Is There a Role for Photobiomodulation in Treating Damaged Articular Cartilage Due to Injury or Degeneration?

Acute effects of photobiomodulation applied on the dorsal root ganglion in gout model-induced rats

Gouty arthritis is an inflammatory disease that triggers symptoms such as pain, swelling, and joint stiffness. Since its main therapy is medication, research on other forms of treatment that do not generate side effects is necessary. Given this, the objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of combined photobiomodulation (LASER and LED) applied on the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in an experimental model of gouty arthritis. For this, 40 Wistar rats were randomized into 4 groups: simulation of the model with saline injection, without treatment (CTL; n = 10); gout simulation with photobiomodulation treatment (CTL-PBM; n = 10); gout model with the injection of monosodium urate crystals (1.25 mg) in the femorotibial joint, without treatment (GOT; n = 10); or gout model with photobiomodulation treatment (GOT-PBM; n = 10). After 7 h of gout induction, photobiomodulation was performed with a cluster of 4 diodes applied to the GRD region in animals from the CTL-PBM and GOT-PBM groups. After analysing the results, it was concluded that the therapy favored the reduction of edema and joint incapacity, as well as the increase in the nociceptive threshold and plantar grip strength. Furthermore, PBM stimulated an increase in the inflammatory response (with increased levels of IL-1β and greater recruitment of leukocytes) and greater activation of the antioxidant system. Therefore, PBM can be considered an effective therapeutic alternative to improve the functional status in this model of joint disease.

The synergic use of the High Power Laser Therapy and Glucosamine sulfate in Knee osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background and aim:

To determine the efficacy of the synergistic use of High Power Laser Therapy (HPLT) with glucosamine sulfate (GS) in knee osteoarthritis.

Methods:

This 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled 90 subjects (M=53, F=37, y= 55±11.2) and randomly allocated using a stratified sampling method in experimental group (A) with HPLT+GS 1500mg (GS - Dona®, Rottapharm, Monza, Italy) (n=45) or in a control group (B) with HPLT + placebo (n=45).

Results:

VAS score in Activities of day Living (ADL), Standardized stair climb test (SSCT), Zohlen’s sign (RASPING) and Rabot test were used, to evaluate patients at the beginning of the study (T0), at 2 months (T1) and at 6 months (T2). In the mean scores for VAS in ADL, SSCT, RABOT and RASPING at T1, no significant differences were found between the experimental and the control group with paired T and ANOVA test. But significant differences between groups (p<0.05) in all outcomes were observed at 6 months (T2).

Conclusions:

HPLT is useful in treating knee osteoarthritis, but when combined with Glucosamine Sulfate, thanks to the synergy of two interventions, can achieve a long-term effect up to 6 months after treatment. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Evaluation of the Whitening Effectiveness of Violet Illumination Alone or Combined with Hydrogen Peroxide Gel

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the whitening and washing steps of a treatment using violet illumination (VI) alone or combined with hydrogen peroxide gel. In addition, we evaluated the color change after cleaning the tooth with and without mineral oil. Methods: First, 16 bovine teeth were extracted and stored in 5% thymol solution. Next, the teeth were collected and cleaned. Then, the teeth were stained with instant coffee solution for 24 h. The teeth were divided in four groups: control, VI without 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (VI), VI with 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (VI + gel), and VI without 35% hydrogen peroxide gel and cleaned with mineral oil before washing (VI + oil). Results: The whitening treatment VI + gel was able to completely restore the teeth whiteness and make the teeth 31.2% less yellow than prior coffee staining. The VI + oil treatment led to about 3.7 times the whiteness and yellowness changes observed in the VI treatment and restored 51% of the whiteness lost by staining. Conclusions: The VI + gel treatment can be recommended against coffee stains and should be further investigated for other types of tooth stains. In addition, cleaning the tooth surface with mineral oil could be an alternative to increase the performance of whitening treatments.