Prevalence of Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer in Individuals with a First-Degree Family History of Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Sonographic Screening

Thyroid nodules: diagnosis and management

Thyroid nodules, with a prevalence of almost 25% in the general population, are a common occurrence. Their prevalence varies considerably depending on demographics such as age and sex as well as the presence of risk factors. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, risk stratification and current management strategies for thyroid nodules, with a particular focus on changes in diagnostic and therapeutic protocols that have occurred over the past 10 years. Several sonography-based stratification systems (such as Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS)) might help to predict the malignancy risk of nodules, potentially eliminating the need for biopsy in many instances. However, large or suspicious nodules necessitate cytological evaluation following fine-needle aspiration biopsy for accurate classification. In the case of cytology yielding indeterminate results, additional tools, such as molecular testing, can assist in guiding the management plan. Surgery is no longer the only treatment for symptomatic or malignant nodules: active surveillance or local ablative treatments might be beneficial for appropriately selected patients. To enhance clinician-patient interactions and discussions about diagnostic options, shared decision-making tools have been developed. A personalized, risk-based protocol promotes high-quality care while minimizing costs and unnecessary testing.

Value of repeated US-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNAB) in the follow-up of benign thyroid nodules: a real-life study based on the MoCyThy (Modena's Cytology of the Thyroid) DATABASE with a revision of the literature

PURPOSE

The utility of repeating ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNAB) in the follow-up of benign (THY2) thyroid nodules is still debated. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic value of re-biopsy of thyroid nodules following an initially benign result.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed US-FNABs performed at the Unit of Endocrinology of Modena from 2006 to 2009. The firstly benign cytological result was compared with the cytological results of subsequent US-FNABs (2nd and/or 3rd) executed on the same nodule.

RESULTS

Among 10449 US-FNABs, 6270 (60%) received a THY2 cytological categorization. Of them, 278 (4.43%) underwent a subsequent US-FNAB: 86.7% maintained the same cytology, 32 (11.5%) changed to THY3 (indeterminate) and 5 (1.8%) to THY4 (suspicious of malignancy). Among the 24 nodules addressed to surgery, 9 (37%) were histologically malignant, with an overall miss rate of 3.2%. Male patients had higher risk of discordant results at subsequent US-FNAB (p = 0.005, OR:3.59, 95%CI:1.453-7.769) while dimensional increase above 5 mm was predictive of concordant benign cytology (p = 0.036, OR:0.249, 95%CI:0.068-0.915). Age, suspicious US characteristics, and distance between US-FNABs resulted not predictive.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-biopsy of benign nodules confirmed the benign nature in most cases. In case of discordant cytology, relocation in indeterminate category was the most common. The histological diagnosis of cancer occurred in one quarter of nodules surgically removed, with a low overall clinically significant miss rate. Thus, a small percentage of false negatives exists; males and subjects with US suspicious nodules should be carefully followed-up, considering case by case re-biopsy possibility.

Ultrasound screening for thyroid nodules and cancer in individuals with family history of thyroid cancer: a micro-costing approach

PURPOSE

Screening programs that target healthy populations are an important tool for identifying unrecognized, asymptomatic disease. However, ultrasound screening for thyroid cancer has no obvious advantage in terms of cost-effectiveness in asymptomatic adults. There is far less consensus (and data) on the indications for screening in high-risk individuals. The aim of the study was to estimate the costs of ultrasound screening for individuals with first-degree family history of thyroid cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2018 in the Thyroid Cancer Outpatient Clinic of a large teaching hospital in Rome, Italy. We estimated the costs of an ultrasound screening protocol using the micro-costing bottom-up method.

RESULTS

For individuals without thyroid nodules, the screening examination had an estimated cost of €66.21 per screenee. For those found to have unsuspicious nodules, the estimated cost rose to €119.52 per screenee, owing to the addition of thyroid function tests. The estimated cost of screening for a subject with newly diagnosed nodules that were submitted to cytology was €259.89. The total cost of screening for the entire population of 1176 individuals was € 118,133.85. The total expenditure to confirm a single thyroid cancer diagnosis was €10,598.71.

CONCLUSION

A sonographic screening implies a significant direct expenditure and is likely to detect a very large number of individuals with benign nodules (more than 45 asymptomatic individuals are diagnosed with a thyroid nodule for each newly detected cancer case), whose long-term follow-up will further increase healthcare costs.