TdT Expression Is a Marker of Better Survival in Merkel Cell Carcinoma, and Expression of B-Cell Markers Is Associated With Merkel Cell Polyomavirus

SATB2, CKAE1/AE3, and synaptophysin as a sensitive immunohistochemical panel for the detection of lymph node metastases of Merkel cell carcinoma

Histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes in Merkel cell carcinoma has become crucial in progression estimation and treatment modification. This study was undertaken to determine the most sensitive immunohistochemical panel for detecting MCC nodal metastases. We included 56 patients with 102 metastatic MCC lymph nodes, which were tested with seven antibodies: cytokeratin (CKAE1/AE3), CK20, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, INSM1, SATB2, and neurofilament (NF). Tissue microarrays (TMA) composed of 2-mm tissue cores from each nodal metastasis were constructed. A semiquantitative 5-tier scoring system (0%, < 25%, 25-74%, 75-99%, 100% positive MCC cells with moderate to strong reactivity) was implemented. In the statistical assessment, we included Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status and expression heterogeneity between lymph nodes from one patient. A cumulative percentage of moderate to strong expression ≥ 75% of tumoral cells was observed for single cell markers as follows: 91/102 (89.2%) SATB2, 85/102 (83%) CKAE1/AE3, 80/102 (78.4%) synaptophysin, 75/102 (75.5%) INSM1, 68/102 (66.7%) chromogranin A, 60/102 cases (58.8%) CK20, and 0/102 (0%) NF. Three markers presented a complete lack of immunoreactivity: 8/102 (7.8%) CK20, 7/102 (6.9%) chromogranin A, and 6/102 (5.9%) NF. All markers showed expression heterogeneity in lymph nodes from one patient; however, the most homogenous was INSM1. The probability of detecting nodal MCC metastases was the highest while using SATB2 as a first-line marker (89.2%) with subsequential adding CKAE1/AE3 (99%); these results were independent of MCPyV status. Synaptophysin showed a superior significance in confirming the neuroendocrine origin of metastatic cells. This comprehensive analysis allows us to recommend simultaneous evaluation of SATB2, CKAE1/AE3, and synaptophysin in the routine pathologic MCC lymph node protocol.

A Challenging Diagnosis of Merkel Cell Carcinoma Occurring in the Lymph Nodes and Skin of a Patient with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Merkel cell carcinoma: an update

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma associated with an adverse prognosis. In recent years, our understanding of MCC biology has markedly progressed. Since the discovery of the Merkel cell polyomavirus, it has become clear that MCC represents an ontogenetically dichotomous group of neoplasms with overlapping histopathology. Specifically, most MCCs arise secondary to viral oncogenesis, while a smaller subset is the direct result of UV-associated mutations. The distinction of these groups bears relevance in their immunohistochemical and molecular characterization, as well as in disease prognosis. Further recent developments relate to the landmark utilization of immunotherapeutics in MCC, providing optimistic options for the management of this aggressive disease. In this review, we discuss both fundamental and emerging concepts in MCC, with a particular focus on topics of practical relevance to the surgical or dermatopathologist.

RB1-deficient squamous cell carcinoma: the proposed source of combined Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine (NE) carcinoma arising from integration of Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) DNA into a host cell or from ultraviolet light-induced genetic damage (proportions vary geographically). Tumors in the latter group include those with "pure" NE phenotype and those "combined" with other elements, most often squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We performed comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of MCPyV+ and MCPyV- (pure and combined) tumors, to better understand their mutational profiles and shed light on their pathogenesis. Supplemental immunohistochemistry for Rb expression was also undertaken. After eliminating low quality samples, 37 tumors were successfully analyzed (14 MCPyV+, 8 pure MCPyV- and 15 combined MCPyV-). The SCC and NE components were sequenced separately in 5 combined tumors. Tumor mutational burden was lower in MCPyV+ tumors (mean 1.66 vs. 29.9/Mb, P < 0.0001). MCPyV- tumors featured frequent mutations in TP53 (95.6%), RB1 (87%), and NOTCH family genes (95.6%). No recurrently mutated genes were identified in MCPyV+ tumors. Mutational overlap in the NE and SCC components of combined tumors was substantial ('similarity index' >24% in 4/5 cases). Loss of Rb expression correlated with RB1 mutational (P < 0.0001) and MCPyV- status (P < 0.0001) in MCCs and it was observed more frequently in the SCC component of combined MCC than in a control group of conventional cutaneous SCC (P = 0.0002). Our results (i) support existing evidence that MCPyV+ and MCPyV- MCCs are pathogenetically distinct entities (ii) concur with earlier studies linking the NE and SCC components of combined MCCs via shared genetic profiles and (iii) lend credence to the proposal that an Rb-deficient subset of SCC's is the source of phenotypically divergent combined MCCs.

The impact of merkel cell polyomavirus positivity on prognosis of merkel cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

There are numerous findings over the past decade have indicated that Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) may have two pathways of pathogenesis: one related to ultraviolet irradiation and the other to the Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV). However, the predictive and clinicopathological value of MCPyV positivity in MCC patients is still debatable. This article aims to examine the most recent data regarding this issue.

Methods

The thorough literature searches were conducted in the Medline Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane CENTRAL Databases, and Embase Databases until December 31, 2021. The associations between overall survival (OS), Merkel cell carcinoma-specific survival (MSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), clinicopathologic features, and MCPyV positivity were examined in our meta-analysis.

Results

This meta-analysis included a total of 14 studies involving 1595 patients. Our findings demonstrated a significant correlation between MCPyV positivity and improved OS (HR=0.61, 95%CI:0.39-0.94, P=0.026) and improved PFS (HR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.45-0.83, P=0.002). MCPyV positivity did not, however, appear to be associated with either MSS (HR=0.61, 95%CI: 0.28-1.32, P=0.209) or RFS (HR= 0.93, 95%CI: 0.37-2.34, P=0.873). Pooled results revealed a correlation between MCPyV positivity with gender (male vs. female, OR=0.606, 95%CI: 0.449-0.817, P=0.001), histopathological stage (AJCC I-II vs. III-IV, OR=1.636, 95%CI: 1.126-2.378, P=0.010) and primary site (head and neck vs. other sites, OR=0.409, 95%CI: 0.221-0.757, P=0.004).

Conclusion

These results imply that MCPyV positivity may present a promising predictive biomarker for human MCC and call for further study.

Merkel cell polyomavirus and associated Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is a ubiquitous skin infection that can cause Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a highly lethal form of skin cancer with a nearly 50% mortality rate. Since the discovery of MCPyV in 2008, great advances have been made to improve our understanding of how the viral encoded oncoproteins contribute to MCC oncogenesis. However, our knowledge of the MCPyV infectious life cycle and its oncogenic mechanisms are still incomplete. The incidence of MCC has tripled over the past two decades, but effective treatments are lacking. Only recently have there been major victories in combatting metastatic MCC with the application of PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade. Still, these immune-based therapies are not ideal for patients with a medical need to maintain systemic immune suppression. As such, a better understanding of MCPyV's oncogenic mechanisms is needed in order to develop more effective and targeted therapies against virus-associated MCC. In this review, we discuss current areas of interest for MCPyV and MCC research and the progress made in elucidating both the natural host of MCPyV infection and the cell of origin for MCC. We also highlight the remaining gaps in our knowledge on the transcriptional regulation of MCPyV, which may be key to understanding and targeting viral oncogenesis for developing future therapies.

Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This review article provides a brief overview of the new WHO classification by adopting a question-answer model to highlight the spectrum of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms which includes epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas) arising from upper aerodigestive tract and salivary glands, and special neuroendocrine neoplasms including middle ear neuroendocrine tumors (MeNET), ectopic or invasive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET; formerly known as pituitary adenoma) and Merkel cell carcinoma as well as non-epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms (paragangliomas). The new WHO classification follows the IARC/WHO nomenclature framework and restricts the diagnostic term of neuroendocrine carcinoma to poorly differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms. In this classification, well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms are termed as neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and are graded as G1 NET (no necrosis and < 2 mitoses per 2 mm²; Ki67 < 20%), G2 NET (necrosis or 2-10 mitoses per 2 mm², and Ki67 < 20%) and G3 NET (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm² or Ki67 > 20%, and absence of poorly differentiated cytomorphology). Neuroendocrine carcinomas (> 10 mitoses per 2 mm², Ki67 > 20%, and often associated with a Ki67 > 55%) are further subtyped based on cytomorphological characteristics as small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Unlike neuroendocrine carcinomas, head and neck NETs typically show no aberrant p53 expression or loss of RB reactivity. Ectopic or invasive PitNETs are subtyped using pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, SF1, GATA3, ER-alpha), hormones and keratins (e.g., CAM5.2). The new classification emphasizes a strict correlation of morphology and immunohistochemical findings in the accurate diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms. A particular emphasis on the role of biomarkers in the confirmation of the neuroendocrine nature of a neoplasm and in the distinction of various neuroendocrine neoplasms is provided by reviewing ancillary tools that are available to pathologists in the diagnostic workup of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms. Furthermore, the role of molecular immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic workup of head and neck paragangliomas is discussed. The unmet needs in the field of head and neck neuroendocrine neoplasms are also discussed in this article. The new WHO classification is an important step forward to ensure accurate diagnosis that will also form the basis of ongoing research in this field.

Relationship between p63 and p53 expression in Merkel cell carcinoma and corresponding abnormalities in TP63 and TP53: a study and a proposal

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Oncogenesis occurs via Merkel cell polyomavirus-mediated (MCPyV+) and/or ultraviolet radiation-associated (MCPyV-) pathways. Advanced clinical stage and an MCPyV- status are important adverse prognostic indicators. There is mounting evidence that p63 expression is a negative prognostic indicator in MCC and that it correlates with MCPyV- status. p63 is a member of the p53 family of proteins among which complex interactions occur. It has two main isoforms (proapoptotic TAp63 and oncogenic ΔNp63). Paradoxically, TAp63 predominates in MCC. To explore this quandary, we examined relationships between p63 and p53 expression and corresponding abnormalities in the TP63 and TP53 genes in MCC. A cohort of 26 MCCs (12 MCPyV+ and 14 MCPyV-) was studied. Comparative immunohistochemical expression of p63 and p53 was evaluated semiquantitatively (H scores) and qualitatively (aberrant patterns). The results were compared with genetic abnormalities in TP63 and TP53 via next-generation sequencing. p63 was positive in 73% of cases. p53 showed "wild-type" expression in 69%, with "aberrant" staining in 31%. TP63 mutations (predominantly low-level copy gains; 23% of cases) and mainly pathogenic mutations in TP53 (50% of cases) featured in the MCPyV- subset of cases. p63 expression correlated quantitatively with p53 expression and qualitatively with aberrant patterns of the latter. Increased expression of p63 and p53 and aberrant p53 staining correlated best with TP53 mutation. We propose that p63 expression (ie, proapoptotic TAp63) in MCC is most likely functionally driven as a compensatory response to defective p53 tumor suppressor activity.

Diagnostic and prognostic impact of cytokeratin 19 expression analysis in human tumors: a tissue microarray study of 13,172 tumors

To evaluate cytokeratin 19 (CK19) expression in normal and cancerous tissues, 15,977 samples from 122 tumor types and 608 samples of 76 normal tissue types were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In normal tissues, CK19 expression occurred in epithelial cells of most glandular organs but was strictly limited to the basal cell layer of nonkeratinizing squamous epithelium and absent in the skin. CK19 expression in ≥90% of cases was seen in 34% of the tumor entities including the adenocarcinomas of the pancreas (99.4%), colorectum (99.8%), esophagus (98.7%), and stomach (97.7%), as well as breast cancer (90.0%-100%), high-grade serous (99.1%) or endometrioid (97.8%) ovarian cancer, and urothelial carcinoma (92.6%-100%). A low CK19 positivity rate (0.1-10%) was seen in 5 of 122 tumor entities including hepatocellular carcinoma and seminoma. A comparison of tumor versus normal tissue findings demonstrated that upregulation and downregulation of CK19 can occur in cancer and that both alterations can be linked to unfavorable phenotypes. CK19 downregulation was linked to high grade (p = 0.0017) and loss of estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-expression (p < 0.0001 each) in invasive breast carcinoma of no special type. CK19 upregulation was linked to nodal metastases in neuroendocrine tumors and papillary thyroid carcinomas (p < 0.05 each) and to poor grade in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (p < 0.05). CK19 upregulation was particularly common in squamous cell carcinomas. We concluded that CK19 IHC might separate primary liver cell carcinoma from liver metastases, seminoma from other testicular tumors, and helps in the detection of early neoplastic transformation in squamous epithelium.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Immunohistochemical and Molecular Analyses Reveal Distinct UV-Signature/MCPyV-Negative and High Immunogenicity/MCPyV-Positive Profiles

Simple Summary

Merkel cell carcinomas (MCCs) of unknown primary are defined as deep-seated tumors without an associated cutaneous tumor. Although the distinction has important clinical implications, it remains unclear whether these tumors represent primary tumors of lymph nodes or metastatic cutaneous primaries. We compared the immunohistochemical profiles of four groups of Merkel cell carcinomas (virus-positive and virus-negative unknown primary tumors and virus-positive and virus-negative cutaneous tumors) and performed molecular studies on the unknown primary tumors. Virus-positive and virus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas of unknown primary (MCC-UPs) exhibited an immunoprofile similar to virus-positive and virus-negative primary cutaneous MCCs, respectively. Similar to primary cutaneous Merkel cell carcinomas, virus-negative unknown primary tumors exhibited UV signatures and frequent high tumor mutational burdens, whereas few molecular alterations were noted in virus-positive tumors. Although additional studies are warranted for the virus-positive cases, our findings are supportive of a cutaneous metastatic origin for virus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas of unknown primary.

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinomas of unknown primary (MCC-UPs) are defined as deep-seated tumors without an associated cutaneous tumor. Although the distinction has important clinical implications, it remains unclear whether these tumors represent primary tumors of lymph nodes or metastatic cutaneous primaries. Methods: We compared the immunohistochemical profiles of four groups of MCCs (Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)-positive UP, MCPyV-negative UP, MCPyV-positive known primary (KP), and MCPyV-negative KP) using B-cell and pre-B-cell markers, cell cycle regulating proteins, follicular stem cell markers, and immune markers, and performed next generation and Sanger sequencing. Results: Virus-positive and virus-negative MCC-UPs exhibited an immunoprofile similar to virus-positive and virus-negative primary cutaneous MCCs, respectively. MCC-UP tumors (both virus-positive and -negative) were immunogenic with similar or even higher tumoral PD-L1 expression and intratumoral CD8 and FoxP3 infiltrates in comparison to MCPyV-positive cutaneous tumors. In addition, similar to primary cutaneous MCCs, MCPyV-negative MCC-UPs exhibited UV signatures and frequent high tumor mutational burdens, whereas few molecular alterations were noted in MCPyV-positive MCC-UPs. Conclusions: Our results showed distinct UV-signatures in MCPyV-negative tumors and high immunogenicity in MCPyV-positive tumors. Although additional studies are warranted for the MCPyV-positive cases, our findings are supportive of a cutaneous metastatic origin for MCPyV-negative MCC-UP tumors.

Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase Commonly Expresses in Germ Cell Tumors: Evaluation on a Large Series from Multiple Centers

Aim

The concrete features of expression of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) are needed to be revealed in male and female germ cell tumors (GCTs).

Methods

TdT immunostaining was performed in 195 GCTs, and the tumor and/or tumorous components included seminomas, germ cell neoplasias in situ (GCNISs), dysgerminomas, embryonal carcinomas (ECs), extragonadal germinomas, yolk sac tumors (YSTs), teratomas, and spermatocytic tumors. Twenty-one sex cord-stromal tumors were also added. Expression of the classical germ cell tumor markers (PLAP, OCT4, SALL4, CD117, and D2-40) was compared to that of TDT.

Results

Nearly all (tumors or tumorous components) seminomas (99%, 107/108), GCNISs (98%, 51/52), dysgerminomas (94%, 17/18), ECs (100%, 15/15), and extragonadal germinomas (100%, 11/11) were positive for TdT. None of the cells in YSTs (0/38), teratomas (0/19), spermatocytic tumors (0/1), or sex cord-stromal tumors (0/21) were immunoreactive for TdT staining. The normal testicular and ovarian gonadal tissues were also negative for TdT. However, TdT presented with significant loss of antigen immunoreactivity in the paraffin-embedded tissues older than 3 years, giving rise to weak or moderate staining in a subset of cases. The expressions of TdT showed no significances with PLAP, OCT4, SALL4, CD117, and D2-40 during the diagnosis of the most GCTs (P>0.05), except for with PLAP, SALL4, or CD117 in YST (P=0.000 each), and D117 (P=0.000) or D2-40 (P=0.006) in ECs.

Conclusion

Our findings further verify that TdT can serve as a new GCT marker for seminomas, GCNISs, dysgerminomas, ECs, and extragonadal germinomas, with a highly positive rate. Awareness of TdT positivity in GCTs contributes to the prevention of erroneous diagnoses, particularly in the setting of core needle biopsies. To determine the properties where TdT staining may not be apparent in some old archived paraffin-embedded tissues, one could circumvent the potential misinterpretations of false-negative immunohistochemistry results.