Implementation of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist at a university hospital in Thailand

Implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in resource-limited Somalia: a new standard in surgical safety

BACKGROUND

Surgical safety remains a critical global health concern, with complications from surgical procedures resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has been shown to reduce surgical complications and mortality rates. However, its implementation and impact in resource-limited settings like Somalia remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the WHO SSC in selected hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia, and assess its impact on surgical safety practices.

METHODS

A pre- and post-intervention study was conducted in 15 randomly selected hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia. The intervention involved a comprehensive training program on the WHO SSC for surgical teams. Data on hospital characteristics, surgical details, and adherence to the SSC were collected over two periods: pre-intervention (April 12th to May 4th, 2024) and post-intervention (May 12th to June 3rd, 2024). The primary outcome was the adherence to the SSC, categorized as good (> 60%) or poor (≤ 60%). Descriptive statistics, McNemar's test, and binary logistic regression were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Adherence to the WHO SSC significantly improved post-intervention, with 98.8% of surgical cases demonstrating good adherence compared to 37% pre-intervention (p < 0.001). The mean adherence score increased from 51.6% (SD = 29.6) to 94.1% (SD = 8.2). Significant improvements were observed for most individual checklist items, including patient identity confirmation, surgical site marking, anesthesia machine checks, and pulse oximeter use (p < 0.001). Team dynamics and communication also improved significantly post-intervention. Hospital type, size, years of service, funding source, surgical department, surgery type, urgency, and staff numbers were associated with checklist adherence pre-intervention.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a comprehensive training intervention significantly improved adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in resource-limited hospitals in Mogadishu, Somalia. The findings highlight the feasibility and effectiveness of the SSC in enhancing surgical safety practices, team communication, and patient outcomes in challenging healthcare environments. Tailored implementation strategies, ongoing training, and cultural adaptation are crucial for the successful adoption of the SSC in resource-constrained settings.

Barriers to the adoption of routine surgical video recording: a mixed-methods qualitative study of a real-world implementation of a video recording platform

BACKGROUND

Routine surgical video recording has multiple benefits. Video acts as an objective record of the operative record, allows video-based coaching and is integral to the development of digital technologies. Despite these benefits, adoption is not widespread. To date, only questionnaire studies have explored this failure in adoption. This study aims to determine the barriers and provide recommendations for the implementation of routine surgical video recording.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pre- and post-pilot questionnaire surrounding a real-world implementation of a C-SATS©, an educational recording and surgical analytics platform, was conducted in a university teaching hospital trust. Usage metrics from the pilot study and descriptive analyses of questionnaire responses were used with the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, sustainability (NASSS) framework to create topic guides for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts of interviews were evaluated in an inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Engagement with the C-SATS© platform failed to reach consistent levels with only 57 videos uploaded. Three attending surgeons, four surgical residents, one scrub nurse, three patients, one lawyer, and one industry representative were interviewed, all of which perceived value in recording. Barriers of 'change,' 'resource,' and 'governance,' were identified as the main themes. Resistance was centred on patient misinterpretation of videos. Participants believed availability of infrastructure would facilitate adoption but integration into surgical workflow is required. Regulatory uncertainty was centred around anonymity and data ownership.

CONCLUSION

Barriers to the adoption of routine surgical video recording exist beyond technological barriers alone. Priorities for implementation include integration recording into the patient record, engaging all stakeholders to ensure buy-in, and formalising consent processes to establish patient trust.

Reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection in high dependency unit: an eighteen-month quality improvement intervention study period

Background

The urinary catheter usually leads to a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) contributing to further morbidity and mortality. There is very limited data on the CAUTI incidence rate in high-dependency units (HDUs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The institutional CAUTI incidence rate in HDU was six times higher compared to the United States National Healthcare Safety Network (US-NHSN) in 2021.

Objective

To reduce 50% CAUTI incidence rate by the end of 2022.

Method

A prospective study was conducted in tertiary HDU from January 2022 to June 2023. A gap analysis was assessed between the hospital practices and the Society Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) basic recommendations. The Kotter and Rathgebers' changing behavior model was applied at the beginning of the project. Formal education and prevention of CAUTI were applied using the National Strategy Model. Surveillance and statistical data analysis were carried out using US-NHSN guidelines.

Results

The overall CAUTI incidence rate declined from 7.07- to 3.57/1000 urinary catheter days despite of significant increase in the utilization ratio from 0.79 to 0.94 (P value 0.0001). The compliance rate of the bundle CAUTI prevention was improved and sustained above 90%. A CAUTI incidence rate reduction was observed following the combination of the changing behavior and SHEA/IDSA of CAUTI prevention models over 18 months.

Conclusion

We assumed the combination of the changing behavior and the prevention models for a long period is useful in reducing the CAUTI incidence rate and possibly applied to reduce other healthcare-associated infections.

Utilization and Completeness of Surgical Safety Checklist with Associated Factors in Surgical Units of Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia

Introduction

Surgical safety checklist is used for every patient undergoing a surgical procedure and is now employed by a majority of surgical providers around the world, but the utilization and completion of surgical safety checklists were low in lower- and middle-income countries.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the utilization and completeness of the surgical safety checklist in surgical units of Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia.

Methods

Hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from October 1 to 30, 2020. A total of 384 surgical cases were included in the study. Checklists were kept as part of each patient's medical record, and consecutive post-operative patient charts were included in the study. The data were collected using the modified version of the WHO checklist constituted of 27 items. The collected data were cleaned, coded, and entered into EpiData version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 20 for analysis. Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were computed, and the level of statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.

Results

The use of a surgical safety checklist was 93.5%. The checklist was completed 17.3% of the time, with sign-in, time-out, and sign-out being completed 83%, 25%, and 35% of the time, respectively. Utilization of the surgical safety checklist was 87.4%, which is lower in elective surgeries (AOR = 0.126 95% CI (0.039-0.414)) compared with the emergency procedure. Once more, the completeness of the safety checklist was 63.3%, which is lower in elective surgery (AOR = 0.367 95% CI (0.208-0.65)) than in emergency procedures.

Conclusion

The use of a surgical safety checklist was promising, while the completeness of the checklist was poor that demands further improvement. Time-out was the least completed section of the checklist. Completion of the checklist was high in the first case on the positions of the theatre list.

Satisfaction and Barriers of Surgical Safety Checklist Implementation in a Nonmandatory Adoption Resource-Limited Country

OBJECTIVES

A surgical safety checklist has been a globally implemented and mandated adoption in several countries. However, its use is not mandatory in Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions of surgical personnel on surgical complications and safety and to examine the satisfaction and barriers of surgical safety checklist implementation.

METHODS

A survey study was performed between November 2013 and February 2015 in 61 Thai hospitals. A questionnaire capturing demographics, perceptions related to surgical complications and safety, and the satisfaction and barriers of surgical safety checklist implementation was distributed to surgical personnel.

RESULTS

A total of 2024 surgical personnel were recruited. Nearly all of them reported experience or knowledge of an adverse surgical event (99.6%). Most thought that it could be preventable (98.2%) and quality care improvement could help reduce the occurrence of adverse events (97.7%). Overall, respondents reported a high level of satisfaction with the checklist (mean [SD] = 3.79 [0.71]). The three areas of highest satisfaction were benefit to the patient (mean [SD] = 4.11 [0.69]), benefit to the organization (mean [SD] = 4.05 [0.68]), and reduction in adverse events (mean [SD] = 4.02 [0.69]). Overall, the barrier for implementation of the checklist was rated as moderate (mean [SD] = 2.52 [0.99]). However, the means of barriers in each period, sign in, time out, and sign out, were rated as low (means [SD] = 2.41 [1.07], 2.50 [1.03], and 2.34 [1.01], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The data document that the satisfaction with the checklist are fairly high. However, some barriers were identified. Efforts to increase understanding through more rigorous policy enforcement and strategic support may lead to improving the checklist implementation.

Cumplimiento de la lista de verificación de seguridad de la cirugía en un hospital de Santander. Un estudio de corte trasversal

Introducción: La seguridad del paciente constituye una prioridad en la atención en salud, siendo la lista de verificación para la seguridad quirúrgica una de las estrategias implementadas por la OMS. El objetivo fue determinar el nivel de cumplimiento en la aplicación de la lista de verificación de seguridad de la cirugía en personal de sala quirúrgica de una institución pública. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio de corte transversal en 45 miembros del equipo quirúrgico de un hospital, en los cuales se evaluó el cumplimiento a la lista de chequeo de la OMS durante el mes de julio y agosto del año 2018. Resultados: El cumplimiento global fue del 13.3% (n=6), siendo la fase previa a la anestesia la que alcanzó el mayor nivel (55.6%, n=25). El mayor cumplimiento lo registró el personal de instrumentación quirúrgica (100%, n=8), mientras el más bajo el personal de enfermería (25%, n=3), con diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p=0.005). Adicionalmente, se observó una correlación entre los años de trabajo en el servicio y el cumplimiento en fase de transferencia (rho= -0.30, p=0.048). Discusión: El cumplimiento general fue bajo, lo cual corrobora la hipótesis planteada y resulta similar a otros estudios descritos en la literatura. Conclusiones: El cumplimiento general a la lista de chequeo fue muy bajo, con comportamientos diferenciales al ser las instrumentadoras quirúrgicas las que presentaron mayor cumplimiento y el personal de enfermería el menor. El ítem de profilaxis antibiótica el de menor cumplimiento, mientras que la fase previa a la anestesia la de mayor nivel. Como citar este artículo: Sepúlveda Plata Martha Cecilia. López Romero Luis Alberto.  González Sandra Beatriz. Cumplimiento de la lista de verificación de seguridad de la cirugía en un hospital de Santander. Un estudio de corte trasversal. Revista Cuidarte. 2021;12(3):e2122. http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.2122 

Impact of an educational intervention on WHO surgical safety checklist and pre-operative antibiotic use at a referral hospital in southwestern Uganda

INTRODUCTION

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends adherence to its surgical safety checklist (SSC) to optimize patient safety and reduce cesarean surgical site infection (SSI). Educational interventions combined with audit and feedback mechanisms on the checklist use by clinicians have the potential to improve adherence and clinical outcomes. Despite the increase in cesarean delivery rates, there is a paucity of data on how such interventions can improve adherence in resource-limited settings.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a quality improvement project to measure the impact of an educational intervention with daily audit and feedback procedures on rates of WHO SSC adherence, including pre-operative antibiotic administration and SSI at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital maternity ward in Uganda.

METHODS

The study involved chart abstraction of WHO SSC and pre-operative antibiotic use during cesarean deliveries and signs of subsequent SSI in three phases. First, we conducted a retrospective review of all charts from May to June 2018 (pre-intervention phase). Second, we instituted an educational intervention on the WHO SSC and pre-operative antibiotics use, followed by a daily audit of charts and feedback to clinicians from July to August 2018 (the intervention phase). Third, we reviewed charts from September to October 2018 (the post-intervention phase). The WHO SSC adherence, pre-operative antibiotic administration and SSI rates were measured as the proportion of the total cesarean deliveries per study phase and then compared across the three phases.

RESULTS

We reviewed 678 patients' charts (200 in the pre-intervention phase, 230 in the intervention phase and 248 in the post-intervention phase). The mean patient age was 25 years. The use of the WHO SSC was 7% in the pre-intervention phase compared to 92% in the intervention phase (P < 0.001), and 77% in the post-intervention phase (P < 0.001). Pre-intervention antibiotic receipt was 18% compared to 90% in the intervention phase (P < 0.001) and 84% in the post-intervention phase (P < 0.001). The documented SSI rate in the pre-intervention phase was 15% compared to 7% in the intervention phase (P = 0.02) and 11% in the post-intervention phase (P = 0.20).

CONCLUSIONS

An educational intervention, daily audit and feedback to clinicians increased the use of the WHO SSC and prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean delivery-although the rates waned with time. Research to understand factors influencing the checklist use and antibiotic prophylaxis including prescriber knowledge, motivation and clinical process is required. Implementation interventions to sustain usage and impact on clinical outcomes need to be explored.

Implementation Strategies and the Uptake of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To identify the implementation strategies used in World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); examine any association of implementation strategies with implementation effectiveness; and to assess the clinical impact.

BACKGROUND

The SSC is associated with improved surgical outcomes but effective implementation strategies are poorly understood.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO from June 2008 to February 2019 and included primary studies on SSC use in LMICs. Coprimary objectives were identification of implementation strategies used and evaluation of associations between strategies and implementation effectiveness. To assess the clinical impact of the SSC, we estimated overall pooled relative risks for mortality and morbidity. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018100034).

RESULTS

We screened 1562 citations and included 47 papers. Median number of discrete implementation strategies used per study was 4 (IQR: 1-14, range 0-28). No strategies were identified in 12 studies. SSC implementation occurred with high penetration (81%, SD 20%) and fidelity (85%, SD 13%), but we did not detect an association between implementation strategies and implementation outcomes. SSC use was associated with a reduction in mortality (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.67-0.89), all complications (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.71) and infectious complications (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.37-0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The SSC is used with high fidelity and penetration is associated with improved clinical outcomes in LMICs. Implementation appears well supported by a small number of tailored strategies. Further application of implementation science methodology is required among the global surgical community.

Development and Feasibility Testing of a Device Briefing Tool and Training to Improve Patient Safety During Introduction of New Devices in Operating Rooms: Best Practices and Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND

Introducing new surgical devices into the operating room (OR) can serve as a critical opportunity to address patient safety. The effectiveness of OR briefings to improve communication, teamwork, and safety has not been evaluated in this setting.

METHODS

Ariadne Labs and Johnson and Johnson (J&J) collaborated to develop and assess an intervention including a Device Briefing Tool (DBT) and novel multidisciplinary team training for clinicians (surgeons and nurses) around the introduction of a new device in the OR. J&J sales representatives trained clinicians to use the DBT, a communication tool to improve patient safety when a new device is used for the first time. Surveys were administered to representatives (n = 10), surgeons (n = 15), and nurses (n = 30) at the baseline, after trainings, and after using the DBT in an operation at six different Thai hospitals.

RESULTS

Familiarity with the Surgical Safety Checklist (SURGICAL SAFETY CHECKLIST) varied but increased post-training. Regarding trainings, 90% of representatives felt they very much or completely met all learning objectives but 50% felt only slightly prepared to train clinicians on using DBT. Post-training, clinician confidence in using a new device rose from 47 to 85%. Regarding the DBT, 90% of clinicians felt confident using it and reported they were very likely to use it in the future. Overall, over 90% of all clinicians and representatives felt safe having surgery in their hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

There is high acceptability and feasibility of the multidisciplinary trainings and the DBT among representatives and clinicians, albeit in a limited number of participants from a small number of institutions.

Impacts of the surgical safety checklist on postoperative clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal tumor patients: A single-center cohort study

A 19-item surgical safety checklist (SSC) was published by the World Health Organization in 2008 and was proved to reduce postoperative complications. To date, however, the impacts of SSC implementation in China have not been evaluated clearly. The study was performed to evaluate the impacts of the SSC on postoperative clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal tumor patients.Between April 2007 and March 2013, 7209 patients with gastrointestinal tumor who underwent elective surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University were studied. Data on the clinical records and outcomes of 3238 consecutive surgeries prior to SSC implementation were retrospectively collected; data on another 3971 consecutive surgeries performed after SSC implementation were prospectively collected. The clinical outcomes (including mortality, morbidity, readmission, reoperation, unplanned intervention and postoperative hospital stay) within postoperative 30 days were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to identify independent factors for postoperative complications.The rates of morbidity and in-hospital mortality before and after SSC implementation were 16.43% vs 14.33% (P = .018), 0.46% vs 0.18% (P = .028), respectively. Median of postoperative hospital stay in post-implementation group was shorter than that in pre-implementation group (8 vs 9 days, P < .001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the SSC was an independent factor influencing postoperative complications (odds ratio = 0.860; 95% CI, 0.750-0.988).Implementation of the SSC could improve the clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal tumor patients undergoing elective surgery in China.

Implementation and evaluation of nationwide scale-up of the Surgical Safety Checklist

Background

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist improves surgical outcomes, but evidence and theoretical frameworks for successful implementation in low‐income countries remain lacking. Based on previous research in Madagascar, a nationwide checklist implementation in Benin was designed and evaluated longitudinally.

Methods

This study had a longitudinal embedded mixed‐methods design. The well validated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to structure the approach and evaluate the implementation. Thirty‐six hospitals received 3‐day multidisciplinary training and 4‐month follow‐up. Seventeen hospitals were sampled purposively for evaluation at 12–18 months. The primary outcome was sustainability of checklist use at 12–18 months measured by questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were CFIR‐derived implementation outcomes, measured using the WHO Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS), safety questionnaires and focus groups.

Results

At 12–18 months, 86·0 per cent of participants (86 of 100) reported checklist use compared with 31·1 per cent (169 of 543) before training and 88·8 per cent (158 of 178) at 4 months. There was high‐fidelity use (median WHOBARS score 5·0 of 7; use of basic safety processes ranged from 85·0 to 99·0 per cent), and high penetration shown by a significant improvement in hospital safety culture (adapted Human Factors Attitude Questionnaire scores of 76·7, 81·1 and 82·2 per cent before, and at 4 and 12–18 months after training respectively; P < 0·001). Acceptability, adoption, appropriateness and feasibility scored 9·6–9·8 of 10. This approach incorporated 31 of 36 CFIR implementation constructs successfully.

Conclusion

This study shows successfully sustained nationwide checklist implementation using a validated implementation framework.

Implementation works

Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet its place in emergency surgery has not been assessed on a global scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate reported checklist use in emergency settings and examine the relationship with perioperative mortality in patients who had emergency laparotomy.

METHODS

In two multinational cohort studies, adults undergoing emergency laparotomy were compared with those having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Relationships between reported checklist use and mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression and bootstrapped simulation.

RESULTS

Of 12 296 patients included from 76 countries, 4843 underwent emergency laparotomy. After adjusting for patient and disease factors, checklist use before emergency laparotomy was more common in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI) (2455 of 2741, 89·6 per cent) compared with that in countries with a middle (753 of 1242, 60·6 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0·17, 95 per cent c.i. 0·14 to 0·21, P < 0·001) or low (363 of 860, 42·2 per cent; OR 0·08, 0·07 to 0·10, P < 0·001) HDI. Checklist use was less common in elective surgery than for emergency laparotomy in high-HDI countries (risk difference -9·4 (95 per cent c.i. -11·9 to -6·9) per cent; P < 0·001), but the relationship was reversed in low-HDI countries (+12·1 (+7·0 to +17·3) per cent; P < 0·001). In multivariable models, checklist use was associated with a lower 30-day perioperative mortality (OR 0·60, 0·50 to 0·73; P < 0·001). The greatest absolute benefit was seen for emergency surgery in low- and middle-HDI countries.

CONCLUSION

Checklist use in emergency laparotomy was associated with a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate. Checklist use in low-HDI countries was half that in high-HDI countries.

Sustainability of using the WHO surgical safety checklist: a mixed-methods longitudinal evaluation following a nationwide blended educational implementation strategy in Madagascar

Background

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist reduces postoperative complications by up to 50% with the biggest gains in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However in LMICs, checklist use is sporadic and widespread implementation has hitherto been unsuccessful. In 2015/2016, we partnered with the Madagascar Ministry of Health to undertake nationwide implementation of the checklist. We report a longitudinal evaluation of checklist use at 12-18 months postimplementation.

Methods

Hospitals were identified from the original cohort using purposive sampling. Using a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design, the primary outcome was self-reported checklist use. Secondary outcomes included use of basic safety processes, assessment of team behaviour, predictors of checklist use, impact on individuals and organisational culture and identification of barriers. Data were collected during 1-day hospital visits using validated questionnaires, WHO Behaviourally Adjusted Rating Scale (WHOBARS) assessment tool and focus groups and analysed using descriptive statistics, multivariate linear regression and thematic analysis.

Results

175 individuals from 14 hospitals participated. 74% reported sustained checklist use after 15 months. Mean WHOBARS scores were high, indicating good team engagement. Sustained checklist use was associated with an improved overall understanding of patient safety but not with WHOBARS, hospital size or surgical volume. 87% reported improved understanding of patient safety and 83% increased job satisfaction. Thematic analysis identified improvements in hospital culture (teamwork and communication, preparation and organisation, trust and confidence) and hospital practice (pulse oximetry, timing of antibiotic prophylaxis, introduction of a surgical count). Lack of time in an emergency and obstructive leadership were the greatest implementation barriers.

Conclusion

74% of participants reported sustained checklist use 12-18 months following nationwide implementation in Madagascar, with associated improvements in job satisfaction, culture and compliance with safety procedures. Further work is required to examine this implementation model in other countries.

A novel method to evaluate quality of care from the perspective of cataract patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate quality of care from patient's perspective following cataract surgery using a novel questionnaire and to assess validity of the survey in context with the identification of lacks in quality of care.

METHODS

Assessment of quality of care in 150 patients (150 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery in an Austrian clinical setting based on a novel "Quality of Care from Patient's perspective following Cataract Surgery" (QCPCS)-questionnaire including 10 subjective, 10 objective and 7 general health care criteria. Quality of care was graded according to importance (range: 1 = not important to 4 = extremely important) and frequency of occurrence (range: 1 = never to 4 = often, 0 = not applicable). Quality-impact indices (QI-respective grading by patient/4) were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean performance score was 3.84 (SD = 0.42, range: 1-4). Mean QI was 0.89 for subjective, 0.90 for objective and 0.96 for general health care criteria (p = 0.29). All-over skewness and coefficient of variation were -2.65 and 5.85 respectively. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = 0.75) confirming causal taxonomy of disease-specific and generic items.

CONCLUSION

A valid new method to reliably and holistically evaluate patient's satisfaction related to cataract surgery including a broad range of patient needs is presented, suitable to assess potential lacks in quality of health care in daily ophthalmological clinical practice.

An exploration of surgical team perceptions toward implementation of surgical safety checklists in a non-native English-speaking country

BACKGROUND

In-depth information on the success and failure of implementing the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist (SSC) has been questioned in non-native English-speaking countries. This study explored the experiences of SSC implementation and documented barriers and strategies to improve SSC implementation.

METHODS

A qualitative study was performed in 33 Thai hospitals. The information from focus group discussions with 39 nurses and face-to-face, in-depth interviews with 50 surgical personnel was analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Major barriers were an unclear policy, inadequate personnel, refusals and resistance from the surgical team, English/electronic SSC, and foreign patients. The key strategies to improve SSC implementation were found to be policy management, training using role-play and station-based deconstruction, adapting SSC implementation suitable for the hospital's context, building self-awareness, and patient involvement.

CONCLUSION

The barriers of SSC were related to infrastructure and patients. Effective policy management, teamwork and individual improvement, and patient involvement may be the keys to successful SSC implementation.

Use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in low and middle income countries: A review of the literature

A wealth of research now exists surrounding use of the WHO surgical safety checklist. This paper reviews the literature regarding checklist use in developing countries. Results identify a lack of available literature specific to developing countries despite this potentially being where the greatest impact could be observed. Unique challenges of checklist use are discussed and opportunities for future research focusing on use of the checklist in developing countries suggested.

Evaluation of a countrywide implementation of the world health organisation surgical safety checklist in Madagascar

BACKGROUND

The 2009 World Health Organisation (WHO) surgical safety checklist significantly reduces surgical mortality and morbidity (up to 47%). Yet in 2016, only 25% of East African anesthetists regularly use the checklist. Nationwide implementation of the checklist is reported in high-income countries, but in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) reports of successful implementations are sparse, limited to single institutions and require intensive support. Since checklist use leads to the biggest improvements in outcomes in LMICs, methods of wide-scale implementation are needed. We hypothesized that, using a three-day course, successful wide-scale implementation of the checklist could be achieved, as measured by at least 50% compliance with six basic safety processes at three to four months. We also aimed to determine predictors for checklist utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a blended educational implementation strategy based on prior pilot studies we designed a three-day dynamic educational course to facilitate widespread implementation of the WHO checklist. The course utilized lectures, film, small group breakouts, participant feedback and simulation to teach the knowledge, skills and behavior changes needed to implement the checklist. In collaboration with the Ministry of Health and local hospital leadership, the course was delivered to 427 multi-disciplinary staff at 21 hospitals located in 19 of 22 regions of Madagascar between September 2015 and March 2016. We evaluated implementation at three to four months using questionnaires (with a 5-point Likert scale) and focus groups. Multivariate linear regression was used to test predictors of checklist utilization.

RESULTS

At three to four months, 65% of respondents reported always using the checklist, with another 13% using it in part. Participant's years in practice, hospital size, or surgical volume did not predict checklist use. Checklist use was associated with counting instruments (p< 0.05), but not with verifying: patient identity, difficult intubation risk, risk of blood loss, prophylactic antibiotic administration, or counting needles and sponges.

CONCLUSION

Use of a multi-disciplinary three-day course for checklist implementation resulted in 78% of participants using the checklist, at three months; and an increase in counting surgical instruments. Successful checklist implementation was not predicted by participant length of medical service, hospital size or surgical volume. If reproducible in other countries, widespread implementation in LMICs becomes a realistic possibility.

Interval follow up of a 4-day pilot program to implement the WHO surgical safety checklist at a Congolese hospital

Background

The World Health Organisation Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) improves surgical outcomes and the research question is no longer ‘does the SSC work?’ but, ‘how to make the SSC work?’ Evidence for implementation strategies in low-income countries is sparse and existing strategies are heavily based on long-term external support. Short but effective implementation programs are required if widespread scale up is to be achieved. We designed and delivered a four-day pilot SSC training course at a single hospital centre in the Republic of Congo, and evaluated the implementation after one year. We hypothesised that participants would still be using the checklist over 50% of the time.

Method

We taught the four-day SSC training course at Dolisie hospital in February 2014, and undertook a mixed methods impact evaluation based on the Kirkpatrick model in May 2015. SSC implementation was evaluated using self-reported questionnaire with a 3 point Likert scale to assess six key process measures. Learning, behaviour, organisational change and facilitators and inhibitors to change were evaluated with questionnaires, interviews and focus group discussion.

Results

Seventeen individuals participated in the training and seven (40%) were available for impact evaluation at 15 months. No participant had used the SSC prior to training. Over half the participants were following the six processes measures always or most of the time: confirmation of patient identity and the surgical procedure (57%), assessment of difficult intubation risk (72%), assessment of the risk of major blood loss (86%), antibiotic prophylaxis given before skin incision (86%), use of a pulse oximeter (86%), and counting sponges and instruments (71%). All participants reported positive improvements in teamwork, organisation and safe anesthesia. Most participants reported they worked in helpful, supportive and respectful atmosphere; and could speak up if they saw something that might harm a patient. However, less than half felt able to challenge those in authority.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that a 4-day pilot course for SSC implementation resulted in over 50% of participants using the SSC at 15 months, positive changes in learning, behaviour and organisational change, but less impact on hierarchical culture. The next step is to test our novel implementation strategy in a larger hospital setting.

Time-Out and Checklists: A Survey of Rural and Urban Operating Room Personnel

Surgical safety checklists were introduced to improve patient safety. Urban and rural hospitals are influenced by differing factors, but how these factors affect patient care is unknown. This study examined time-out and checklist processes in rural and urban operating rooms and found that although checklist use has been adopted in many organizations, use is inconsistent across both settings. An understanding of these variations is needed to improve utilization.

Recommendations for surgical safety checklist use in Canadian children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

There is ample evidence that avoidable harm occurs in patients, including children, who undergo surgical procedures. Among a number of harm mitigation strategies, the use of surgical safety checklists (SSC) is now a required organizational practice for accreditation in all North American hospitals. Although much has been written about the effects of SSC on outcomes of adult surgical patients, there is a paucity of literature on the use and role of the SSC as an enabler of safe surgery for children.

METHODS

The Pediatric Surgical Chiefs of Canada (PSCC) advocates on behalf of all Canadian children undergoing surgical procedures. We undertook a survey of the use of SSC in Canadian children's hospitals to understand the variability of implementation of the SSC and understand its role as both a measure and driver of patient safety and to make specific recommendations (based on survey results and evidence) for standardized use of the SSC in Canadian children's hospitals.

RESULTS

Survey responses were received from all 15 children's hospitals and demonstrated significant variability in how the checklist is executed, how compliance is measured and reported, and whether or not use of the checklist resulted in specific instances of error prevention over a 12-month observation period. There was near unanimous agreement that use of the SSC contributed positively to the safety culture of the operating room.

CONCLUSION

Based on the survey results, the PSCC have made 5 recommendations regarding the use of the SSC in Canadian children's hospitals.

Efficacy of surgical safety checklist: Assessing orthopaedic surgical implant readiness

INTRODUCTION

Our institution employs a Surgical Universal Protocol Preoperative Checklist in accordance with World Health Organization guidelines to promote patient safety. It is used in part to evaluate orthopaedic surgical equipment and implant readiness prior to the initiation of each surgical case. Our goal is to measure the preoperative checklist's efficacy in assessing orthopaedic equipment readiness preoperatively and its ability to prevent orthopaedic equipment failures (OEF). Our study focused on orthopaedic surgery cases as they require a large volume of equipment and implants for successful completion. These cases therefore present an appropriate medium to identify potential weakness in our institution's current surgical safety checklist (SSC).

METHODS

Data was collected over a 6 month period of time, broken into 2 distinct periods. The goal during the first 3 months was to observe compliance with the SSC. And during this time, we observed how often the SSC identified an implant or equipment deficiency at the outset of the case. The goal during the second 3 months was to record if orthopaedic surgical equipment issues were occurring that should have been identified by the SSC. During the second 3 months, we continued to utilize the SSC but also added a postsurgical review at the end of each surgical case. The postsurgical review was a one page questionnaire aimed at identifying any orthopaedic equipment failures that had occurred during the surgical case. For the purposes of this study, we defined an intraoperative orthopaedic equipment failure (OEF) as any one of the 6 following categories: (1) surgery delayed due to missing equipment, (2) lack of sterility of equipment, (3) equipment not available, (4) equipment malfunction, and (5) equipment sets incomplete, or (6) additional equipment brought into room necessary for completion of case. The data was collected at a postsurgical review that was performed by the physicians, nurses, and technicians from the surgical team in a nonthreatening manner. We also attempted to quantify the impact that the OEF had upon the surgical case.

RESULTS

During the first 3 months of the study (phase 1), we confirmed that our institutional SSCs were completed for all orthopaedic cases, including the specific questions related to implants and equipment. During phase 1, using the SSC alone, no orthopaedic equipment failures were identified. During phase 2, 33% of the reported surgical cases were identified as having started without essential equipment available or operational (defined as an orthopaedic equipment failure) in the operating room. The most common negative impact upon the surgical case was additional time requirement.

CONCLUSION

Our institution's current SSC fails to prevent OEF in our operating rooms. These checklist failures and intraoperative equipment deficiencies have measureable negative patient safety and institutional cost implications.

IMPLICATIONS

While the SSC is an effective tool it cannot be used alone to prepare for orthopaedic surgical cases. In order to improve patient safety and decrease hospital losses, further research is necessary to implement an effective communication network between surgeons, administrators, operating room nursing and sterile processing to eliminate OEF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and surgical swab and instrument counts at a regional referral hospital in Uganda - a quality improvement project

The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is a cost-effective tool that has been shown to improve patient safety. We explored the applicability and effectiveness of quality improvement methodology to implement the WHO checklist and surgical counts at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda between October 2012 and September 2013. Compliance rates were evaluated prospectively and monthly structured feedback sessions were held. Checklist and surgical count compliance rates increased from a baseline median (IQR [range]) of 29.5% (0-63.5 [0-67.0]) to 85.0% (82.8-87.5 [79.0-93.0]) and from 25.5% (0-52.5 [0-60.0]) to 83.0% (80.8-85.5 [69.0-89.0]), respectively. The mean all-or-none completion rate of the checklist was 69.3% (SD 7.7, 95% CI [64.8-73.9]). Use of the checklist was associated with performance of surgical counts (p value < 0.001; r(2) = 0.91). Pareto analysis showed that understaffing, malfunctioning and lack of equipment were the main challenges. A carefully designed quality improvement project, including stepwise incremental change and standardisation of practice, can be an effective way of improving clinical practice in low-income settings.

Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous research has described contextual factors that impact on the implementation of checklists, however there is limited understanding of the issues that impede team participation in checklist use in surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to identify and describe factors that drive team participation in safety checks in surgery.

METHODS

We observed ten surgical teams and conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with 70 participants from nursing, surgery and anaesthetics, and the community. Constant comparative methods were used to analyse textual data derived from field notes and interviews. Observational and interview data were collected during 2014-15.

RESULTS

Analysis of the textual data generated from the field notes and interviews revealed the extent to which members of the surgical team participated in using the surgical safety checklist during each phase of patient care. These three categories included: 'using the checklist'; 'working independently'; and, 'communicating checks with others'. The phases in the checking process most vulnerable to information loss or omission were sign in and sign out.

CONCLUSIONS

Team participation in safety checks depends on a convergence of intertwined factors; namely, team attributes, communication strategies and checking processes. A whole-of-team approach to participation in surgical safety checks is far more complex when considering the factors that drive participation. Strategies to increase participation in safety checks need to target professional communication practices and work processes such as workflow which curtail team members' ability to participate.

Compliance and Surgical Team Perceptions of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist; Systematic Review

This systematic review aimed to assess surgical safety checklist compliance and evaluate surgical team perceptions and attitudes, post-checklist implementation in the operating room. The World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC) has decreased complications and mortality. However, it is unclear whether this reduction is influenced by the vicarious enhancement in teamwork, communication, and staff awareness established by SSC implementation. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses model of review guided a search across MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases. English-language studies using any adapted form of the WHO-SSC in operating rooms were reviewed by abstract and full text. Twenty-six studies, 13 assessing SSC compliance and 13 investigating surgical team perceptions of SSC, were evaluated. Compliance studies showed a checklist initiation rate of &gt;90%, but actual observed completion rate varied widely across studies. Sign out was the most poorly performed phase of the checklist (&lt;50%) with time out being the best. Verification of patient identity and procedure demonstrated a high degree (&gt;90%) of compliance across studies, but “verification of team-members” was significantly less compliant. Studies assessing surgical team perceptions found that SSC improved participants' perception of teamwork, communication, patient safety, and staff awareness of adverse events. However, when stakeholders placed differing degrees of importance on SSC completion, results indicated the SSC might actually antagonize team relationships. SSC compliance varies significantly across studies, being highly dependent on staff perceptions, training, and effective leadership. Surgical teams have positive perceptions of SSC; thus with effective implementation strategies, compliance rates across all phases can be substantially improved.

Assessment of Three "WHO" Patient Safety Solutions: Where Do We Stand and What Can We Do?

Background:

Most medical errors are preventable. The aim of this study was to compare the current execution of the 3 patient safety solutions with WHO suggested actions and standards.

Methods:

Data collection forms and direct observation were used to determine the status of implementation of existing protocols, resources, and tools.

Results:

In the field of patient hand-over, there was no standardized approach. In the field of the performance of correct procedure at the correct body site, there were no safety checklists, guideline, and educational content for informing the patients and their families about the procedure. In the field of hand hygiene (HH), although availability of necessary resources was acceptable, availability of promotional HH posters and reminders was substandard.

Conclusions:

There are some limitations of resources, protocols, and standard checklists in all three areas. We designed some tools that will help both wards to improve patient safety by the implementation of adapted WHO suggested actions.

Implementation of safety checklists in surgery: a realist synthesis of evidence

AIM

The aim of this review is to present a realist synthesis of the evidence of implementation interventions to improve adherence to the use of safety checklists in surgery.

BACKGROUND

Surgical safety checklists have been shown to improve teamwork and patient safety in the operating room. Yet, despite the benefits associated with their use, universal implementation of and compliance with these checklists has been inconsistent.

DATA SOURCES

An overview of the literature from 2008 is examined in relation to checklist implementation, compliance, and sustainability.

REVIEW METHODS

Pawson's and Rycroft-Malone's realist synthesis methodology was used to explain the interaction between context, mechanism, and outcome. This approach incorporated the following: defining the scope of the review, searching and appraising the evidence, extracting and synthesising the findings, and disseminating, implementing, and evaluating the evidence. We identified two theories a priori that explained contextual nuances associated with implementation and evaluation of checklists in surgery: the Normalisation Process Theory and Responsive Regulation Theory.

RESULTS

We identified four a priori propositions: (1) Checklist protocols that are prospectively tailored to the context are more likely to be used and sustained in practice, (2) Fidelity and sustainability is increased when checklist protocols can be seamlessly integrated into daily professional practice, (3) Routine embedding of checklist protocols in practice is influenced by factors that promote or inhibit clinicians' participation, and (4) Regulation reinforcement mechanisms that are more contextually responsive should lead to greater compliance in using checklist protocols. The final explanatory model suggests that the sustained use of surgical checklists is discipline-specific and is more likely to occur when medical staff are actively engaged and leading the process of implementation. Involving clinicians in tailoring the checklist to better fit their context of practice and giving them the opportunity to reflect and evaluate the implementation intervention enables greater participation and ownership of the process.

CONCLUSIONS

A major limitation in the surgical checklist literature is the lack of robust descriptions of intervention methods and implementation strategies. Despite this, two consequential findings have emerged through this realist synthesis: First, the sustained use of surgical checklists is discipline-specific and is more successful when physicians are actively engaged and leading implementation. Second, involving clinicians in tailoring the checklist to their context and encouraging them to reflect on and evaluate the implementation process enables greater participation and ownership.

A realist analysis of hospital patient safety in Wales: applied learning for alternative contexts from a multisite case study

Background

Hospital patient safety is a major social problem. In the UK, policy responses focus on the introduction of improvement programmes that seek to implement evidence-based clinical practices using the Model for Improvement, Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle. Empirical evidence that the outcomes of such programmes vary across hospitals demonstrates that the context of their implementation matters. However, the relationships between features of context and the implementation of safety programmes are both undertheorised and poorly understood in empirical terms.

Objectives

This study is designed to address gaps in conceptual, methodological and empirical knowledge about the influence of context on the local implementation of patient safety programmes.

Design

We used concepts from critical realism and institutional analysis to conduct a qualitative comparative-intensive case study involving 21 hospitals across all seven Welsh health boards. We focused on the local implementation of three focal interventions from the 1000 Lives+patient safety programme: Improving Leadership for Quality Improvement, Reducing Surgical Complications and Reducing Health-care Associated Infection. Our main sources of data were 160 semistructured interviews, observation and 1700 health policy and organisational documents. These data were analysed using the realist approaches of abstraction, abduction and retroduction.

Setting

Welsh Government and NHS Wales.

Participants

Interviews were conducted with 160 participants including government policy leads, health managers and professionals, partner agencies with strategic oversight of patient safety, advocacy groups and academics with expertise in patient safety.

Main outcome measures

Identification of the contextual factors pertinent to the local implementation of the 1000 Lives+patient safety programme in Welsh NHS hospitals.

Results

An innovative conceptual framework harnessing realist social theory and institutional theory was produced to address challenges identified within previous applications of realist inquiry in patient safety research. This involved the development and use of an explanatory intervention–context–mechanism–agency–outcome (I-CMAO) configuration to illustrate the processes behind implementation of a change programme. Our findings, illustrated by multiple nested I-CMAO configurations, show how local implementation of patient safety interventions are impacted and modified by particular aspects of context: specifically, isomorphism, by which an intervention becomes adapted to the environment in which it is implemented; institutional logics, the beliefs and values underpinning the intervention and its source, and their perceived legitimacy among different groups of health-care professionals; and the relational structure and power dynamics of the functional group, that is, those tasked with implementing the initiative. This dynamic interplay shapes and guides actions leading to the normalisation or the rejection of the patient safety programme.

Conclusions

Heightened awareness of the influence of context on the local implementation of patient safety programmes is required to inform the design of such interventions and to ensure their effective implementation and operationalisation in the day-to-day practice of health-care teams. Future work is required to elaborate our conceptual model and findings in similar settings where different interventions are introduced, and in different settings where similar innovations are implemented.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Compliance with Surgical Safety Checklist completion in the operating room of University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Appropriate utilization and compliance of Surgical Safety Checklist reduces occurrence of perioperative surgical complications and improve patient outcomes. However, data on compliance of surgical checklists are scarce in the study area. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate compliance of checklist completion and its barrier for utilization at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted among 282 patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery from January to March 2013. Compliance and completeness rate with implementation of Sign-in, Time-out, and Sign-out domains was computed with SPSS 20 package.

RESULTS

A total of 282 operations were performed and checklists were utilized in 39.7% (112/282) of cases. Among these, most checklists were employed during emergency procedures (61.6%) that need general anesthesia (75.9%) in department of surgery (58.9%). The overall compliance and completeness rate were 39.7 and 63.4% respectively. The sign-in, time-out and sign-out were missed in 30.5% (273/896), 35.4 % (436/1,232) and 45.7% (307/672) respectively. The main reasons cited for non-user were lack of previous training (45.1%) and lack of cooperation among surgical team members (21.6%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The completeness rate was satisfactory but the overall compliance rate was suboptimal. An instrument that is used 40% of the time has been a fairly basic introduction without significant reinforcement training. Moreover, frequent use of the checklist during emergency cases has been deemed to be of value by clinicians. Supplementary training and attention to actual checklist use would be indicated to ensure that this valuable tool could be used more routinely and improve communication. Conducting regular audit of checklist utilization is also recommended.

Segurança do paciente no centro cirúrgico e qualidade documental relacionadas à infecção cirúrgica e à hospitalização

Objetivo Descrever a qualidade documental de dois registros relacionados à segurança de pacientes no centro cirúrgico e estabelecer as diferenças nas informações relacionadas à infecção cirúrgica e à permanência hospitalar. Métodos Estudo comparativo baseado em dois cortes transversais, realizado com 3.033 pacientes internados há mais de 24 horas, advindos de Cirurgia Ortopédica e Traumatologia. Foram comparados dados sociodemográficos, clínicos e de preenchimento. Mediu-se a infecção pós-cirúrgica como um evento adverso. Resultados Houve correlação significativa entre os dias de hospitalização e o número total de diagnósticos coletados (Pearson=0,328; p<0,001). Quando se agruparam os diagnósticos e a infecção, notou-se um valor significativo entre as fraturas fechadas e a infecção (p=0,001). Conclusão Foram observadas diferenças no grau de preenchimento entre os dois registros. Não houveram diferenças no evento adverso.

Surgical team member assessment of the safety of surgery practice in 38 South Carolina hospitals

We assessed surgical team member perceptions of multiple dimensions of safe surgical practice in 38 South Carolina hospitals participating in a statewide initiative to implement surgical safety checklists. Primary data were collected using a novel 35-item survey. We calculated the percentage of 1,852 respondents with strongly positive, positive, and neutral/negative responses about the safety of surgical practice, compared results by hospital and professional discipline, and examined how readiness, teamwork, and adherence related to staff perception of care quality. Overall, 78% of responses were positive about surgical safety at respondent's hospitals, but in each survey dimension, from 16% to 40% of responses were neutral/negative, suggesting significant opportunity to improve surgical safety. Respondents not reporting they would feel safe being treated in their operating rooms varied from 0% to 57% among hospitals. Surgeons responded more positively than nonsurgeons. Readiness, teamwork, and practice adherence related directly to staff perceptions of patient safety (p < .001).

Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation

BACKGROUND

Surgical complications represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality with the rate of major complications after inpatient surgery estimated at 3-17% in industrialised countries. The purpose of this review was to summarise experience with surgical checklist use and efficacy for improving patient safety.

METHODS

A search of four databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE and the Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials) was conducted from 1 January 2000 to 26 October 2012. Articles describing actual use of the WHO checklist, the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist, a wrong-site surgery checklist or an anaesthesia equipment checklist were eligible for inclusion (this manuscript summarises all but the anaesthesia equipment checklists, which are described in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality publication).

RESULTS

We included a total of 33 studies. We report a variety of outcomes including avoidance of adverse events, facilitators and barriers to implementation. Checklists have been adopted in a wide variety of settings and represent a promising strategy for improving the culture of patient safety and perioperative care in a wide variety of settings. Surgical checklists were associated with increased detection of potential safety hazards, decreased surgical complications and improved communication among operating staff. Strategies for successful checklist implementation included enlisting institutional leaders as local champions, incorporating staff feedback for checklist adaptation and avoiding redundancies with existing systems for collecting information.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical checklists represent a relatively simple and promising strategy for addressing surgical patient safety worldwide. Further studies are needed to evaluate to what degree checklists improve clinical outcomes and whether improvements may be more pronounced in particular settings.

Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in an Ethiopian Referral Hospital

Background

The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has a growing evidence base to support its role in improving perioperative safety, although its impact is likely to be directly related to the effectiveness of its implementation. There remains a paucity of documented experience from low-resource settings on Checklist implementation approaches. We report an implementation strategy in a public referral hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, based on consultation, local leadership, formal introduction, and supported supervision with subsequent audit and feedback.

Methods

Planning, implementation and assessment took place from December 2011 to December 2012. The planning phase, from December 2011 until April 2012, involved a multidisciplinary consultative approach using local leaders, volunteer clinicians, and staff from non-governmental organisations, to draw up a locally agreed and appropriate Checklist. Implementation in April 2012 involved formal teaching and discussion, simulation sessions and role play, with supportive supervision following implementation. Assessment was performed using completed Checklist analysis and staff satisfaction questionnaires at one month and further Checklist analysis combined with semi-structured interviews in December 2012.

Results and discussion

Checklist compliance rates were 83% for general anaesthetics at one month after implementation, with an overall compliance rate of 65% at eight months. There was a decrease in Checklist compliance over the period of the study to less than 20% by the end of the study period. The ‘Sign out’ section was reported as being the most difficult section of the Checklist to complete, and was missed completely in 21% of cases. The most commonly missed single item was the team introduction at the start of each case. However, we report high staff satisfaction with the Checklist and enthusiasm for its continued use.

Conclusion

We report a detailed implementation strategy for introducing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist to a low-resource setting. We show that this approach can lead to high completion rates and high staff satisfaction, albeit with a drop in completion rates over time. We argue that maximal benefit of the Surgical Safety Checklist is likely to be when it engenders a conversation around patient safety within a department, and when there is local ownership of this process.

Avaliação da adesão ao checklist de cirurgia segura da OMS em cirurgias urológicas e ginecológicas, em dois hospitais de ensino de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil

O checklist de cirurgia segura da Organização Mundial da Saúde é uma ferramenta útil para diminuir eventos adversos em hospitais, porém sua implantação efetiva ainda é um desafio. Este estudo objetiva avaliar a adesão ao checklist em cirurgias urológicas e ginecológicas de dois hospitais de ensino em Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. O desenho foi observacional transversal; selecionaram-se cirurgias eletivas, e a coleta se deu por meio de revisão de prontuários. Descreveu-se a adesão mediante a existência e qualidade do preenchimento do checklist, e analisou-se a associação de fatores estruturais e socioprofissionais valendo-se de análise de regressão múltipla. Das 375 cirurgias revisadas, 61% tinham checklist, e 4% estavam totalmente preenchidos. A existência do checklist se associou às cirurgias ginecológicas (maternidade) (OR = 130,18) e à maior duração da cirurgia (OR = 2,13), enquanto a qualidade do preenchimento se relacionou com as cirurgias urológicas (hospital geral) (β = 26,36). A adesão ao checklist precisa ser aprimorada, e as diferenças sugerem a influência das distintas estratégias de implantação utilizadas em cada instituição.

Long-term effects of a perioperative safety checklist from the viewpoint of personnel

BACKGROUND

While positive short-term effects of the use of safety checklists have previously been reported by personnel, it is unclear to which extent these effects are maintained for a long-term period. The aim of the present study was to evaluate perioperative safety standards and the quality of interprofessional cooperation from the viewpoint of the involved personnel for up to 2 years following the introduction of a safety checklist.

METHODS

A survey of 99 co-workers in the departments of anaesthesiology and traumatology was conducted using a 19-point questionnaire concerning perioperative safety-relevant aspects and the quality of interprofessional cooperation before and at 3, 18, and 24 months after the introduction of a safety checklist.

RESULTS

Verification of written consent for surgery (P < 0.01), clear marking of the surgical site (P < 0.01), and time management (P < 0.05) were rated more positively over time by the anaesthesiologists and nurses. Items involving communication were rated less positively after 18 and 24 months than at 3 months. Orthopaedic surgeons rated being better informed about the patients (P < 0.05), the planned operation (P < 0.01), and the assignment of tasks during surgery (P < 0.01) progressively more positively over the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Some positive effects concerning the perioperative organisation and management were rated more positively even 2 years after checklist implementation. However, interprofessional communication and cooperation did not show long-term improvement from staff members' point of view. Probably longer lasting effects for the latter aspects could be achieved by repeated instruction and communication training.

Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and post-operative surgical site infections

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is unequivocally morbid and costly. The estimated 300,000 SSIs annually in the United States represent the second most common infection among surgical patients, prolong hospitalization by 7-10 days, and have an estimated annual incremental cost of $1 billion. The mortality rate associated with SSI is 3%, with about three quarters of deaths being attributable directly to the infection. Prevention is possible for the most part, and concerted effort has been made to limit these infections, arguably to little effect.

METHODS

Review of pertinent English-language literature.

RESULTS

Numerous risk factors for SSI and tactics for prevention have been described, but efforts to bundle these tactics into an effective, comprehensive prevention program have been disappointing. Numerous studies now demonstrate that the Surgical Care Improvement Program (SCIP), which focused on process improvement rather than outcomes, has been ineffective despite governmental support, financial penalties for non-compliance, and consequent widespread implementation.

CONCLUSION

Required reporting has increased awareness of the problem of SSI, but just as the complexity of SSI risk, pathogenesis, and preventions reflects the complexity of the disease, many other factors must be taken into account, including the skill and knowledge of the surgical team and promulgation of a culture of quality and safety in surgical patient care.