM (In Vitro Study)

AIM: This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the shear bond strength after bonding between porcelain laminate veneers and the tooth surface using different etching methods METHODS: Thirty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were used and prepared for receiving Enamic laminate veneers. Specimens were divided into two groups (n = 15), according to the surface treatment protocol. The specimens were sandblasted with 50 μm Al2O3 for 20 s; 2 bar pressure was maintained for air abrasion. Distribution of groups was as follow G1: Prepared enamel surface treatment of each tooth was according to the manufacturer’s instructions. G2: The prepared enamel surface of each tooth was subjected to Erbium,Chromium-Doped: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, and Garnet laser application. Light cured adhesive resin cement was applied to fitting surface of each ceramic specimen. To simulate thermal aging, the samples were subjected to 5000 thermal cycling in a thermocycler. By dividing the failure load (N) by the bonding area (mm2), debonding loads were calculated as shear stress (MPa). Numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation values. They were explored for normality by checking the data distribution using Shapiro–Wilk test. Data showed parametric distribution and were analyzed using independent t-test. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 within all tests. Statistical analysis was performed with R statistical analysis software version 4.1.2 for Windows. RESULTS: Group (II) (15.84 ± 3.09) had significantly higher mean value than group (I) (13.69 ± 2.36) (t = 2.15, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of this study, it was revealed that the laser surface treatment for tooth substrate plays a significant role in increasing the shear bond strength of laminate veneers.

Assessment of chemical, ultrasonic, diode laser, and Er:YAG laser application on debonding of ceramic brackets

Background

Risk of enamel damage that often accompanies ceramic brackets debonding raises the demand of finding an optimal method for debonding of them without adverse effects. Different techniques were proposed in an attempt to facilitate their debonding. Comparison of these techniques is crucial. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare different techniques for debonding of ceramic brackets in terms of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 extracted premolars were randomly allocated into 5 groups. Ceramic brackets were then bonded to teeth using light cure composite resin. Among test groups; group I: served as control, group II: chemical aided debonding via peppermint oil, group III: ultrasonic aided debonding, group IV: diode laser aided debonding, and group V: Er:YAG laser aided debonding. Brackets were shear tested using universal testing machine followed by ARI assessment and evaluation of enamel microstructure was performed using scanning electron microscopy.

Results

A significantly lower shear bond strength was found in ultrasonic, diode, and Er:YAG laser groups. However, no significant difference was found in the chemical group. A significantly higher adhesive remnant index was found solely in Er:YAG laser group with minimal enamel microstructure alterations.

Conclusions

Er:YAG laser is a promising tool in debonding ceramic brackets. Ultrasonic and diode laser significantly reduced shear bond strength. Yet, adhesive remnant index in both groups revealed no difference. Chemical aided debonding had little effect and hence, it cannot be recommended without further development.

Effects of laser debonding treatment on the optical and mechanical properties of all-ceramic restorations

The objective of this study was to evaluate how erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser debonding treatment affects the optical and mechanical properties of dental ceramics. In total, 120 rectangular (22*5*1.2 mm) IPS E.max Press specimens were fabricated and divided into 4 groups: the control group, 3 W laser group, 4 W laser group, and 5 W laser group. For each group, 10 specimens were used for the colour test (colour difference (△E) and transparency parameter (TP)), 10 specimens were used for the flexural strength test, and 10 were used for the Vickers hardness test. One random sample from each colour test specimens was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The L*, a*, b*, △E, TP, flexural strength, and Vickers hardness values were measured and calculated. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, the L*, a*, and b* values showed no significant variations (P > 0.05), except for the b* value in the 5 W laser group (P < 0.05). The △E, TP, flexural strength, and Vickers hardness values were analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The 5 W laser group exhibited a higher △E value, which exceeded the perceptible threshold and significantly lower TP values than the other groups (P < 0.05). The mean flexural strength and Vickers hardness values after Er:YAG laser debonding revealed no significant changes (P > 0.05). Microcracks were detected during the SEM analysis of the 5 W laser group. Er:YAG laser debonding treatment did not affect the mechanical properties, but changed the optical properties of dental ceramics.

Retrieval of Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser from Primary and Permanent Molars

(1) Background: Prefabricated zirconia crowns are used to restore teeth in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the removal of these crowns with the erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser; (2) Methods: A total of 12 primary and 12 permanent teeth were prepared and prefabricated zirconia crowns were passively fitted and cemented with two resin modified glass-ionomer (RMGI) cements. Surface areas of prepared teeth and crowns were calculated. Crowns were removed using two laser settings: 4.5 Watts, 15 Hertz, 20 water/20 air, and 5 Watts, 15 Hertz, 50 water/50 air. The retrieval time and temperature changes were tested recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s adjusted post hoc pairwise comparison t-test; (3) Results: The average time for crown removal was: 3 min, 47.7 s for permanent; and 2 min 5 s for primary teeth. The mean temperature changes were 2.48 °C (SD = 1.43) for permanent; and 3.14 °C (SD = 1.88) for primary teeth. The time to debond was significantly positively correlated with tooth inner surface area and volume, outer crown volume, and the cement volume; (4) Conclusions: Use of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser is an effective, safe and non-invasive method to remove prefabricated zirconia crowns cemented with RMGI cements from permanent and primary teeth.

Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Veneers With Four Different Thicknesses

Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare in vitro the resistance and type of failure in the debonding of lithium disilicate veneers with four different thicknesses using an erbium chromium yttrium-scandium gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser. Methods: Sixty-eight bovine teeth were used to bond round lithium disilicate veneers with a 6-millimeter diameter and four different thicknesses: group 1 (0.4 mm), group 2 (0.8 mm), group 3 (1.2 mm) and group 4 (1.6 mm). Each sample was irradiated with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser with 4 W of power and a frequency of 50 Hz, during 60 seconds, scanning concentrically. The energy density per pulse or fluency applied was 5.33 J/cm2 for the four groups. The samples were subjected to a force in a universal testing machine and then observed under a microscope to determine the type of failure. Data were statistically analyzed with the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The tendency in the results revealed that the thicker veneers showed more resistance to the debonding process. The debonding strength for group 3 was the highest (5.62 MPa), followed by group 4 (5.20 MPa), then group 2 (0.85 MPa) and finally group 1 (0.0 MPa). The most frequent type of failure was cohesive failure in cement (CC) for all groups, with 73.53% (P ≤ 0.083). Conclusion: Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation influences the debonding of lithium disilicate veneers with different thicknesses: the smaller thickness showed the greater debonding. The thickness of veneers was not associated with the type of failure.

Er,Cr:YSGG Laser in the Debonding of Feldspathic Porcelain Veneers: An In Vitro Study of Two Different Fluences

Background: New applications in laser technology in aesthetic restorative dentistry merit further research. This study compares the debonding strength and failure mode of feldspathic ceramic veneers using either Er,Cr:YSGG (erbium,chromium:ytrrium-scandium-gallium-garnet) laser at two levels of fluency or no laser (control group). Methods: An in vitro comparative study was carried out using bovine teeth that were randomly distributed into 3 groups of 21 specimens each: (a) experimental group 1 (EG1): irradiated with Er,Cr:YSGG (Waterlase iPlus®; Biolase, Irvine) at an energy density per pulse of 4 J/cm2, using a handpiece (Turbo; Biolase) with a sapphire tip (MX7) and applying the beam perpendicular to the specimen at a distance of 4 mm for 60 sec; (b) experimental group 2 (EG2): irradiated as in EG1, but at 2.7 J/cm2; and (c) control group (CG): debonding without laser irradiation. Results: The stress required for veneer debonding was 8.19 MPa in CG, 0.91 MPa in EG1, and 0.48 MPa in EG2. The difference between the control and both experimental groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The percentages of adhesive failure were 40%, 61.9%, and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: Using the Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 4 or 2.7 J/cm2 requires significantly less force to debond ceramic veneers. The percentage of adhesive failures in the two experimental protocols was higher than in the control group. Application of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser using the parameters in this study may be useful in removing feldspathic ceramic veneers, avoiding damaging them and protecting the enamel.

Morphological, optical, and elemental analysis of dental enamel after debonding laminate veneer with Er,Cr:YSGG laser: A pilot study

Laminate veneer removal is becoming a routine procedure at the dental clinic and the use of laser can facilitate its removal. This work aimed to evaluate the morphological, elemental, and optical changes in the remaining enamel after veneer removal using Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Forty-four enamel slabs were prepared and randomly distributed into nine experimental groups, for bonding using lithium disilicate laminates with three different luting agents (Variolink Veneer, RelyX U200, and RelyX Veneer). Then each agent was debonded using Er,Cr:YSGG laser (2.78 μm) using two different protocols:3.5 W, 48.14 J/cm² , 20 Hz non-contact and 3.0 W, 48.14 J/cm² , 20 Hz non-contact. The morphological, optical, and elemental analysis of enamel was performed before cementation and after laser debonding, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The level of statistical significance adopted was 5%. The EDS analysis of enamel after debonding revealed a significant increase in silane and carbon, as well as a decrease in calcium and phosphate contents. Analysis showed the presence of residual cement in most experimental groups but the morphological analysis showed alteration of the enamel's prisms only in the groups that used RelyX Veneer and Variolink Veneer cements. There was no evidence of deleterious morphological changes resulting from irradiation. However, an increase in the optical attenuation coefficient by the OCT was observed due to the presence of the remaining cement. It can be concluded that the Er,Cr:YSGG laser, in the mean powers used, is efficient for veneer removal without causing deleterious effects for the enamel.

Debonding Time and Dental Pulp Temperature With the Er, Cr: YSGG Laser for Debonding Feldespathic and Lithium Disilicate Veneers

Introduction: The removal of ceramic veneers is a time-consuming procedure in a dental office. Little research has been done in alternative removal techniques for ceramic veneers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the removal of feldspathic and lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic veneers by Er, Cr: YSGG and to measure debonding time and pulpal temperature increase during veneer removal. Methods: Fifty-seven bovine incisor teeth were prepared and divided into 3 groups. Ceramic specimens with a thickness of 0.7mm, a width of 4mm and a length of 8 mm were fabricated from feldspathic ceramic, lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic HT (high translucency) and lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic MO (medium opacity) (19 for each group). Specimens were cemented on the labial surface of incisors using resin cement. The Er, Cr: YSGG laser was applied to each specimen at 2.5 W and 25 Hz. Debonding time was measured for each specimen, and the intrapulpal temperature was detected in 3 specimens for each group. Data were analyzed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at significance level of 0.05 (α = 0.05). Results: Mean debonding time was 103.68 (26.76), 106.58 (47.22) and 103.84 (32.90) seconds for feldspathic, lithium disilicate MO, and lithium disilicate HT respectively. There was no significant statistical difference among the groups (P value = 0.96). The intrapulpal temperature increase was less than 1°C in all groups. Conclusion: Er, Cr: YSGG can successfully be used to efficiently debond feldspathic and lithium disilicate reinforced glass ceramic veneers. There was no significant difference for debonding time among these ceramic materials. During ceramic laminate veneer removal by laser irradiation, no irritating temperature rise was detected.

Evaluation of rebonding strengths of leucite and lithium disilicate veneers debonded with an Er:YAG laser

Resin cements create a high bond between the tooth and ceramic surfaces, thus making it impossible to remove the restoration in one piece. The aims of this study were to evaluate (i) the efficiency of an Er:YAG laser for debonding, and (ii) the changes in the rebonding strength values of all-ceramic veneers, which were removed after laser application. A tooth reduction of 120 extracted human maxillary central incisors was made to provide two different bonding surfaces (60 enamel and 60 dentin). Sixty leucite and 60 lithium disilicate discs (1-mm thickness, 5-mm diameter) were cemented to prepared surfaces with a dual-cure resin cement. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 15): control and laser-irradiated. Er:YAG laser (2940 nm) was applied for 9 s at 3 W power (10 Hz, 300 mJ) with 100 μs pulse duration. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was made with a universal testing machine. After the tested laser-irradiated specimens had been rebonded, the SBS test was performed again and rebonding strengths were measured. The statistical evaluations were performed by using repeated measures one-way ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni tests (p < 0.05). Significant differences were found between the control and laser-irradiated groups (p < 0.001). While the required SBS values for control groups were between 30.04 and 24.66 MPa, the values for laser-irradiated groups were between 6.60 and 4.09 MPa. There was no significant difference between the control and rebonded groups. Er:YAG laser-irradiation is an effective method for removing all-ceramic restorations without affecting the rebonding strength.

Laser Aided Ceramic Restoration Removal: A Comprehensive Review

Introduction: All-ceramic restorations are being widely used due to its various advantages. However, they have restricted durability and may have to be removed. The conventional procedure for removal is grinding the restoration with rotary instruments which are considered time-consuming and inconvenient. A newer advantageous method is the application of lasers for debonding ceramics from the tooth surface. The objective of this study is to provide a comprehensive literature review on laser-aided ceramic restorations debonding. Methods: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Seven articles from 2011 to 2018 were identified. Studies were assessed for the efficacy of laser application and the amount of pulpal temperature rise. Results: Studies selected were categorized according to variables including shear bond strength, debonding time and intrapulpal temperature. Oztoprak and Iseri investigated that erbium-doped yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser application reduced shear bond strength of ceramic laminate veneers. The time of debonding took an average of 190 seconds in Rechmann's study and 106 seconds in Morford's study. One of the main issues while using the laser is thermal irritation of the pulp. A 5.5°C temperature increase may cause pulpal damage according to Zach and Cohen. Philips et al and Rechmann et al reported no intrapulpal harm due to temperature increase. Additionally, Phillips et al demonstrated that the laser setting affects both the debonding time and the temperature alterations and that a laser adjustment of 2.5 W/25 Hz would be the best safest group. Conclusion: Removal of ceramic crowns and veneers from tooth surfaces can be successfully done by Er:YAG laser application in a less time-consuming procedure and without any harm to the underlying dentin. However, a temperature rise in the pulp may occur which could be overcome by adequate air water cooling.

The effect of transmitted Er:YAG laser energy through a dental ceramic on different types of resin cements

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The laser debonding procedure of adhesively luted all-ceramic restorations is based on the ablation of resin cement due to the transmitted laser energy through the ceramic. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation transmitted through a dental ceramic on five different resin cements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five different resin cements were evaluated in this study: G-Cem LinkAce, Multilink Automix, Variolink II, Panavia F, and Rely X Unicem U100. Disc shaped resin cement specimens (n = 10) were fabricated for each group. A ceramic disc was placed between the resin cement discs and the tip of the handpiece of Er:YAG laser device. The resin cement discs were irradiated through the ceramic and the volume of the resin cement discs were measured using a micro-CT system before and after Er:YAG laser irradiation. The volume loss of the resin cement discs was calculated and analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey-HSD tests.

RESULTS

The highest volume loss was determined in G-Cem (1.1 ± 0.6 mm³ ) and Multilink (1.3 ± 0.1 mm³ ) (P < 0.05) groups, and the lowest volume loss was determined in Rely X (0.3 ± 0.07 mm³ ), Variolink (0.4 ± 0.2 mm³ ), and Panavia (0.6 ± 0.2 mm³ ) groups (P < 0.05). All resin cements were affected by the laser irradiation resulting in the volume loss of the cement; however, there are significant differences among different resin cements.

CONCLUSIONS

All the resin cements tested in this study were effected by the Er:YAG laser irradiation and there were significant differences among the resin cements with regard to ablation volume. Lasers Surg. Med. 47:602-607, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.