Comparison of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide, 5-Fluorouracil, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Keloids

Treatment of Delayed Hypersensitivity After Injection of Nasal Fillers

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue filler injection is the second most commonly performed cosmetic procedure worldwide, with augmentation rhinoplasty being the most common filling surgery in Asian countries because Asians predominantly have a low nasal bridge. With the increasing pursuit of beauty, the adverse reactions after injection not only damage the patient's appearance but also greatly affect their quality of life. Therefore, exploring effective methods to address adverse reactions after nasal filler injections is necessary.

AIMS

Herein, we aimed to explore safe and effective drug doses and concentrations for the treatment of two patients who developed an allergic reaction after a nasal filling by intralesional drug injection.

METHODS

Two patients developed severe swelling and deformity of the nose after the injection of fillers 6 months to 1 year prior to presentation. High-frequency ultrasound and local conditions revealed inflammation in the injected area. The patients were administered the combination of 0.7% triamcinolone acetonide, 0.42% 5-fluorouracil, and 0.7% lidocaine into the affected area; they were followed up for 6 months.

RESULTS

After three times of treatment, swelling and sclerosis disappeared after 44.5 ± 2.12 days. No adverse effects of the infections were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This drug regimen may represent a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of complications after soft tissue filler injections.

Safety and efficacy of intralesional bleomycin for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bleomycin, originally an antitumor drug, was explored as a pathological scar treatment in the mid-1990s. However, its efficacy and safety profile varies among individuals.

AIMS

This study aimed to assess topical bleomycin's efficacy and safety in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids.

METHODS

We reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) published in English, comparing intralesional bleomycin to placebos or common intralesional scar treatments. Primary outcomes included percentage change in scar improvement, pigmentation, recurrence, atrophy, pain, telangiectasia, ulceration, patient self-assessment, and observer assessment (>50%).

RESULTS

Six trials met the criteria. Bleomycin significantly improved scar reduction compared to triamcinolone (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pigmentation (p = 0.05) and recurrence (p = 0.21) compared to other treatments. In terms of safety, bleomycin caused less skin atrophy (p < 0.01) and telangiectasia (p < 0.01) but more pain (p = 0.03) than other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Bleomycin was more effective than TAC, 5-FU, or TAC combined with 5-FU for treating keloids and hypertrophic scars with lower skin atrophy and telangiectasia risks. However, it may cause more pain than 5-FU or TAC. Further comprehensive studies, including RCTs, are required for objective analysis.

Efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5- fluorouracil in keloids and hypertrophic scars: Randomized, parallel group, and double blinded trial

Background

Treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars is challenging. The current first-line treatment is a steroid which has high resistance and recurrence rate along with unacceptable adverse effects. Different studies involving the combination of TAC and 5-FU that have been done so far showed better treatment outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety.

Objective

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide alone and its combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with keloids and hypertrophic scars at 12 weeks follow-up.

Methods

In this randomized parallel group double-blinded clinical trial, we enroled 66 cases of keloids and hypertrophic scars randomly allocated into two treatment groups. Patients received an intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) in Group A and an intralesional injection of a combination of triamcinolone acetonide (20 mg/mL) and 5-fluorouracil (25 mg/mL) in Group B for every 2 weeks until 10 weeks and the final evaluation was done at 12 weeks follow-up.

Results

There was a reduction in all the parameters at every follow-up visit in both groups. The ≥50% reduction in height, reduction in the VSS and POSAS scores, and good to excellent subjective improvement reported by both the patients and the observer were significantly greater in the combination group compared to TAC alone group. The response rate was faster and complications were lesser in the combination group as compared to TAC alone group.

Limitation

Single-centred, no long-term follow-up, and recurrence could not be assessed.

Conclusion

TAC alone and its combination with the 5-FU both were effective in keloids and hypertrophic scars. Yet, the TAC and 5-FU combination treatment was more efficacious with a faster response rate and safer than the TAC alone treatment.

Clinical Effect of Dermatologic Trephination Combined With Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Keloids

BACKGROUND

Keloids are excessive formations of scar tissue that develop at the site of a skin injury. Due to their invasive nature, they have a negative impact on the skin's appearance and are prone to recurrence, making them a challenging condition to treat with regard to skin aesthetics.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this article was to compare the long-term effects of dermatologic trephination with nonsurgical treatments for scars and evaluate the clinical value of the treatments.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 48 patients who received keloid treatment in the Department of Dermatology and Department of Thoracic Surgery at our hospital from January 2021 to October 2023. Twenty-four patients received dermatologic trephination, and 24 patients received nonsurgical treatment. Outcome measures included scar appearance, scar healing time, pain and itching levels, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The healing time of patients receiving dermatologic trephination was significantly shorter than that of patients in the nonsurgical group. The degree of itching in patients undergoing dermatologic trephination was significantly lower than that of patients in the nonsurgical group. The satisfaction of patients who received dermatologic trephination was significantly higher than that of patients in the nonsurgical group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we demonstrated that trephination achieves better long-term results in keloid revision, including improved keloid appearance, itching symptoms, and patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

A Triple Combination Therapy Using 2-mm Biopsy Punch for the Treatment of Multifocal Keloids

BACKGROUND

Keloid treatment is challenging. The surgical approach can be divided into complete excision versus partial excision.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aims to introduce our novel surgical approach of partial excision using a 2-mm punch biopsy device to treat refractory multifocal keloids in the trunk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a case series of 30 patients with refractory multifocal keloids treated with a triple combination therapy consisting of a punch-assisted partial excision and intralesional triamcinolone injections followed by immediate single fractional electron beam radiotherapy within 8 hours, postoperatively. The follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was recorded as recurrence versus nonrecurrence or aggravation versus remission . The secondary outcome was patient satisfaction as assessed by the POSAS.

RESULTS

The recurrence or aggravation of keloid was not found without complications. Scores obtained from the POSAS patient scale showed that pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

Our novel surgical approach using a 2-mm punch biopsy device effectively treats refractory multifocal keloids once considered intractable. Triple combination therapy of partial excision using a 2-mm punch biopsy device, intralesional triamcinolone injections, followed by immediate single fractional electron beam radiotherapy, is a safe, efficacious, and more convenient protocol to treat this condition.

Combination of Fractional Er:YAG Laser, Pulsed Dye Laser, and Intralesional Triamcinolone With 5-Fluorouracil for Keloid Treatment

Introduction: Benign fibroproliferative scars that are larger than the initial lesion are called keloids. Keloids treatment in clinical practice is still difficult. Although there are various therapy choices, none is embraced by everyone or is relapse-free. Various treatment modalities such as intralesional corticosteroid injection with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), fractional Er:YAG laser, pulsed dye laser (PDL), and others can be used either as monotherapies or combined therapies. Therefore, efforts should be made to select the treatment that will provide the best results. Case Presentation: A 6-year-old boy with keloids on the lower lips extending to the chin was successfully treated with a 2940-nm fractional Er:YAG laser alternated with a 595-nm long-PDL followed by the combined intralesional injection of corticosteroid and 5-FU. The patient was followed up for 1 year with no lesion recurrence. Conclusion: Our case supports a combined therapy to successfully treat a patient with a keloid on the chin. Therapy using a combination of these four modalities seems safe and effective and may have a synergistic effect with minimal downtime.

Keloid treatments: an evidence-based systematic review of recent advances

BACKGROUND

Keloids are pathologic scars that pose a significant functional and cosmetic burden. They are challenging to treat, despite the multitude of treatment modalities currently available.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct an evidence-based review of all prospective data regarding keloid treatments published between 2010 and 2020.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed (National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) was performed in November of 2020. Search strategies with the keywords "keloid" and "treatment" were performed by a medical librarian. The search was limited to prospective studies that were peer-reviewed, reported on clinical outcomes of keloid therapies, and were published in the English language between January 1, 2010, and November 24, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 3462 unique citations were identified, of which 108 studies met inclusion criteria. Current literature supports silicone gel or sheeting with corticosteroid injections as first-line therapy for keloids. Adjuvant intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), bleomycin, or verapamil can be considered, although mixed results have been reported with each. Laser therapy can be used in combination with intralesional corticosteroids or topical steroids with occlusion to improve drug penetration. Excision of keloids with immediate post-excision radiation therapy is an effective option for recalcitrant lesions. Finally, silicone sheeting and pressure therapy have evidence for reducing keloid recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This review was limited by heterogeneity of subject characteristics and study outcome measures, small sample sizes, and inconsistent study designs. Larger and more robust controlled studies are necessary to further understand the variety of existing and emerging keloid treatments, including corticosteroids, cryotherapy, intralesional injections, lasers, photodynamic therapy, excision and radiation, pressure dressings, and others.

Comparative Efficacy of Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide and 5-Fluorouracil for Keloid Scars

Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC; a synthetic corticosteroid) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; a cytotoxic chemotherapy drug) are the medications most commonly used to treat keloid scars. We investigated the clinical efficacy of TAC compared with 5-FU. We included 40 patients in the study and divided them into two equal groups ( n = 20 Group A; n = 20 Group B). Group A patients received 4 mg/cm 2 or 0.1 ml/cm 2 of intralesional TAC (40 mg/ml) at 3-week intervals. Group B patients received 10 mg/cm 2 or 0.2 ml/cm 2 of intralesional 5-FU (50 mg/ml) at 3-week intervals. We assessed the scar using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction score (PSS). We found that Group A patients had a lower VAS than Group B patients (2.09 vs. 3.18). We saw a reduction in the VSS in both treatment arms; however, we found that Group B patients had a more marked reduction in the VSS compared with Group A patients (2.57 vs. 2.68). The PSS was higher in Group A than in Group B (1.97 vs. 1.78). We concluded that intralesional 5-FU elicits a better response than intralesional TAC. Although 5-FU is less well tolerated and has more side effects than TAC, we found that 5-FU was more effective in resolving keloid scars. Notably, the PSS was higher in the TAC group, but the VSS and VAS were better in Group B.

Evaluation of Efficacy of Corticosteroid and Corticosteroid Combined with Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Keloid and Hypertrophic Scars: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Both keloid and hypertrophic scars are common benign skin lesions manifested by hyperplasia of fibroblasts. Clinically, this will not only have physiological effects on patients, but also cause psychological damage. However, there is no unified standard treatment method at present. Intralesional corticosteroid injection alone and corticosteroid combined with botulinum toxin type A has been gradually found to be useful for the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars, but the difference in efficacy between the two is controversial.

METHODS

A systematic search was made of the relevant experiments from Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI).

RESULTS

The scores of Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Vancouver Scar Score sheet (VSS), scar thickness, itching degree and patient satisfaction after the combination of corticosteroid and botulinum toxin type A were superior than those after corticosteroid (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with corticosteroid alone, corticosteroid combined with botulinum toxin type A is more effective in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scar. Although clinical case studies for the treatment of keloid or hypertrophic scars are limited, it is necessary and helpful to understand the effectiveness of corticosteroid combined with botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of keloid or hypertrophic scars.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treatment of Small Keloids Using Intralesional 5-fluorouracil and Triamcinolone Acetonide versus Intralesional Bleomycin and Triamcinolone Acetonide

BACKGROUND: The aberration of wound healing leads to scar formation in the form of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Various modalities with variable results have been used in the treatment of keloids. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate outcomes in the treatment of small keloids with the combination of intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and triamcinolone acetonide versus intralesional bleomycin and triamcinolone acetonide. DESIGN: Sixty clinically diagnosed keloid lesions in 40 patients aged 18 to 60 years were divided equally into Groups A (n=30) and B (n=30). The combination of intralesional 5-FU and triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) was given to Group A and the combination of intralesional bleomycin and triamcinolone acetonide was given to Group B. Treatment was repeated in both groups at three-week intervals until keloid flattening was achieved or a maximum of 10 treatments were completed. Before treatment, the lesions were assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale and their size was measured using vernier calipers. RESULTS: In Group A, 15 (50%) keloids showed an excellent response, 10 (33.33%) keloids showed a good response, three (10%) keloids showed a fair response, and two (6.66%) keloids showed a poor response. In Group B, 23 (76%) keloids showed an excellent response, three (10%) keloids showed a good response, two (6.66%) keloids showed a fair response, and two (6.66%) keloids showed a poor response. CONCLUSION: Patient response regarding treatment duration, flattening of lesions, improvements in the Vancouver Scar Scale score, and recurrence rates were statistically significant in Group B. A greater improvement in the signs and symptoms of keloids (with respect to cosmetic problems, restriction of movement, and tenderness) was observed in the patients treated with a combination of intralesional bleomycin and triamcinolone acetonide compared to those treated with a combination of intralesional 5-FU and triamcinolone acetonide.

The safety and efficacy of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide for keloids and hypertrophic scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) is widely used for hypertrophic scars and keloids; however, TAC has variable efficacy and safety in different individuals.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional TAC for treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov prior to 25 March 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials in English that compared TAC with a placebo or other medications that are commonly used for intralesional injection in hypertrophic scars and keloids.

DATA EXTRACTION

Primary outcomes were reduction in scar height, vascularity, pliability, pigmentation, total scores on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) or patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), telangiectasia, and skin atrophy. Secondary outcomes included overall scar improvement.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fifteen trials met the inclusion criteria. In the short term, TAC was associated with a significant improvement in vascularity (MD: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.42 to -0.02) and pliability (MD: -0.25, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.06) compared to verapamil. In the medium term, compared to TAC, 5-FU showed a significant improvement in scar height (SMD: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.15-1.75), while TAC led to a significant improvement in vascularity compared to 5-FU (MD: -0.45, 95% CI: -0.76 to -0.14). Compared to TAC, TAC+5-FU showed a significant improvement in pliability (SMD: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.17-1.78) and pigmentation (MD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.12-0.78). Botulinum toxin type A resulted in significantly better pliability (SMD: 1.99, 95% CI: 0.98-3.00) compared to TAC. In the long term, compared to TAC, 5-FU led to a significant improvement in scar height (MD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.17-0.93), but significantly less vascularity (MD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.05). Compared to TAC, TAC+5-FU produced a significant improvement in scar height (MD: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.12-1.88), pliability (MD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.10-0.80), and pigmentation (MD: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.24-0.86).

CONCLUSION

TAC may be beneficial for the short-term treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids; however, 5-FU, 5-FU+TAC, and verapamil may produce superior results for medium- and long-term treatments. TAC injections at concentrations of 20 mg/ml or 40 mg/ml are more likely to result in skin atrophy compared to 5-FU or verapamil, and are more likely to cause telangiectasia than 5-FU, 5-FU+TAC, or bleomycin.

Efficacy and Safety of Intralesional Triamcinolone Versus Combination of Triamcinolone with 5-Fluorouracil in the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although keloids and hypertrophic scars are common benign hyperproliferative growths of dermal fibroblasts, the clinical problems including physical and psychological problems are significant and impairing, with few proven treatments. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) and combination of TAC with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are widely used to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars, but their efficacy and safety remain controversial.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CNKI for relevant trials.

RESULTS

The mean scar height and the erythema score in the TAC + 5-FU group were lower than those in the TAC group after treatment (P < 0.05). The effectiveness based on observer assessment after treatment in the TAC + 5-FU group was superior than that in the TAC group (P < 0.05); further, the subgroup analysis showed the TAC + 5-FU group was also superior than the TAC group in the treatment of hypertrophic scars (P = 0.01), and there were no significant differences in the treatment of keloid (P = 0.12). The effectiveness based on patient self-assessment after treatment in the TAC + 5-FU group was also superior than the TAC group (P < 0.05). The overall complication rate in the TAC + 5-FU group was lower than the TAC group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of TAC with 5-FU is more effective and safer than TAC alone therapy in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Data on keloids alone or hypertrophic scars alone are, however, limited. A better understanding of effective after intralesional combination of TAC with 5-FU in the treatment of keloids alone or hypertrophic scars alone is imperative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis of 5-fluorouracil and triamcinolone treated keloids in double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Keloids are a major complication related to surgical wound healing and very challenging condition to treat. Many treatment options are available, but the efficacy of the treatment is poor in most of cases and some keloids do not respond to the treatment at all. We compared the efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and triamcinolone (TAC) injections in a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). Forty-three patients with 50 keloid scars were treated with either intralesional TAC or 5-FU-injections over 6 months. We wanted to find out whether biological features (cell density, cell proliferation rate, vascular density, myofibroblast numbers, steroid hormone receptor expression) in keloids could be used to predict the response to therapy and define the biological changes that take place in patients receiving a response. As there was no statistically significant difference in the remission rate between TAC and 5-FU treatments, all patients were combined and analyzed as responders and nonresponders. Although responders have slightly more myofibroblasts than the nonresponders in their keloids in the pretreatment biopsy samples, we could not identify a single predictive factor that could identify those patients that respond to drug injections. The good clinical response to therapy is associated with the simultaneous reduction of myofibroblasts in the keloid. This study demonstrates that myofibroblasts are reduced in number in those keloids that were responsive to therapy, and that both 5-FU and TAC injections are useful for keloid treatment.

Frontal fibrosing alopecia: efficacy of treatment modalities

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a primary cicatricial alopecia characterized by loss of follicular stem cells, fibrosis, and a receding frontotemporal hairline, with frequent loss of eyebrows, and less commonly, body hair involvement. Diagnosis is clinical and the disease most often affects postmenopausal women. Treatment is difficult with the goal of disease stabilization rather than hair regrowth due to the scarring nature of FFA. To date, there are no randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy of treatments. Therefore, much of our knowledge is based on small retrospective studies. In this review, we highlight the various and most current treatment options for FFA, including 5-α-reductase inhibitors, intralesional steroids, hydroxychloroquine, topical steroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, systemic retinoids, pioglitazone, oral antibiotics, minoxidil, excimer laser, and hair transplantation. Currently, 5-α-reductase inhibitors, intralesional steroids, and hydroxychloroquine have the highest level of evidence for treating FFA, while the remaining therapies have variable results and require further data to draw definitive conclusions.

Comparison of Fractional CO2 Laser, Verapamil, and Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Keloid

Objective: Scar biology is a territory less understood. The search for ideal treatment of keloid continues. The aim of this study was to compare the role of CO₂ laser, triamcinolone (TAC), and verapamil in the treatment of keloid. Approach: A randomized parallel-group study was conducted in which 60 patients were randomly allocated to three groups from May 2017 to April 2018. First group received fractional CO₂ laser therapy, second group received triamcinolone, and third group received intralesional verapamil. Outcomes were evaluated using Vancouver scar scale score at 3 weekly intervals for 6 months. Results: There was a reduction in scar height, vascularity, and pliability in all the three groups. However, pigmentation was not completely resolved by any of the three modalities. The response was fastest in case of triamcinolone followed by verapamil and laser, which was statistically significant. There was reduction in pain and pruritus in all the three groups and lesser injection site pain with verapamil. There was some amount of charring with CO₂ laser. Innovation: Our study provides evidence that TAC has the fastest response in treating keloids when compared to other modalities. Scar pigmentation is the parameter that is not completely resolved by TAC, verapamil, or CO₂ laser. Conclusion: The study revealed that fractional CO₂ laser and verapamil are as efficient as triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) for treating keloids, except it takes longer for laser and verapamil to act compared to TAC. Verapamil can be used as an alternative treatment modality that is cost-effective with minimal adverse effects.

Treatment of keloid scars with intralesional triamcinolone and 5-fluorouracil injections - a randomized controlled trial

Keloids have high recurrence rates. Current first-line therapy is triamcinolone (TAC) injection, but it has been suggested that approximately 50% of keloids are steroid resistant. We compared the efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and triamcinalone injections in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Forty-three patients with 50 keloid scars were treated with either intralesional TAC or 5-FU-injections over 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the remission rate at 6 months between the 5-FU and TAC groups (46% vs 60%, respectively). Local adverse effects were higher in the TAC group compared to the 5-FU group. Occurrence of skin atrophy in TAC group was 44% and in the 5-FU group 8% (p < 0.05). Also the occurrence of telangiectasia in the TAC group was 50% and in the 5-FU 21% (p < 0.05). Vascularity of the keloids, assessed by spectral imaging and immunohistochemical staining for blood vessels, after treatment decreased in the TAC group, but not in the 5-FU group (p < 0.05). Fibroblast proliferation evaluated by Ki-67 staining significantly decreased in the TAC group (p < 0.05) but increased in the 5-FU group (p < 0.05). TAC and 5-FU injections did not differ in their clinical effectivity in this randomized study, but 5-FU injections lead to increased proliferation rate and did not affect vascular density in histological assessment. Due to the greater number of adverse effects observed after TAC treatment, 5-FU injections may be preferable for cosmetically sensitive skin areas.

Dose Effect in Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Resected Keloids

PURPOSE

Surgical excision of keloids can result in an insidious cycle of tissue injury and repeat keloid formation unless combined with adjuvant therapy to halt this cycle. We present our results of postoperative radiation therapy for keloids with various dose regimens.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of 124 patients with 250 keloid lesions treated with postoperative radiation therapy was analyzed. In this institutional review board-approved study, 125 keloids were treated to 20 Gy in 5 fractions and 125 keloids were treated to 12 to 16 Gy in 3 to 4 fractions. Local failure was defined as redevelopment of any clinically apparent keloid at the treated site. The median age was 34 years (14-84 years). Keloids were located on the ear (34%), neck/shoulder (19%), abdomen (13%), chest (10%), face (9%), breast (7%), extremities (4%), and back (3%). Median keloid size was 4 cm (0.5-20 cm).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 40 months, the recurrence rate for all lesions was 5.6%. Lesions treated to 20 Gy had a recurrence rate of 1.6% compared with 9.6% with <20 Gy and an odds ratio of 0.16 (P = .02). Upon univariate and multivariate analysis there were no differences in recurrence rate with respect to location, race, gender, age, previously treated lesions, and presence of multiple keloids. The lone predictor for improved control rate was the dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions compared with less than that. Control rate for lesions treated to a biologically equivalent dose₂ of 35 to 36 Gy₂, 48 to 52.5 Gy₂, and 60 to 72 Gy₂ were 10% (P = .007), 8.9% (P = .16), and 1.6% (P = .02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical excision followed by immediate adjuvant radiation therapy for keloids provides excellent local control and cosmesis. Treatment with a biologically equivalent dose₂ > 60 (20 Gy in 5 fractions) yielded superior local control over lower dose regimens.