Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Application of Nucleic Acid-Based Strategies to Detect Infectious Pathogens in Orthopaedic Implant-Related Infection

➤

Implant-associated infection in orthopaedic surgery remains an enormous and largely unsolved clinical problem with a high rate of persistent or recurrent infection. This may be due, at least in part, to the potential for underdiagnosis by traditional microbial culture or the potential for culture to incompletely identify the microbial species present.

➤

Nucleic acid-based diagnostic techniques, focused on using the diagnostic information contained in DNA or RNA to identify microbial species, have been developing rapidly and have garnered escalating interest for both clinical and research applications.

➤

Commonly applied techniques include end-point polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing. Understanding the specific strengths and weaknesses of each technique is critical to understanding their utility, applying the correct assessment strategy, and critically understanding and interpreting research.

➤

The best practices for interpreting nucleic acid-based diagnostic techniques include considering positive and negative controls, reads per sample, detection thresholds (for differentiating contaminants from positive results), and the primer set or targeted regions.

Thromboelastography parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection and predicting reimplantation timing

BACKGROUND

Coagulation-related biomarkers are drawing new attention in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The thromboelastography (TEG) assay provides a comprehensive assessment of blood coagulation; therefore, it could be a promising test for PJI. This study aims to assess the value of TEG in diagnosing PJI and to determine the clinical significance of TEG in analysing reimplantation timing for second-stage revision.

METHODS

From October 2017 to September 2020, 62 patients who underwent revision arthroplasty were prospectively included. PJI was defined by the 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, in which 23 patients were diagnosed with PJI (Group A), and the remaining 39 patients were included as having aseptic loosening (Group B). In group A, 17 patients completed a two-stage revision in our centre. C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), D-dimer, and TEG parameters (clotting time, α-angle, MA [maximum amplitude], amplitude at 30 min, and thrombodynamic potential index) were measured preoperatively in all included patients. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of these biomarkers.

RESULTS

ESR (area under curve [AUC], 0.953; sensitivity, 81.82; specificity, 94.87) performed best for PJI diagnosis, followed by MA (AUC, 0.895; sensitivity, 82.61; specificity, 97.44) and CRP (AUC, 0.893; sensitivity, 82.61; specificity, 94.74). When these biomarkers were combined in pairs, the diagnostic value improved compared with any individual biomarker. The overall success rate of the two-stage revision was 100%. Furthermore, ESR and MA were valuable in determining the time of reimplantation, and their values all decreased below the cut-off values before reimplantation.

CONCLUSION

TEG could be a promising test in assisting PJI diagnosis, and a useful tool in judging the proper timing of reimplantation.