1
|
Kim J, Olaiya MT, De Silva DA, Norrving B, Bosch J, De Sousa DA, Christensen HK, Ranta A, Donnan GA, Feigin V, Martins S, Schwamm LH, Werring DJ, Howard G, Owolabi M, Pandian J, Mikulik R, Thayabaranathan T, Cadilhac DA. Global stroke statistics 2023: Availability of reperfusion services around the world. Int J Stroke 2024; 19:253-270. [PMID: 37853529 PMCID: PMC10903148 DOI: 10.1177/17474930231210448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in the availability of reperfusion services for acute ischemic stroke are considerable globally and require urgent attention. Contemporary data on the availability of reperfusion services in different countries are used to provide the necessary evidence to prioritize where access to acute stroke treatment is needed. AIMS To provide a snapshot of published literature on the provision of reperfusion services globally, including when facilitated by telemedicine or mobile stroke unit services. METHODS We searched PubMed to identify original articles, published up to January 2023 for the most recent, representative, and relevant patient-level data for each country. Keywords included thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy and telemedicine. We also screened reference lists of review articles, citation history of articles, and the gray literature. The information is provided as a narrative summary. RESULTS Of 11,222 potentially eligible articles retrieved, 148 were included for review following de-duplications and full-text review. Data were also obtained from national stroke clinical registry reports, Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) and PRE-hospital Stroke Treatment Organization (PRESTO) repositories, and other national sources. Overall, we found evidence of the provision of intravenous thrombolysis services in 70 countries (63% high-income countries (HICs)) and endovascular thrombectomy services in 33 countries (68% HICs), corresponding to far less than half of the countries in the world. Recent data (from 2019 or later) were lacking for 35 of 67 countries with known year of data (52%). We found published data on 74 different stroke telemedicine programs (93% in HICs) and 14 active mobile stroke unit pre-hospital ambulance services (80% in HICs) around the world. CONCLUSION Despite remarkable advancements in reperfusion therapies for stroke, it is evident from available patient-level data that their availability remains unevenly distributed globally. Contemporary published data on availability of reperfusion services remain scarce, even in HICs, thereby making it difficult to reliably ascertain current gaps in the provision of this vital acute stroke treatment around the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joosup Kim
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Stroke Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Muideen T Olaiya
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Deidre A De Silva
- Department of Neurology, Singapore General Hospital Campus, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore
| | - Bo Norrving
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Section of Neurology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jackie Bosch
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Diana A De Sousa
- Department of Neurosciences (Neurology), Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Hanne K Christensen
- Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen and Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna Ranta
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Geoffrey A Donnan
- Melbourne Brain Centre, The University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Valery Feigin
- National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sheila Martins
- Neurology Department, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - David J Werring
- Stroke Research Centre, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - George Howard
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Mayowa Owolabi
- Center for Genomic and Precision Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Jeyaraj Pandian
- Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
| | - Robert Mikulik
- Health Management Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Neurology Department, Bata Hospital, Zlin, Czech Republic
| | - Tharshanah Thayabaranathan
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Dominique A Cadilhac
- Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Stroke Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Worthmann H, Winzer S, Schuppner R, Gumbinger C, Barlinn J. Telestroke networks for area-wide access to endovascular stroke treatment. Neurol Res Pract 2023; 5:9. [PMID: 36864498 PMCID: PMC9983226 DOI: 10.1186/s42466-023-00237-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular therapy (EVT) offers a highly effective therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) are required to provide permanent accessibility to EVT. However, when affected patients are not located in the immediate catchment area of a CSC, i.e. in rural or structurally weaker areas, access to EVT is not always ensured. MAIN BODY Telestroke networks play a crucial role in closing this healthcare coverage gap and thereby support specialized stroke treatment. The aim of this narrative review is to elaborate the concepts for the indication and transfer of EVT candidates via telestroke networks in acute stroke care. The targeted readership includes both comprehensive stroke centers and peripheral hospitals. The review is intended to identify ways to design care beyond those areas with narrow access to stroke unit care to provide the indicated highly effective acute therapies on a region-wide basis. Here, the two different models of care: "mothership" and "drip-and-ship" concerning rates of EVT and its complications as well as outcomes are compared. Decisively, forward-looking new model approaches such as a third model the "flying/driving interentionalists" are introduced and discussed, as far as few clinical trials have investigated these approaches. Diagnostic criteria used by the telestroke networks to enable appropriate patient selection for secondary intrahospital emergency transfers are displayed, which need to meet the criteria in terms of speed, quality and safety. CONCLUSION The few findings from the studies with telestroke networks are neutral for comparison in the drip-and-ship and mothership models. Supporting spoke centres through telestroke networks currently seems to be the best option for offering EVT to a population in structurally weaker regions without direct access to a CSC. Here, it is essential to map the individual reality of care depending on the regional circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Worthmann
- Klinik Für Neurologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30623, Hannover, Germany.
| | - S. Winzer
- grid.412282.f0000 0001 1091 2917Klinik Für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - R. Schuppner
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Klinik Für Neurologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30623 Hannover, Germany
| | - C. Gumbinger
- grid.5253.10000 0001 0328 4908Klinik Für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J. Barlinn
- grid.412282.f0000 0001 1091 2917Klinik Für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tumma A, Berzou S, Jaques K, Shah D, Smith AC, Thomas EE. Considerations for the Implementation of a Telestroke Network: A Systematic Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 31:106171. [PMID: 34735902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The application of telestroke has matured considerably since its inception in 1999. The use of telestroke is now recommended in several published guidelines. Consequently, jurisdictions without a telestroke service are seeking practical information on the best approach to implement telestroke. French et al. (2013) reviewed the challenges of implementing a telestroke network including studies between 2000 and 2010. At the time, telestroke networks were largely limited to the UK, USA, Canada and Europe and only one process evaluation had been conducted. Given the prolific expansion of telestroke services since 2010, we conducted a systematic review to determine factors associated with successful establishment, management, and sustainability of a contemporary telestroke services. A comprehensive search of telestroke studies was conducted in July 2021. Empirical studies published between 2010 and 2021 were included if they contained descriptive, evaluation or operational data on the implementation of a telestroke network. Studies were subsequently evaluated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The initial literature search revealed a total of 7415 potential studies; 38 of which met the inclusion criteria. The past decade of process evaluation studies has enabled a more nuanced investigations into how to implement and sustain a telestroke network. Pre-implementation planning is crucial to ensure clear telestroke processes, governance structures and stakeholder engagement. Sustainability of networks relies on securing long-term investment, providing adequate resources, and maintaining staff motivation and willingness. Recommendations are provided to overcome commonly identified barriers related to technology, staffing, planning and standardisation of processes, evaluation, and sustainability and scale-up. Further research needs to explore how new advancements in stroke care such as endovascular clot retrieval (EVT) and advanced brain imaging can be considered and planned for during the implementation of a new telestroke service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abishek Tumma
- Department of Medicine, Queensland Health, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Souad Berzou
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Katherine Jaques
- Queensland Health, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane Australia
| | - Darshan Shah
- Department of Neurology, Queensland Health, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Innovative Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Emma E Thomas
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zachrison KS, Richard JV, Wilcock A, Zubizaretta JR, Schwamm LH, Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A. Association of Hospital Telestroke Adoption With Changes in Initial Hospital Presentation and Transfers Among Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attacks. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2126612. [PMID: 34554236 PMCID: PMC8461501 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE It has been proposed that the implementation of telestroke services (a web-based approach to using video telecommunication to treat patients with stroke before hospital admission) changes where patients with stroke symptoms receive care, but this proposal has not been rigorously assessed. OBJECTIVE To assess whether the implementation of telestroke services is associated with changes in where and how patients initially present with stroke symptoms, in their decision to be transferred to another hospital, and which hospitals they are transferred to. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study compared changes in stroke systems of care between a sample of 593 US hospitals that adopted telestroke during the period from 2009 to 2016 but were not comprehensive stroke centers, major teaching hospitals, or thrombectomy-capable hospitals vs 593 matched control hospitals without telestroke based on rural location, critical access hospital status, bed size, primary stroke center status, presence of hospital alternatives in the community, hospital stroke volume, census region, and ownership. With the use of data on 100% of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, all stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions from 2008 to 2018 were identified. EXPOSURES For each hospital pair (telestroke plus matched control), the telestroke hospital's implementation date and difference-in-differences approach were used to quantify the association between telestroke implementation and changes in care from 2 years before implementation to 2 years after implementation. Models also controlled for differences in observed patient characteristics. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Hospital stroke volume, patients' ambulance transport distance to initial hospital, hospital case mix, interhospital transfer proportion, and size of the receiving hospital for transferred patients. RESULTS Of the 669 telestroke hospitals and 2143 potential control hospitals, 593 hospital pairs were matched; in each category, 261 hospitals (44.0%) were located in a rural area, 179 (30.2%) were primary stroke centers, and 130 (21.9%) were critical access hospitals. The changes in the preimplementation to postimplementation period were similar at telestroke and control hospitals in mean annual stroke volume (telestroke hospitals, decreased from 79.6 to 76.3 patients; control hospitals, decreased from 78.8 to 75.5 patients [-3.3 patients per year for both; difference-in-differences, 0.009; P ≥ .99]). Similarly, no differences were seen in ambulance transport distance, case mix, interhospital transfers, or bed size of receiving hospitals among transferred patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study suggests that, across a national sample of hospitals implementing telestroke, no association between telestroke adoption and changes in stroke systems of care were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kori S. Zachrison
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Jessica V. Richard
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Wilcock
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington
| | - Jose R. Zubizaretta
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lee H. Schwamm
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | - Ateev Mehrotra
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barlinn J, Winzer S, Worthmann H, Urbanek C, Häusler KG, Günther A, Erdur H, Görtler M, Busetto L, Wojciechowski C, Schmitt J, Shah Y, Büchele B, Sokolowski P, Kraya T, Merkelbach S, Rosengarten B, Stangenberg-Gliss K, Weber J, Schlachetzki F, Abu-Mugheisib M, Petersen M, Schwartz A, Palm F, Jowaed A, Volbers B, Zickler P, Remi J, Bardutzky J, Bösel J, Audebert HJ, Hubert GJ, Gumbinger C. [Telemedicine in stroke-pertinent to stroke care in Germany]. DER NERVENARZT 2021; 92:593-601. [PMID: 34046722 PMCID: PMC8184549 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-021-01137-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Telemedical stroke networks improve stroke care and provide access to time-dependent acute stroke treatment in predominantly rural regions. The aim is a presentation of data on its utility and regional distribution. METHODS The working group on telemedical stroke care of the German Stroke Society performed a survey study among all telestroke networks. RESULTS Currently, 22 telemedical stroke networks including 43 centers (per network: median 1.5, interquartile range, IQR, 1-3) as well as 225 cooperating hospitals (per network: median 9, IQR 4-17) operate in Germany and contribute to acute stroke care delivery to 48 million people. In 2018, 38,211 teleconsultations (per network: median 1340, IQR 319-2758) were performed. The thrombolysis rate was 14.1% (95% confidence interval 13.6-14.7%) and transfer for thrombectomy was initiated in 7.9% (95% confidence interval 7.5-8.4%) of ischemic stroke patients. Financial reimbursement differs regionally with compensation for telemedical stroke care in only three federal states. CONCLUSION Telemedical stroke care is utilized in about 1 out of 10 stroke patients in Germany. Telemedical stroke networks achieve similar rates of thrombolysis and transfer for thrombectomy compared with neurological stroke units and contribute to stroke care in rural regions. Standardization of network structures, financial assurance and uniform quality measurements may further strengthen the importance of telestroke networks in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Barlinn
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - S Winzer
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - H Worthmann
- Klinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - C Urbanek
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland
| | - K G Häusler
- Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - A Günther
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - H Erdur
- Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Görtler
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland
| | - L Busetto
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - C Wojciechowski
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - J Schmitt
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Y Shah
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland
| | - B Büchele
- Klinik für Neurologie, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| | - P Sokolowski
- Klinik für Neurologie und neurologische Intensivmedizin, Fachkrankenhaus Hubertusburg, Hubertusburg, Deutschland
| | - T Kraya
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum St.Georg Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - S Merkelbach
- Klinik für Neurologie, Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum Zwickau, Zwickau, Deutschland
| | - B Rosengarten
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland
| | - K Stangenberg-Gliss
- Klinik für Neurologie, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - J Weber
- Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - F Schlachetzki
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - M Abu-Mugheisib
- Klinik für Neurologie, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Deutschland
| | - M Petersen
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Deutschland
| | - A Schwartz
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Region Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - F Palm
- Klinik für Neurologie, Helios Klinikum Schleswig, Schleswig, Deutschland
| | - A Jowaed
- Klinik für Neurologie, Westküstenkliniken Heide, Heide, Deutschland
| | - B Volbers
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - P Zickler
- Klinik für Neurologie und Klinische Neurophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland
| | - J Remi
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum der LMU München-Großhadern, München, Deutschland
| | - J Bardutzky
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland
| | - J Bösel
- Klinik für Neurologie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland
| | - H J Audebert
- Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.,Centrum für Schlaganfallforschung Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - G J Hubert
- Klinik für Neurologie, München-Klinik Harlaching, München, Deutschland
| | - C Gumbinger
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Feil K, Rémi J, Küpper C, Herzberg M, Dorn F, Kunz WG, Reidler P, Levin J, Hüttemann K, Tiedt S, Heidger W, Müller K, Thunstedt DC, Dabitz R, Müller R, Pfefferkorn T, Hamann GF, Liebig T, Dieterich M, Kellert L. Inter-hospital transfer for mechanical thrombectomy within the supraregional stroke network NEVAS. J Neurol 2020; 268:623-631. [PMID: 32889616 PMCID: PMC7880976 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-10165-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Telemedicine stroke networks are mandatory to provide inter-hospital transfer for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, studies on patient selection in daily practice are sparse. Methods Here, we analyzed consecutive patients from 01/2014 to 12/2018 within the supraregional stroke network “Neurovascular Network of Southwest Bavaria” (NEVAS) in terms of diagnoses after consultation, inter-hospital transfer and predictors for performing MT. Degree of disability was rated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), good outcome was defined as mRS ≤ 2. Successful reperfusion was assumed when the modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) was 2b-3. Results Of 5722 telemedicine consultations, in 14.1% inter-hospital transfer was performed, mostly because of large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. A total of n = 350 patients with LVO were shipped via NEVAS to our center for MT. While n = 52 recanalized spontaneously, MT-treatment was performed in n = 178 patients. MT-treated patients had more severe strokes according to the median National institute of health stroke scale (NIHSS) (16 vs. 13, p < 0.001), were more often treated with intravenous thrombolysis (64.5% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.026) and arrived significantly earlier in our center (184.5 versus 228.0 min, p < 0.001). Good outcome (27.5% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.35) and mortality (32.6% versus 23.5%, p = 0.79) were comparable in MT-treated versus no-MT-treated patients. In patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion in the M1 segment or carotid artery occlusion good outcome was twice as often in the MT-group (21.8% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.184). Independent predictors for performing MT were higher NIHSS (OR 1.096), higher ASPECTS (OR 1.28), and earlier time window (OR 0.99). Conclusion Within a telemedicine network stroke care can successfully be organized as only a minority of patients has to be transferred. Our data provide clinical evidence that all MT-eligible patients should be shipped with the fastest transportation modality as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Feil
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Rémi
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens Küpper
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Moriz Herzberg
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Franziska Dorn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Reidler
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Levin
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Katrin Hüttemann
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Tiedt
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Wanja Heidger
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Müller
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Dennis C Thunstedt
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Dabitz
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany
| | - Robert Müller
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Günzburg, Germany
| | | | - Gerhard F Hamann
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Günzburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Liebig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Marianne Dieterich
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU), Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Lars Kellert
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|