Pilot Study on the Efficacy of Combined Intraoral and Extraoral Low-Level Laser Therapy for Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Oral Mucositis Management in Children under Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review

Children undergoing antineoplastic treatment often present severe side effects due to the dosage and duration of treatments, with oral mucositis emerging as one of the most prevalent and painful inflammatory conditions. There is a growing body of evidence on therapeutic interventions such as cryotherapy, low-level laser therapy, and natural compounds for this condition. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and compare therapies for the management of cancer treatment-induced oral mucositis in pediatric patients. From 2655 articles obtained in initial searches, 39 articles were considered in this systematic review, after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria. Low-level laser therapy, palifermin, honey, and zinc demonstrated reductions in oral mucositis incidence, duration, severity, and pain reported by the patient. Although there are several therapies in place for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in children, evidence of their efficacy is still inconclusive to establish accurate clinical protocols.

Utilization of Photobiomodulation for the Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis

Background: Oral mucositis is a significant and common toxicity experienced by patients who receive high-dose chemotherapy as a preparatory regimen for a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been found to be feasible with significant efficacy in preventing the progression of oral mucositis in adult patients undergoing HCT. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of PBM in pediatric oncology patients undergoing HCT. Method: Forty children and adolescents admitted to the transplant unit for an allogeneic HCT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute myeloid leukemia were treated daily at six sites until day + 20 or engraftment. Results: There were 1,035 patient encounters, with successful treatment of four or more sites during 979 patient encounters for a feasibility 93.3% CI [0.926, 0.039]. We had estimated a meaningful effect size of 20% for PBM and estimated 51% of patients treated with PBM would have at least one day or more of Grade 3 mucositis. The rate of patients who received PBM and developed Grade 3 mucositis was 20% CI [0.091, 0.356]. Patients treated with PBM had fewer days of hospitalization (p = .009) and less severe mucositis in comparison to the matched control group (p = .03). Conclusion: PBM is feasible and effective in preventing and treating oral mucositis and is now supported by the Children's Oncology Group for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in patients undergoing an allogeneic HCT or receiving head/neck radiation.

Window therapeutic of extraoral photobiomodulation for prevention of oral mucositis in HSCT patients: additional arm

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 1W extraoral photobiomodulation (EOPBM) and to compare with our previous results of 2W EOPBM and intraoral photobiomodulation (IOPBM) protocols in the management of oral mucositis (OM) related to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

A total of 30 patients underwent autologous or allogenic HSCT. Experimental protocol of 1W EOPBM was performed daily beginning in the first day of the conditioning regimen until 5 days after transplantation. The application areas included six points on the face and three points on the cervical area. Additional application of IOPBM was performed if patients had ulcered mucositis. Its severity was assessed daily according to WHO (World Health Organization) and NCI (National Cancer Institute) scales. Oral and oropharynx pains were scored daily by visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The 1W EOPBM protocol was well tolerated without any complaints. Of total, 13 patients were male and 17 were female and the mean age was 49.3 years old. Most patients (21 patients - 70%) received autologous HSCT, and 24 patients (80%) underwent myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regime and 6 patients (20%) reduced intensive conditioning regime. Nineteen patients (63.3%) developed OM according to WHO criteria, 3 patients grade I, 10 grade II and 6 grade III. NCI mucositis grades were similar to WHO grades. OM outcomes of 1W EOPBM were similar when compared to our previous groups and no significant differences were observed. No differences were found between pain and the protocols (1W EOPBM, IOPBM and 2W EOPBM).

CONCLUSION

This 1W EOPBM protocol seemed to be as effective as IOPBM and 2W EOPBM in the prevention of OM in HSCT patients. In addition, we might assume that there is a window of application on EOPBM.

Preconditioning with Photobiomodulation as an Effective Method in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review

Background: Given the suffering experienced by cancer patients, effective solutions must be found to prevent the most painful and debilitating side effects of anticancer treatment. The use of photobiomodulation (PBM) with specific parameters has been proposed to prevent oral mucositis in adults undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as well as in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy alone without chemotherapy. No recommendations were possible for patients undergoing chemotherapy alone. This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness of preconditioning by PBM in preventing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Methods: This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, PRISMA, Checklist and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). We searched and identified articles of the subsequent bibliographic databases: PubMed and Cochrane. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias of studies included in this review. Results: There were only six clinical trials examining the efficacy of PBM therapy in the primary prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. All of the studies used lasers, except for one study that compared lasers with light-emitting diodes. The wavelength ranges from 630 to 830 nm. Irradiation parameters varied among the included studies. All studies showed good results for the use of PBM in the prevention of oral mucositis except for one study that found no benefit for the laser application. Conclusions: PBM has been shown to be effective in preventing oral mucositis when applied to healthy tissues. Finding the optimal protocol has been difficult due to the variability between studies, and therefore, further well-designed, controlled, blinded studies are recommended to precisely determine irradiation parameters and the number of sessions. This review has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42023397771.

Development and Application of Prototype System Based on Light-Emitting Diode Arrays (660 nm) with a Top Hat Beam Profile in Order to Optimize Photobiomodulation Protocols for Treatment of Radiation-Induced Oral Mucositis in Rats

Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common adverse effect of radiation to the head and neck. Recent research has shown that extra oral photobiomodulation (EO-PBM) reduces the severity of OM. However, appropriate EO-PBM therapy parameters for OM severity reduction have not been documented. Objective: This work aims to optimize EO-PBM radiation parameters for lowering the severity of radiation-induced OM in rats by establishing a photobiomodulation (PBM) treatment system based on light-emitting diode arrays with top-hat beam profile. Methods: The 36 rats are separated into 2 control groups and 4 groups receiving PBM treatment. The PBM groups are exposed to irradiance between 4 and 24 J/cm2 at 660 nm. The cheek pouch mucosa is removed after scarification for biochemical and histological examination. Student's t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's Multiple were applied to compare the statistical significance of differences between control groups and PBM treatment groups. Results: Statistical analysis reveals that PBM irradiation at 12 J/cm2 (200 sec) with a flatness of 0.8 and a diameter of 3 cm substantially decreased the level of inflammatory cytokines compared with the positive control group. Conclusions: Our results indicate that the designed treatment PBM system is capable of delivering the optical parameters necessary for therapeutic treatment.

Red, infrared, and simultaneous laser-wavelengths irradiation effects on 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis in hamsters

The association of more than one wavelength for photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) to treat oral mucositis (OM) is unusual in the literature. Thus, this study aims to compare the simultaneous irradiation effects with their isolated application to treat OM. In order of that, 48 male Syrian hamsters were divided into 4 groups: Chemotherapy (Ch), which received only a OM induction protocol (5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and superficial oral mucosa scratches); red laser (RL), which received the OM induction and a PBMT protocol at 660 nm; infrared laser (IRL), which received the OM induction, and a PBMT protocol at 808 nm; and the RL + IRL group, which received the simultaneous application, of 660 and 808 nm wavelengths. Clinical (OM grade classification), histological (light microscopy analysis with H&E and collagen staining), immunohistochemical (TNF-α expression), and biochemical (TNF-α and hydroxyproline concentration) analyzes were performed after 7 and 10 days. Mainly on the 10th day, the RL and IRL groups showed lower OM grades and faster microscopic repair process, with greater expression of collagen fibers and lower TNF-α levels, besides the higher hydroxyproline concentrations, mainly in comparison with the Ch group. In conclusion, in this study, the simultaneous protocol did not present superior results than the isolated irradiations.

Twenty-year analysis of photobiomodulation clinical studies for oral mucositis: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to review the first 20 years of photobiomodulation (PBM) clinical studies for oral mucositis (OM) mitigation.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review screened controlled clinical studies. The PBM devices, protocols, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five studies met the inclusion criteria. The first study dated from 1992, and the term "PBM" was first published in 2017. Public services, placebo-controlled randomized trials, and patients with head and neck chemoradiation were predominant among included studies. Prophylactic red intraoral laser protocols were mostly used. Comparing the outcomes of all protocols was unfeasible due to missing treatment parameters and nonhomogeneous measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The main barrier to optimizing clinical protocols of PBM for OM was the lack of standardization in clinical studies. Although PBM use is now globally present in oncology settings and generally marked by good outcomes reported, additional randomized clinical trials with well-described methods are necessary.

Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022

Disclaimer

This article is based on recommendations from the 12th WALT Congress, Nice, October 3-6, 2018, and a follow-up review of the existing data and the clinical observations of an international multidisciplinary panel of clinicians and researchers with expertise in the area of supportive care in cancer and/or PBM clinical application and dosimetry. This article is informational in nature. As with all clinical materials, this paper should be used with a clear understanding that continued research and practice could result in new insights and recommendations. The review reflects the collective opinion and, as such, does not necessarily represent the opinion of any individual author. In no event shall the authors be liable for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the proposed protocols.

Objective

This position paper reviews the potential prophylactic and therapeutic effects of photobiomodulation (PBM) on side effects of cancer therapy, including chemotherapy (CT), radiation therapy (RT), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Background

There is a considerable body of evidence supporting the efficacy of PBM for preventing oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing RT for head and neck cancer (HNC), CT, or HSCT. This could enhance patients’ quality of life, adherence to the prescribed cancer therapy, and treatment outcomes while reducing the cost of cancer care.

Methods

A literature review on PBM effectiveness and dosimetry considerations for managing certain complications of cancer therapy were conducted. A systematic review was conducted when numerous randomized controlled trials were available. Results were presented and discussed at an international consensus meeting at the World Association of photobiomoduLation Therapy (WALT) meeting in 2018 that included world expert oncologists, radiation oncologists, oral oncologists, and oral medicine professionals, physicists, engineers, and oncology researchers. The potential mechanism of action of PBM and evidence of PBM efficacy through reported outcomes for individual indications were assessed.

Results

There is a large body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of PBM for preventing OM in certain cancer patient populations, as recently outlined by the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). Building on these, the WALT group outlines evidence and prescribed PBM treatment parameters for prophylactic and therapeutic use in supportive care for radiodermatitis, dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia, trismus, mucosal and bone necrosis, lymphedema, hand-foot syndrome, alopecia, oral and dermatologic chronic graft-versus-host disease, voice/speech alterations, peripheral neuropathy, and late fibrosis amongst cancer survivors.

Conclusions

There is robust evidence for using PBM to prevent and treat a broad range of complications in cancer care. Specific clinical practice guidelines or evidence-based expert consensus recommendations are provided. These recommendations are aimed at improving the clinical utilization of PBM therapy in supportive cancer care and promoting research in this field. It is anticipated these guidelines will be revised periodically.

Oral mucositis in paediatric cancer patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation preventively treated with professional dental care and photobiomodulation: Incidence and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Oral mucositis (OM) is an important side effect related to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), and it has been associated with a significative reduction of quality of life. A negative impact of OM in paediatric patients could result in increased use of parenteral feeding and opioids, longer periods of hospitalization, and a higher risk of systemic infection.

AIM

To investigate the clinical features and clinical outcomes associated with OM development and severity in hematological cancer paediatric patients undergoing allo-HSCT who underwent professional dental care (PDC) and photobiomodulation (PBM) as prophylactic treatment.

DESIGN

Medical data and OM presentation were retrieved retrospectively from all patients younger than 18 years who received allo-HSCT between 2013 and 2016. The incidence of OM was assessed and graded by two oral medicine specialists following the WHO guidelines, and it was correlated with clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Forty-nine consecutive paediatric patients were included. OM was diagnosed in 73.5% of patients, and in 36.1% of patients, OM was classified as severe. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a primary diagnosis and the use of a myeloablative regimen were associated with OM development. The primary diagnosis and use of total body irradiation (TBI) were associated with aggressive OM. Neither the incidence nor the severity of OM affected the overall survival, whereas only the use of a myeloablative regimen and a high body mass index (BMI) were determinants of lower OM-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

A myeloablative conditioning and a high BMI were observed to be independent prognostic determinants of a lower OMFS rate. The cluster analysis allowed us to outline patient profiles with greater susceptibility to the development and severity of oral mucositis, which seems to be a useful tool to determine the risk of OM in paediatric patients.

The Path to an Evidence-Based Treatment Protocol for Extraoral Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Prevention of Oral Mucositis

Oral mucositis is a painful complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for which photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is a safe and effective intervention. Extraoral delivery of PBMT has clinical advantages over intraoral delivery but requires additional dosimetric considerations due to the external tissue layers through which the light must propagate before reaching the oral mucosa. Additionally, to date there has been no dose modeling study, a task essential to developing a justified treatment protocol. We review here some of the complexities surrounding extraoral photobiomodulation therapy and offer that may help guide researchers toward an evidence-based treatment protocol for the prevention of oral mucositis.

Intraoral versus extraoral photobiomodulation therapy in the prevention of oral mucositis in HSCT patients: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial

To compare the efficacy of intraoral and extraoral photobiomodulation (PBM) protocols for the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. A total of 60 patients was randomized into intraoral PBM (IOPBM) and extraoral PBM (EOPBM) groups. Both PBM protocols were well tolerated and no side effects were observed. EOPBM session times were one fourth of IOPBM durations. Of 60 patients, 35 (58.3%) developed ulcerated OM between day +3 and day +12. No intergroup difference was observed in OM healing times (p = 0.424). The lateral border of the tongue was the most common site affected in both groups. However, the incidence of mucositis on buccal mucosa was significantly reduced in the EOPBM group (p = 0.021). Young patients (OR.5.35, 95%CI 0.94-30.4, p = 0.058) and those who had received myeloablative conditioning (OR.55.1, 95%CI 2.69-1129.3, p = 0.009) were more likely to develop ulcerated OM, whereas autologous HSCT recipients (OR 0.079, 95% CI 0.009-0.67, p = 0.021) had a lower probability of developing ulcerated OM independent of PBM protocol. EOPBM protocol was as effective as IOPBM in the management of OM in HSCT patients, with the advantage of shorter treatment sessions. Trial registration number: RBR-7nww56. Date of trial registration submission: 30th September 2019.

Photo-Biomodulation as a Prevention Modality of Oral Mucositis in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The aim of the study was to observe the effectiveness of a photo-biomodulation (PBM) protocol for the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT). A case-control study was conducted on 40 patients undergoing aHSCT. The patients were divided into two groups; the preventive group (PG) included 20 patients (7 females and 13 males) who were subjected to intra-oral PBM for five sessions a week, starting one day before the conditioning regimen and continuing until the 10th day after transplantation (D+10). In each session, ten points on the at-risk mucosal surfaces were irradiated using a double diode laser that emits two wavelengths simultaneously at 650 nm and at 904–910 nm with the following parameters at each point: energy of 4 J, and power of 88.9 mW. The control group (CG) included 20 patients (10 females and 10 males) who were not subjected to laser therapy and were selected retrospectively to compare the obtained results. For all patients, OM was assessed by the World Health Organization (WHO) grading scale. Eight patients in the PG did not experience OM during their hospitalization period (with grade 0). Severe OM was observed in 40% of the patients in the PG, while in the CG, severe OM was shown in 85% of the patients. The mean duration of OM in the PG was significantly lower than that of CG (4.7 days in the PG and 15 days in the CG) (p < 0.001). The study demonstrated that the preventive PBM protocol reduced the severity and duration of OM in patients undergoing aHSCT.

Optimization of Photobiomodulation Protocol for Chemotherapy-Induced Mucositis in Pediatric Patients

Objective: To determine optimal settings of a specific diode laser for reducing the severity of oral mucositis (OM) in pediatric patients. Background: Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been reported to reduce the severity of chemotherapy-induced OM. Treatment parameters for PBM are difficult to determine due to different reports in the literature. Materials and methods: Patients with OM graded WHO 3 or 4 were randomly assigned to three groups with different laser settings (group A: power 250 mW, the energy density 8.8 and 15.5 J/cm² for WHO grade 3 and 4, respectively; group B: power 500 mW, energy density as in group A; group C: power 250 mW, energy density was half of groups A and B). PBM was performed on all lesion areas. The mean number of PBM sessions to a decrease from WHO 3 or 4 to WHO 2, 1, or 0 was calculated for each patient. Multiple linear regression was used to determine whether the test groups differed in the mean number of sessions to a decrease of OM. Results: The mean number of PBM sessions to reduce from severe mucositis to mild or no mucositis was 3.8 [standard deviation (SD) = 3.5] in group A, 4.4 (SD = 2.3) in group B, and 4.0 (SD = 2.7) in group C. The differences in the number of PBM sessions for OM severity decrease were not statistically significantly different among the three study groups. Conclusions: Because of the lack of statistically significant differences between the groups, more patient practical laser parameters could be applied, that is, a shorter irradiation time.

Clinical Characteristics of Children and Adolescents Undergoing Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Who Develop Oral Mucositis

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical characteristics of children and adolescents undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) who develop oral mucositis.

SAMPLE & SETTING

45 patients who underwent HCT from July 2015 to May 2016 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Clinical factors were described as transplantation type, mucositis severity or grade, mucositis duration, days to engraftment, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) support, IV opioid pain management use during mucositis, positive blood or oral cultures, and length of hospitalization, then compared across mucositis grade.

RESULTS

24 patients had grade 3 or greater mucositis onset from day -3 to day 9 of transplantation; of these, 23 required IV opioid medication to treat mucosal pain. Patients with mucositis grade 3 or greater were more likely to have undergone an allogeneic transplantation, receive TPN, have documented positive blood or oral cultures, and have longer hospitalizations than those with low-grade mucositis.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Nurses are in a unique position to propose and administer interventions to prevent and alleviate symptoms of mucositis.

Comparison of photobiomodulation using either an intraoral or an extraoral laser on oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy in rats

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of intraoral (IO) and extraoral (EO) diode laser irradiation on oral mucositis (OM) induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in rats.

METHODS

Animals (n = 78) were divided into the following groups: negative control (NC), positive control (PC), IO 6 J/cm², EO with 6 J/cm² (EO 6 J/cm²), and 12 J/cm² (EO 12 J/cm²). OM was induced with an intraperitoneal injection of 5-FU and scarification of the buccal mucosa. Over the following 14 days, animals received photobiomodulation (PBM) daily. Clinical and histological evaluation was done by scores at days 8, 10, and 14. The redox state was evaluated by reactive species levels, antioxidant network, and immunohistochemistry analysis.

RESULTS

Clinically, on day 8, PBM groups showed lower scores of OM with EO 6 J/cm² presenting a significantly lower degree compared to PC (p < 0.05). On days 10 and 14, all PBM groups exhibited improvement of OM compared to PC (p < 0.01). On day 8, all PBM groups exhibited an accelerated healing process compared to PC (p < 0.01) and reduction of reactive species (p < 0.001). Also, all PBM groups demonstrated higher levels of antioxidant GPx compared to PC (p < 0.001). Analysis of nitrotyrosine revealed that on day 14, this protein damage marker was significantly reduced in the EO 6 J/cm² group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An EO diode laser protocol promoted positive effects in the clinical, histopathological, and redox state in OM induced by 5-FU in rats. Among the EO protocols, EO 6 J/cm² showed the most encouraging results.

Tumor safety and side effects of photobiomodulation therapy used for prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities. A systematic review

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), also known as low-level laser therapy (LLLT), has been increasingly used for the treatment of toxicities related to cancer treatment. One of the challenges for the universal acceptance of PBMT use in cancer patients is whether or not there is a potential for the light to stimulate the growth of residual malignant cells that evaded oncologic treatment, increasing the risk for tumor recurrences and development of a second primary tumor. Current science suggests promising effects of PBMT in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema and oral mucositis, among other cancer treatment toxicities. Nevertheless, this seems to be the first systematic review to analyze the safety of the use of PBMT for the management of cancer-related toxicities. Scopus, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Embase were searched electronically. A total of 27 articles met the search criteria. Selected studies included the use of PBMT for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis, lymphedema, radiodermatitis, and peripheral neuropathy. Most studies showed that no side effects were observed with the use of PBMT. The results of this systematic review, based on current literature, suggest that the use of PBMT in the prevention and management of cancer treatment toxicities does not lead to the development of tumor safety issues.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients

Oral mucositis is one of the most frequent complications after chemotherapy, occurring in approximately 52 to 80% of children receiving treatment for cancer. Recently, it has been suggested that the use of low-energy laser could reduce the grade of oral mucositis and alleviate the symptoms. In 2014, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology has recommended low-level laser therapy in prevention of mucositis for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients because of its beneficial effects in majority of recent studies. However, the recommendation was made for adult patients, not pediatric patients. Data about the effect of low-level laser therapy in pediatric patients is limited. This study aims to synthesize the available clinical evidences on the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, China Biology Medicine (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Data on occurrence, duration, and severity of oral mucositis were collected. All randomized controlled studies and clinical controlled studies comparing LLLT to routine qualified prevention or treatment during or after chemotherapy were critically appraised and analyzed. We found 8 qualified clinical trials with a total of 373 pediatric patients; the methodological quality was acceptable. After prophylactic LLLT, the odds ratio for developing OM was significantly lower compared with placebo(OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.87, P = 0.01), the odds ratio for developing grade III OM or worse was statistically significantly lower compared with placebo (OR = 0.30, 95% CI (0.10, 0.90), P = 0.03), and the OM severity was statistically significantly lower compared with placebo (SMD = - 0.56, 95% CI (- 0.98, - 0.14), P = 0.009). For therapeutic LLLT, the OM severity was significantly reduced compared to routine care (SMD = - 1.18, 95% CI (- 1.52, - 0.84), P < 0.00001). Oral pain was also reduced after LLLT over routine care (MD = - 0.73, 95% CI (- 1.36, - 0.11), P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic LLLT reduces mucositis and severe mucositis and decreases the average severity of oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients with cancer. Therapeutic LLLT also reduces the average severity of oral mucositis and oral pain. Further research should investigate the optimal parameter of LLLT in pediatric and young patients, and studies with higher methodological quality should be performed. What is known: • Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was recommended by Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology; however, evidences about LLLT on oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients were insufficient and lack supportive synthesized data. • Recently, there have been several new RCTs or CCTs for pediatric patients or young adults. What is new: • Prophylactic LLLT reduces the occurrence of mucositis and severe mucositis and decreases the average severity of oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients. • Therapeutic LLLT reduces the average severity of oral mucositis and oral pain.