Development and Implementation of a Web-Based International Registry Dedicated to Atypical Pigmented Skin Lesions of the Face: Teledermatologic Investigation on Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Dermoscopy Training Course Improves Ophthalmologists' Accuracy in Diagnosing Atypical Pigmented Periorbital Skin Lesions

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Facial pigmented skin lesions are extremely common, starting from the fourth to fifth decades, especially in South-European countries, often located in the periorbital region. These include malignant forms, Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), characterized by growing incidence, and a series of benign simulators, including solar lentigo (SL), pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK), seborrheic keratosis (SK) and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPK). The clinical differential diagnosis of atypical pigmented skin lesions (aPFLs) can be difficult, even for dermatologists, leading to inappropriate skin biopsies with consequent aesthetic impacts. Dermoscopy of the facial area is a specific dermoscopic field that requires dedicated training and proved to increase diagnostic accuracy in dermatologists. Since these lesions are often seen by ophthalmologists at first, we aimed to evaluate the effect of a focused dermoscopy training course on a group of ophthalmologists naïve to the use of a dermatoscope.

METHODS

A set of 80 periorbital pigmented skin lesions with both clinical and dermoscopic images was selected and evaluated by six ophthalmologists before and after a one-day intensive dermoscopic training course. They were required to evaluate 80 periorbital lesions one month before and after a one-day intensive dermoscopic training course, illustrating second-level diagnostic options such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), obtaining a total of 480 evaluations. Specifically, they had to provide, for each case, a punctual diagnosis and a management option among dermoscopic follow-up/skin biopsy/RCM/LC-OCT. Descriptive statistics were carried out, and the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP), with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), were estimated.

RESULTS

In the pre-course test, ophthalmologists achieved 84.0% SP, 33.3% SE and 63.7% ACC, while after the course, SE increased by +9% (i.e., 41.7%), SP decreased by 4%, and ACC remained comparable, i.e., 64.6%. In the management study, the percentage of benign lesions for which a close dermoscopic follow-up was suggested significantly decreased (51.6% versus 22.2%), in parallel with an increase in the number of lesions referred for RCM. As for malignant cases, the reduction in responses "close dermoscopic follow-up" decreased from 37.0% to 9.9%, (-27%), in favor of RCM (+15%) and skin biopsy (+12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ophthalmologists proved to be very receptive in quickly metabolizing and putting into practice the concepts learned during the one-day intensive dermoscopy training course. Indeed, after only a one-day lesson, they were able to increase their SE by 9% and to improve their management strategy. The present findings highlight the importance of providing training ophthalmologists in dermoscopy during residency programs, in terms of benefits for the correct patient care.

Time from Diagnostic Suspicion to In-Person Evaluation in Skin Cancer Using Teledermatology

Introduction: Early diagnosis of skin cancer is crucial for improving prognosis. Teledermatology (TD) usage can optimize referrals and reduce waiting times. This study aims to evaluate waiting times at the critical referral nodes in teleinterconsultations that raised suspicion of skin malignancy in the Chilean TD platform of the public health care system. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study that analyzed asynchronous teleinterconsultations and raised suspicion for skin malignancy following the teledermatologist evaluation was uploaded on the Chilean Ministry of Health's TD platform from January 1 to June 30, 2022. Results: Out of 20,522 teleinterconsultations, 1,853 raised suspicion of skin cancer. Among them, 1,119 patients were assessed by in-person examination, while 669 were still on the waiting list. Response times averaged 3.98 days for TD diagnostic suggestions. Overall referral times averaged 75.98 days from initial teleinterconsultation to the final specialist in-person evaluation. Waiting times showed significant differences among health care services and geographic regions. Discussion: In resource-limited settings, TD serves as a valuable tool to optimize referrals and manage the demand for oncologic dermatological consultation. The long waiting times emphasize the need for targeted interventions, especially in regions with longer delays. Conclusion: While TD has shown to be an effective tool in optimizing referrals, waiting times still exceed international recommendations, even in urban centers. The considerable heterogeneity in referral times within health care services and geographic regions highlights the necessity of establishing standardized referral protocols and explicit deadlines to fulfill teleinterconsultations that raise suspicion of skin malignancy in the Chilean public system.

Comparison of Ophthalmologists versus Dermatologists for the Diagnosis and Management of Periorbital Atypical Pigmented Skin Lesions

Background/Objectives: Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) are significant subtypes of melanoma, with an annual incidence of 1.37 per 100,000 people in the U.S. These skin tumors, often found in photo-exposed areas such as the face, are frequently misdiagnosed, leading to delayed treatment or unnecessary excisions, especially in the elderly. Facial melanocytic skin tumors (lentigo maligna-LM/lentigo maligna melanoma-LMM) and their simulators (solar lentigo, pigmented actinic keratosis, seborrheic keratosis and lichen planus-like keratosis) often affect the periocular region. Thus, their diagnosis and management can involve different medical figures, mainly dermatologists and ophthalmologists. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of ophthalmologists to diagnose and manage pigmented skin lesions of the periorbital area. Methods: A multicentric, retrospective, cross-sectional study on a dataset of 79 periorbital pigmented skin lesions with both clinical and dermoscopic images was selected. The images were reviewed by six ophthalmologists and two dermatologists. Descriptive statistics were carried out, and the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), were estimated. Results: Ophthalmologists achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 63.50% (95% CI: 58.99-67.85%), while dermatologists achieved 66.50% (95% CI: 58.5-73.8). The sensitivity was lower for ophthalmologists in respect to dermatologists, 33.3% vs. 46.9%, respectively. Concerning the case difficulty rating, ophthalmologists rated as "difficult" 84% of cases, while for dermatologists, it was about 30%. Management was also consistently different, with a "biopsy" decision being suggested in 25.5% of malignant lesions by ophthalmologists compared with 50% of dermatologists. Conclusions: Ophthalmologists revealed a good diagnostic potential in the identification of periorbital LMs/LMMs. Given progressive population ageing and the parallel increase in facial/periorbital skin tumors, the opportunity to train new generations of ophthalmologists in the early diagnosis of these neoformations should be considered in the next future, also taking into account the surgical difficulty/complexity of this peculiar facial area.

Pattern Analysis of Benign and Malignant Atypical Melanocytic Skin Lesions of Palms and Soles: Variations of Dermoscopic Features According to Anatomic Site and Personal Experience

Background: The differential diagnosis of atypical melanocytic skin lesions localized on palms and soles represents a diagnostic challenge: indeed, this spectrum encompasses atypical nevi (AN) and early-stage melanomas (EN) displaying overlapping clinical and dermoscopic features. This often generates unnecessary excisions or delayed diagnosis. Investigations to date were mostly carried out in specific populations, focusing either on acrolentiginous melanomas or morphologically typical acquired nevi. Aims: To investigate the dermoscopic features of atypical melanocytic palmoplantar skin lesions (aMPPLs) as evaluated by variously skilled dermatologists and assess their concordance; to investigate the variations in dermoscopic appearance according to precise location on palms and soles; to detect the features with the strongest association with malignancy/benignity in each specific site. Methods: A dataset of 471 aMPPLs-excised in the suspect of malignancy-was collected from 10 European Centers, including a standardized dermoscopic picture (17×) and lesion/patient metadata. An anatomical classification into 17 subareas was considered, along with an anatomo-functional classification considering pressure/friction, (4 macroareas). A total of 156 participants (95 with less than 5 years of experience in dermoscopy and 61 with ≥than 5 years) from 17 countries performed a blinded tele-dermoscopic pattern analysis over 20 cases through a specifically realized web platform. Results: A total of 37,440 dermoscopic evaluations were obtained over 94 (20%) EM and 377 (80%) AN. The areas with the highest density of EM compared to AN were the heel (40.3% EM/aMPPLs) of the sole and the "fingers area" (33%EM/aMPPLs) of the palm, both characterized by intense/chronic traumatism/friction. Globally, the recognition rates of 12 dermoscopic patterns were non statistically different between 95 dermatology residents and 61 specialists: aMPPLs in the plantar arch appeared to be the most "difficult" to diagnose, the parallel ridge pattern was poorly recognized and irregular/regular fibrillar patterns often misinterpreted. Regarding the aMPPL of the "heel area", the parallel furrow pattern (p = 0.014) and lattice-like pattern (p = 0.001) significantly discriminated benign cases, while asymmetry of colors (p = 0.002) and regression structures (p = 0.025) malignant ones. In aMPPLs of the "plantar arch", the lattice-like pattern (p = 0.012) was significant for benignity and asymmetry of structures, asymmetry of colors, regression structures, or blue-white veil for malignancy. In palmar lesions, no data were significant in the discrimination between malignant and benign aMPPLs. Conclusions: This study highlights that (i) the pattern analysis of aMPPLs is challenging for both experienced and novice dermoscopists; (ii) the histological distribution varies according to the anatomo-functional classification; and (iii) different dermoscopic patterns are able to discriminate malignant from benign aMPPLs within specific plantar and palmar areas.

A European Multicentric Investigation of Atypical Melanocytic Skin Lesions of Palms and Soles: The iDScore-PalmoPlantar Database

Background: The differential diagnosis of atypical melanocytic palmoplantar skin lesions (aMPLs) represents a diagnostic challenge, including atypical nevi (AN) and early melanomas (MMs) that display overlapping clinical and dermoscopic features. We aimed to set up a multicentric dataset of aMPL dermoscopic cases paired with multiple anamnestic risk factors and demographic and morphologic data. Methods: Each aMPL case was paired with a dermoscopic and clinical picture and a series of lesion-related data (maximum diameter value; location on the palm/sole in 17 areas; histologic diagnosis; and patient-related data (age, sex, family history of melanoma/sunburns, phototype, pheomelanin, eye/hair color, multiple/dysplastic body nevi, and traumatism on palms/soles). Results: A total of 542 aMPL cases-113 MM and 429 AN-were collected from 195 males and 347 females. No sex prevalence was found for melanomas, while women were found to have relatively more nevi. Melanomas were prevalent on the heel, plantar arch, and fingers in patients aged 65.3 on average, with an average diameter of 17 mm. Atypical nevi were prevalent on the plantar arch and palmar area of patients aged 41.33 on average, with an average diameter of 7 mm. Conclusions: Keeping in mind the risk profile of an aMPL patient can help obtain a timely differentiation between malignant/benign cases, thus avoiding delayed and inappropriate excision, respectively, with the latter often causing discomfort/dysfunctional scarring, especially at acral sites.

Dermoscopy of atypical pigmented lesions of the face: Variation according to facial areas

Atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs)-including lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), solar lentigo (SL), pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK), atypical nevi (AN), seborrheic keratosis (SK) and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPLK)-can exhibit clinical and dermoscopic overlapping features. We aimed to investigate if and how 14 dermoscopic features suggestive for the aforementioned aPFLs vary according to six facial sites among 1197 aPFLs cases (excised to rule out malignancy) along with lesion and patients' metadata. According to distribution and association analysis, aPFLs on the forehead of a male patient aged > 69 years displaying the obliterated follicular openings pattern, appear to be more at risk of malignancy. Of converse, aPFLs of the orbital/cheek/nose area with evident and regular follicular openings with diameter < 10 mm in a female aged below 68 are probably benign. The obliterated follicular openings, keratin plugs, evident and regular follicular openings and target-like pattern features differed significantly among six facial areas in all aPFLs cases. Lesion of the nose may show both features suggestive of malignancy and benignity (e.g. many SL and PAK may display target-like pattern and some LM/LMM cases display keratin plugs and evident and follicular openings), making these features less specific.

A risk-scoring model for the differential diagnosis of lentigo maligna and other atypical pigmented facial lesions of the face: The facial iDScore

BACKGROUND

Due to progressive ageing of the population, the incidence of facial lentigo maligna (LM) of the face is increasing. Many benign simulators of LM and LMM, known as atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs-pigmented actinic keratosis, solar lentigo, seborrheic keratosis, seborrheic-lichenoid keratosis, atypical nevus) may be found on photodamaged skin. This generates many diagnostic issues and increases the number of biopsies, with a subsequent impact on aesthetic outcome and health insurance costs.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to develop a risk-scoring classifier-based algorithm to estimate the probability of an aPFL being malignant. A second aim was to compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of dermoscopists so as to define the advantages of using the model in patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 154 dermatologists analysed 1111 aPFLs and their management in a teledermatology setting: They performed pattern analysis, gave an intuitive clinical diagnosis and proposed lesion management options (follow-up/reflectance confocal microscopy/biopsy). Each case was composed of a dermoscopic and/or clinical picture plus metadata (histology, age, sex, location, diameter). The risk-scoring classifier was developed and tested on this dataset and then validated on 86 additional aPFLs.

RESULTS

The facial Integrated Dermoscopic Score (iDScore) model consisted of seven dermoscopic variables and three objective parameters (diameter ≥ 8 mm, age ≥ 70 years, male sex); the score ranged from 0 to 16. In the testing set, the facial iDScore-aided diagnosis was more accurate (AUC = 0.79 [IC 95% 0.757-0.843]) than the intuitive diagnosis proposed by dermatologists (average of 43.5%). In the management study, the score model reduced the number of benign lesions sent for biopsies by 41.5% and increased the number of LM/LMM cases sent for reflectance confocal microscopy or biopsy instead of follow-up by 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

The facial iDScore can be proposed as a feasible tool for managing patients with aPFLs.