Comparative Study of Drainage and Antibiotics versus Drainage Only in the Management of Primary Subcutaneous Abscesses

Purulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections, Challenging the Practice of Incision and Drainage: A Scoping Review

Aim

To generate a landscape of the current knowledge in the interventional management and outcomes of purulent skin and soft tissue infections.

Design

This study is a scoping review.

Methods

Electronic searches were undertaken using CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane Library, British Nursing Index, Science Direct, the National Health Service knowledge and library hub, ClinicalTrials.gov, and MedNar. The population, concept, context framework, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews were utilised, supporting a rigorous appraisal and synthesis of literature. Data Sources. The initial search and synthesis of literature were completed in January 2022 with repeat searches completed in March 2022 and July 2023. There were no imposed chronological parameters placed on the returned literature.

Results

Nineteen papers were reviewed. Incision and drainage with primary closure, needle aspiration, loop drainage, catheter drainage, and suction drainage are viable adjuncts or alternatives to the traditional surgical management of skin and soft tissue abscesses.

Conclusion

Despite the empirically favourable alternatives to the incision and drainage technique demonstrated, this does not appear to be driving a change in clinical practice. Future research must now look to mixed and qualitative evidence to understand the causative mechanisms of incision and drainage and its ritualistic practice. Implications. Ritual surgical practices must be challenged if nurses are to improve the treatment and management of this patient group. This will lead to further practice innovation. Impact: This study explored the challenges posed to patients, clinicians, nurses, and stakeholders, resulting from the ritualistic practice of the incision and drainage technique in purulent skin or soft tissue abscesses. Empirically and holistically viable alternatives were identified, impacting all identified entities and recommending a wider holistic study. Reporting Method. Adherence to EQUATOR guidance was achieved through the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

International survey evaluating treatment of primary superficial skin abscesses

INTRODUCTION

Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI) present regularly as cutaneous abscesses which require surgical drainage. These abscesses often affect younger patients and interfere with their independency substantially. Existing guidelines display heterogeneous recommendations concerning surgical aftercare. Primary aim of this survey was to present a nomogram for standard abscess therapy based on international expert opinions.

METHOD

An online survey dealing with standard of care protocols for cutaneous abscesses concerning surgical treatment and aftercare was created. The survey was conducted in 2017 during two international conferences held in Switzerland.

RESULT

490 surgeons originating from 66 nations participated in this survey with the majority coming from Europe and Asia. Indication for surgery, operation type, and wound rinsing were answered homogeneously. Perioperative setting (45% sterile, 55% semi-sterile), anesthesia (45% local, 55% general), antibiotic therapy (38% always, 35% never, 27% other), irrigation fluid (54% sterile, 32% non-sterile, 14% antiseptic), irrigation frequency (55% once daily, 30% twice daily), and wound dressing (69% packing, 31% coverage) were heterogeneously answered topics.

CONCLUSION

Treatment and aftercare of simple primary skin abscesses are processed heterogeneously throughout the world. Focus should be on optimal patient focused treatment with minimal socio-economic impact. Future studies should focus on the validation of the different postoperative treatment options with the aim to develop a socio-economically accepted algorithm.