Effectiveness of interventions in older adults with cognitive frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Summary of best evidence for prevention and management of frailty

BACKGROUND

Frailty in older people can seriously affect their quality of life and increase the demand for long-term care and health care expenses. Aims of this study are to provide an evidence-based basis for clinical practice of frailty in older people by systematically searching for the best current evidence on interventions for the prevention and management of frailty.

METHODS

According to the '6S' evidence resource model, evidence retrieval is searched from the top-down and collected relevant guidelines, best practices, evidence summaries, systematic reviews and expert consensus. The retrieval time limit was from the database establishment to 20 March 2023. Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated the literature, and then extracted and summarised the evidence according to the JBI grading of evidence and recommendation system.

RESULTS

A total of 44 publications were finally included, including 12 guidelines, 5 best practices, 4 expert consensus, 5 evidence summaries and 18 systematic reviews. Through the induction and integration of the evidence, the evidence was finally summarised from eight aspects: frailty screening, frailty assessment, exercise intervention, nutrition intervention, multi-domain intervention, drug administration, social support and health education, and 43 best evidences were formed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study summarised the best evidence for the prevention and management of frailty from eight aspects, which can provide guidance for clinical or community medical staff to develop and apply frailty intervention and practice programmes for older people and improved the clinical outcome and quality of life of older people.

Prevalence and associated factors of cognitive frailty in community-dwelling older adults: Results from the Korean longitudinal study of aging

BACKGROUND

Cognitive frailty, a condition characterized by physical frailty with cognitive impairment, is emerging as a determinant of adverse health outcomes in older adults. However, its prevalence and correlation with associated factors are unknown in the aging population of Korea.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of cognitive frailty and identify factors associated with it among older Korean adults.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was performed using the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging seventh survey dataset collected in 2018. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between cognitive frailty and demographic, psychosocial, oral health and physical function factors. Individuals aged ≥65 years and without dementia were included (N = 1024). Participants were classified into four groups based on the presence or absence of physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment. This article is executed in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement.

RESULTS

The prevalence of cognitive frailty in the study sample was 11.2%. The results of multinomial logistic regression showed that advanced age, being female, lower education levels, heart disease, arthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, underweight, depression, non-social activity, poor oral health and functional limitation were significantly associated with cognitive frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive frailty is prevalent among community-dwelling older adults in Korea. The findings provide primary care providers with insights about effective strategies for identifying at-risk individuals and will guide the development of population-level interventions to prevent or delay the onset of physical frailty and cognitive impairment in older adults.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The findings provide practical information to healthcare providers for identifying cognitive frailty in older adults. The risk factors of cognitive frailty, such as psychosocial, oral health, and physical function factors, should be thoroughly monitored for older adults. Health personnel working in primary care have a critical role in identifying risk and beneficial factors and promoting preventative strategies that enhance health outcomes.

Does Multicomponent Training Improve Cognitive Function in Older Adults Without Cognitive Impairment? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

To carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to verify the effects of multicomponent training on the cognitive function of older adults without cognitive impairment.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Adults aged 60 years and older.

METHODS

The searches were accomplished through MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases. We performed the searches up to November 18, 2022. The study included only randomized controlled trials and older adults without any cognitive impairment (dementia, Alzheimer's, mild cognitive impairment, neurologic diseases). Risk of Bias 2 tool and PEDro scale was performed.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review, of which 6 (involving 166 participants) were compiled in the meta-analysis of random effects models. The Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment were used to assess global cognitive function. The Trail-Making Test (TMT) (A and B domains) was performed by 4 studies. Compared with the control group, multicomponent training increases the global cognitive function (standardized mean difference = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34-0.81, I² = 11%; P < .001). Regarding TMT-A and TMT-B, multicomponent training decreases the time performed in the tests (TMT-A: mean difference = -6.70, 95% CI: -10.19 to -3.21; I² = 51%; P = .0002) (TMT-B: mean difference = -8.80, 95% CI: -17.59 to -0.01; I² = 69%; P = .05). The PEDro scale for the studies in our review ranged from 7 to 8 (mean = 7.4 ± 0.5), meaning good methodologic quality, and most studies were judged as at least low in terms of risk of bias.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Multicomponent training improves cognitive function in older adults without cognitive impairment. Therefore, a possible protective effect of multicomponent training for cognitive function in older adults is suggested.