Performance and Utilization of a Laboratory-Developed Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis in a Low-Prevalence Area

Nanopore-based targeted next-generation sequencing of tissue samples for tuberculosis diagnosis

Objective

Diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) can be particularly challenging in the absence of sputum for pulmonary tuberculosis cases and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). This study evaluated the utility of nanopore-based targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for diagnosing TB in tissue samples, and compared its efficacy with other established diagnostic methods.

Methods

A total of 110 tissue samples from clinical cases were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of tNGS were benchmarked against a range of existing diagnostic approaches including hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining in conjunction with acid-fast bacilli (AFB) detection, HE staining combined with PCR, HE staining paired with immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anti-MPT64, and the Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF) assay.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of tNGS were 88.2 and 94.1%, respectively. The respective sensitivities for HE staining combined with AFB, HE staining combined with PCR, HE staining combined with IHC using anti-MPT64, and Xpert MTB/RIF were 30.1, 49.5, 47.3, and 59.1%. The specificities for these methods were 82.4, 88.2, 94.1, and 94.1%, respectively. Analysis of drug resistance based on tNGS results indicated that 10 of 93 TB patients (10.75%) had potential drug resistance.

Conclusion

Targeted next-generation sequencing achieved higher accuracy than other established diagnostic methods, and can play a crucial role in the rapid and accurate diagnosis of TB, including drug-resistant TB.

Determination of the diagnostic accuracy of nanopore sequencing using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis

PURPOSE

The early and efficient diagnosis of patients suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of nanopore sequencing for PTB diagnosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples and compared it with other techniques such as acid-fast bacilli smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF, and CapitalBio Mycobacterium reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (MTB RT-PCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 195 patients with suspected PTB who were admitted to our hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of these assays were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of nanopore sequencing were 90.70%, 84.85%, 92.13%, 82.35%, and 0.88; those of acid-fast bacilli smear were 12.40%, 98.48%, 94.12%, 36.52%, and 0.55; those of culture were 36.43%, 100%, 100%, 44.59%, and 0.68; those of Xpert MTB/RIF were 41.09%, 100%, 100%, 46.48%, and 0.71; and those of CapitalBio MTB RT-PCR were 34.88%, 98.48%, 97.83%, 43.62%, and 0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The nanopore sequencing assay using BALF samples showed the best diagnostic accuracy for sputum-scarce PTB. Moreover, it can improve the clinical diagnosis of PTB.

Efficacy of LAMP assay for Mycobacterial spp. detection to prevent treatment delays and onset of drug resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a deadly disease affecting one-third population globally. Long turnaround time and poor sensitivity of the conventional diagnostics are the major impediments for faster diagnosis of Mycobacterial spp to prevent drug resistance. To overcome these issues, molecular diagnostics have been developed. They offer enhanced sensitivity but require sophisticated infrastructure, skilled manpower and remain expensive.

Methods

In that context, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, recommended by the WHO in 2016 for TB diagnosis, sounds as a promising alternative that facilitates visual read outs. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic efficiency of LAMP for the detection of a panel of Mycobacterium spp. following PRISMA guidelines using scientific databases. From 1600 studies reported on the diagnosis of Mycobacterium spp., a selection of 30 articles were identified as eligible to meet the criteria of LAMP based diagnosis.

Results

It was found that most of the studies were conducted in high disease burden nations such as India, Thailand, and Japan with sputum as the most common specimen to be used for LAMP assay. Furthermore, IS6110 gene and fluorescence-based detections ranked as the most used target and method respectively. The accuracy and precision rates mostly varied between 79.2% to 99.3% and 73.9% to 100%, respectively. Lastly, a quality assessment based on QUADAS-2 of bias and applicability was conducted.

Conclusion

LAMP technology could be considered as a feasible alternative to current diagnostics considering high burden for rapid testing in low resource regions.

Revisiting the methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis: what has the new millennium brought thus far?

Tuberculosis (TB) affects around 10 million people worldwide in 2019. Approximately 3.4 % of new TB cases are multidrug-resistant. The gold standard method for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which is the aetiological agent of TB, is still based on microbiological culture procedures, followed by species identification and drug sensitivity testing. Sputum is the most commonly obtained clinical specimen from patients with pulmonary TB. Although smear microscopy is a low-cost and widely used method, its sensitivity is 50-60 %. Thus, owing to the need to improve the performance of current microbiological tests to provide prompt treatment, different methods with varied sensitivity and specificity for TB diagnosis have been developed. Here we discuss the existing methods developed over the past 20 years, including their strengths and weaknesses. In-house and commercial methods have been shown to be promising to achieve rapid diagnosis. Combining methods for mycobacterial detection systems demonstrates a correlation of 100 %. Other assays are useful for the simultaneous detection of M. tuberculosis species and drug-related mutations. Novel approaches have also been employed to rapidly identify and quantify total mycobacteria RNA, including assessments of global gene expression measured in whole blood to identify the risk of TB. Spoligotyping, mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing are also promising technologies; however, their cost needs to be reduced so that low- and middle-income countries can access them. Because of the large impact of M. tuberculosis infection on public health, the development of new methods in the context of well-designed and -controlled clinical trials might contribute to the improvement of TB infection control.