Choi DH, Choi SW, Kim KH, Choi Y, Kim Y. Early identification of suspected serious infection among patients afebrile at initial presentation using neural network models and natural language processing: A development and external validation study in the emergency department.
Am J Emerg Med 2024;
80:67-76. [PMID:
38507849 DOI:
10.1016/j.ajem.2024.03.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop and externally validate models based on neural networks and natural language processing (NLP) to identify suspected serious infections in emergency department (ED) patients afebrile at initial presentation.
METHODS
This retrospective study included adults who visited the ED afebrile at initial presentation. We developed four models based on artificial neural networks to identify suspected serious infection. Patient demographics, vital signs, laboratory test results and information extracted from initial ED physician notes using term frequency-inverse document frequency were used as model variables. Models were trained and internally validated with data from one hospital and externally validated using data from a different hospital. Model discrimination was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
The training, internal validation, and external validation datasets comprised 150,699, 37,675, and 85,098 patients, respectively. The AUCs (95% CIs) for Models 1 (demographics + vital signs), 2 (demographics + vital signs + initial ED physician note), 3 (demographics + vital signs + laboratory tests), and 4 (demographics + vital signs + laboratory tests + initial ED physician note) in the internal validation dataset were 0.789 (0.782-0.796), 0.867 (0.862-0.872), 0.881 (0.876-0.887), and 0.911 (0.906-0.915), respectively. In the external validation dataset, the AUCs (95% CIs) of Models 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.824 (0.817-0.830), 0.895 (0.890-0.899), 0.879 (0.873-0.884), and 0.913 (0.909-0.917), respectively. Model 1 can be utilized immediately after ED triage, Model 2 can be utilized after the initial physician notes are recorded (median time from ED triage: 28 min), and Models 3 and 4 can be utilized after the initial laboratory tests are reported (median time from ED triage: 68 min).
CONCLUSIONS
We developed and validated models to identify suspected serious infection in the ED. Extracted information from initial ED physician notes using NLP contributed to increased model performance, permitting identification of suspected serious infection at early stages of ED visits.
Collapse