1
|
Li Y, Pope C, Damonte J, Spates T, Maa A, Chen S, Yeung H. Barriers and Facilitators to Teledermatology and Tele-Eye Care in Department of Veterans Affairs Provider Settings: Qualitative Content Analysis. JMIR DERMATOLOGY 2024; 7:e50352. [PMID: 38324360 PMCID: PMC10882469 DOI: 10.2196/50352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Veterans Affairs health care systems have been early adopters of asynchronous telemedicine to provide access to timely and high-quality specialty care services in primary care settings for veterans living in rural areas. Scant research has examined how to expand primary care team members' engagement in telespecialty care. OBJECTIVE This qualitative study aimed to explore implementation process barriers and facilitators to using asynchronous telespecialty care (teledermatology and tele-eye care services). METHODS In total, 30 participants including primary care providers, nurses, telehealth clinical technicians, medical and program support assistants, and administrators from 2 community-based outpatient clinics were interviewed. Semistructured interviews were conducted using an interview guide, digitally recorded, and transcribed. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis summative approach. Two coders reviewed transcripts independently. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus discussion. RESULTS In total, 3 themes were identified from participants' experiences: positive perception of telespecialty care, concerns and challenges of implementation, and suggestions for service refinement. Participants voiced that the telemedicine visits saved commute and waiting times and provided veterans in rural areas more access to timely medical care. The mentioned concerns were technical challenges and equipment failure, staffing shortages to cover both in-person and telehealth visit needs, overbooked schedules leading to delayed referrals, the need for a more standardized operation protocol, and more hands-on training with formative feedback among supporting staff. Participants also faced challenges with appointment cancellations and struggled to find ways to efficiently manage both telehealth and in-person visits to streamline patient flow. Nonetheless, most participants feel motivated and confident in implementing telespecialty care going forward. CONCLUSIONS This study provided important insights into the positive perceptions and ongoing challenges in telespecialty care implementation. Feedback from primary care teams is needed to improve telespecialty care service delivery for rural veterans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiwen Li
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Charlene Pope
- Charleston Veterans Affairs Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center, Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Jennifer Damonte
- Clinical Resource Hub, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tanika Spates
- Clinical Resource Hub, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - April Maa
- Clinical Resource Hub, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Suephy Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Howa Yeung
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Clinical Resource Hub, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peracca SB, Lachica O, Lamkin RP, Jackson GL, Mohr DC, King HA, Whited JD, Fonseca AS, Morris IJ, Gifford AL, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:97-105. [PMID: 38252250 PMCID: PMC10937882 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08480-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective. OBJECTIVE We evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) implementation of My VA Images, a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling established dermatology patients to receive follow-up care remotely instead of in-person. DESIGN /PARTICIPANTS/APPROACH Following pilot testing at 3 facilities, the app was introduced to 28 facilities (4 groups of 7) every 3 months using a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. Using the Organizational Theory of Implementation Effectiveness, we examined the app's implementation using qualitative and quantitative data consisting of encounter data from VA's corporate data warehouse; app usage from VA's Mobile Health database; bi-monthly reports from facility representatives; phone interviews with clinicians; and documented communications between the operational partner and facility staff. KEY RESULTS Implementation policies and practices included VA's vision to expand home telehealth and marketing/communication strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic dominated the implementation climate by stressing staffing, introducing competing demands, and influencing stakeholder attitudes to the app, including its fit to their values. These factors were associated with mixed implementation effectiveness, defined as high quality consistent use. Nineteen of 31 exposed facilities prepared to use the app; 10 facilities used it for actual patient care, 7 as originally intended. Residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were more likely than attendings to use the app. Facilities exposed to the app pre-pandemic were more likely to use and sustain the new process. CONCLUSIONS Considerable heterogeneity existed in implementing mobile teledermatology, despite VA's common mission, integrated healthcare system, and stakeholders' broad interest. Identifying opportunities to target favorable facilities and user groups (such as teaching facilities and physician extenders, respectively) while addressing internal implementation barriers including incomplete integration with the electronic health record as well as inadequate staffing may help optimize the initial impact of direct-to-patient telehealth. The COVID pandemic was a notable extrinsic barrier. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT03241589.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Peracca
- Dermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Olevie Lachica
- Dermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Rebecca P Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | - George L Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Heather A King
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 6301 Herndon Road, Durham, NC, 27713, USA
| | - John D Whited
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 6301 Herndon Road, Durham, NC, 27713, USA
| | - Allene S Fonseca
- Department of Dermatology, Wayne State University, 18101 Oakwood Boulevard #402, Dearborn, MI, 48124, USA
| | - Isis J Morris
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Allen L Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 E Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Martin A Weinstock
- Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI, 02908, USA
| | - Dennis H Oh
- Dermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, 1701 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lamkin RP, Peracca SB, Jackson GL, Hines AC, Gifford AL, Lachica O, Li D, Morris IJ, Paiva M, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Using the RE-AIM framework to assess national teledermatology expansion. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1217829. [PMID: 37936881 PMCID: PMC10627029 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1217829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Teledermatology has been utilized in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for decades but continues to have incomplete penetration. VA has funded an initiative to enhance access to dermatology services since 2017 to support asynchronous teledermatology for Veterans living in rural areas. As part of an ongoing evaluation of this program, we assessed the teledermatology activity between the fiscal years 2020 and 2022. We focused on the second cohort of the initiative, comprising six VA facilities and their 54 referral clinics. Methods We studied teledermatology programs at cohort facilities using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. We used a mixed-methods design including annual online reports completed by participating facilities and VA administrative data. When possible, we compared the data from the 3 years of teledermatology funding with the baseline year prior to the start of funding. Findings Reach: Compared with the baseline year, there was a 100% increase in encounters and a 62% increase in patients seen at the funded facilities. Over 500 clinicians and support staff members were trained. Effectiveness: In FY 2022, primary or specialty care clinics affiliated with the funded facilities had more dermatology programs than primary or specialty care clinics across the VA (83% vs. 71% of sites). Adoption: By the end of the funding period, teledermatology constituted 16% of dermatology encounters at the funded facilities compared with 12% nationally. This reflected an increase from 9.2% at the funded facilities and 10.3% nationally prior to the funding period. Implementation: The continued funding for staff and equipment facilitated the expansion to rural areas. Maintenance: By the end of the funding period, all facilities indicated that they had fully implemented their program for patients of targeted primary care providers. The Program Sustainability Index scores generally increased during the funding period. Conclusions Targeted funding to support asynchronous teledermatology implementation for rural Veterans increased its reach, adoption, and implementation, ultimately improving access. Providing program guidance with staffing and training resources can increase the impact of these programs. Ongoing efforts to maintain and increase communication between primary care and dermatology will be needed to sustain success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca P. Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sara B. Peracca
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - George L. Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC, United States
- Peter O'Donnell, Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Aliya C. Hines
- Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Allen L. Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Health, Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Olevie Lachica
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Donglin Li
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Isis J. Morris
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Marcelo Paiva
- Center for Dermatology, Providence VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Martin A. Weinstock
- Center for Dermatology, Providence VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
- Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Office of Connected Care, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dennis H. Oh
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Office of Connected Care, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Giansanti D. Advancing Dermatological Care: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Tele-Dermatology and mHealth for Bridging Gaps and Expanding Opportunities beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:1911. [PMID: 37444745 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11131911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) has recently had significant advances in tele-dermatology (TD) thanks to the developments following the COVID-19 pandemic. This topic is very important, as telemedicine and mHealth, when applied to dermatology, could improve both the quality of healthcare for citizens and the workflow in the health domain. The proposed study was centered on the last three years. We conducted an overview on the opportunities, the perspectives, and the problems involved in TD integration with mHealth. The methodology of the narrative review was based on: (I) a search of PubMed and Scopus and (II) an eligibility assessment, using properly proposed parameters. The outcome of the study showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, TD integration with mHealth advanced rapidly. This integration enabled the monitoring of dermatological problems and facilitated remote specialist visits, reducing face-to-face interactions. AI and mobile apps have empowered citizens to take an active role in their healthcare. This differs from other imaging sectors where information exchange is limited to professionals. The opportunities for TD in mHealth include improving service quality, streamlining healthcare processes, reducing costs, and providing more accessible care. It can be applied to various conditions, such as (but not limited to) acne, vitiligo, psoriasis, and skin cancers. Integration with AI and augmented reality (AR), as well as the use of wearable sensors, are anticipated as future developments. However, integrating TD with mHealth also brings about problems and challenges related to regulations, ethics, cybersecurity, data privacy, and device management. Scholars and policymakers need to address these issues while involving citizens in the process.
Collapse
|