Prescribing and deprescribing in very old age: perceptions of very old adults, caregivers and health professionals

Deprescribing Hypertension Medication in Older Adults: Can It Lower Drug Burden Without Causing Harm?

Due to the high prevalence of older individuals with multiple morbidities, polypharmacy, and exposed to unnecessary or inappropriate treatments that can cause potentially serious adverse effects, better medication management should be an objective of all health professionals. This is particularly important in older patients with hypertension. Antihypertensive deprescribing and non-pharmacological strategies have been disseminated as viable and safe alternatives for improving the quality of care for hypertension in the older population.

Co-designing Medication Optimization Patient-Centered Outcomes Research With Older People and Caregivers as Research Partners

Background: Additional evidence is required to address the unintended consequences of medication use in older people and the required caregiver support. To inform priorities for future research efforts, different stakeholder perspectives are needed, including those of older people, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Objective: To develop a co-designed medication-related research agenda. Methods: A 12-member Advisory Council, half of which were older people and caregivers, designed the research. An 11-question survey to identify priorities for medication-related patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) topics was administered to members of the Elder Care Medicine Network (ECMN) (ie, older people, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers). Respondents were categorized into two groups with hierarchical assignment to the clinician/research group over the older adult/caregiver group. Chi-square tests compared priority areas for medication-related PCOR between the two groups. Results: There were 53 responses (48% response rate) from the ECMN, with 39.6% (n = 21) from the clinician/researcher group and 60.4% (n = 32) from the older adult/caregiver group. The priority areas from both groups included safe ways to simplify medicines (62.2%), communicating with pharmacists and prescribers about medications (58.5%), and information about safe supplements with prescription medications (52.8%). Statistically significant differences existed between the two groups in the proportions choosing the priority areas. Conclusion: Co-design of a survey to identify priority areas for PCOR demonstrated successful engagement of older people and caregivers as research partners. While older people and caregivers may have differing perspectives on the importance of specific medication-related PCOR topics, simplifying medication regimen and health care communications were germane to both groups.

[The relevant role of caregivers of patients using opioid analgesics]

Aging is a global reality that is accompanied by an increase in polypharmacy. In this vital stage, caregivers emerge as relevant actors since their intervention impacts on the safety of the medication use process and on the quality of life of the patient they assist. As the knowledge about the treatments that caregivers supervise for the patient under their care conditions the health outcomes of the medications, the main objective of this study is to characterize the caregivers of patients who use opioid analgesics and to identify factors that increase the risk of the appearance of Medication Related Problems (DRP).The results reveal that the caregiver profile affects the health outcomes of this therapeutic group in both the prevalence and type of DRP. Of the 63 patients using opioid analgesics under pharmacotherapeutic follow-up during this study, 17 (27%) had caregivers. The caregiver in this study was predominantly female (61.1%).Considering DRP and kinship, a higher prevalence of DRP was observed when the caregivers were children or external personnel.Analyzing the pharmacotherapy of these caregivers, 4.8% have started antidepressant treatment, 3.2% hypnotic treatment after becoming caregivers of these patients. The Zarit Test reveals that 29.4% of the caregivers of these patients manifest overload.We conclude that Pharmaceutical Care should consider the opportunity and relevance of designing and implementing intervention and education protocols focused on caregivers.

'Troubling' medication reviews in the context of polypharmacy and ageing: A linguistic ethnography

Healthy ageing is a global priority. Polypharmacy (the use of 5+ medicines) amongst older people is increasing, with over one-third of adults in England, aged 80-89, prescribed at least eight medications. Although sometimes necessary, polypharmacy can be harmful; the risk of harm increases with age and number of medicines prescribed. Medication reviews are recommended as one way of reducing the potential harms of polypharmacy although evidence of clinically significant benefit of medication reviews as currently delivered is limited. What happens in medication reviews in practice is poorly understood. We used a linguistic ethnography approach to explore how medication reviews proceed and what is accomplished during these consultations. We studied 18 video-recorded medication review consultations from three general practices in England. The consultations involved patients aged 65 or older, prescribed 10+ medications ('higher risk' polypharmacy), and primary care clinicians (general practitioner or clinical pharmacist). Video-recordings were gathered as part of a wider ethnographic study investigating practices of polypharmacy in primary care between 2017 and 2021. We conducted microanalysis of consultation data, drawing on our ethnographic knowledge of the organisational, institutional and domestic contexts of polypharmacy to inform our interpretation of these interactions. Consultations were time-consuming and involved lengthy stretches of interactional trouble: non-understandings; misunderstandings; misalignments. These stretches revealed profound uncertainties as to the effectiveness of medicines in the context of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. These uncertainties seeped further into 'troubles talk' concerning patients' existential concerns relating to enduring illness, ageing and mortality. Although these existential concerns were partially articulated, clinicians and patients left such troubles talk unelaborated, unresolved and unfinished. Participants succeeded in smoothing over interactional difficulties and maintaining respectful relationships but often fell short of addressing problematic polypharmacy more directly.

Strategies for Identifying Patients for Deprescribing of Blood Pressure Medications in Routine Practice: An Evidence Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarise the evidence regarding which patients might benefit from deprescribing antihypertensive medications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Older patients with frailty, multi-morbidity and subsequent polypharmacy are at higher risk of adverse events from antihypertensive treatment, and therefore may benefit from antihypertensive deprescribing. It is possible to examine an individual's risk of these adverse events, and use this to identify those people where the benefits of treatment may be outweighed by the harms. While such patients might be considered for deprescribing, the long-term effects of this treatment strategy remain unclear. Evidence now exists to support identification of those who are at risk of adverse events from antihypertensive treatment. These patients could be targeted for deprescribing interventions, although the long-term benefits and harms of this approach are unclear.

PERSPECTIVES

Randomised controlled trials are still needed to examine the long-term effects of deprescribing in high-risk patients with frailty and multi-morbidity.

Deprescribing potential of commonly used medications among community-dwelling older adults: insights from a pharmacist's geriatric assessment

Pharmacist's geriatric assessment can provide valuable insights into potential deprescribing targets, while including important information on various health-related domains. Data collected from a geriatric assessment questionnaire, for 388 patients, from the Croatian cohort of the EuroAgeism H2020 ESR 7 international project, along with guideline-based deprescribing criteria, were used to analyse potentially inappropriate prescribing of four medication groups (benzodiazepines (BZN), proton pump inhibitors (PPI), opioids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)), and to assess the deprescribing potential. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the effects of age, gender, number of medicines and diagnoses, self-reported health, frailty score, and healthcare utilization on the likelihood of needing deprescribing. More than half of participants (n = 216, 55.2%) are candidates for deprescribing, with 31.1% of PPI, 74.8% of NSAID, 75% of opioid, and 96.1% of BZN users meeting at least one criterion. Most common criteria for deprescribing were inappropriately long use and safety concerns. Women (aOR = 2.58; p < 0.001), those reporting poor self-reported health (aOR = 5.14; p < 0.001), and those exposed to polypharmacy (aOR = 1.29; p < 0.001) had higher odds of needing to have medicines deprescribed. The high rate of deprescribing potential warrants prompt action to increase patient safety and decrease polypharmacy. Pharmacist's geriatric assessment and deprescribing-focused medication review could be used to lead a personalised approach.