Value of C-Reactive Protein in the Assessment of Organ-Space Surgical Site Infections after Elective Open and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

C-reactive Protein as a Negative Predictor of Anastomotic Leak Following Elective Colorectal Resection: A Beacon of Assurance?

Background To evaluate the accuracy and optimal C-reactive protein (CRP) level for detecting anastomotic leak (AL) in patients following elective colorectal resection. Methods A retrospective data collection of patients undergoing elective colorectal resection with primary anastomosis at a single institution was performed. Data were collected between June 2021 and November 2022. All colorectal resections and any anastomosis type were included. The following information was collected: basic patient demographics, operative and postoperative complications, and daily CRP results for the first seven postoperative days (POD). SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for all data analysis. Results A total of 231 patients with a mean age of 68.8 ± 14.4 years were included. The most common surgical procedure was a right hemicolectomy (46.3%), followed by anterior resection (42.8%), segmental colectomy (7.4%), and subtotal colectomy (3.4%). The overall AL rate for this cohort was 3%, and the median length of hospital stay was six days (mean: 7.6 ± 5.1 days). POD3, POD4, and POD5 showed an area under the curve of 0.73 (P = 0.07), 0.90 (P = 0.001), and 0.95 (P = 0.002), respectively. An optimal CRP cut-off value of 160 mg/L on POD4 resulted in a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 83%, negative predictive value of 98%, and positive predictive value of 24%. Conclusion CRP is an excellent negative predictor of AL following colorectal resection and primary anastomosis. Patients with a POD4 CRP of <160 mg/L may be earmarked for hospital discharge if clinically appropriate.

Importance of timely and adequate source control in sepsis and septic shock

Source control is defined as the physical measures undertaken to eliminate the source of infection and control ongoing contamination, as well as restore anatomy and function at the site of infection. It is a key component of the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock and one of the main determinants of the outcome of infections that require source control. While not all infections may require source control, it should be considered in every patient presenting with sepsis; it is applicable and necessary in numerous infections, not only those occurring in the abdominal cavity. Although the biological rationale is clear, several aspects of source control remain under debate. The timing of source control may impact outcome; early source control is particularly relevant for patients with abdominal infections or necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections, as well as for those with more severe disease. Percutaneous procedures are increasingly used for source control; nevertheless, surgery-tailored to the patient and infection-remains a valid option for source control. For outcome optimization, adequate source control is more important than the strategy used. It should be acknowledged that source control interventions may often fail, posing a challenge in this setting. Thus, an individualized, multidisciplinary approach tailored to the infection and patient is preferable.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict postsurgical intra-abdominal infection in blunt abdominal trauma patients: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infection is a common complication of blunt abdominal trauma. Early detection and intervention can reduce the incidence of intra-abdominal infection and improve patients' prognoses. This study aims to construct a clinical model predicting postsurgical intra-abdominal infection after blunt abdominal trauma.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 553 patients with blunt abdominal trauma from the Department of General Surgery of 7 medical centers (2011-2021). A 7:3 ratio was used to assign patients to the derivation and validation cohorts. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether intra-abdominal infection occurred after blunt abdominal trauma. Multivariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used to select variables to establish a nomogram. The nomogram was evaluated, and the validity of the model was further evaluated by the validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 113 were diagnosed with intra-abdominal infection (20.4%). Age, prehospital time, C-reactive protein, injury severity score, operation duration, intestinal injury, neutrophils, and antibiotic use were independent risk factors for intra-abdominal infection in blunt abdominal trauma patients (P < .05). The area under the receiver operating curve (area under the curve) of derivation cohort and validation cohort was 0.852 (95% confidence interval, 0.784-0.912) and 0.814 (95% confidence interval, 0.751-0.902). The P value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was .135 and .891 in the 2 cohorts. The calibration curve demonstrated that the nomogram had a high consistency between prediction and practical observation. The decision curve analysis also showed that the nomogram had a better potential for clinical application. To facilitate clinical application, we have developed an online at https://nomogramcgz.shinyapps.io/IAIrisk/.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram is helpful in predicting the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal infection in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and provides guidance for clinical decision-making and treatment.

The Predictive Value of PCT and Other Infection Indicators in Postoperative Infection of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Purpose

To study the early predictive value of WBC, CRP and PCT on infectious complications after epithelial ovarian cancer surgery, draw ROC curves, and construct a nomogram prediction model.

Patients and Methods

The clinical data of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in Shengjing Hospital from August 2019 to August 2022 were included. The levels of WBC, CRP and PCT were statistically analyzed on the first, third and fifth days after surgery, and the ROC was plotted. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined independent influencing factors, individualized nomogram model for predicting the occurrence of postoperative infectious complications was constructed, and the correction curve was used for verification.

Results

A total of 116 patients were enrolled. The postoperative test levels of WBC, CRP and PCT were compared between two groups, and the differences on POD3 and POD5 were statistically significant. The ROC area on POD5 was 0.739, 0.838 and 0.804, respectively, better than that on POD3. Among them, CRP has the greatest value; The predicted value of the combined test of WBC, CRP and PCT on POD5 was greater than that of a single index on POD5. The nomogram model on POD5 was constructed, and the ROC analysis showed that it had a good degree of differentiation.

Conclusion

WBC, CRP and PCT can effectively predict the occurrence of postoperative infectious complications, among which CRP alone has the greatest diagnostic value on POD5, and the combined test value of the three indicators is higher than that of a single index. The nomogram model constructed by the combined indicators on POD5 can assess the risk individually.

Systematic use of the serum C-reactive protein concentration and computed tomography for the detection of intestinal anastomotic leaks

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to characterize the time-dependent relationship between serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and anastomotic integrity in the early post-operative period and to develop a systematic use of CRP and computed tomography.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or over who had the formation of a left-sided colonic or a colorectal anastomosis, in Royal Sussex County Hospital, were included. The post-operative day (POD) CRP cut-off values were calculated according to receiver operating characteristic analysis to evaluate the sensitivities and specificities of the proposed cut-off parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 125 left-sided colonic and colorectal anastomoses were recruited and analysed. When comparing to POD1 CRP cut-off, the calculated CRP ratio cut-off values of all the rest of PODs (2-5) were highly significant in the laparoscopic group and the overall group (P < 0.001). This statistically significant ratio was also demonstrated in the open group at POD2 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

CRP and CRP ratios cut-off values were sensitive to detect an anastomotic leak in the early post-operative period. The cut-off values could facilitate the development of systematic use of CRP and computed tomography.

Predictive factors for early- and late-onset surgical site infections in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. A multicentre, prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Europe. However, the risk factors for the development of early-onset (EO) and late-onset (LO) SSI have not been elucidated.

AIM

This study investigated the predictive factors for EO-SSI and LO-SSI in a large cohort of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We prospectively followed-up adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in 10 hospitals (2011-2014). Patients were divided into three groups: EO-SSI, LO-SSI, or no infection (no-SSI). The cut-off defining EO-SSI and LO-SSI was seven days (median time to SSI development). Different predictive factors for EO-SSI and LO-SSI were analysed, comparing each group with the no-SSI patients.

FINDINGS

Of 3701 patients, 320 (8.6%) and 349 (9.4%) developed EO-SSI and LO-SSI, respectively. The rest had no-SSI. Patients with EO-SSI were mostly males, had colon surgery and developed organ-space SSI whereas LO-SSI patients frequently received chemotherapy or radiotherapy and had incisional SSI. Male sex (odds ratio (OR): 1.92; P < 0.001), American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status >2 (OR: 1.51; P = 0.01), administration of mechanical bowel preparation (OR: 0.7; P = 0.03) and stoma creation (OR: 1.95; P < 0.001) predicted EO-SSI whereas rectal surgery (OR: 1.43; P = 0.03), prolonged surgery (OR: 1.4; P = 0.03) and previous chemotherapy (OR: 1.8; P = 0.03) predicted LO-SSI.

CONCLUSION

We found distinctive predictive factors for the development of SSI before and after seven days following elective colorectal surgery. These factors could help establish specific preventive measures in each group.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin and C-reactive Protein for the Early Diagnosis of Intra-abdominal Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) after elective colorectal surgery impact significantly the short- and long-term outcomes. In the era of fast-track surgery, they often come to light after discharge from hospital. Early diagnosis is therefore essential. C-reactive protein levels have proved to be accurate in this setting. Procalcitonin has been evaluated in several studies with conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the predictive abilities of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in the occurrence of IAIs after elective colorectal surgery.

METHODS

This meta-analysis included studies analyzing C-reactive protein and/or procalcitonin levels at postoperative days 2, 3, 4, and/or 5 as markers of intra-abdominal infection after elective colorectal surgery. Methodological quality was assessed by the QUADAS2 tool. The area under the curve summary receiver-operating characteristic was calculated for each day and each biomarker, using a random-effects model in cases of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 11 studies (2692 patients). An IAI occurred in 8.9% of the patients. On postoperative day 3, area under the curve was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85) for C-reactive protein and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.68-0.87) for procalcitonin. On postoperative day 5, their predictive accuracies were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.98), respectively. The accuracy of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin did not differ at any postoperative day.

CONCLUSIONS

Levels of inflammatory markers under the cutoff value between postoperative days 3 and 5 ensure safe early discharge after elective colorectal surgery. Procalcitonin seems not to have added value as compared to C-reactive protein in this setting.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Inflammatory Markers As Early Predictors of Infection After Elective Colorectal Surgery: Results From the IMACORS Study

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal infections are frequent and life-threatening complications after colorectal surgery. An early detection could diminish their clinical impact and permit safe early discharge.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to find the most accurate marker for the detection of postoperative intra-abdominal infection and the appropriate moment to measure it.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted in 3 centers. Consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis were included. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin were measured daily until the fourth postoperative day. Postoperative infections were recorded according to the definitions of the Centres for Diseases Control. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed and compared to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each marker.

RESULTS

Five-hundred and one patients were analyzed. The incidence of intra-abdominal infection was 11.8%, with 24.6% of patients presenting at least one infectious complication. Overall mortality was 1.2%. At the fourth postoperative day, C-reactive protein was more discriminating than procalcitonin for the detection of intra-abdominal infection (areas under the ROC curve: 0.775 vs 0.689, respectively, P = 0.03). Procalcitonin levels showed wide dispersion. For the detection of all infectious complications, C-reactive protein was also significantly more accurate than procalcitonin on the fourth postoperative day (areas under the ROC curve: 0.783 vs 0.671, P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

C-reactive protein is more accurate than procalcitonin for the detection of infectious complications and should be systematically measured at the fourth postoperative day. It is a useful tool to ensure a safe early discharge after elective colorectal surgery.

Ability of Serum C-Reactive Protein Concentrations to Predict Complications After Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

Inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC), are widely available in clinical practice. However, their predictive roles for infectious complications following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) have not been investigated. Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CRP concentrations and WBC counts for early detection of infectious complications following LAG and to construct a nomogram for clinical decision-making.The clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent LAG with curative intent between December 2013 and March 2015 were prospectively collected. Postoperative complications were recorded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The diagnostic value of CRP concentrations and WBC counts was evaluated by area under the curve of receiver-operating characteristic curves. Optimal cutoff values were determined by Youden index. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for complications, after which a nomogram was constructed.Twenty-nine of 278 patients (10.4%) who successfully underwent LAG developed major complications (grade ≥III). CRP concentration on postoperative day 3 (POD 3) and WBC count on POD 7 had the highest diagnostic accuracy for major complications with an area under the curve value of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.92] and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.56-0.79) respectively. An optimal cutoff value of 172.0 mg/L was identified for CRP, yielding a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.60-0.92) and specificity 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80). Multivariate analysis identified POD3 CRP concentrations ≥172.0 mg/L, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥1, presence of preoperative comorbidity, and operation time ≥240 min as risk factors for major complications after LAG.The optimal cut-off value of CRP on POD3 to predict complications following LAG was 172.0 mg/L and a CRP-based nomogram may contribute to early detection of complications after LAG.

Validation in colorectal procedures of a useful novel approach for the use of C-reactive protein in postoperative infectious complications

AIM

Our aim was to validate a novel use of C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement to identify postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, and to compare the predictive value in this setting against white blood cell (WBC) count and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

METHOD

This was a retrospective study of CRP, NLR and WBC measurements in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. CRP, NLR and WBC were recorded on the second postoperative day and on the day of infectious complication (patients who developed infectious complications) or within 3 days prior to discharge (subjects with no complications). The test for detecting infectious complications consisted of comparing the value of the inflammatory marker on the day on which a complication was suspected against the value recorded on the second postoperative day. The test was considered positive if a given value was higher than the registered peak at postoperative day 2. Factors influencing the postoperative peak CRP were also studied.

RESULTS

A total of 254 patients were retrospectively studied. Patients whose CRP value was higher than on the second postoperative day had a diagnostic accuracy for infectious complications of up to 94.4% and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of up to 97.4%, 93.4%, 85.7% and 99.1%, respectively. Poorer results were observed when WBC count and NLR were used rather than CRP measurement. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that surgical procedure and approach, as well as additional resections, were independent factors for 48 h peak CRP.

CONCLUSION

C-reactive protein is a better parameter than WBC count and NLR for detecting infectious complications. Our proposed methodology presents good diagnostic accuracy and performance and could potentially be used for any surgical procedure.

Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein to rule out infectious complications after major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Infectious complications occur frequently after major abdominal surgery and have a major influence on patient outcome and hospital costs. A marker that can rule out postoperative infectious complications (PICs) could aid patient selection for safe and early hospital discharge. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a widely available, fast, and cheap marker that might be of value in detecting PIC. Present meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic value of CRP to rule out PIC following major abdominal surgery, aiding patient selection for early discharge.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane was performed identifying all prospective studies evaluating the diagnostic value of CRP after abdominal surgery. Meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included for qualitative analysis of which 16 studies were eligible for meta-analysis, representing 2215 patients. Most studies analyzed the value of CRP in colorectal surgery (eight studies). The pooled negative predictive value (NPV) improved each day after surgery up to 90% at postoperative day (POD) 3 for a pooled CRP cutoff of 159 mg/L (range 92-200). Maximum predictive values for PICs were reached on POD 5 for a pooled CRP cutoff of 114 mg/L (range 48-150): a pooled sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79-91%), specificity of 86% (95% CI 75-92%), and a positive predictive value of 64% (95% CI 49-77%). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were significantly higher on POD 5 than on other PODs (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Infectious complications after major abdominal surgery are very unlikely in patients with a CRP below 159 mg/L on POD 3. This can aid patient selection for safe and early hospital discharge and prevent overuse of imaging.

Inflammatory markers as predictors of surgical site infection after elective colorectal cancer surgery

We raise some doubts regarding the methods, results and conclusions obtained by Takakura et al. in their article published in the August's issue of the journal about the use of inflammatory markers as early predictors of surgical infection after colorectal cancer surgery.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies have investigated the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) as an early marker of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the predictive value of CRP in this setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of postoperative CRP for anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. A meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model and pooled predictive parameters were determined along with a CRP cut-off value at each postoperative day (POD).

RESULTS

Seven studies, with a total of 2483 patients, were included. The pooled prevalence of leakage was 9·6 per cent and the median day on which leakage was diagnosed ranged from POD 6 to 9. The serum CRP level on POD 3, 4 and 5 had comparable diagnostic accuracy for the development of an anastomotic leak with a pooled area under the curve of 0·81 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·75 to 0·86), 0·80 (0·74 to 0·86) and 0·80 (0·73 to 0·87) respectively. The derived CRP cut-off values were 172 mg/l on POD 3, 124 mg/l on POD 4 and 144 mg/l on POD 5; these corresponded to a negative predictive value of 97 per cent and a negative likelihood ratio of 0·26-0·33. All three time points had a low positive predictive value for leakage, ranging between 21 and 23 per cent.

CONCLUSION

CRP is a useful negative predictive test for the development of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery.