The cost-effectiveness of routine histologic examination

Histologic Examination of Mastectomy Scars during Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background

Breast reconstruction is a standard procedure in postmastectomy plastic surgery. The necessity of routine histological examinations for mastectomy scars during delayed reconstruction remains a topic of debate. We evaluated the need for histological examination of scars during delayed breast reconstruction.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, TDnet, and Cochrane Central in August 2023. Inclusion criteria involved delayed breast reconstruction with histological scar analysis and malignancy reporting. Exclusion criteria encompassed noncancerous breast diseases, prophylactic mastectomies, articles lacking relevant information, case reports, technique descriptions, and reviews. We independently assessed articles. Differences in recurrence rates were determined using a Z-test for proportions. A linear regression model explored the relationship between reconstruction timing and pathological results. The number needed to treat was calculated based on the literature. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare mean reconstruction times and postreconstruction follow-up between groups.

Results

Our analysis covered 11 retrospective observational studies published between 2003 and 2018, including 3754 mastectomy scars. The malignancy recurrence rate was 0.19%, consistent with previous reports, with a number needed to treat of 144.93-188.68 patients. The timing of breast reconstruction postmastectomy averaged 19.9 months, without statistically significant association between reconstruction timing and recurrence rates. Postreconstruction follow-up periods ranged from 60 to 87 months. The postreconstruction adverse outcomes ratio was 2.21%.

Conclusions

Assessing the necessity of histological examination in breast reconstruction is complex. Based on the literature and this study, we do not recommend routine histological examination of mastectomy scars during delayed reconstruction. A selective approach based on risk factors may be beneficial, warranting further research.

The Limited Utility of Routine Pathologic Examination of Ganglion Cyst Excision From the Hand and Digits

BACKGROUND

It is routine practice at many institutions to send surgically excised ganglion cysts for pathologic analysis. This adds significant cost to the procedure with questionable benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine the necessity of routine pathologic examination of ganglion cysts excised from the hand.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 443 patients who underwent ganglion excision from the hand with routine pathologic examination between 2012 and 2022. The final pathologic diagnosis was compared with the treating surgeon's clinical diagnosis, and the rates of concordant, discrepant, and discordant diagnoses were identified. Discrepant diagnoses were defined as differing clinical and pathologic diagnoses that did not change clinical management. Discordant diagnoses were defined as differing clinical and pathologic diagnoses that altered the treatment plan.

RESULTS

The prevalence of a concordant diagnosis was 96.2% (426 of 443; 95% confidence interval, 94.4%-98.0%). The prevalence of a discrepant diagnosis was 3.8% (17 of 443; 95% confidence interval, 2.1%-5.6%), and the prevalence of a discordant diagnosis was 0. The odds ratio was 0.04 for a discrepant diagnosis and 0 for a discordant diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests abandoning routine pathologic analysis in patients undergoing ganglion cyst excision from the hand will not compromise quality of care when the surgeon is able to make a confident diagnosis. Discrepant diagnoses were rare and discordant diagnoses that did not occur. We recommend pathologic evaluation only when there is uncertainty in the clinical diagnosis.

Routine evaluation of tonsillectomy specimens: a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgeons

Background

Tonsillectomy is a commonly performed procedure in Canada. The rate of occult malignancy is rare in adult and pediatric populations. At present, no guidelines exist surrounding the need for routine histopathological evaluation of tonsil specimens when no malignancy is suspected.

Methods

We sent a confidential online survey to active members of the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (CSO-HNS) about their current tonsillectomy practice and beliefs surrounding the need for routine histopathological evaluation of tonsillectomy specimens when no malignancy is suspected. We used Opinio survey software for data collection and descriptive statistics.

Results

95 participants completed our survey (response rate 19.3%). Most participants reported performing both adult and pediatric tonsillectomies. When no malignancy is suspected, participant responses were split between whether they send tonsil specimens in pediatrics only (4.2%), in adults only (31.6%), or not sending specimens (29.5%). Half of the participants reported that routinely sending specimens to rule out occult malignancy is an institutional policy. Approximately 75% of participants were in favour of removing this practice in both the pediatric and adult populations.

Conclusion

Eliminating the practice of automatically sending tonsil specimens for histopathological evaluation when no malignancy is suspected was supported by the majority of study participants. This is in keeping with Choosing Wisely, a campaign designed to facilitate conversations about unnecessary medical tests and procedures. Institutional change is likely required in order to alter this practice.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-022-00569-7.

Diagnostic Utility and Significance of Performing Multistep Level Sections in Breast and Gynecologic Biopsy Specimens

OBJECTIVES

The significance of performing multistep level sections, including preparation of unstained sections in breast and gynecologic biopsy specimens, has been studied.

METHODS

Consecutive H&E-stained level sections of 785 atypical and malignant biopsy specimens were included. The diagnostic material was categorized into present, absent, increased in size, or depleted. If the multistep level sections helped in establishing the diagnosis after a nondiagnostic material or the tissue significantly increased in size, this was considered a positive impact.

RESULTS

No effect and positive impact of performing multistep level sections were obtained in 84.8% and 15.2% by preparing a second level and 97.2% and 2.8% by preparing a third level, respectively. Eighteen (2.3%) of the diagnoses could have been missed without performing a second level, while 8 (1%) could have been missed without performing a third level. The intervening unstained sections were used in 27 of 785 (3.4%) of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Staining two level sections with H&E significantly affected the diagnosis. However, preparing a third level did not improve the diagnosis. A universal protocol should be considered to standardize the handling of biopsy specimens among laboratories.

Discrepant histological diagnoses: A cause of early low FJS-12 score and if untreated, unhappy Total Knee Arthroplasty patient

PURPOSE

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most successful operations in orthopedics. Still, a sizable percentage of patients (20%) remain dissatisfied after a well-executed TKA. The study aims to examine the excised synovium from the suprapatellar region in osteoarthritic knees during TKA and evaluate the histopathology (HP) report to know whether discrepant diagnoses affect the Forgotten Joint Score-12 at various time intervals.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study. Two hundred (160 female; 40 male) end-stage osteoarthritis patients who underwent primary TKA were studied. An inclusion criterion was patient with end-stage osteoarthritis. Clinically and serologically proven rheumatoid arthritis patients were excluded from the study. The synovium excised during the TKA procedure was sent for the HP examination. The statistical significance was measured with the Chi-square test and two-sample t-test.

RESULTS

A total of 184 out of the 200 patients (92%) knee synovium showed HP features of osteoarthritis. The discordant diagnoses and discrepant diagnosis rate was 8% and 7%, respectively, which is statistically significant by Chi-square test (p value < 0.0001 and p value = 0.0001). 14 of the patients (12 F:2 M) showed histological features of inflammatory/rheumatoid arthritis who were treated, two patients (all female) showed HP features of villonodular synovitis. The mean (SD) improvement in FJS-12 at six weeks in the concordant group (25.3 [17.6]) is significantly more than the discrepant group (15.3 [12.5]), p-value 0.0385.

CONCLUSION

8% of our patients exhibited unexpected results. The study showed a 7% rate of discrepant diagnosis. This discrepant diagnosis if missed and untreated, would have affected the function and long-term survival of the implanted TKA.

Rising incidence of appendiceal neoplasms over time: Does pathological handling of appendectomy specimens play a role?

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is the most common emergent surgical procedure. Primary appendiceal neoplasms are rare entities that are usually detected incidentally in less than 2% of all appendectomies. The increase in the incidence rates of appendiceal neoplasms over time raises the question whether there is an actual change in the disease occurrence or is it a matter of increased recognition and reporting of what would have been previously missed and undiagnosed.

OBJECTIVES

In our study, we aimed to review the archived tissue specimens of patients who were diagnosed with appendiceal neoplasms during the past decade at our institution and compare our clinical experience with published data to identify possible reasons that contribute to the increase in incidence rates of such neoplasms over the past few years.

METHODS

Using a pathological database of surgical specimens from patients who underwent appendectomies between January 01, 2010 and September 30, 2020 at a large academic medical center, a single-center retrospective cohort analysis was performed, and medical charts of patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the total 1568 patients included, 102 (6.5%) had appendiceal neoplasms divided between primary (79.4%) and secondary/metastatic (20.6%) neoplasms. Annual incidence of appendiceal neoplasms over the past 10 years in our institution demonstrated an increasing trend from 5.6% in 2010 to 12.7% in 2020, which we hypothesize might be attributed to submitting more representative sections of the appendix for pathological examination than we had previously. Our results also showed that 2.8% of patients initially presenting with a typical clinical picture of acute appendicitis had appendiceal neoplasms as a truly incidental finding, while 20.3% of patients who underwent elective appendectomies for a suspicious appendiceal mass were found to be neoplastic. Interestingly, among the 80 cases of epithelial neoplasms, more non-carcinoid neoplasms were detected than carcinoid tumors.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results and what has been published recently, we confirm an additional increase in incidental appendiceal neoplasms found in appendectomies performed for a clinical picture of acute appendicitis, which may be related to more thorough specimen assessment. Whether this is clinically impactful remains to be determined. However, these data support a modification in the way appendectomy specimens are handled in pathology labs post-operatively.

Incidental secondary findings in hemorrhoidectomy specimens: a 16-year experience from a single academic center

Hemorrhoidectomy specimens serve as an excellent resource for study of incidental anal pathology. Detection of most incidental findings is quite rare, although diagnosing clinically significant lesions can have profound impact on the clinical follow-ups. While there are many case reports of incidental findings in hemorrhoidectomy specimens, there are few large studies focused on this topic. The aim of this study was to describe the spectrum and likelihood of detecting incidental findings in hemorrhoidectomy specimens. We reviewed all hemorrhoidectomy specimens that showed incidental clinically significant diagnoses over a 16-year period (2003-2019) for this study. Patient's age, sex, and significant clinical history (Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status, precursor lesions, other malignancy) were recorded from clinical notes. We identified incidental clinically significant findings in 72 of 1612 (4.5%) specimens. We identified 7 incidental malignancies (squamous cell carcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, mixed adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, melanoma), 54 anal intraepithelial neoplasias (AINs), and 11 benign findings (melanocytic lesions, colorectal polyps, angiokeratoma, infectious/inflammatory). Within the AIN group, the detection of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs) remained steady; there was a recent, sustained rise in detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), with more cases showing HSILs (2.6%) than only LSILs (0.7%). In 72.2% of patients, the incidental secondary finding represented a first diagnosis for that entity in the anal canal. Thirty seven percent of patients with anal dysplasia in the hemorrhoidectomy specimen had a prior diagnosis of squamous dysplasia in the anogenital tract. Overall, significant incidental findings were detected in 4.5% (72/1612) of hemorrhoidectomies, supporting routine histological examination of these specimens.

Co-Registration of Peripheral Atherosclerotic Plaques Assessed by Conventional CT Angiography, MicroCT and Histology in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

To co-register conventional computed tomography angiography (CTA), with ex vivo micro-computed tomography (microCT) and histology of popliteal atherosclerotic plaques. Improving the non-invasive imaging capabilities may be valuable to advance patient care with peripheral arterial obstructive disease towards lesion and individual based treatment.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 12 popliteal arteries from 11 symptomatic patients who had undergone transfemoral amputations for chronic limb threatening ischaemia and who had pre-operative CTA, were analysed ex vivo by microCT and histology. A total of 353 histological cross sections were co-registered with microCT and CTA, and classified as: lipid rich (LP, n = 26), fibrous (FP, n = 80), or calcific (CP, n = 247) plaques. CTA and microCT plaque density was calculated in 791 regions of interest as Hounsfield units (HU).

RESULTS

CTA and microCT could identify plaque components that were confirmed by histology such as fibrous tissue (FP), lipid pool/core (LP), and calcification (CP). MicroCT densities were 77.8 HU for FP (IQR 52.8, 129.5 HU), -28.4 HU for LP (IQR -87.1, 13.2 HU), and 3826.0 HU for CP (IQR 2989.0, 4501.0 HU). CTA densities of the three components of the plaque were: 78.0 HU for FP (IQR 59.5, 119.8 HU), 32.5 HU for LP (IQR 15.0, 42 HU), and 641.5 HU for CP (IQR 425.8, 1135 HU). The differences were statistically significant between the HU densitometric characteristics among the three groups (p < .0001) for both imaging modalities. Overall, microCT performed better diagnostically than conventional CTA for the three types of plaques: areas under the receiving operator characteristics curve were greater for microCT than CTA for FP (0.97 vs. 0.90), for LP (0.88 vs. 0.67), and for CP (0.97 vs. 0.90).

CONCLUSION

CTA and microCT can be used to identify histological atherosclerotic plaque components, with better diagnostic performance for microCT. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using microCT to assess plaque morphology lesions in a manner that approaches histology thus becoming a useful tool for ex vivo assessment of atherosclerosis and towards lesion based treatment.

Indiscriminate Pathologic Examination of Pediatric Supraglottoplasty Specimens: An Evidence-Based Approach toward Exempt Status

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate that indiscriminate pathologic evaluation of supraglottoplasty specimens is unnecessary and does not influence postoperative management. The secondary objective was to determine the costs associated with pathologic evaluation of supraglottoplasty specimens.

METHODS

A planned chart review was conducted to evaluate data from consecutive patients undergoing supraglottoplasty. Demographic data were extracted and pathology reports were reviewed. Projected cost savings were estimated based on 2018 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reimbursement rates for Current Procedural Terminology code 88304 (surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination).

RESULTS

A total of 1417 consecutive patients were identified. All specimens underwent gross and microscopic examination. Pathologic outcomes were categorized into 3 major categories: no diagnostic abnormality (n = 1069), chronic inflammation (n = 346), and other (n = 2). Pathologic evaluation did not alter postoperative management in any patient. Projected yearly and 5-year cost- savings totaled $11,818.08 and $59,173.92, respectively.

DISCUSSION

These findings demonstrate that pathologic examination of supraglottoplasty specimens adds no value to patient management. A more selective approach to pathologic examination of certain surgical specimens is an improvement opportunity to enhance the value of patient care by eliminating direct financial costs and "hidden costs" associated with unnecessarily increased workload.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Addressing inappropriate, indiscriminate pathologic examination of certain surgical specimens is a potential quality improvement opportunity that has a meaningful impact on the value of patient care and reduces strains on the workload of surgical and pathology department personnel.

Are Histological Examinations of Arthroplasty Specimens Performed Consistently Across the Country? A Large Database Study

BACKGROUND

It is currently unknown to what extent routine histological examination of joint arthroplasty specimens occurs across hospitals nationwide. Although this practice is neither supported nor refuted by the available evidence, given the increasing demand for joint arthroplasties, it is crucial to study overall utilization as well as its main drivers.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Using national data on joint replacements, we aimed to evaluate: (1) What is the current use of routine histological examination of joint arthroplasty specimens? (2) Does the use vary by geographic location and hospital characteristics? (3) Has use changed over time?

METHODS

From the Premier Healthcare database (2006-2016) we included claims data from 87,667 shoulder (595 hospitals, median age 70 years, 16% nonwhite), 564,577 hip (629 hospitals, median age 65 years, 21% nonwhite), and 1,131,323 (630 hospitals, median age 66 years, 24% nonwhite) knee arthroplasties (all elective). Our study group has extensive experience with this data set, which contains information on 20% to 25% of all US hospitalizations. Included hospitals are mainly concentrated in the South (approximately 40%) with equal distributions among the Northeast, West, and Midwest (approximately 20% each). Moreover, the Premier data set has detailed billing information, which allows for evaluations of real-world clinical practice. There was no missing information on the main variables of interest for this specific study. We assessed frequency of histology examination (defined by Current Procedural Terminology codes) overall as well as by hospital characteristics (urban/rural, bed size, teaching status, arthroplasty volume), geographic region (Northeast, South, Midwest, West), and year. Given the large sample size, instead of p values, standardized differences were applied in assessing group differences where a standardized difference of > 0.1 (or 10%) was assumed to represent a meaningful difference between groups. For significance of trends, p values were applied. Percentages provided represent proportions of individual procedures.

RESULTS

In most hospitals, histology testing was either rare (1%-10%, used in 187 of 595, 189 of 629, and 254 of 630 hospitals) or ubiquitous (91%-100%, used in 121 of 595, 220 of 629, and 195 of 630 hospitals) for shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasties, respectively. Overall, histology testing occurred more often in smaller hospitals (37%-53% compared with 26%-45% in larger hospitals) and those located in the Northeast (59%-68% compared with 22%-44% in other regions) and urban areas (32%-49% compared with 20%-31% in rural areas), all with standardized differences > 10%. Histologic examination is slowly decreasing over time: from 2006 to 2016, it decreased from 34% to 30% for shoulder arthroplasty, from 50% to 45% for THAs, and from 43% to 38% for TKAs (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although overall use is decreasing, a substantial number of hospitals still routinely perform histology testing of arthroplasty specimens. Moreover, variation between regions and hospital types suggests that this practice is driven by a variety of factors. This is the first study addressing national utilization, which will be helpful for individual hospitals to assess how they compare with national utilization patterns. Moreover, the findings have clear implications for followup studies, which may be necessary given the exponentially growing demand for arthroplasties.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Use of Routine Pathologic Evaluation of Nonmalignant Lesions in Hand Surgery: A National Study

BACKGROUND

Most lesions of the upper extremity are common and benign, and many have questioned the need for routine pathologic evaluation of these specimens. The authors aim to examine the national use of routine pathologic examination of nonmalignant hand lesions to help guide health care policy and practice patterns.

METHODS

The authors used a national level MarketScan database to form a cohort of adult patients who underwent excision of nonmalignant upper extremity lesions. The authors calculated the rate of submission for each surgical procedure and separately for each diagnosis. The authors also investigated demographic and clinical characteristics associated with the submission of surgical specimens using a multivariable logistic regression model. The authors calculated the total cost of routine pathologic evaluation.

RESULTS

The final study cohort included 222,947 patients and 182,962 specimens from 153,518 cases. The mean rate of submission was 69 percent. Older age, Northeast region, and high comorbidity scores showed significant correlation with the odds of having a specimen submitted for pathologic evaluation. Excision of primary wrist ganglion was the most performed procedure, and benign lesions larger than 4.0 cm were most frequently submitted for pathologic evaluation. The mean cost of routine pathologic examination was $133 per specimen, and the annual expenditure was $5 million.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine pathologic examination of benign hand lesions is used frequently but provides limited clinical benefit at a cost. To increase efficiency and improve quality of care, surgeons should be aware of the low value of routine pathologic evaluation and be more selective for cases for which diagnostic testing will change management.

Routine Pathologic Evaluation of Plastic Surgery Specimens: Are We Wasting Time and Money?

BACKGROUND

Recent health care changes have encouraged efforts to decrease costs. In plastic surgery, an area of potential cost savings includes appropriate use of pathologic examination. Specimens are frequently sent because of hospital policy, insurance request, or habit, even when clinically unnecessary. This is an area where evidence-based guidelines are lacking and significant cost-savings can be achieved.

METHODS

All specimen submitted for pathologic examination at two hospitals between January and December of 2015 were queried for tissue expanders, breast implants, fat, skin, abdominal pannus, implant capsule, hardware, rib, bone, cartilage, scar, and keloid. Specimens not related to plastic surgery procedures were excluded. Pathologic diagnosis and cost data were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 759 specimens were identified. Of these, 161 were sent with a specific request for gross examination only. There were no clinically significant findings in any of the specimens. There was one incidental finding of a seborrheic keratosis on breast skin. The total amount billed in 2015 was $430,095.

CONCLUSIONS

The infrequency of clinically significant pathologic examination results does not support routine pathologic examination of all plastic surgery specimens. Instead, the authors justify select submission only when there is clinical suspicion or medical history that warrants evaluation. By eliminating unnecessary histologic or macroscopic examination, significant cost savings may be achieved.

Cost-benefit analysis of routine pathology examination in primary shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The annual number of shoulder arthroplasty procedures is continuing to increase. Specimens from shoulder arthroplasty cases are routinely sent for pathologic examination. This study sought to evaluate the clinical utility and associated costs of routine pathologic examination of tissue removed during primary shoulder arthroplasty cases and to determine cost-effectiveness of this practice.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of primary shoulder arthroplasty cases. Patients whose humeral head was sent for routine pathologic examination were included. Cases were determined to have concordant, discrepant, or discordant diagnoses based on preoperative/postoperative diagnosis and pathology diagnosis. Costs were estimated in 2015 U.S. dollars, and cost-effectiveness was determined by the cost per discrepant diagnosis and cost per discordant diagnosis.

RESULTS

We identified 714 cases of primary shoulder arthroplasty in 646 patients who met inclusion criteria. The prevalence of concordant diagnoses was 94.1%, the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 5.9%, and no cases had discordant diagnoses. There were 172 cases that had biceps tendon specimens sent for pathology examination, and none led to a change in patient care. Total estimated costs were $77,309.34 in 2015 U.S. dollars. Cost per discrepant diagnosis for humeral head specimens was $1424.09, and cost per discordant diagnosis is at least $59,811.78.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Primary shoulder arthroplasty has a high rate of concordant diagnosis. Discrepant diagnoses were 5.9% in our study, and there were no discordant diagnoses. This study showed limited clinical utility in routinely sending specimens from primary shoulder arthroplasty cases for pathology examination, and calculation using a traditional life-year value of $50,000 showed that the standard for cost-effectiveness is not met.

Unsuspected Malignancies in Routine Femoral Head Histopathologic Examination During Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Routine femoral head histopathology during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been recently reported as a potentially useful screening tool for bone- and bone marrow-associated malignancies. However, cost-effectiveness of routine histopathology during THA remains unclear due to low prevalence of significant medical findings which alter patient management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of routine histopathology in diagnosing unsuspected malignancy in patients undergoing primary THA.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2011, we retrospectively analyzed routine histopathologic findings of 3200 femoral head specimens from 2725 patients that underwent primary THA. Preoperative and postoperative diagnoses were classified into concordant (clinical diagnosis concurred with pathologic diagnosis), discrepant (differing diagnosis with no resultant impact on patient management), and discordant (differing diagnosis with subsequent change in patient management). Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using the incremental cost-utility ratio.

RESULTS

A total of 3055 of 3200 pathologic samples were concordant with the preoperative diagnosis (95.4%), 140 of 3200 were discrepant (4.4%), and 5 of 3200 were discordant (0.2%). Routine histopathology revealed 1 unsuspected malignancy out of 640 (5 of 3200) femoral heads. The total cost of histopathologic screening was $614,664.80. The average cost to identify a discrepant case was $4390.46, and the cost to identify a discordant case was $122,932.96. The incremental cost-utility ratio was $49,569.74 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates routine femoral head histopathology may be cost-effective in diagnosing unsuspected malignancy at $49,569.74/QALY gained (less than World Health Organization recommended threshold $159,000/QALY gained), providing useful clinical information for surgeons considering the value of routine femoral head histopathology in patients undergoing THA.

Does everything a surgeon takes out have to be seen by a pathologist? A review of the current pathology practice

Histopathologic examination of surgically removed tissues and organs is an important aspect of modern hospital quality health care. Most surgical specimens deserve to be submitted for pathologic examination, which may yield valuable new information relevant for the future treatment of the patient. A small number of specimens, recognized as providing limited or no valuable clinical data during pathologic examination, may be placed on the list of specimens "exempt from submission" or those that are labeled as "for gross examination only." Guidelines written by the committees of the national regulatory organizations provide general orientation on how to deal with various specimens, but the final decision on which type of specimen to eliminate and which ones to include for pathologic examination rests on local governing and advisory bodies of each institution. Particular lists of specimens exempt from pathologic examination are best generated through a consensus agreement of clinical and laboratory physicians. Even though there is general nationwide and even international consensus on which types of specimens deserve pathologic examination and which do not, there are still discussions about the necessity of some pathologic examinations.

Routine Examination of Pathology Specimens Following Knee Arthroscopy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

While the clinical value of routine pathologic examination of tissues removed during orthopaedic procedures has not been determined, limited cost-effectiveness and a low prevalence of findings that alter patient management have been previously demonstrated with arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of routine histological examination of knee arthroscopy specimens.

METHODS

Retrospective chart analysis of 3797 consecutive knee arthroscopies by two surgeons from 2004 to 2013 at three affiliated hospitals within one health-care system was undertaken. Pathology reports regarding tissue removed during partial meniscectomies and anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions were reviewed to determine if the results altered patient care. The total costs of histological examination were estimated in 2012-adjusted U.S. dollars. The cost per health effect was determined by calculating the cost per discrepant and discordant diagnosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of concordant diagnoses was 99.3% (3769 of 3797), the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 0.7% (twenty-seven of 3797), and the prevalence of discordant diagnoses was 0.026% (one of 3797). The total cost of histological examinations was estimated to be $371,810. The total cost of the pathology cost per discrepant diagnosis was $13,771, and the cost per discordant diagnosis was $371,810.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine pathological examination of surgical specimens from patients undergoing knee arthroscopy had limited cost-effectiveness because of the low prevalence of findings that altered patient management. Histological examination of surgical specimens from arthroscopic knee surgery did not alter patient care and increased costs. We suggest that gross and histological examination of tissue removed during knee arthroscopy should be done at the discretion of the orthopaedic surgeon rather than being mandatory.

Comparison of clinical and histologic diagnoses in 16,587 total joint arthroplasties: implications for orthopedic and pathologic practices

OBJECTIVES

To confirm how often histologic diagnoses correspond to reported clinical diagnoses in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasties.

METHODS

We compared the submitting operative diagnosis with the pathologic diagnosis in 16,587 total joint arthroplasties for the seven most common diagnoses.

RESULTS

The discrepancy rates between the submitted operative and histologic diagnosis were 18.8% for 7,968 total hip replacements and 9.4% for 8,619 total knee replacements. In addition, 5.4% of hip joints and 1.4% of knee joints demonstrated discordant histologic findings that had not been suspected clinically and should have affected clinical management and patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrated significantly more diagnostic discrepancies and discordance than has been suggested by the previously published literature. A large part of the difference may be due to more careful diagnostic analyses of orthopedic specimens than in other institutions. These analyses include some diagnoses that are not often made elsewhere but may have important future implications for patients.

Necessity of routine pathological examination after surgical excision of wrist ganglions

PURPOSE

The value of routine pathological evaluation of ganglion cysts is questionable considering that the pretest odds of a wrist lesion being a ganglion cyst are usually high based on physical examination and surgical findings alone. This study evaluates the necessity of routine pathological examination of specimens derived from surgical removal of wrist ganglion cysts.

METHODS

We identified 429 consecutive adult patients who underwent surgical excision of a wrist ganglion with routine pathological examination of the specimen between 1997 and 2008. The rates of concordant, discrepant, and discordant diagnoses were reported with 95% confidence intervals. The odds of a discrepant or discordant diagnosis were calculated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of a concordant diagnosis was 98.6% (424 of 429; 95% confidence interval, 97.3% to 99.6%). The prevalence of a discrepant diagnosis was 1.4% (5 of 429; 95% confidence interval, 0.38% to 2.7%), and the prevalence of a discordant diagnosis was zero. The odds ratio was 0.012 for a discrepant diagnosis and zero for a discordant diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that, in patients with the clinical diagnosis of wrist ganglion cyst, quality of care would not be compromised by abandoning the practice of routinely submitting surgical specimens for pathological examination after excision of the ganglion cyst. Discrepant diagnoses are encountered infrequently and discordant diagnoses did not occur. We recommend pathological examination only when the clear gelatinous fluid typical of a ganglion cyst is not encountered at surgery.

The clinical value of histologic examination in shoulder arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of histologic examination of tissues removed during shoulder arthroscopy has not been determined. The guidelines of the College of American Pathologists require routine histologic examination of all surgical specimens not specifically exempted by individual hospitals. Previous orthopaedic studies have examined the clinical value of these examinations in total hip and knee arthroplasty, lumbar discectomy, knee arthroscopy, and thumb arthroplasty. Those studies demonstrated that routine histologic examination rarely altered the diagnosis and increased the costs. This study examines the clinical value of histologic examination of shoulder arthroscopic specimens. We regard clinical value to include both diagnostic value and cost of the procedure.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 2005, 2144 consecutive shoulder arthroscopies were performed by one surgeon. We retrospectively reviewed the pathology report from every procedure to determine whether the histologic diagnosis affected patient care. We then estimated the total cost of histologic examination in 2005 dollars.

RESULTS

In all cases, the histologic examination confirmed the findings at arthroscopic surgery. In no case did the histologic findings alter patient care. In 2005 dollars, the total cost of reviewed histologic examinations is estimated to be $160,543.

CONCLUSIONS

Histologic examination of surgical specimens from arthroscopic shoulder surgery does not alter patient care, and it increases costs. On the basis of this study, histologic examination in shoulder arthroscopy should be done at the discretion of the orthopaedic surgeon rather than being mandatory.

Histopathological examination of intervertebral disc specimens: a cost-benefit analysis

OBJECT

Routine histopathological examination of intervertebral disc specimens is commonly performed in North American hospitals, but recent studies have questioned the utility of this practice in cases where the indication for surgery is a benign process such as degenerative disc disease. In this study, we have performed a cost-benefit analysis of this practice.

METHODS

We performed a cost-benefit analysis of routine histopathological examination of 1775 routine (non-neoplastic and non-infectious indications for surgery) and 70 non-routine (suspected neoplastic or infectious indications for surgery) discectomy specimens obtained over an eight-year period (1996 and 2004). Chart reviews were used to determine if any histopathology findings were clinically significant (i.e., affected subsequent patient care). Total costs were calculated. A literature review was conducted to compare our results with other published series.

RESULTS

We found four unexpected histopathology results among 1775 specimens obtained from routine cases, one of which was clinically significant. We calculated costs of $42,165.25 per unexpected histopathological finding and $168,625 per clinically significant histopathological finding. For non-routine surgeries, the cost per abnormal pathological finding was $116.67.

CONCLUSIONS

In routine cases, histopathological examination of disc specimens is not justified. The decision to send specimens for pathological examination should be based on the surgeon's judgment.

Squamous Dysplasia of the Uterine Cervix

Despite the technological advances in colposcopic techniques, there continues to be a 10% to 20% discordance rate between the colposcopic findings and the histological diagnoses on the resultant biopsies. One of the many factors to which this may be theoretically attributable is related to sampling error from the paraffin-embedded tissue block. In this study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of routinely obtaining 6 sections in cervical biopsies, using the frequency with which dysplastic lesions would be missed with various levels of sectioning as the sole benchmark determinant of clinical efficacy. Our database was searched for all cervical biopsies in which a diagnosis of squamous dysplastic lesion was made for the period February 1, 2006 to April 28, 2006. All cases were processed in 6-level sectioning, which entails cutting and staining (hematoxylin-eosin) 6 consecutive sections from the paraffin block without preserving or discarding any intervening unstained sections. The first level at which a diagnosis of dysplastic lesion could be unequivocally made by a gynecologic pathologist was determined. Six hundred consecutive biopsies from 404 patients were reviewed. For the whole cohort, the average level at which a dysplastic lesion was unequivocally diagnosable was 1.9 (median, 1). Three hundred fifty-seven (59.5%), 97 (16.2%), 41 (6.8%), 55 (9.2%), 34 (5.7%), and 16 (2.6%) of the 600 lesions were diagnosable at levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. The cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 (n = 89) was, on average, diagnosable at an earlier level (1.35) compared with CIN 1 (level, 2.025; P < 0.001 [n = 511]). Indeed, 79.8% of the CIN 2-3 cases were diagnosable at level 1, as compared with 56% of the CIN 1 cases (P < 0.001); 87, 38, 52, 32, and 16 cases of CIN 1 and 10, 3, 3, 2, and 0 cases of CIN 2-3 were diagnosable at levels 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively. Therefore, if sectioning were limited to 3 levels, 17.5% (105/600) of all dysplastic lesions would have been missed, including 19.6% (100/511) of CIN 1 and 5.6% (5/89) of CIN 2-3. Because not more than 3 levels are routinely evaluated in most laboratories, our findings suggest that sampling error is indeed at least 1 significant factor contributing to colposcopic/histological discrepancies. Using our clinical efficacy standard, when no pathologic findings are initially identified in a colposcopic-directed biopsy, at least 5 levels (a priori or in recuts) are required to ensure a 100% diagnostic accuracy for CIN 2-3.

Routine surgical pathology in general surgery

BACKGROUND

Although pathological analysis provides the definitive diagnosis for most resection specimens, recent evidence suggests that such analysis may be omitted for certain routine samples. This was a retrospective analysis of the value of routine histopathological examination performed in daily general surgical practice.

METHODS

All specimens from routine appendicectomies, cholecystectomies, haemorrhoidectomies and inguinal hernia repairs performed between 1993 and 2002 were included. The analysis included a comparison of histological and macroscopic diagnoses, review of preoperative and peroperative findings, and an evaluation of the consequences of routine histopathological assessment on patient management and costs.

RESULTS

With the exception of hernia specimens, the rate of submission for routine pathological evaluation was 100 per cent. No hernia sac specimen from more than 2000 interventions revealed aberrant histological findings. Of 311 haemorrhoidectomy specimens three showed malignancy, all of which had a suspicious macroscopic appearance. Of 1465 appendices, only one (0.1 per cent) had a potentially relevant histological diagnosis that was not suspected macroscopically. Among 1523 cholecystectomy specimens, all adenomas (0.6 per cent) and carcinomas (0.4 per cent) were suspected macroscopically or developed in association with a known disease.

CONCLUSION

The rarity of incidental histological findings relevant to patient management, especially in the absence of macroscopic abnormalities, suggests that routine histological examination of certain specimens may be omitted. A more elementary role for macroscopic examination of the specimen by the surgeon and the pathologist is proposed.

Frequency of unexpected and important histopathological findings in routine intervertebral disc surgery

Object

The value of routine histopathological examination of intervertebral disc tissue has been questioned, but sufficient numbers of studies have yet to be conducted to provide a definitive sense of its importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature and frequency of unexpected histopathological findings in intervertebral disc surgery.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective examination of consecutive surgical specimens obtained in patients with benign indication for discectomy at four neurosurgical centers.

Surgical specimens obtained during 2102 operations (2177 intervertebral discs) in 2017 patients were evaluated. In addition to one case of cavernous malformation, two specimens (obtained in 0.1% of patients) revealed unexpected pathological diagnoses of malignancy (metastasized prostate carcinoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma).

Conclusions

The results of this retrospective study suggest that routine histopathological examination of specimens obtained during intervertebral disc procedures is both justified and cost effective.

Pathological evaluation of intervertebral disc tissue specimens after routine cervical and lumbar decompression. A cost-benefit analysis retrospective study

BACKGROUND

After decompression of cervical and lumbar nerve roots for radicular pain, pathological evaluation of the extracted disc material is commonly performed. Although histological examination rarely detects clinically significant unsuspected disease, it remains a common practice in most hospitals in the United States. To determine the cost-effectiveness of this routine practice, we conducted a retrospective study. The results are contained within this report.

METHODS

Using the University Neurosurgery database, we retrospectively identified 1,387 patients who had spinal decompression surgery (laminectomy and/or discectomy). These cases were broadly classified into routine and non-routine cases depending on the preoperative diagnosis. Benign and noninfectious cases were classified as routine; malignant and all other cases were classified as nonroutine. We reviewed the medical records and pathology reports of these routine and nonroutine cases in an attempt to study the efficacy of the pathological evaluation of the disc material. The cost-benefit value of histopathology in these cases was analyzed, retrospectively.

RESULTS

In all routine cases, the histopathology was consistent with benign disc disease and yielded no additional information that could have altered the treatment plan. In the nonroutine cases, however, histopathology was significant in the management of the patient. The cost factor for pathological study was the same for both case groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological study of intervertebral disc specimens is cost beneficial only in cases with significant preoperative clinical diagnoses. Pathological evaluation of routine herniated nucleus pulposus extracted during decompressive surgeries is not warranted.

Pathology of the pediatric regio inguinalis: mysteries of the hernia sac exposed

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgeries performed on children. However, the value of routine histologic examination of hernia sac tissues continues to be debated. Although the surgical pathology of herniorrhaphy tissues is usually simple, occasional examples have unexpected findings that potentially lead to inappropriate management or that have added clinical implications. These along with surgical-quality assurance issues need to be considered in cost-benefit arguments. This article reviews basic histology, common potential pitfalls, and significant unexpected conditions encountered in the surgical pathology of the inguinal hernia sac in children.

Cost and effectiveness of routine pathological examination of operative specimens obtained during primary total hip and knee replacement in patients with osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The challenge of cost-efficiency is maintaining the quality of medical care while reducing costs and eliminating unnecessary practices. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of routine pathological examination of surgical specimens from patients undergoing primary total hip or knee replacement for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Effectiveness was assessed by comparing clinical and pathological diagnoses associated with 1,234 consecutive primary total joint replacements (471 hip and 763 knee replacements) performed between 1992 and 1995 in one hospital in patients with the clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Clinical and pathological diagnoses were considered concordant if they agreed, discrepant if they differed without a resultant change in patient management, and discordant if they differed with a resultant change in patient management. Cost identification was performed by determining charges, reimbursement, and costs in 1998-adjusted American dollars for both total hip and total knee replacement. The cost per health-effect was determined by calculating the cost per discrepant and discordant diagnosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of concordant diagnoses was 97.6 percent (1,205 of 1,234) (95 percent confidence interval, 96.6 to 98.4 percent), the prevalence of discrepant diagnoses was 2.3 percent (twenty-eight of 1,234) (95 percent confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.1 percent), and the prevalence of discordant diagnoses was 0.1 percent (one of 1,234) (95 percent confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.3 percent). The cost per discrepant diagnosis was $4,383, and the cost per discordant diagnosis was $122,728.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine pathological examination of surgical specimens from patients undergoing primary total hip or knee replacement because of the clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis had limited cost-effectiveness at our hospital due to the low prevalence of findings that altered patient management.

The cost-effectiveness of immunohistochemistry

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of immunohistochemistry.

DESIGN

Using a theoretical decision analytic model, the cost-effectiveness of immunohistochemistry was evaluated in different scenarios depicting the beneficial use of immunohistochemistry. Data regarding the effectiveness of immunohistochemistry were obtained from the medical literature and costs were obtained from Allegheny General Hospital.

SETTINGS

The scenarios depicted both private practice and university patients from which anatomic pathology specimens were obtained. Immunohistochemistry was subsequently performed on these specimens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost, life expectancy, diagnostic certainty, ability to predict prognosis, and cost-effectiveness were evaluated.

RESULTS

In all scenarios, immunohistochemistry was cost-effective at very low efficacies. Assuming a per-antibody cost of $50 and use of a 5-antibody panel, immunohistochemistry was cost-effective if it resulted in a 1-year gain of population life expectancy in 1 or more of every 200 cases in which it was applied. Alternatively, if the gain in diagnostic certainty by using immunohistochemistry was 10% and the value placed on a percentage gain in diagnostic certainty was $1000, immunohistochemistry was cost-effective if it produced this increase in certainty in 1 of every 40 tests. If a life-year was valued at $50 000, immunohistochemistry was cost-effective if it resulted in a change in patient prognosis of 0.5 years in 1 of every 100 tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Using theoretical modeling, immunohistochemistry is extremely cost-effective. These data have implications in an era of managed care when providers attempt to trim laboratory services. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the actual practice efficacy of immunohistochemistry.