Calculus Removal and Root Surface Roughness When Using the Er:YAG or Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Compared with Conventional Instrumentation Method: A Literature Review

The cutting-edge roles of lasers in endodontics: A bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles

PURPOSE

This bibliometric and scientometric analysis aimed to delve into the forefront roles of lasers in endodontics from 1990 to 2024.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using "Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, All Databases" to retrieve the most-cited articles pertaining to the topic. These articles were then ranked in descending order according to their citation counts and the top 100 were selected for further analysis. Parameters including citation density, publication year, journal, journal impact factor (IF), country, institution, author, study design, study field, evidence level, laser type, and keywords were meticulously analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviations of total citation and citation density were 106.47 ± 65.76 and 7.61 ± 5.13, respectively. Positive and negative correlations were found between the number of citations and citation density and age of publication. While the mean number of citations was significantly higher in the period 2001-2010 compared to the other periods (P < 0.05), values were similar between the periods 1990-2000 and 2011-2014 (P > 0.05). Articles were mainly published in the Journal of Endodontics. The most productive country, institutions, and author were the United States, the University of Showa, and Koukichi Matsumoto. Diode and Er: YAG lasers were commonly investigated. Ex vivo studies were mainly performed followed by in vitro ones. The main study field was "antimicrobial effect". Among keywords, "photodynamic therapy" was used more frequently.

CONCLUSION

Lasers are predominantly utilized to leverage their antimicrobial efficacy. Advancements in technology will lead to improvements in the properties of lasers, thereby enhancing the disinfection of the root canal system.

Efficacy of ultrasonics and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on root surface calculus removal: A comparative in vitro field emission scanning electron microscope study

Background

Scaling and root planing (SRP) is an inevitable primary step in non-surgical periodontal therapy. Debridement carried out with manual instruments and ultrasonics results in the removal of tooth structure. Current research revolves around laser as an efficient adjunct to SRP. This study evaluated and compared the effectiveness of root surface calculus removal between ultrasonics and Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Methods

Twenty-eight single-rooted teeth extracted due to periodontal disease were selected for the study. The specimens were randomly assigned to two groups (n=14). Group I underwent ultrasonic instrumentation using a piezo ultrasonic scaler, and group II was subjected to laser instrumentation using Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Waterlase). The specimens were processed, fixed, viewed under a field emission scanning electron microscope and evaluated using the remaining calculus index (RCI) and loss of tooth substance index (LTSI).

Results

Ultrasonics-treated specimens revealed more remaining calculus (1.57±0.65) and lost tooth substance (1.71±0.61) compared to the Er,Cr:YSGG laser-treated specimens, with significantly lower RCI (0.71±0.61) and LTSI (1.00±0.56). There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in the efficacy of root surface calculus removal between the two groups.

Conclusion

Compared to ultrasonics, Er,Cr:YSGG laser demonstrated superior results by causing precise removal of root surface calculus without significantly affecting tooth structure and aiding in new attachment.

In Vitro Evaluation of the Different Supragingival Prophylaxis Tips on Enamel Surfaces

Objective: Periodontal instrumentation during supragingival prophylaxis may increase enamel surface roughness, which may lead to increased dental biofilm accumulation and demineralization of the enamel. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes of the enamel surface profilometrically after the application of different scaler tips used for the professional supragingival prophylaxis. Materials and methods: Forty-eight enamel block samples obtained from extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were prepared and randomly assigned to four different treatment groups. Each treatment group was instrumented by the same clinician with different tools as Group 1: Er:YAG laser chisel tip, Group 2: scaler, Group 3: new generation universal curette; and Group 4: ultrasonic device. Sample surfaces were evaluated with a profilometer before and after instrumentations and after the polishing process. Results: Baseline roughness of the prepared enamel samples was similar between the groups. After instrumentation and polishing, the Er:YAG laser chisel tip revealed the most irregular surface morphology, whereas the new generation curette induced the smoothest surface. Conclusions: New generation universal curette is a promising tool, which can be used safely for supragingival calculus removal without the need for polishing on enamel surfaces.

Effect of Twinlight Laser on the Attachment of Human Gingival Fibroblasts to the Root Surface In Vitro

Background

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing with the Twinlight laser, Er: YAG laser, and hand instrumentation on the removal of endotoxin and attachment of human gingival fibroblasts (HGFs) to cementum surfaces in vitro.

Material/Methods

Single-rooted teeth extracted for periodontal disease were collected and divided into 3 groups: group A, root planing with Gracey curet no. 5/6; group B, irradiation with Er: YAG laser; group C, irradiation with Er: YAG laser and Nd: YAG laser. Endotoxins were determined by the limulus amebocyte lysate test. Cell attachment and proliferation of HGFs on root specimens were evaluated by cell counting kit-8 assay. The root surface and cell morphology were observed by scanning electron microscope.

Results

A flat root surface with scratches was found in group A, Group B had a homogeneous rough morphology without carbonization, and group C had a non-homogeneous rough morphology with ablation. The endotoxin concentration was highest in group A (P<0.05) and lowest in group C (P>0.05). HGFs cultured in group B showed significantly increased adhesion and proliferation compared with groups A and C (P<0.05). HGFs in group B were well attached, covered densely by pseudopodia. HGFs in group A were round with poor extension and short pseudopodia, while the cells in the group C were in narrow, triangular, or polygonal shapes.

Conclusions

Twinlight laser-assisted periodontal treatment effectively improved the biocompatibility of root surface and promoted the attachment and proliferation of fibroblasts by removing calculus and reducing the concentration of endotoxins.

Treatment effects and periodontal status of chronic periodontitis after routine Er:YAG laser-assisted therapy

BACKGROUND

Routine preclinical interventions for patients with chronic periodontitis such as supragingival cleaning and subgingival curettage, establishing a balanced occlusal relationship, and irrigation with 3% hydrogen peroxide can relieve the symptoms to some extent. However, there is room for improvement in the overall effect. For example, Er:YAG lasers can quickly increase the temperature of the irradiated tissue, effectively eliminate dental plaque and calculus, reduce periodontal pockets, adjust periodontal microecology, and reduce the gingival sulcus. The content of factors in the liquid, and then achieve the purpose of treatment.

AIM

The aim was evaluate the effect of Er:YAG laser-assisted routine therapy on the periodontal status in chronic periodontitis.

METHODS

Between October 2018 and January 2020, 106 patients with chronic periodontitis in our hospital were randomly assigned to either the study or control group, with 53 patients in each group. The control group underwent routine therapy, and the study group underwent Er:YAG laser therapy in addition to routine therapy. We evaluated the treatment outcome in both groups. Periodontal status was determined by clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival index (GI), periodontal probing depth (PD), dental plaque index (PLI), and sulcular bleeding index (SBI), inflammatory factors in the gingival crevicular fluid, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8], and colony forming units (CFUs).

RESULTS

Total effectiveness in the study group (94.34%) was higher than that in the control group (79.25%, P < 0.05). The clinical parameters in the study group (PD, 5.28 ± 1.08 mm; CAL, 4.81 ± 0.79 mm; SBI, 3.37 ± 0.59; GI, 1.38 ± 0.40; PLI, 2.05 ± 0.65) were not significantly different from those in the control group (PD, 5.51 ± 1.14 mm; CAL, 5.09 ± 0.83 mm; SBI, 3.51 ± 0.62; GI, (1.41 ± 0.37; PLI, 1.98 ± 0.70) before treatment (P > 0.05). However, after treatment, the parameters in the study group (PD, 2.97 ± 0.38 mm; CAL, 2.71 ± 0.64 mm; SBI, 2.07 ± 0.32; GI, 0.51 ± 0.11; PLI, 1.29 ± 0.34) were lower than those in the control group (PD, 3.71 ± 0.42 mm; CAL, 3.60 ± 0.71 mm; SBI, 2.80 ± 0.44; GI, 0.78 ± 0.23; PLI, 1.70 ± 0.51) (P < 0.05). Differences in crevicular TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8 levels in the study (TNF-α, 7.82 ± 3.43 ng/mL; IL-6, 11.67 ± 2.59 ng/mL; IL-8, 12.12 ± 3.19 pg/mL) and control groups (TNF-α, 9.06 ± 3.89 ng/ml, IL-6, 12.13 ± 2.97 ng/mL, IL-8, 10.99 ± 3.30 pg/mL) before therapy (P > 0.05) were not significant. Following treatment, the parameters were significantly lower in the study group (TNF-α, 2.04 ± 0.89 ng/mL; IL-6, 4.60 ± 1.26 ng/mL; IL-8, 3.15 ± 1.08 pg/mL) than in the control group (TNF-α, 3.11 ± 1.07 ng/mL; IL-6, 6.25 ± 1.41 ng/mL; IL-8, 4.64 ± 1.23 pg/mL, P < 0.05). The difference in the CFU of the study group [(367.91 ± 74.32) × 10⁴/mL and control group (371.09 ± 80.25) × 10⁴/mL] before therapy was not significant (P > 0.05). The CFU decreased in both groups following therapy, however, the CFU values were lower in the study group [(36.09 ± 15.26) × 10⁴/mL] than in the control group [(45.89 ± 18.08) ×10⁴/mL] (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Combining Er:YAG lasers with routine measures significantly improved the overall periodontal therapy outcomes by improving periodontal status and reducing oral levels of inflammatory factors and CFUs.

LASER in periodontal treatment: is it an effective treatment or science fiction?

There are several studies that evaluate the use of lasers in periodontal treatment in non-surgical or surgical therapy. However, while several studies showed clinically beneficial effects of some lasers in periodontal treatment, there are few clinical reports of additional advantages of lasers as adjunctive treatments in periodontology. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate and critically analyze the level of scientific evidence of effects of low-level lasers and high-power lasers in periodontology. A narrative review of the studies was carried out in each topic and type of laser or periodontal treatment. In nonsurgical periodontal therapy the results showed that there is an additional clinical benefit when using a diode laser (DL) associated with scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with moderate to severe periodontitis. The Er:YAG laser seems to be the most suitable for nonsurgical periodontal therapy and promotes the same clinical effects as conventional therapy. In periodontal surgery vaporization of the gingival or mucosal tissue can be carried out with DL, CO2, Nd:YAG, Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG lasers. Photobiomodulation (PBM), mediated by low-level lasers associated with non-surgical periodontal therapy, promotes additional benefits in the short term and accelerates the bone and gingival tissue repair process and also reduces postoperative symptoms of periodontal surgery. The effect of antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy is relevant in the initial reevaluation periods. Studies have shown controversial results of the use of lasers in periodontics, and this fact may be due to the lack of standard parameters of irradiation in each clinical application.

Overview of the Clinical Benefits Using the Different Diode Laser Wavelengths in Treatment of the Mucocele: Clinical Cases Report Review

Objective: Diode laser has a wide range of wavelengths that may render the absorption effect and interaction with the tissue is different. Based on available evidences, the aim of this review is to critically evaluate the use of different diode laser wavelengths in the treatment of mucocele. Materials and methods: The literature of clinical case studies for the past 8 years has been considered. Literature search and selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting and revision have been performed. Both authors have read and approved the final article. Results: This review has aimed at detecting the experience on the background and at giving a critical summary of the clinical cases literature. Previous results of controlled clinical case reviews in this field as well as in basic research pointed to a potential of the diode laser in the surgical removal of mucocele. Initial clinical results showed that diode laser surgical therapy positively influences the post-surgical wound healing. All diode laser wavelengths do not show much difference in the acceleration in epithelial regeneration, and the healing of the wound takes some time by all wavelengths. They can reduce the need for anesthesia or wound care and therefore reduce the fear of the patient. Conclusions: The procedure in the most reviewed clinical cases took place within a few minutes and thus required no more time than a conventional surgical intervention with conventional surgical instruments. Since all surgical steps are carried out with the same instrument, there is no need for sutures and only one handpiece is sterilized. Due to the contactless preparation and the lack of vibrations as well as the elimination of the anesthesia, the entire process is much more pleasant for the patient and thus indirectly for the practitioner, because a relaxed patient can simply be better treated.

Network meta-analysis of the treatment efficacy of different lasers for peri-implantitis

The aim of this study was comparing different lasers with conventional non-surgical treatment (CNT) for the management of peri-implantitis, regarding probing depth (PD), plaque index (PLI), clinical attachment level (CAL), and sulcus bleeding index (SBI). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on different lasers and CNT for peri-implantitis were searched. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed to analyze the PD, PLI, CAL, and SBI outcomes. The risk of bias, evidence quality, statistical heterogeneity, and ranking probability were also evaluated. Eleven studies were included in this study, involving three types of lasers. Diode + CNT had significantly superior efficacy to CNT alone, regarding PD reduction, while Er:YAG + CNT had significantly superior efficacy than CNT in terms of the PLI, CAL, and SBI. The highest probability of being most effective for PD was diode + CNT (49%), while Er:YAG + CNT had the highest probability of improving the PLI, CAL, and SBI (66%, 53%, and 79%, respectively). Diode + CNT was significantly superior for PD management in peri-implantitis compared with CNT alone, while Er:YAG + CNT significantly improved the PLI, CAL, and SBI. Therefore, Er:YAG + CNT might be recommended methods considered for management of peri-implantitis.

Efficacy of laser monotherapy or non-surgical mechanical instrumentation in the management of untreated periodontitis patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the effects of laser monotherapy with non-surgical mechanical instrumentation alone in untreated periodontitis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A focused question was formulated based on the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design criteria (PICOS): in patients with untreated periodontitis, does laser mono-therapy provide adjunctive effects on pocket probing depth (PPD) changes compared with non-surgical instrumentation alone? Both randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) were included. The results of the meta-analyses are expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD) and reported according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1268 records, out of which 8 articles could be included. With respect to PPD changes, a meta-analysis including 5 articles (n = 148) failed to identify statistically significant differences in favor of laser monotherapy for PPD change (WMD = 0.14 mm; 95% CI: - 0.04/0.32; z = 1.51; p = 0.132) nor for clinical attachment level (CAL) (WMD = 0.04 mm; 95% CI: - 0.35/0.42; z = 0.19; p = 0.850). Data on cost-effectiveness are lacking. One study reported patient-related outcome measures (PROMS).

CONCLUSIONS

In untreated periodontitis patients, laser monotherapy does not yield superior clinical benefits compared with non-surgical mechanical instrumentation alone.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In untreated periodontitis patients, mechanical instrumentation with hand and/or ultrasonic instruments remains the standard of care.

Clinical and Immunological Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser in Nonsurgical Periodontal Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and immunological results of nonsurgical periodontal treatment with or without the erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser. Background data: As lasers have begun to be used in dentistry, the Er,Cr:YSGG laser has started to attract attention in the field of periodontology. Materials and methods: Fifty-nine nonsmoking patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were randomly allocated to a test group (full-mouth ultrasonic supra- and subgingival debridement+Er,Cr:YSGG laser application) and a control group (full-mouth ultrasonic supra- and subgingival debridement+root planing with Gracey curettes). The laser parameters were set as follows: 1.5 W output power, pulse mode H (pulse duration of 140 μs), pulse frequency of 20 Hz, and an air-water spray ratio of 10% air and 15% water. The instrumentation was performed until the operator felt that the root surfaces were adequately debrided. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8), tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), and MMP-8/TIMP-1 levels in gingival crevicular fluid were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. Results: There were statistically significant differences in PD, which was our primary outcome, and BOP between the groups at both examinations [p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 (for PD) and p = 0.048 and p < 0.001 (for BOP), respectively], in favor of the laser group. However, there were no significant differences among groups at any time for CAL gain (p = 563 and p = 369, respectively). No significant differences in MMP-8, TIMP-1, and MMP-8/TIMP-1 levels were detected among groups. There was a statistically significant difference for IL-1β levels among groups at 3-month evaluations in favor of the laser group. Conclusions: Using the Er,Cr:YSGG laser instead of hand instruments in nonsurgical periodontal treatment has shown additional improvements in terms of pocket reduction and gingival bleeding compared with traditional nonsurgical therapy.