North American Multicenter Study on flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells

Use of allogeneic apheresis stem cell products as an interlaboratory proficiency challenge

BACKGROUND

AABB Standards requires that laboratories participate in a proficiency test (PT) program for critical analytes. Institutions can purchase commercial PT materials; however, PT can also be performed through interlaboratory exchange. We investigated the utility of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis (HPC-A) products as an interlaboratory PT challenge for total nucleated cell count (TNC) and CD34 assessment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Three-year retrospective and comparative review of unrelated allogeneic HPC-A products received by the University of Michigan between January 2011 and December 2013. Internal TNC and CD34 count were compared to the external collecting facility by paired t test and linear regression. The absolute and percent difference between external and internal counts and 95% limits of agreeability (95% LA) were determined. Results were analyzed relative to donor center location (international, domestic), time zone (domestic), and calendar year.

RESULTS

There was a strong correlation between internal and external TNC, regardless of donor center location or year. For CD34, there was a good correlation between centers (R = 0.88-0.91; slope = 0.95-0.98x) with a median difference of -1% (95% LA, -50%, +47%). This was considerably better than commercial PT challenges, which showed a persistent negative bias for absolute CD34 and CD3 counts.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic HPC-A products represent an interlaboratory PT exchange for all critical analytes, including TNC and CD34 count, cell viability, and sterility. Allogeneic HPC-A products, which are fresh and transported under validated conditions, are less subject to preanalytical variables that may impact commercial PT samples such as aliquoting and sample homogeneity, commercial additives, and sample stability during manufacturing and transport.

Multiple-laboratory comparison of in vitro assays utilized to characterize hematopoietic cells in cord blood

BACKGROUND

Understanding the variability in results obtained by multiple laboratories is important because cord blood units are distributed worldwide for transplantation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four exercises were conducted by multiple laboratories to assess assay variability on nucleated cell (NC), mononuclear cell (MNC) by hematology analyzers [HAs], and CD34+ cell (flow cytometry) measurements. Exercise 1 was an intralaboratory exercise in which the reproducibility of cell measurements was determined. Exercises 2 and 3 involved the shipment of identical processed cord blood samples. In Exercise 2, laboratory-specific methods were utilized. In Exercise 3, two commercial CD34+ cell methods (Stem-Kit and TruCOUNT) were used. In Exercise 4, CD34+ cell levels were determined on repetitive regating of identical list-mode files.

RESULTS

Intralaboratory reproducibility was highest for NC measurements and lowest for CD34+ cell measurements. In Exercise 2, all laboratories except one utilized HA with an impedance technology and determined comparable results for NC and MNC levels, whereas the other laboratory utilized a HA with an optical counting method. Substantial variation was observed on measuring CD34+ cells with ranges of 32 to 141, 32 to 66, and 25 to 116 CD34+ cells per microL for the three identical samples. In Exercise 3, on the use of one specific commercial assay, the ranges of CD34+ levels were 214 to 411 and 62 to 178 cells per microL for the two identical samples. Nearly all participating laboratories determined comparable CD34+ levels on the use of identical list-mode files.

CONCLUSION

These studies indicate that substantial variability in CD34+ cell levels were determined with flow cytometry. The variability in NC and MNC levels was minimal with HA methodology.

Mobilizing the older patient with myeloma

Although hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells (HPC) have been used for autologous transplants for approximately 25 years, it is only recently that we have begun to finally understand the factors which play important roles in causing these cells to leave their marrow niches and circulate in the blood. Still less is understood about factors important in homing of these cells from the blood to the marrow, and their re-engraftment there. Nonetheless, a significant amount of clinical information exists on how to make these cells leave the marrow in order to facilitate their collection from the blood for use as a transplant graft. This review provides an overview of what is currently known about the factors influencing mobilization of HPC from the marrow into the blood. Further, it suggests how this knowledge may be used to individually optimize collection of HPC. It is particularly important to optimize collection in the older myeloma patient, where it has traditionally been difficult to collect adequate numbers of cells for the tandem transplant now thought to provide the best hope for long-term survival in this disease.

Initiation of peripheral blood progenitor cell harvest based on peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell counts enumerated by the Sysmex SE9000

BACKGROUND

The most reliable index for timing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection following mobilization is still to be determined. The techniques to enumerate peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells are expensive and time-consuming. The SE9000 (Sysmex) provides an estimate of immature cells, called hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of PB HPC levels for timing PBPC harvest.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients (15 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and 20 multiple myeloma) were enrolled. PB HPCs and harvested CD34+ cells were counted with the SE9000 and flow cytometry, respectively. Circulating HPCs were monitored daily. PBPC harvest was initiated when HPC levels reached at least 5 per mm(3).

RESULTS

HPC levels reached 5 per mm(3) or more on Median Day 12 (range, days 9 to 16) of mobilizing chemotherapy. The median number of CD34+ cells collected per patient was 19.40 x 10(6) per kg (range, 1.94 x 10(6)-52.55 x 10(6) per kg). Both successful and optimal harvest was achieved in 97 percent of patients. PBPCs were successfully harvested in 25 patients (71%) in one session. An optimal harvest in a single session was attained in 16 patients (46%).

CONCLUSION

This might be the first prospective study showing the PB HPC level for timing PBPC harvest.

Quantitation of MHC tetramer-positive cells from whole blood: Evaluation of a single-platform, six-parameter flow cytometric method

BACKGROUND

Quantitation of antigen-specific T cells provides an insight into the development and dynamics of T-cell responses in tumor immunology and infectious diseases. Soluble major histocompatibility class I tetramers are widely used to monitor immune responses; however, variations due to handling and analysis are likely to confound comparisons between different experiments and laboratories.

METHODS

Whole blood from healthy donors was stained with HLA-A*0201/tetramers specific for an epitope of phosphoprotein 65, the immunodominant antigen in cytomegalovirus infection. With the help of Trucount tubes, a single-platform, four-color flow cytometric assay was established to obtain absolute counts of tetramer-positive cells. Various staining and gating strategies were evaluated.

RESULTS

The no-wash method was a quick and straightforward procedure for the quantitation of tetramer-positive events from whole blood. The level for background staining was low. This information about the intra-assay-related variation and the physiologic variation will allow validation and interpretation of data in future studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The method is highly reliable and can be standardized for multiple experiments. It is therefore suitable for the direct ex vivo analysis of antigen-specific T cells in a variety of clinical settings such as infectious, autoimmune, or neoplastic diseases and can be implemented as a tool for multicenter studies.

Standardization of the CFU-GM Assay: Advantages of Plating a Fixed Number of CD34+ Cells in Collagen Gels

We investigated whether plating a stable amount of CD34(+) cells improves the CFU-GM assay. Data of CFU-GM assays performed with leukaphereses products in two transplant centers using a commercial collagen-based medium and unified CFU-GM scoring criteria were pooled and analyzed according to the numbers of CD34(+) cells plated. A first series of 113 CFU-GM assays was performed with a fixed number of mononuclear cells (i.e., a variable number of CD34(+) cells). In these cultures the CFU-GM/CD34 ratio varied according to the number of CD34(+) cells plated: median CFUGM/CD34 ratios were 1/6.2 to 1/6.6 for grafts containing <2% CD34(+) cells, vs. 1/10.2 for grafts containing > or =2% CD34(+) cells. The median CFU-GM/CD34 ratio also varied depending on pathology: 1/9.3 for multiple myeloma (MM), 1/6.8 for Hodgkin's disease (HD), 1/6.5 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and 1/4.5 for solid tumors (ST). A second series of 95 CFU-GM assays was performed with a fixed number of CD34(+) cells (220/ml). The range of median CFU-GM/CD34 ratios was narrowed to 1/7.0 to 1/5.2, and coefficients of variation for CFU-GM counts decreased by half to 38.1% (NHL), 36.1% (MM), 49.9% (HD), and 22.4% (ST). In addition, CFU-GM scoring was facilitated as the percentages of cultures with >50 CFU/GM/ml decreased from 6.7% to 43.8% when a variable number of CD34(+) cells was plated, to 4.5% to 16.7% when 220 CD34(+) cells/ml were plated. Hence, plating a fixed number of CD34(+) cells in collagen gels improves the CFU-GM assay by eliminating cell number-related variability and reducing pathology-related variability in colony growth.

Using point-of-care CD34 enumeration to optimize PBSC collection conditions

BACKGROUND

A PBSC graft containing 4-5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg is considered optimal in terms of durable engraftment. Tracking CD34 kinetics via point-of-care testing during PBSC mobilization could determine which (and when) patients will yield an optimal product. We evaluated whether microvolume fluorimetry (MVF) would be useful in optimizing PBSC mobilization/harvest and if it will shorten our standard 6 h collection.

METHODS

Absolute CD34 values were obtained using the IMAGN 2000 and STELLer CD34 assay (50 microL sample volume). Peripheral blood (PB) CD34 values from 30 patients undergoing PBSC mobilization were used to generate a PB CD34-based algorithm that would predict collection day/duration of apheresis. The algorithm was then used prospectively to collect PBSC products on 50 hematologic malignancy (HM) patients.

RESULTS

Using the algorithm, patients were assigned to either a 6 (11-20 CD34/microL), 4 (21-49 CD34/microL) or 2 (> or = 50 CD34/microL) h collection. Patients with a CD34 value < or = 10/microL were re-tested. All patients (n = 43) predicted to mobilize reached the optimal CD34 (4-5 x 10(6)/kg) value with 1.0 apheresis procedure; seven patients had < or = 10/microL (nonmobilizers). The majority (75%) had apheresis charges decreased by 33-66%; 47% only required a 2 h procedure and 28% required 4 h. All patients demonstrated rapid trilineage engraftment.

DISCUSSION

Absolute PB CD34 measurement using MVF offers a rapid and reliable approach to obtaining optimal PBSC products with minimal technical expertise. Although not a replacement for conventional flow cytometry, it meets the requirements for a point-of-care procedure.

Stem cell mobilization

Successful blood and marrow transplant (BMT), both autologous and allogeneic, requires the infusion of a sufficient number of hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells (HPCs) capable of homing to the marrow cavity and regenerating a full array of hematopoietic cell lineages in a timely fashion. At present, the most commonly used surrogate marker for HPCs is the cell surface marker CD34, identified in the clinical laboratory by flow cytometry. Clinical studies have shown that infusion of at least 2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg recipient body weight results in reliable engraftment as measured by recovery of adequate neutrophil and platelet counts approximately 14 days after transplant. Recruitment of HPCs from the marrow into the blood is termed mobilization, or, more commonly, stem cell mobilization. In Section I, Dr. Tsvee Lapidot and colleagues review the wide range of factors influencing stem cell mobilization. Our current understanding focuses on chemokines, proteolytic enzymes, adhesion molecules, cytokines and stromal cell-stem cell interactions. On the basis of this understanding, new approaches to mobilization have been designed and are now starting to undergo clinical testing. In Section II, Dr. Michele Cottler-Fox describes factors predicting the ability to mobilize the older patient with myeloma. In addition, clinical approaches to improving collection by individualizing the timing of apheresis and adjusting the volume of blood processed to achieve a desired product are discussed. Key to this process is the daily enumeration of blood CD34(+) cells. Newer methods of enumerating and mobilizing autologous blood HPCs are discussed. In Section III, Dr. John DiPersio and colleagues provide data on clinical results of mobilizing allogeneic donors with G-CSF, GM-CSF and the combination of both as relates to the number and type of cells collected by apheresis. Newer methods of stem cell mobilization as well as the relationship of graft composition on immune reconstitution and GVHD are discussed.

New approaches to hematopoietic cell transplantation in oncology

The use of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous HCT and the use of allogeneic HCT in children and adolescents with high-risk ALL, AML, and NBL has successfully improved outcomes. For other diseases, however, the role of HCT in treatment remains a subject of further research. The availability of HCT was significantly expanded by developing alternative graft sources that currently include BM, peripheral blood, and UCB from autologous and allogeneic related or unrelated donors. Progress in autologous HCT has been achieved by the identification of more effective and less toxic preparative regimens and by ex vivo purging of stem cell products. In allogeneic HCT, graft-versus-leukemia or graft-versus-tumor effects are being exploited increasingly to lower relapse rates. In addition, immunomodulation to promote tolerance, as well as allogeneic antitumor reactions have been achieved by antibody therapy, cytokine therapy, or cell-based immunotherapy. Future improvements are likely, as evidenced by promising preliminary results in the development of stem cell collection techniques, in vitro stem cell expansion, and purging techniques of stem cell grafts. The development of less intensive or nonmyeloablative preparative regimens may further reduce regimen-related morbidity and mortality Specific immunotherapy may facilitate tolerance induction in mismatched allogeneic HCT and support allogeneic HCT in the setting of donor-host HLA disparity. Ultimately, advances in cytokine therapy, tumor-specific vaccines, and gene therapy may decrease or even eradicate recurrence of the malignant disease after HCT.

Correlation between the percentages of myeloblasts in bone marrow obtained by flow cytometry and manual counting on glass slide smears in 74 hematologic patients

To investigate reliability of calculating percentage of myeloblasts by flow cytometric method, data were obtained from 74 hematologic patients (76 paired data). Myeloblast counts obtained by manual count versus flow cytometry were compared. Our data show that the percentage of myeloblasts in the bone marrow obtained with flow cytometric method correlates well with manual count (correlation coefficient is 0.9912). A very high correlation coefficient means that reliable percentage of myeloblasts in the bone marrow can be obtained by either method alone. Flow cytometry is a useful adjunct (or quality control) to validate manual myeloblast count and vice versa.

Flow cytometric CD34+ determination in stem cell transplantation: before or after cryopreservation of grafts?

Various attempts have been made to standardize and improve the reproducibility of flow cytometric determination of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells. It is still not clear, however, whether the quantification of CD34+ cells in a stem cell graft should be done before or after cryopreservation. To address this issue, we investigated 78 unselected and 32 immunomagnetically selected autologous and allogeneic leukapheresis products (LA) before and after cryopreservation using pilot vials. Cell numbers were quantified within a Neubauer chamber, and CD34+ content was determined by flow cytometry; propidium iodide staining was used to exclude dead cells from analysis. Before freezing, the mean viable CD34 cell content in the unselected samples was 1.22% and increased after thawing to a mean of 2.16% of viable cells. Taking into account cell loss and cell death, the overall recovery of viable cells was 64.5%; all CD34+ cells could be recovered. Mean purity in the CD34-selected cell fraction was 85% (48-97) before and 91.3% (67-99) after thawing. The number of viable cells was 86.8% before and 86.1% after freezing with a 93.9% recovery of total cells. This leads to a mean 93.7% (SD +/- 23.1) recovery of viable cells and 100% (SD +/- 22.3) recovery of viable CD34+ cells. There was no significant difference in tolerance to freeze/thaw stress between cells from heavily pretreated autologous patients and healthy allogeneic donors. Our data show that freezing significantly increases the percentage of CD34(+) cells in unmanipulated LA, probably due to the death of granulocytes and mononuclear cells (MNCs). Nevertheless, the overall number of viable CD34+ cells in unselected as well as selected samples remains unchanged. Thus, CD34 data from different laboratories, for example, within multicenter trials, should be comparable independent of the different time points of acquisition.

Effects of antibody concentration on the separation of human natural killer cells in a commercial immunomagnetic separation system

BACKGROUND

The magnetic separation of a cell population based on cell surface markers is a critical step in many biological and clinical laboratories. In this study, the effect of antibody concentration on the separation of human natural killer cells in a commercial, immunomagnetic cell separation system was investigated.

METHODS

Specifically, the degree of saturation of antibody binding sites using a two-step antibody sandwich was quantified. The quantification of the first step, a primary anti-CD56-PE antibody, was achieved through fluorescence intensity measurements using a flow cytometer. The quantification of the second step, an anti-PE-microbeads antibody reagent, was achieved through magnetophoretic mobility measurements using cell tracking velocimetry.

RESULTS

From the results of these studies, two different labeling protocols were used to separate CD56+ cells from human, peripheral blood by a Miltenyi Biotech MiniMACS cell separation system. The first of these two labeling protocols was based on company recommendations, whereas the second was based on the results of the saturation studies. The results from these studies demonstrate that the magnetophoretic mobility is a function of both primary and secondary antibody concentrations and that mobility does have an effect on the performance of the separation system.

CONCLUSIONS

As the mobility increased due to an increase in bound antibodies, the positive cells were almost completely eliminated from the negative eluent. However, with an increase in bound antibodies, and thus mobility, the total amount of positive cells recovered decreases. It is speculated that these cells are irreversibly retained in the column. These results demonstrate the complexity of immunomagnetic cell separation and the need to further optimize the cell separation process.

Influence of CD34(+) marrow cell dose on outcome of HLA-identical sibling allogeneic bone marrow transplants in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia

In order to study the influence of bone marrow CD34(+) cell dose on the outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we analysed the results of BMT from HLA-identical siblings donors in 50 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). The median numbers of nucleated cells (NC) and CD34(+) cells infused were 2.18 x 10(8)/kg (0.05-4.14 x 10(8)/kg) and 3.12 x 10(6)/kg (0.35-8.52 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. All patients engrafted. In univariate analysis, there was no correlation between the number of CD34(+) cells infused and the time to neutrophil recovery (P = 0.17). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day 100 was 53 +/- 14% and 2-year survival was 46 +/- 15%. A number of CD34(+) cells infused greater than the median was the main factor increasing survival (P = 0.0006) and decreasing 100 day transplant-related mortality (P = 0.009). Patient-, disease- and transplant-related characteristics were not statistically different among patients receiving more or less than the median number of CD34(+) cells. The rate of infectious deaths was significantly higher in patients receiving less than 3.12 x 10(6) CD34/kg (48% vs 16%, P = 0.01). In a multivariable analysis, two factors associated with increased risk of death were advanced disease status at transplant (HR: 2.5 (95% CI: 1.09-5.75), P = 0.03) and a lower number of marrow CD34(+) cells infused/kg (HR: 4.55 (95% CI: 1.87-10.90), P = 0.0008).

A European reference protocol for quality assessment and clinical validation of autologous haematopoietic blood progenitor and stem cell grafts

Recently, the regulatory authorities have begun to show interest in haematopoietic stem cell products. On a professional rather than a regulatory basis, the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) has established the Foundation for the Accreditation of Haematopoietic Cell Therapy (FACHT), which has drawn up guidelines for standards and accreditation of such activity. In Europe, the regulatory environment with regard to haematopoietic stem cell grafts, processing and storage are currently less stringent. However, in 1998 the European Joint Accreditation Committee Euro-ISHAGE/EBMT (JACIE) prepared a regulatory document 'Standards for Blood and Marrow Progenitor Cell Collection, Processing and Transplantation' which was approved by the EBMT General Assembly. The major objectives were to promote quality of medical and laboratory practice in haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. The standards extend and detail the pre-existing activity of EBMT centres including all phases of collection, processing and administration of these cells. This is the platform for the proposed reference protocol for CD34(+) cell enumeration and clinical validation of quality assessment to ensure that appropriate standards of work and product quality are established and will be maintained.

Cytofluorometric methods for assessing absolute numbers of cell subsets in blood. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis

The enumeration of absolute levels of cells and their subsets in clinical samples is of primary importance in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)+ individuals (CD4+ T- lymphocyte enumeration), in patients who are candidates for autotransplantation (CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells), and in evaluating leukoreduced blood products (residual white blood cells). These measurements share a number of technical options, namely, single- or multiple-color cell staining and logical gating strategies. These can be accomplished using single- or dual-platform counting technologies employing cytometric methods. Dual-platform counting technologies couple the percentage of positive cell subsets obtained by cytometry and the absolute cell count obtained by automated hematology analyzers to derive the absolute value of such subsets. Despite having many conceptual and technical limitations, this approach is traditionally considered as the reference method for absolute cell count enumeration. As a result, the development of single-platform technologies has recently attracted attention with several different technical approaches now being readily available. These single-platform approaches have less sources of variability. A number of reports clearly demonstrate that they provide better coefficients of variation (CVs) in multicenter studies and a lower chance to generate aberrant results. These methods are therefore candidates for the new gold standard for absolute cell assessments. The currently available technical options are discussed in this review together with the results of some cross-comparative studies. Each analytical system has its own specific requirements as far as the dispensing precision steps are concerned. The importance of precision reverse pipetting is emphasized. Issues still under development include the establishment of the critical error ranges, which are different in each test setting, and the applicability of simplified low-cost techniques to be used in countries with limited resources.

A randomized phase 2 study of PBPC mobilization by stem cell factor and filgrastim in heavily pretreated patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This randomized, controlled study compared the ability to mobilize and collect an optimal target yield of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg using stem cell factor (SCF; 20 microg/kg/day) plus filgrastim (G-CSF; 10 microg/kg/day) vs filgrastim alone (10 microg/kg/day) in 102 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD), who were prospectively defined as being heavily pretreated. Leukapheresis began on day 5 of cytokine administration and continued daily until the target yield was reached, or until a maximum of five leukaphereses had been performed. Compared with the filgrastim-alone group (n = 54), the SCF plus filgrastim group (n = 48) showed an increase in the proportion of patients reaching the target yield within five leukaphereses (44% vs 17%, P = 0.002); reduction in the number of leukaphereses required to reach the target yield (P = 0.003); reduction in the proportion of patients failing to reach a minimum yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg to proceed to transplant (16% vs 26%, P = NS); increase in the median yield of CD34+ cells per leukapheresis (0.73 x 10(6)/kg vs 0.48 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.04); and an increase in the median total CD34+ cells collected within five leukaphereses (3.6 x 10(6)/kg vs 2.4 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.05). All patients receiving SCF were premedicated (antihistamines and albuterol), and treatment was generally well tolerated. Five patients experienced severe mast cell-mediated reactions, none of which were life-threatening. In this study of heavily pretreated lymphoma patients, SCF plus filgrastim was more effective than filgrastim alone for mobilizing PBPC for harvesting and transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy.

Technical aspects and clinical impact of hematopoietic progenitor subset quantification

As high-dose therapy for malignancies is now being applied to newly diagnosed patients as adjuvant therapy, it has become a requirement that quality and safety assessment of hematopoietic stem cell grafts be evidence-based. This process has developed a new institution in medicine, the stem cell laboratory. In most cases this speciality has evolved from or within hematological research laboratories. However, the increased routine technologies applied in quality evaluation, ex vivo manipulation and safety assessment in stem cell handling naturally places this activity in transfusion medicine. Multiparametric flow cytometry can identify progenitor subsets in normal human bone marrow and peripheral blood, and such subset quantification has been used retrospectively to predict three-lineage engraftment following high-dose therapy for malignancies. Published single center data have suggested an impact on clinical outcome, and a standardized technique for subset enumeration needs to be established before prospective multicenter trials can be initiated to document the prognostic value of such quality assessment in autografting. Based on experiences of CD34 enumeration, which we consider to be the first step in quality assessment of hematopoietic stem cell grafts, this review discusses flow cytometry subset identification by lineage-specific differentiation markers, stromal-dependent adherence molecules, and regulatory growth factor receptors from a technical point of view. The aim of this review is:To recommend a simple method based on the experiences of the Nordic workshop III on subset identification; To present new molecular genetic-based methods for future use in quality assessment; and To propose new endpoints necessary for validation of the likely clinical impact of subsets in prospective trials. As sample differences between blood and marrow result in technical difficulties, this review only focuses on the methodology of identifying subsets in blood and leukapheresis products. Methods for subset analysis in diagnostic bone marrow samples will be covered in a forthcoming review.

Reduction of intra- and interlaboratory variation in CD34+ stem cell enumeration using stable test material, standard protocols and targeted training. DK34 Task Force of the European Working Group of Clinical Cell Analysis (EWGCCA)

The European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis (EWGCCA) has, in preparation for a multicentre peripheral blood stem cell clinical trial, developed a single-platform flow cytometric protocol for the enumeration of CD34+ stem cells. Using this protocol, stabilized blood and targeted training, the EWGCCA have attempted to standardize CD34+ stem cell enumeration across 24 clinical sites. Results were directly compared with participants in the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for CD34+ Stem Cell Quantification that analysed the same specimens using non-standardized methods. Two bead-counting systems, Flow-Count and TruCount, were also evaluated by the EWGCCA participants during trials 2 and 3. Using Flow-Count, the intralaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was </= 5% in 39% of the laboratories (trial 1), increasing to 65% by trial 3. Interlaboratory variation was reduced from 23.3% (trial 1) to 10.8% in trial 3. In trial 2, 70% of laboratories achieved an intralaboratory CV </= 5% using TruCount, increasing to 74% for trial 3; the interlaboratory CV was reduced from 23.4% to 9.5%. Comparative analysis of the EWGCCA and the UK NEQAS cohorts revealed that EWGCCA laboratories, using the standardized approach, had lower interlaboratory variation. Thus, the use of a common standardized protocol and targeted training significantly reduced intra- and interlaboratory CD34+ cell count variation.

Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products

BACKGROUND

The measurement of CD34+ cells is the most important step in the quality control of peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. For this purpose, flow cytometry is applied. Recently, a new test kit has been introduced for the enumeration of CD34-expressing cells, in combination with software support for semi-automation of data acquisition and analysis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study evaluated the ProCOUNT kit. Ninety samples obtained from peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products from 39 patients with hemato-oncologic diseases were analyzed. For data acquisition and analysis, ProCOUNT software was used. Data comparison was performed with parallel measurements according to the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and the German reference protocol for analysis of CD34-expressing cells.

RESULTS

Correlation of the German and ISHAGE techniques was excellent (r2 = 0.99). The initial correlation coefficient of ProCOUNT analysis with the German protocol was r2 = 0.89. In 21 (23.3%) of 90 ProCOUNT analyses, a warning message was encountered from the ProCOUNT software. Following manual reevaluation of these data with CellQUEST software, a correlation of r2 = 0.96 with the German protocol and r2 = 0.97 with the ISHAGE analyses was obtained. ANOVA testing revealed significant differences between ProCOUNT and ISHAGE techniques (p<0.05) and between ProCOUNT and the German protocol (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference between ISHAGE and German protocol was observed (p = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

The ProCOUNT kit and software for semi-automated data acquisition and analysis represents a further step toward standardization of CD34 cell quantitation in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. However, the occurrence of software warnings is high, and analysis or data reevaluation by experienced staff is still mandatory. Therefore, currently there is no definite advantage of the kit and software over the existing guidelines for CD34+ analysis in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts.

Comparative evaluation of commonly used clones and fluorochrome conjugates of monoclonal antibodies for CD34 antigen detection

CD34+ cell enumeration is currently the most appropriate technique for hematopoietic graft quality control. At the same time, numerous CD34 mAb have become commercially available. This study was designed to compare the commonly used clones 8G12 and QBEND-10 with the new clones 581 and BIRMA-K3. All available fluorochrome conjugates were tested: FITC, PE, and PE-Cy5 or PerCP for QBEND, BIRMA, 581, and 8G12 and FITC and PE for 581. Bone marrow from healthy donors (n = 5) and leukapheresis samples (n = 16) were stained, according to each manufacturer's protocol and analyzed using the FACScan. The following parameters were evaluated: % CD34+ cells detected and percentage of deviation from the median within each sample; mean channel fluorescence intensity of the CD34+ cells; resolution index (median channel fluorescence intensity of CD34+ cells/monocytes), % overlapping of CD34+ cell and monocyte fluorescence; proportion of CD34+ events after blocking with the same unlabeled clone; values of compensation requirements. Tables with results for each evaluated parameter separately were created, and rank points were applied. These scores represented the quality performance of the studied clones and fluorochrome conjugates and may be summarized as follows: 581 and 8G12 produced the best results, followed by BIRMA-K3 and QBEND10. The fluorochrome sequence was PE, PE-Cy5, PerCP, and FITC. However, all PE conjugates of the studied clones provided highly comparable results and conditions for CD34+ cell enumeration. When antigen coexpression must be studied and another dye than PE must be applied for CD34+ cell discrimination, the PE-Cy5 conjugates should be preferred.

Toward standardization of CD34+ cell enumeration: an international study. Biomedial Excellence for Safer Transfusion Working Party

BACKGROUND

An international multicenter study, involving six sites in North America and six sites in Europe, was undertaken to assess the performance of standardized methods for the enumeration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood over the dynamic range from 200 cells per microL to zero. Two commercially available techniques were studied, a flow cytometry method and a microvolume fluorimetry method.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Coded samples were centrally prepared and sent to test sites by overnight mail. Samples included internal replicates, linear dilutions, and specimens at the lower limit of detection. In addition, commercially available reagent positive control cells were sent to a subset of laboratories.

RESULTS

Over the sample range studied, the intersite precision among different laboratories was good with coefficients of variation ranging from 14 percent to 24 percent for microvolume fluorimetry and from 20 percent to 31 percent for flow cytometry. Intrasite precision ranged from 7 percent to 21 percent. Test linearity was excellent with sites demonstrating a mean r2 = 0.992 for microvolume fluorimetry and r2 = 0.984 for flow cytometry. The lower limit of detection was 5 CD34+ cells per microL for both commercial assays. Over the range of 5 to 50 CD34+ cells per microL, the microvolume fluorimetry assay reported slightly higher values than the flow cytometry assay. Preliminary analysis of reagent positive control cells showed very good precision and accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of CD34+ cells enumeration is improving and commercially available assays provide accurate and precise methods. More investigation of reagent positive control cells is warranted.

The absolute number of circulating CD34+ cells as the best predictor of peripheral hematopoietic stem cell yield

Many controversies still exist about the timing of leukapheresis procedures for PBSC transplantation. Thirty-nine patients were followed daily by monitoring the absolute PB WBC count and CD34+ cell enumeration prior to apheresis. These determinations were compared with the apheresis cell content (nucleated cells and CD34+ cells yield). There was a highly significant correlation between PB CD34+ cells and apheresis CD34+ cell yield (r = 0.921, p < 0.001). A small but significant correlation was found between the PB WBC count and the apheresis nucleated cell content (r = 0.383, p < 0.001), but no correlation was found between PB WBC count and apheresis CD34+ cell yield (r = -0.065, p = 0.460). A target value of 20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/L was determined to be the most reliable predictor to collect at least 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a single apheresis. Of the 39 patients, 20 could be followed after transplantation, and a good correlation was found for total number of CD34+ cells reinfused and platelet and neutrophil engraftment. No correlation was found for nucleated cells infused and engraftment. CD34+ cell determination is a better predictor than WBC count for timing leukapheresis and is thus recommended for monitoring the quality of the product.

Cell analysis for hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell transplantation

Cytometric analysis has become an important aspect in the quality control of cells in all phases of hematopoietic cell transplantation. In the stage of donor conditioning the counting of stem and progenitor cells is important and several reliable single platform tests for CD34+ cells have become available recently. It has been shown, that the count of certain subsets of CD34 may predict best time for harvesting stem cells better than just CD34. In many cases manipulation of the cell sample after collection from the donor is necessary before the cells are adequate for transplantation. Characterization of the resulting cell preparations requires reliable quantitative analysis of a variety of cell types like the enumeration of T-cells at the level of one in ten thousand for some allogeneic transplantations. It is discussed how these clinical requirements will need a refinement of cytometric procedures to achieve adequate clinical decisions.

Reproducible scoring of CFU-GM and BFU-E grown in collagen-based semisolid medium after a short (3 h) training

Colony counting remains an important source of variation in colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assays performed in methylcellulose or agar. We studied the reliability of colony scoring of CFU-GM assays carried out with collagen, a matrix that allows gel collection on glass slides and in situ cellular morphology. Fourteen slides were exchanged among laboratories, and two rounds of colony (CFU-GM and burst-forming units-erythrocyte [BFU-E]) counting were performed by 11 (first counting), then 8 (second counting) different laboratories, the majority of which had no previous experience of collagen gel cultures and reading. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the first round of colony counting showed significant differences among centers in CFU-GM counts (p = 0.023) but not in BFU-E counts (p = 0.163). Coefficients of variation for the 14 slides ranged from 22% to 50% (median 28%) for CFU-GM counts and from 12% to 74% (median 23%) for BFU-E counts. After a 3 h session of collective colony reading attended by members of 8 laboratories, a second round of colony counting was performed. This time, ANOVA showed no significant difference among centers for CFU-GM (p = 0.533) and BFU-E (p = 0.328) counts, and coefficients of variation were significantly improved, with medians of 17% for CFU-GM counts and 20% for BFU-E counts. In addition, when data from the second round of readings were analyzed without the 2 centers counting consistently low (center 8) or consistently high (center 5), variance among centers was further improved for both CFU-GM (p = 0.798) and BFU-E (p = 0.619). In summary, this study shows for the first time that reproducible BFU-E and CFU-GM scoring can be achieved using collagen-based semisolid medium (now commercially available) as long as adequate training in colony identification is provided.

Validation of the Nordic flow cytometry standard for CD34+ cell enumeration in blood and autografts: report from the third workshop. Nordic Stem Cell Laboratory Group

Following two workshops on standardization of enumeration of CD34+ cells in blood and leukapheresis products, the Nordic Stem Cell Laboratory Group (NSCL-G) evaluated the Milan/Mulhouse/Nordic standard in clinical practice during the third workshop (WS-III). This report documents an acceptable interlaboratory variation in the most clinically active laboratories, with a coefficient of variation (CV) below 0.19 in 7 of 8 analyses performed. The introduction of a pan-CD45 antibody in the analysis did not improve the CV. Comparison of two different CD34 class II antibodies on a total of 99 samples and procedures with and without washing on a total of 96 samples revealed a significant correlation (r2 >0.99) for all analyses. Finally, subset analysis of uncommitted and lineage-specific progenitors revealed major gating difficulties, indicating that further improvements are necessary. In an analysis of more than 600 patients undergoing mobilization and harvest of blood progenitors, with about 500 patients autografted, we found a significant correlation between blood levels of CD34+ cells and recovery of CD34+ cells from each harvest as well as between CD34+ cell number reinfused and time to neutrophil and platelet recovery. This report documents for the first time that the very simple Milan/Mulhouse method (termed The Nordic Standard) can be used by a group of laboratories to obtain important clinical information. Consequently, we consider this method as the conventional method in quality assessment of autografts, which should provide a benchmark for development of second-generation improvements.

Minimization of CD34+ cell enumeration variability using the ProCOUNT standardized methodology

The dose of cells expressing the surface antigen CD34 (CD34+) has been shown to be a reliable predictor of the time to engraftment following transplantation of PBPC to support high-dose chemotherapy. However, evaluation of rare cells is complicated by a number of factors, including the variability in operator and technical procedures. Recently, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems introduced a new CD34+ cell analysis system, the ProCOUNT cell enumeration kit, which automates the analysis of CD34+ cells and minimizes the variabilities of this procedure. We have evaluated the ProCOUNT system in comparison to a standard CD34 cell analysis (based on the Milan approach) using leukapheresis products from patients and normal donors mobilized with chemotherapy plus recombinant human G-CSF (rhG-CSF) or with rhG-CSF alone. In addition, we compared these analyses using CD34+ cell-selected mobilized leukapheresis products with purities of 75% or greater. The standard CD34 cell analysis methodology quantitated the frequency of cells identified as CD45+, low side scatter, and CD34+. A high correlation coefficient was obtained between the ProCOUNT methodology and the standard CD34 cell analysis methodology for cells obtained from leukapheresis products mobilized with chemotherapy plus rhG-CSF (r = 0.98), rhG-CSF alone (r = 0.96), and CD34+-selected mobilized leukapheresis products (r = 0.83). A comparison was also made between technicians using both analysis methods. Whereas the correlation coefficient between two technicians using the standard methodology was r = 0.77, the correlation coefficient was much higher when using ProCOUNT (r = 0.99). These data demonstrate that the use of ProCOUNT is associated with less variability between data analyzed by different operators. Also, ProCOUNT is consistent with existing CD34+ cellular analysis methodologies. An additional advantage is the ability to determine the absolute concentration of CD34+ cells, thereby allowing calculation of total CD34+ cell numbers without using WBC counts, which also have inherent errors. The ProCOUNT system provides an automated analysis procedure that minimizes the variables in CD34+ cell analysis and may be useful for standardization of methodology between laboratories.

Direct measurement of CD34+ blood stem cell absolute counts by flow cytometry

For the collection of adequate numbers of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for PBSC transplantation, an accurate quantification of circulating CD34+ stem cells is required for deciding the optimal time of the collection. To enumerate peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ stem cells, the percentage of CD34+ cells in the gated PB mononuclear cells should be multiplied by the percentage of the gated mononuclear cells among white blood cells (WBC) and by the total WBC count. Accordingly, a minor difference in the measured percentage of the CD34+ cells can lead to a major difference in the PB CD34+ cell concentration. In the present study, we measured the concentration of PB CD34+ stem cells with a flow cytometer designed to provide direct absolute counts of cell subsets from a single instrument. Whole blood was stained with a phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody, and, after the lysis of red blood cells, CD34+ cells were counted in a fraction of the lymphocyte and monocyte gate. The accuracy of our method was demonstrated in an experiment in which various dilutions of known numbers of CD34+ leukemic cells were mixed with normal blood; the predicted value of the CD34+ cell count was observed. The concentration of CD34+ cells in leukapheresis products was measured both by our direct assay and an indirect assay that calculates the number from the percentage of CD34+ cells in mononuclear cells, and our assay was shown to produce less variation. Further, our assay showed a significant correlation between the concentration of mobilized CD34+ cells in the PB and the number of harvested CD34+ cells in leukapheresis. These findings indicate that the monitoring of the concentration of PB CD34+ cells by the present method can be used to predict the number of stem cells collected in leukapheresis. This procedure is easy to perform and can be applied to daily monitoring to decide the appropriate timing for harvest of mobilized stem cells.

Use of collagen for standardization of PBSC graft quality evaluation: a multicenter comparative analysis of commercial collagen-based and methylcellulose-based colony-forming unit (CFU) assay kits

The colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assay, an essential test in evaluation of the quality of autologous grafts of hematopoietic stem cells, has yet to be standardized. With this aim in view, we carried out a multicenter study of five commercially available culture kits for CFU-GM evaluation. Four kits were methylcellulose-based (H4431, H4434, H4435, StemBio1d) and one was collagen-based (EasyClone-Multi). Using fresh and frozen samples of PBSC grafts, we compared CFU-GM and burst-forming unit-erythrocytes (BFU-E) growth using the EasyClone kit to each of the methylcellulose kits. BFU-E and CFU-GM clonogenicity of both fresh and frozen PBSC was clearly inferior with the H4431 kit, which provides conditioned medium only. CFU-GM numbers obtained with fresh and frozen PBSC samples were significantly higher with the EasyClone kit than with the H4434 and StemBio kits. BFU-E numbers were also higher with the EasyClone kit, but only when colonies were scored after May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) staining. Finally, although the H4435 kit provides higher doses of recombinant cytokines than the EasyClone kit, CFU-GM and BFU-E numbers obtained for fresh or frozen PBSC with both kits were similar. In addition, CFU-GM and BFU-E numbers correlated well with CD34+ cell numbers for all five kits for both fresh and frozen PBSC. In summary, our study shows that the EasyClone-Multi and H4435 kits provide the best CFU-GM growth. The collagen-based EasyClone kit has the additional advantage of allowing gel staining and storage, which facilitates colony identification and, more importantly, makes gel exchange possible for standardization of the CFU-GM assay.

Quality assessment of CD34+ stem cell enumeration: experience of the United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) using a unique stable whole blood preparation

CD34+ peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and harvesting has rapidly replaced autologous bone marrow as a source of stem cells for transplantation. Timing and adequacy of harvests rely upon the accurate enumeration of circulating CD34+ cells. However, previous EQA programmes have reported interlaboratory CVs as high as 284%, suggesting the need for greater standardization. In addition the routine use of fresh and/or frozen cells as analytes also introduces antigen instability as a variable factor. To circumvent this problem and achieve a true reflection of interlaboratory variation, we have used a novel whole blood preparation in which the antigenic profiles of PBSCs, as determined by flow cytometry, are retained for > 200 d. This international scheme, currently the largest in the world, distributes aliquots of stabilized whole blood bi-monthly to 91 laboratories in 20 countries (44 U.K., 47 overseas). Participants are required to determine the percentage and absolute values for CD34+ PBSCs using in-house techniques. Adopting such a preparation, a more accurate determination of interlaboratory variation has been possible when compared to previous EQA studies, with CVs as low as 22% and 24% for percentage and absolute counts. In addition the programme has established that a wide range of methods are in routine use, emphasizing the urgent requirement for national/international consensus guidelines.

Circulating CD34-expressing cells: German Proficiency Testing Survey

Determination of absolute numbers of CD34-expressing cells is critical in the setting of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell transplantation/reinfusion. The diagnostic value of the parameter, CD34-expressing cells/microliter, has been validated. A survey of CD34-expressing cells has been integrated into a series of flow cytometry proficiency testing surveys (reticulocytes, lymphocytes, leukemia, and lymphoma) that we have established in Germany. Commercially available, modified, stabilized myeloblastic leukemia cells (KG1a cell line) spiked at different numbers into two normal blood samples were sent out, and report forms were returned from 50 of 58 participants. With a predicted percentage of CD34-expressing cells of 0.5% (sample A) and of 0.25% (sample B), the respective mean values analyzing data from 44 participants returning the completed forms were 0.49% (sample A) and 0.29% (sample B). The coefficients of variation were 57% and 83%, respectively. Engineered samples based on normal blood and on commercially available stabilized modified KG1a cells seem to be reliable material for external quality assessment surveys of CD34-expressing cells.

Enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells in peripheral blood and leukapheresis products by microvolume fluorimetry: a comparison with flow cytometry

There is increasing interest in both standardization and simplification of methods for enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) to facilitate cellular therapies and to improve interinstitutional comparison of clinical and laboratory results. We evaluated a novel method for CD34+ cell enumeration based on microvolume fluorimetry (MVF) compared with our laboratory's routine flow cytometric method on samples of peripheral blood and leukapheresis products. The MVF method is semiautomated and uses a 633-nm light from a helium-neon laser to scan fluorochrome-labeled cells held in stasis in a capillary known volume. The performance of the MVF assay for enumeration of CD34+ cells was found to be comparable to our routine flow cytometric assay in linearity and accuracy in the range of 5-1500 cells per microliter. Precision of MVF for replicate assays on the same instrument was demonstrated by coefficient of variation (CV) values of 8.4% at a CD34+ cell concentration of 284/microliters for a sample volume of 0.8 microliters, and 15.7% at 12/microliters for a sample volume of 3.2 microliter. Precision among three different instruments was demonstrated, using sample volumes of 1.6 microliters, by CV values of 44% at 6 cells/microliters and 4.6% at 733 cells/microliters. In a field sample evaluation, precision of the entire assay system for paired measurements on 0.8-microliter sample volumes was demonstrated by CV values of 50%, 31%, and 15% for peripheral blood samples with concentrations of 0-10, 10-20, and 20-100 CD34+ cells/microliters, respectively, and 6.3%, 8.1% and 6.5% for leukapheresis samples with concentrations of 0-100, 100-1,000, and 1,000-2,500 CD34+ cells/microliters, respectively. The MVF assay was easy to perform, required minimal technical training time, and had a turnaround time of 40 min, of which less than 10 min was actual technical time. These observations suggest that the MVF method for CD34+ cell enumeration may prove useful to clinical laboratories providing support for HPC collection, processing, and transplantation services that require relatively simple, rapid assays for product quality control or to guide real-time clinical decisions.

Quantification of CD34+ cells: comparison of methods

BACKGROUND

Quantification of CD34+ stem and progenitor cells is predominantly performed by flow cytometric analysis of cells prepared by whole blood staining and red cell lysis. This method also includes cell washing, which is thought to cause the destruction and loss of some of the nucleated cells (NCs). To address this cell loss and its influence on the outcome of enumeration, three techniques for preparing cells for quantification of CD34+ cells were compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Blood (n = 179), bone marrow (n = 60), and leukapheresis components (n = 64) were examined by the use of density separation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) and two red cell-lysis procedures (wash and no-wash). Cell counts were determined in the original materials and after cell preparation. Absolute CD34+ cell counts were calculated using the flow cytometry-analyzed proportions of CD34+ cells and the various white cell counts.

RESULTS

Depending on the cell source and the cell preparation chosen, the loss of NCs ranged between 12 percent and 89 percent of the original white cell number. This loss of NCs was exclusively due to cell washing and predominantly affected granulocytic cells. Analysis of the flow cytometry data revealed that the relative CD34+ values in blood and bone marrow were roughly threefold higher in density separated MNCs than in those that underwent the lyse-and-wash procedure. Calculation of absolute CD34+ cell counts confirmed that the MNC procedure underestimated the CD34+ cell content by a median of 26 percent (blood), 21 percent (bone marrow), and 5 percent (leukapheresis component) when compared with the median yield from analysis and cell counting performed after the lyse-and-wash procedure. On the other hand, the conventional lysis procedure, which applies the original white cell counts for CD34+ quantification, was shown to overestimate the CD34+ cell content by a median of 1.2-fold, 1.33-fold, and 1.13-fold, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neither density separation nor the whole-blood lysis procedure seems appropriate for optimal CD34+ quantification.

An intralaboratory quality control program for quantitation of CD34+ cells by flow cytometry

This study was undertaken to develop a quality control protocol to monitor instrument, operator, and CD34 assay performance. A dual level control system was established by cryopreserving aliquots of cells from peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections exhibiting different percentages of CD34+ cells. Twenty-five samples from each control specimen were assayed to establish a control range (mean +/- 2 SD). Levey-Jennings graphs were prepared for each control specimen to plot multiple measurements of CD34%. No significant differences were observed between fresh or cryopreserved PBPC aliquots in terms of light scatter properties or CD34 antigen density within the gated cell population. Cryopreserved PBPC samples are ideal for serving as a positive methodology control for daily CD34 analysis. Furthermore, such a system can help identify problems with assay reagents, sample preparation technique, or incorrect data analysis.

Enumeration of CD34-positive stem cells: evaluation and comparison of three methods

Accurate enumeration of CD34+ stem cells is important in assessing the need for continued mobilization and subsequent apheresis collections. We compared two new analysis systems, ProCOUNT (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems) and IMAGN 2000 STELLer (Biometric Imaging, Inc.) with our current (3-Color) flow cytometry-based method. The ProCOUNT system uses an absolute counting tube, which contains reference beads and a specific (multiple) gating strategy to determine an absolute count. The STELLer assay combines microvolume fluorimetry and automated analysis software to determine an absolute count. To evaluate linearity and reproducibility, peripheral blood was spiked with CD34+ cells (KG1a cell line). Three dilution series (measured at approximately equal to 0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 CD34+ cells/microliter) were analyzed by each method. Analysis of predicted versus actual CD34+ concentration showed excellent correlation with all methods (r2 > or = 0.97, slope 0.98-1.04). To further assess precision, two PBSC samples, at approximately 200 and 800 CD34+ cells/microliter, respectively, were analyzed 10 times by each method. Coefficients of variation for the precision analysis of these samples were 5.1%-6.4% and 5.4%-12.3%, respectively. To assess overall performance, 75 patient specimens were analyzed. Excellent correlation (r2 values of 0.89-0.98) was observed among all three methods. We conclude that the three methods provide comparable linearity and reproducibility.

The influence of flow cytometric gating strategy on the standardization of CD34+ cell quantitation: an Australian multicenter study. Australasian BMT Scientists Study Group

The Australian Multi-centre study on CD34+ cell quantitation by flow cytometry documented, first, the extent of variation of CD34+ cell enumeration and, second, the influence of flow cytometric gating on CD34+ cell measurement. A PBSC harvest analyzed by 20 participating centers showed results ranging from 0.64% to 2.80%, with a median of 1.54% CD34+ cells. Of 20 centers, 9 obtained results within +/-10% of the median (the criteria for reproducibility suggested by the ISHAGE Guidelines). The flow cytometric gating strategy was identified as one of the major variables among the methods used. In stage 2, list mode data from two samples were analyzed by 24 Australian and overseas centers, including the authors of three published guidelines. Significantly different CD34+ results were obtained when different gating strategies were used (p < 0.006). When all the centers used the same gating strategy, the measurement of CD34+ cells fell within a narrow range, with 0-7% of results outside +/-10% of the median. However, when different gating strategies were used, the results were more widely scattered, with 17% of centers outside +/-10% of the median. This study demonstrated the potential impact of flow cytometric gating strategy on the reproducibility of CD34+ cell enumeration.