Case triage model for the practice of telepathology

Invention and Early History of Telepathology (1985-2000)

This narrative-based paper provides a first-person account of the early history of telepathology (1985–2000) by the field's inventor, Ronald S. Weinstein, M. D. During the 1980s, Dr. Weinstein, a Massachusetts General Hospital-trained pathologist, was director of the Central Pathology Laboratory (CPL) for the National Cancer Institute-funded National Bladder Cancer Project, located at Rush Medical College in Chicago, IL. The CPL did post therapy revalidations of surgical pathology and cytopathology diagnoses before outcomes of the completed clinical trials were published. The CPL reported that interobserver variability was invalidating inclusion of dozens of treated bladder cancer patients in published reports on treatment outcomes. This problem seemed ripe for a technology-assisted solution. In an effort to solve the interobserver variability problem, Dr. Weinstein devised a novel solution, dynamic-robotic telepathology, that would potentially enable CPL uropathologists to consult on distant uropathology cases in real-time before their assignment to urinary bladder cancer, tumor stage, and grade-specific clinical trials. During the same period, universities were ramping up their support for faculty entrepreneurism and creating in-house technology transfer organizations. Dr. Weinstein recognized telepathology as a potential growth industry. He and his sister, Beth Newburger, were a successful brother–sister entrepreneur team. Their PC-based education software business, OWLCAT™, had just been acquired by Digital Research Inc., a leading software company, located in California. With funding from the COMSAT Corporation, a publically traded satellite communications company, the Weinstein-Newburger team brought the earliest dynamic-robotic telepathology systems to market. Dynamic-robotic telepathology became a dominant telepathology technology in the late 1990s. Dr. Weinstein, a serial entrepreneur, continued to innovate and, with a team of optical scientists at The University of Arizona's College of Optical Sciences, developed the first sub-1-min whole-slide imaging system, the DMetrix DX-40 scanner, in the early 2000s.

Telepathology Impacts and Implementation Challenges: A Scoping Review

CONTEXT

Telepathology is a particular form of telemedicine that fundamentally alters the way pathology services are delivered. Prior reviews in this area have mostly focused on 2 themes, namely technical feasibility issues and diagnosis accuracy.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize the literature on telepathology implementation challenges and broader organizational and societal impacts and to propose a research agenda to guide future efforts in this domain.

DATA SOURCES

Two complementary databases were systematically searched: MEDLINE (PubMed) and ABI/INFORM (ProQuest). Peer-reviewed articles and conference proceedings were considered. The final sample consisted of 159 papers published between 1992 and 2013.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the diversity of telepathology networks and the importance of considering these distinctions when interpreting research findings. Various network structures are associated with different benefits. Although the dominant rationale in single-site projects is financial, larger centralized and decentralized telepathology networks are targeting a more diverse set of benefits, including extending access to pathology to a whole region, achieving substantial economies of scale in workforce and equipment, and improving quality by standardizing care. Importantly, our synthesis reveals that the nature and scale of encountered implementation challenges also varies depending on the network structure. In smaller telepathology networks, organizational concerns are less prominent, and implementers are more focused on usability issues. As the network scope widens, organizational and legal issues gain prominence.

Subspecialty surgical pathologist's performances as triage pathologists on a telepathology-enabled quality assurance surgical pathology service: A human factors study

BACKGROUND

The case triage practice workflow model was used to manage incoming cases on a telepathology-enabled surgical pathology quality assurance (QA) service. Maximizing efficiency of workflow and the use of pathologist time requires detailed information on factors that influence telepathologists' decision-making on a surgical pathology QA service, which was gathered and analyzed in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical pathology report reviews and telepathology service logs were audited, for 1862 consecutive telepathology QA cases accrued from a single Arizona rural hospital over a 51 month period. Ten university faculty telepathologists served as the case readers. Each telepathologist had an area of subspecialty surgical pathology expertise (i.e. gastrointestinal pathology, dermatopathology, etc.) but functioned largely as a general surgical pathologist while on this telepathology-enabled QA service. They handled all incoming cases during their individual 1-h telepathology sessions, regardless of the nature of the organ systems represented in the real-time incoming stream of outside surgical pathology cases.

RESULTS

The 10 participating telepathologists' postAmerican Board of pathology examination experience ranged from 3 to 36 years. This is a surrogate for age. About 91% of incoming cases were immediately signed out regardless of the subspecialty surgical pathologists' area of surgical pathology expertise. One hundred and seventy cases (9.13%) were deferred. Case concurrence rates with the provisional surgical pathology diagnosis of the referring pathologist, for incoming cases, averaged 94.3%, but ranged from 88.46% to 100% for individual telepathologists. Telepathology case deferral rates, for second opinions or immunohistochemistry, ranged from 4.79% to 21.26%. Differences in concordance rates and deferral rates among telepathologists, for incoming cases, were significant but did not correlate with years of experience as a practicing pathologist. Coincidental overlaps of the area of subspecialty surgical pathology expertise with organ-related incoming cases did not influence decisions by the telepathologists to either defer those cases or to agree or disagree with the referring pathologist's provisional diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Subspecialty surgical pathologists effectively served as general surgical pathologists on a telepathology-based surgical pathology QA service. Concurrence rates with incoming surgical pathology report diagnoses, and case deferral rates, varied significantly among the 10 on-service telepathologists. We found no evidence that the higher deferral rates correlated with improving the accuracy or quality of the surgical pathology reports.

Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future

Telepathology, the practice of pathology at a long distance, has advanced continuously since 1986. Today, fourth-generation telepathology systems, so-called virtual slide telepathology systems, are being used for education applications. Both conventional and innovative surgical pathology diagnostic services are being designed and implemented as well. The technology has been commercialized by more than 30 companies in Asia, the United States, and Europe. Early adopters of telepathology have been laboratories with special challenges in providing anatomic pathology services, ranging from the need to provide anatomic pathology services at great distances to the use of the technology to increase efficiency of services between hospitals less than a mile apart. As to what often happens in medicine, early adopters of new technologies are professionals who create model programs that are successful and then stimulate the creation of infrastructure (ie, reimbursement, telecommunications, information technologies, and so on) that forms the platforms for entry of later, mainstream, adopters. The trend at medical schools, in the United States, is to go entirely digital for their pathology courses, discarding their student light microscopes, and building virtual slide laboratories. This may create a generation of pathology trainees who prefer digital pathology imaging over the traditional hands-on light microscopy. The creation of standards for virtual slide telepathology is early in its development but accelerating. The field of telepathology has now reached a tipping point at which major corporations now investing in the technology will insist that standards be created for pathology digital imaging as a value added business proposition. A key to success in teleradiology, already a growth industry, has been the implementation of standards for digital radiology imaging. Telepathology is already the enabling technology for new, innovative laboratory services. Examples include STAT QA surgical pathology second opinions at a distance and a telehealth-enabled rapid breast care service. The innovative bundling of telemammography, telepathology, and teleoncology services may represent a new paradigm in breast care that helps address the serious issue of fragmentation of breast cancer care in the United States and elsewhere. Legal and regulatory issues in telepathology are being addressed and are regarded as a potential catalyst for the next wave of telepathology advances, applications, and implementations.

The use of digital imaging, video conferencing, and telepathology in histopathology: a national survey

AIMS

To undertake a large scale survey of histopathologists in the UK to determine the current infrastructure, training, and attitudes to digital pathology.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to 500 consultant histopathologists randomly selected from the membership of the Royal College of Pathologists in the UK.

RESULTS

There was a response rate of 47%. Sixty four per cent of respondents had a digital camera mounted on their microscope, but only 12% had any sort of telepathology equipment. Thirty per cent used digital images in electronic presentations at meetings at least once a year and only 24% had ever used telepathology in a diagnostic situation. Fifty nine per cent had received no training in digital imaging. Fifty eight per cent felt that the medicolegal implications of duty of care were a barrier to its use. A large proportion of pathologists (69%) were interested in using video conferencing for remote attendance at multidisciplinary team meetings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a reasonable level of equipment and communications infrastructure among histopathologists in the UK but a very low level of training. There is resistance to the use of telepathology in the diagnostic context but enthusiasm for the use of video conferencing in multidisciplinary team meetings.

Telecytology in Hokkaido Island, Japan: results of primary telecytodiagnosis of routine cases

In 1997, an Internet-based static image telepathology system was built at Sapporo National Hospital, Japan. We can exchange high-resolution microscopical images through a file transfer protocol server and discuss cytological findings and diagnosis on an electronic mailing list. We applied the system to primary telecytodiagnosis. From May 1997 to April 1999 we have made diagnoses of 614 daily cases only by looking at the video monitor images transmitted from the cytotechnologist of Wakkanai Municipal Hospital 300 km distant from Sapporo. The concordance between telecytodiagnosis and glass slide diagnosis was 88.6%. Kappa statistics for cervical smears was 0.919 and that for specimens other than uterine cervix was 0.810. The accuracy of telecytodiagnosis was 91.4%, and was not substantially different from that of the conventional mail-based cytology in a previous year. We had five cases with a severely inappropriate diagnosis in telecytology, all of which however were quickly corrected by follow-up histological or cytological specimens. With the use of an electronic mailing list the participants had quick and sufficient discussions. We conclude that telecytology is very useful for primary cytodiagnosis in regional medicine and that it may raise the accuracy of cytodiagnosis in future, if we make consistent efforts to reflect the benefits of telecytology in daily practices. This is the first report of clinical results of telecytology from Japan.

Telepathology overview: from concept to implementation

Telepathology is the practice of pathology at a distance by using video imaging and telecommunications. Significant progress has been made in telepathology. To date, 12 classes of telepathology systems have been engineered. Rapid and ultrarapid virtual slide processors may further expand the range of telepathology applications. Next-generation digital imaging light microscopes, such as miniaturized microscope arrays (MMA), may make virtual slide processing a routine laboratory tool. Diagnostic accuracy of telepathology is comparable with that of conventional light microscopy for most diagnoses. Current telepathology applications include intraoperative frozen sections services, routine surgical pathology services, second opinions, and subspecialty consultations. Three telepathology practice models are discussed: the subspecialty practice (SSP) model; the case triage practice (CTP) model; and the virtual group practice (VGP) model. Human factors influence performance with telepathology. Experience with 500 telepathology cases from multiple organs significantly reduces the video viewing time per case (P < .01). Many technology innovations can be represented as S-curves. After long incubation periods, technology use and/or efficiency may accelerate. Telepathology appears to be following an S-curve for a technical innovation.

Experience-related differences in diagnosis from medical images displayed on monitors

OBJECTIVE

To compare diagnostic accuracy using conventional versus monitor-displayed medical images in order to determine if years of experience as a board-certified clinician influences diagnostic performance in either modality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In separate observer performance studies, six radiologists and six pathologists differing in years of experience viewed clinical images, once in the conventional modality (X-ray film or light microscopy) and once using a monitor display. Readers also were surveyed regarding their experience with digital/video display systems.

RESULTS

In both studies, performance was similar for conventional and monitor modalities. For the conventional displays, there was a positive correlation between years of clinical experience and performance. For the monitor displays, however, there was a strong negative correlation between years of clinical experience and performance. Performance using the monitor displays correlated highly with experience using digital/video systems in general.

CONCLUSION

More exposure to and use of monitor displays, such as recreational video games and computers, may influence positively the clinician-monitor display system interaction and improve diagnostic performance.

Blueprint for multimedia telemedicine networks in the Rocky Mountain Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN-19)

A multimedia telemedicine network is proposed for a VISN-19 test bed and it will include picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). Initial tests have been performed, and the technical feasibility of the basic plan has been demonstrated.

Provider attitudes toward a rural telepathology program

OBJECTIVE

To assess the attitudes of referring and consulting pathologists toward a recently initiated live video telepathology network in rural Vermont.

METHODS

A semistructured interview was conducted with each referring pathologist before implementation of the telepathology program and again 9 months later. The interview consisted of questions concerning reasons for seeking a consultation in general and attitudes toward telepathology specifically. A questionnaire with Likert-type response categories was administered at the 9-month timepoint to the referring (N = 4) and consulting (N = 10) pathologists. This questionnaire contained items regarding communication, cost, education, quality, and timeliness aspects of telepathology. In addition, a brief mail survey was sent to attending physicians who utilized pathology services at the rural hospitals.

RESULTS

The referring pathologists found the timeliness of consults using telemedicine to be a significant advantage. They also cited educational benefits both from attending telepathology conferences and from the interactive nature of the consultations. Two areas of concern were difficulties in minimizing scheduling inconveniences and uncertainty about the financial sustainability of the network. Overall, the telepathology system was well received by the consulting pathologists. Recurrent technical difficulties with the system were mentioned as a problem area.

CONCLUSION

The pathologists participating in the Vermont telepathology network have reported benefiting from using this technology. Whether these benefits will outweight the costs of using telepathology for routine consultations remains to be determined.

Diagnostic accuracy of a rural live video telepathology system

Accuracy of diagnoses rendered using a live video telepathology network was assessed for permanent sections of surgical pathology specimens. To determine accuracy, telepathology diagnoses were compared with those obtained by directly viewing the glass slide using a standard microscope. A total of 294 cases were read via both telepathology and glass slide by attending pathologists at a tertiary care medical center. Overall accuracy was defined as exact concordance between diagnoses. Clinically insignificant differences in diagnoses were excluded to determine clinically significant accuracy. For the 285 cases with complete data, the overall accuracy for telepathology was 0.912 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.872-0.941), whereas the overall accuracy for glass slide readings was 0.968 (95% CI, 0.939-0.985). This difference is statistically significant (p = 0.009). When focusing on clinically significant discrepancies, where the difference in diagnosis might affect therapeutic decisions, the video accuracy was only slightly less than the glass slide accuracy (0.965 [95% CI, 0.934-0.982] vs. 0.982 [95% CI, 0.957-0.994], respectively), but this difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.302). Most of the cases with clinically significant differences involved lesions with inherently high interobserver variation. Certainty of diagnosis did not differ between video and glass slide readings (p = 0.911), but there was an association between certainty of diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy for video (p = 0.003 for clinically significant accuracies). Based on these findings, we recommend when using this telepathology system that only preliminary diagnoses should be given in the following situations: for diagnostic areas with known high interobserver variability; when the consultant has any degree of uncertainty about the presence or absence of the lesion in question; and when there is insufficient experience using telepathology as a diagnostic medium.

Dynamic-robotic telepathology: Department of Veterans Affairs feasibility study

In this retrospective study, we assess the accuracy, confidence levels, and viewing times of two generalist pathologists using both dynamic-robotic telepathology and conventional light microscopy (LM) to render diagnoses on a test set of 100 consecutive routine surgical pathology cases. The objective is to determine whether telepathology will allow a pathology group practice at a diagnostic hub to provide routine diagnostic services to a remote hospital without an on-site pathologist. For TP, glass slides were placed on the motorized stage of the robotic microscope of a telepathology system by a senior laboratory technologist in Iron Mountain, MI. Real-time control of the motorized microscope was then transferred to a pathologist in Milwaukee, WI, who viewed images of the glass slides on a video monitor. The telepathologists deferred rendering a diagnosis in 1.5% of cases. Clinically important concordance between the individual diagnoses rendered by telepathology and the "truth" diagnoses established by rereview of glass slides was 98.5%. In the telepathology mode, there were five incorrect diagnoses out of a total of 197 diagnoses. In four cases in which the telepathology diagnosis was incorrect, the pathologist's diagnosis by LM was identical to that rendered by telepathology. These represent errors of interpretation and cannot be ascribed to telepathology. The certainty of the pathologists with respect to their diagnoses was evaluated over time. Results for the first 50 cases served as baseline data. For the second 50 cases, confidence in rendering a diagnosis in the telepathology mode was essentially identical to that of making a diagnosis in the LM viewing mode. Viewing times in the telepathology mode also improved with more experience using the telepathology system. These results support the concept that an off-site pathologist using dynamic-robotic telepathology can substitute for an on-site pathologist as a service provider.

Diagnostic accuracy of an international static-imaging telepathology consultation service

Static-image and dynamic- (real-time) image telepathology are competing technologies. Although some studies suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of the dynamic-image telepathology approaches the accuracy of light microscopy, few reports have documented the diagnostic accuracy of static-image telepathology as used in the setting of an actual surgical pathology consultation practice. We report the results of an analysis of 171 telepathology consultation cases submitted to the Arizona-International Telemedicine Network (AITN). Digital images were submitted by pathologists from six participating institutions in Arizona, Mexico, and China. Telepathologists could render a telepathology diagnosis (TP) or defer rendering a diagnosis to obtain additional video images, glass slides for detailed analysis, or to obtain tissue blocks for special studies such as immunohistochemistry. The telepathologists rendered diagnoses for 144 cases and deferred 27 cases. Two pathologists retrospectively evaluated-glass slides from each case and rendered a consensus glass slide (GS) "truth" diagnosis. There was 88.2% concordance between TP and GS diagnoses (127 of 144 diagnoses). Concordance of 96.5% was achieved for clinically important diagnoses (139 of 144 diagnoses). Telepathologists deferred making a diagnosis to obtain glass slides for conventional light microscopy in 14 cases (8.1%) and for results of immunohistochemistry studies in 13 cases (7.6%). Thus, correct diagnoses were rendered by static-image telepathology in 127 of 171 cases (74.3%) at the time of telepathology diagnostic sessions. Inappropriate field selection and sampling biases of referring pathologists, as well as a tendency of static-image telepathologists to underestimate the complexity of some cases, may reduce the value of consultations based on the viewing of static images.