Get up and get moving-early mobilisation after hip fracture surgery

What factors affect early mobilisation following hip fracture surgery: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Identify and evaluate factors affecting early mobilisation on the day following hip fracture surgery.

DESIGN

Mixed methods, scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, AMED, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, APA PsycArticles, ISRCTN, Clinical Trials registry and grey literature accessed in November 2022 with publication dates between 2001 and November 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

English language publications that:1. Include patient populations who sustain a fragility hip fracture managed surgically2. Include patient populations who are mobilised out of bed on the day following their hip fracture surgery3. Report factors which influence the ability to undergo early mobility postsurgery DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: One reviewer screened all titles and abstracts for inclusion. Two reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessments using the relevant Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

3337 papers were identified, of which 23 studies were eligible for review, representing 210 811 patients. The heterogeneity in the types of study included, the definition of early mobilisation and the outcome measures used precluded meta-analysis. 13 factors were identified as having an effect on whether people were mobilised on day 1 post-hip fracture surgery, grouped into 5 principal themes: (1) healthcare setting or worker-related factors, (2) patient psychological factors, (3) acute patient health factors, (4) non-acute patient health factors and (5) surgical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a paucity of robust research investigating day 1 mobilisation post-hip fracture surgery.Each of the five factors identified is potentially modifiable through service improvement change and innovation strategies. There is an opportunity to explore how service provision change could be implemented to improve outcomes for all patients following hip fracture surgery demonstrating the clinical and cost benefits of these changes against the cost of delivering the change.

Positive medial cortical support versus anatomical reduction for trochanteric hip fractures: Finite element analysis and biomechanical testing

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The anatomical reduction (AR) is usually considered the best option for fractures. Nevertheless, in unstable trochanteric hip fractures (UTHF), previous clinical reports found that the positive medial cortical support (PMCS, an over-reduction technique) attained higher mechanical stability, but this challenging clinical finding still needs experimental validation.

METHODS

This study constructed in-silico and biomechanical PMCS and AR models, with the use of the most clinically-representative geometry design of fracture models, the multi-directional design in FE analysis, and the subject-specific (osteoporotic) bone material properties, to make the models better mimic the actual condition in clinical settings. Then multiple performance variables (von-Mises stress, strain, integral axial stiffness, displacement, structural changes, etc.) were assessed to uncover details of integral and regional stability.

RESULTS

Among in-silico comparison, PMCS models showed significantly lower maximum displacement than AR models, and the maximum von Mises stress of implants (MVMS-I) was significantly lower in PMCS models than in AR models (highest MVMS-I in -30°-A3-AR of 1055.80 ± 93.37 MPa). Besides, PMCS models had significantly lower maximum von Mises stress along fracture surfaces (MVMS-F) (highest MVMS-F in 30°-A2-AR of 416.40 ± 38.01 MPa). Among biomechanical testing comparison, PMCS models showed significantly lower axial displacement. Significantly lower change of neck-shaft angle (CNSA) was observed in A2-PMCS models. A fair amount of AR models converted into the obvious negative medial cortical support (NMCS) condition, whereas all PMCS models kept the PMCS condition. The results were also validated through comparison to previous clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

The PMCS is superior to the AR in the UTHF surgery. The current study opens up the second thought of the role of over-reduction technique in bone surgery.

Effect of perioperative ultrasound guided fascia iliaca compartment block in elderly adults with hip fractures undergoing arthroplasty in spinal anesthesia-a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

For elderly adults undergoing hip arthroplasty, fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is often used before spinal anesthesia to reduce the pain of posture placement. However, the impact of FICB within 48 h needs further study.

METHODS

89 elderly adults scheduled to undergo arthroplasty for hip fracture were enrolled and randomized into the FICB group (n = 45) and the control group (n = 44). The fascia iliaca on the operated side was located using ultrasound, and a puncture needle was placed under the fascia iliaca. The FICB group was injected with 40 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine, and the control group was injected with 40 ml of normal saline. Spinal anesthesia was performed after 20 min. Our primary outcome measures were: duration of analgesia, muscle strength, and Quality of Recovery (QoR).

RESULTS

The duration of analgesia in the FICB group was 403.5 ± 39.6 min, which was longer than that (357.5 ± 35.9 min) of the control group (P = 0.012). There were 19 (42.2%) patients with muscle strength of grade 4 in the FICB group and 36 (81.8%) patients with muscle strength of grade 4 in the control group. FICB group was lower (P < 0.001). QoR-15 at 24 h after surgery was 114.1 ± 8.3 in the FICB group and 104.6 ± 8.4 in the control group (P < 0.001). QoR-15 at 48 h after surgery was 122.7 ± 8.4 in the FICB group and 120.5 ± 9.5 in the control group (P = 0.232).

CONCLUSIONS

For elderly adults with hip fractures, FICB provided longer analgesia and improved 24-h QoR, but reduced postoperative muscle strength.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Registry Center, ChiCTR2200056937, 23/02/2022.

Mobility and mortality outcomes among older individuals with hip fractures at a teaching hospital in Malaysia

The challenges of hip fracture care in Malaysia is scarcely discussed. This study evaluated the outcomes of older patients with hip fracture admitted to a teaching hospital in Malaysia. We found that one in five individuals was no longer alive at one year after surgery. Three out of five patients did not recover to their pre-fracture mobility status 6 months following hip fracture surgery.

PURPOSE

With the rising number of older people in Malaysia, it is envisaged that the number of fragility hip fractures would also increase. The objective of this study was to determine patient characteristics and long-term outcomes of hip fracture in older individuals at a teaching hospital in Malaysia.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study which included consecutive patients aged  ≥ 65 years old admitted to the orthopedic ward with acute hip fractures between March 2016 and August 2018. Patient socio-demographic details, comorbidities, pre-fracture mobility status, fracture type, operation and anesthesia procedure, and length of stay were recorded. Post-fracture mobility status was identified at 6 months. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the risk of death in all patients.

RESULTS

310 patients (70% women) with the mean age of 79.89 years (SD 7.24) were recruited during the study period. Of these, 284 patients (91.6%) underwent surgical intervention with a median time to surgery of 5 days (IQR 3-8) days. 60.4% of patients who underwent hip fracture surgery did not recover to their pre-fracture mobility status. One year mortality rate was 20.1% post hip fracture surgery. The independent predictor of mortality included advanced age (hazard ratio, HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.08; p = 0.01), dependency on activities of daily living (HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.26-3.45; p = 0.01), and longer length of hospitalization (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

One in 5 individuals who underwent hip fracture surgery at a teaching hospital in Kuala Lumpur was no longer alive at one year. A systematic approach to hip fracture management is crucial to improve outcomes and restore pre-fracture function of this vulnerable group of patients.

Mobilisation and physiotherapy intervention following hip fracture: snapshot survey across six countries from the Fragility Fracture Network Physiotherapy Group

PURPOSE

Hip fracture guidelines recommend early mobilisation, multidisciplinary care, physiotherapy and fall prevention interventions. This study documents mobilisation practices and physiotherapy interventions provided post-hip fracture in six countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Physiotherapists from orthopaedic wards in Denmark, Australia, Spain, Brazil, Norway and Ireland provided information regarding mobilisation and physiotherapy for 10 consecutive hip fracture patients (>60 years), between 2014 and 2018.

RESULTS

Physiotherapists (n = 107) entered data on 426 patients. Two-thirds of patients (283, 66%) attempted standing 0-1 days after surgery (range: 0% of patients in Spain to 92% in Norway). Fewer patients (199, 47%) attempted walking on day 0-1 (range: 0% Spain/Brazil to 69% Norway). Physiotherapy to mobilise every weekday was provided to 356 patients (84%, range: 60% Ireland to 100% Spain). On weekends, physiotherapy to mobilise was limited (175, 40%, range: 0% Spain to 81% Brazil) but 298 patients (70%) mobilised with non-physiotherapy staff (range: 0% Spain to 96% Denmark/Ireland). Physiotherapy treatments included mobility, gait training, and range-of-motion exercises. Referral to fall prevention interventions was low (93, 22%, range: 0% Spain to 76% Ireland).

CONCLUSION

Stronger compliance with guideline recommendations on early mobilising, weekend mobilising and referral to fall prevention interventions post hip-fracture is needed in some countries.Implications for rehabilitation This study provides a snapshot of mobilisation and physiotherapy practice for hip fracture patients in six countries. The results suggest a need to improve systems and approaches in some countries to enhance compliance with recommendations specifically relating to: • early attempts at standing and walking post-surgery. • opportunities to mobilise on weekends (with physiotherapist and/or other staff). • broader range of multidisciplinary care e.g., geriatric review, occupational therapy and nutrition advice. • use of standardised tests by physiotherapists post-surgery. • referral to fall prevention interventions.

Geographic variation in hip fracture surgery rate, care quality and outcomes: a comparison between national registries in Ireland and Denmark

Ireland and Denmark have similar hip fracture surgery rates but differences in care quality indicators and patterns of intracapsular fracture repair. Very high variation in total hip arthroplasty rate within both countries and higher observed early mortality in Denmark require further investigation.

PURPOSE

To explore and compare geographic variation of hip fracture surgery rate, care quality and outcomes in Ireland and Denmark.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 65 years with surgically treated hip fracture were included from the Irish Hip Fracture Database (years = 2017-2020, n = 12,904) and the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry (years = 2016-2017, n = 12,924). The age and sex standardised rate of hip fracture surgery and the proportion of patients with seven process quality indicators, three surgery types and four outcomes were calculated. Systematic components of variation (SCV) were calculated based on hospital area (6 Irish hospital groups, 5 Danish regions).

RESULTS

The age and sex standardised rate of hip fracture surgery per 1000 older population in 2017 was 4.7 (95% CI = 4.4-5.1) in Ireland and 5.3 (95% CI = 5.1-5.5) in Denmark. Ireland had lower rates of surgery within 36 h (59% versus 84%), nutritional assessment (27% versus 84%) and pre-discharge mobility recording (52% versus 92%). Patterns of intracapsular fracture repair also differed between countries (hemiarthroplasty: Ireland = 85%, Denmark = 52%). Both countries had very high variation for total hip arthroplasty (THA) provision (SCV Ireland = 10.6, Denmark = 97.9). Ireland had longer hospital stays (median 12 versus 7 days), but lower 7-day (1.0% versus 3.1%) and 14-day (2.0% versus 5.5%) mortality.

CONCLUSION

Ireland and Denmark have similar hip fracture surgery rates, but differences in care quality, surgery patterns and outcomes. High variation in THA provision and observed differences in mortality require further exploration. In Ireland, there is scope for improvement regarding early surgery, mobility, nutrition assessment and improved post-discharge follow-up.