Macrocalcifications Do Not Alter Malignancy Risk Within the American Thyroid Association Sonographic Pattern System When Present in Non-High Suspicion Thyroid Nodules

Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system

PURPOSE

To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.

RESULTS

Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.

CONCLUSION

AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.

Evaluating the Diagnostic Role of ACR-TIRADS and Bethesda Classifications in Thyroid Nodules Highlighted by Cyto-Histopathological Studies

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of thyroid imaging reporting and data system (ACR-TIRADS) and the Bethesda system for reporting cytopathology (TBSRCP) classifications for identifying or ruling out thyroid malignancy in relation to the gold standard (post-surgical pathology).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 573 patients with single or multiple thyroid nodules. Patients were evaluated using the TIRADS and the TBSRCP classification. The data from a cohort of patients who underwent surgery (77/573, 13.4%) were correlated with post-operative pathology and the relevant clinical features of the patients.

RESULTS

Of 573 patients, 545 (95.1%) were euthyroid, 24 (4.1%) were hypothyroid, and 4 (0.8%) were hyperthyroid; 419 (73.1%) had benign nodules (Bethesda II), 115 (20.1%) had intermediate (Bethesda III, IV), and 39 (6.8%) had Bethesda V and VI nodules. Four-hundred twenty (73.3%) patients were categorized as TIRADS 2,3, and 153 (26.7%) were categorized as TIRADS 4,5. The Bethesda and TIRADS classifications concorded significantly in thyroid nodule diagnosis (K=14.9%, P<0.001).Thyroid malignancy was significantly associated with microcalcification and interrupted halo, while benign nodules were significantly associated with macrocalcification and complete halo type (P=0.041, P=0.005, respectively). The TBSRCP could significantly detect malignant thyroid nodules with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 64.1%, 98.1%, 85.0%, and 94.1%, respectively (K=88.2%, P<0.001), while the respective values for the TIRADS classification were 63.5%, 76.0%, 84.6%, and 50.0% (K=34.8%, P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TIRADS and TBSRCP are essential primary steps for evaluating thyroid nodules and both are complimentary. Hence, each patient with thyroid nodules should be evaluated by both approaches before opting for surgery. Highly suspicious TIRADS categories TR4 and TR5 need further evaluation by fine needle aspiration cytology.

Improvement in thyroid ultrasound report quality with radiologists' adherence to 2015 ATA or 2017 TIRADS: a population study

Objectives

There has been slow adoption of thyroid ultrasound guidelines with adherence rates as low as 30% and no population-based studies investigating adherence to guideline-based malignancy risk assessment. We therefore evaluated the impact of adherence to the 2015 ATA guidelines or 2017 ACR-TIRADS guidelines on the quality of thyroid ultrasound reports in our healthcare region.

Methods

We reviewed 899 thyroid ultrasound reports of patients who received fine-needle aspiration biopsy and were diagnosed with Bethesda III or IV nodules or thyroid cancer. Ultrasounds were reported by radiology group 1, group 2, or other groups, and were divided into pre-2018 (before guideline adherence) or 2018 onwards. Reports were given a utility score (0-6) based on how many relevant nodule characteristics were included.

Results

Group 1 had a pre-2018 utility score of 3.62 and 39.4% classification reporting rate, improving to 5.77 and 97.0% among 2018-onwards reports. Group 2 had a pre-2018 score of 2.8 and reporting rate of 11.5%, improving to 5.58 and 93.3%. Other radiology groups had a pre-2018 score of 2.49 and reporting rate of 32.2%, improving to 3.28 and 61.8%. Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher utility scores and reporting rates in their 2018-onward reports when compared to other groups' 2018-onward reports, pre-2018 group 1 reports, and pre-2018 group 2 reports.

Conclusions

Dedicated adherence to published thyroid ultrasound reporting guidelines can lead to improvements in report quality. This will reduce diagnostic ambiguity and improve clinician's decision-making, leading to overall reductions in unnecessary FNA biopsy and diagnostic surgery.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for calcified benign thyroid nodules: results of over 5 years' follow-up

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating calcified benign thyroid nodules (CBTNs).

Methods

Fifty-two patients with 52 CBTNs who underwent RFA in our hospital were included in this retrospective study. According to the size of calcifications, CBTNs were divided into two groups: the punctate echogenic foci (PEF) group and macrocalcification group. Moreover, the macrocalcification group was further subdivided into two groups, the strong group and the weak group, based on their morphologic characteristics. After the RFA procedure, routine ultrasound (US) and clinical evaluation were performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively and every 12 months thereafter.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 68.98 ± 7.68 months (60–87 months), and the 5-year mean volume reduction rate (VRR) after RFA was 92.95%, with a complication rate of 0.6% (3/52). The mean initial volume of the macrocalcification group was significantly larger than that of the PEF group (9.94 ± 24.60 ml vs. 0.23 ± 0.22 ml, respectively; P = 0.011). Thus, their VRRs were not comparable between the two groups. However, baseline characteristics did not show statistically significant differences between the strong and weak macrocalcification subgroups. The VRRs of the strong subgroup were significantly lower than those of the weak subgroup at the 3-year, 4-year, and 5-year follow-ups.

Conclusion

RFA was effective and safe for treating CBTNs. Strong macrocalcification was related to the VRR of CBTNs after the RFA procedure.

Ultrasonography of the thyroid, parathyroids, and beyond

Background

Ultrasonography has become an essential tool for the evaluation and management of thyroid and parathyroid diseases. Its applications extend beyond neck endocrine conditions to a multitude of pathologies within the head and neck region.

Objectives

Our study aimed to: (1) provide a broad review of neck ultrasonography and key findings in neck endocrine diseases; (2) support skilled performance office-based diagnostic ultrasonography and its varied applications.

Materials and methods

A review of the current literature was supplemented with clinical examples of key ultrasonographic findings.

Results

Current applications and key findings of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of neck endocrine conditions are reviewed.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography is a fundamental component in the evaluation and management of neck endocrine diseases. The reader is encouraged to use this review to enhance office-based performance and application of ultrasonography.

Video online

The online version of this article contains 11 additional videos. They are provided to illustrate some of the dynamic aspects of US performance. The article and the videos are available online (10.1007/s00106-022-01162-0). The videos can be found in the article back matter as “Electronic Supplementary Material”.