An Uncommon Case of Double-Hit Mantle Cell Lymphoma That Demonstrates a Transformation Process

EBV-Positive Pleomorphic Variant Transformation of CD5-Negative Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell lymphoma associated with cyclin D family rearrangements and typically expresses CD5 and cyclin D1. Epstein-Barr virus- (EBV-) positive MCL is rare, and the role of EBV infection and its transformation in MCL remains unclear. We present a case of CD5-negative classic MCL that progressed to an EBV + pleomorphic MCL six years after the initial diagnosis. Molecular studies confirmed the same clonal origin. To the best of our knowledge, the EBV-positive transformation of CD5-negative MCL into a pleomorphic variant has rarely been reported, and its recognition is important for the diagnosis and the management of patients with MCL.

Comprehensive FISH testing using FFPE tissue microarray of primary lymph node tissue identifies secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), is characterised by the reciprocal translocation t(11;14) resulting in CCND1-IGH gene fusion and subsequent upregulation of the CCND1 gene. Rearrangements of MYC and losses of CDKN2A and TP53 have been identified as biomarkers informing prognostic and potentially therapeutic information however these are not routinely assessed in MCL investigation. We aimed to identify additional cytogenetic changes using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) on formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary lymph node tissue microarrays in a cohort of 28 patients diagnosed with MCL between 2004 and 2019. FISH results were compared with corresponding immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers to determine if IHC was a reliable screening tool to direct FISH testing.

METHOD

FFPE lymph node tissue samples were constructed into tissue microarrays (TMA) which were stained with 7 immunohistochemical biomarkers: Cyclin D1, c-Myc, p16, ATM, p53, Bcl-6 and Bcl-2. The same TMAs were hybridised with FISH probes for the corresponding genes; CCND1-IGH, MYC, CDKN2A, ATM, TP53, BCL6 and BCL2. FISH and the corresponding IHC biomarkers were analysed to determine if secondary cytogenetic changes could be identified and if IHC could be used as a reliable, inexpensive predictor of FISH abnormalities to potentially direct FISH testing.

RESULTS

CCND1-IGH fusion was detected in 27/28 (96%) of samples. Additional cytogenetic changes were identified by FISH in 15/28 (54%) of samples. Two additional abnormalities were detected in 2/28 (7%) samples. Cyclin D1 IHC overexpression was an excellent predictor of CCND1-IGH fusion. MYC and ATM IHC were useful screening tests to direct FISH testing and identified cases with poor prognostic features including blastoid change. IHC did not show clear concordance with FISH for other biomarkers.

CONCLUSION

FISH using FFPE primary lymph node tissue can detect secondary cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with MCL which are associated with an inferior prognosis. An expanded FISH panel including MYC, CDKN2A, TP53 and ATM should be considered in cases where anomalous IHC expression or is seen for these markers or if the patient appears to have the blastoid variant of the disease.

MYC: a multipurpose oncogene with prognostic and therapeutic implications in blood malignancies

MYC oncogene is a transcription factor with a wide array of functions affecting cellular activities such as cell cycle, apoptosis, DNA damage response, and hematopoiesis. Due to the multi-functionality of MYC, its expression is regulated at multiple levels. Deregulation of this oncogene can give rise to a variety of cancers. In this review, MYC regulation and the mechanisms by which MYC adjusts cellular functions and its implication in hematologic malignancies are summarized. Further, we also discuss potential inhibitors of MYC that could be beneficial for treating hematologic malignancies.

Progress in molecular feature of smoldering mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered one of the most aggressive lymphoid tumors. However, it sometimes displays indolent behavior in patients and might not necessitate treatment at diagnosis; this has been described as "smoldering MCL" (SMCL). There are significant differences in the diagnosis, prognosis, molecular mechanisms and treatments of indolent MCL and classical MCL. In this review, we discuss the progress in understanding the molecular mechanism of indolent MCL to provide insights into the genomic nature of this entity. Reported findings of molecular features of indolent MCL include a low Ki-67 index, CD200 positivity, a low frequency of mutations in TP53, a lack of SOX11, normal arrangement and expression of MYC, IGHV mutations, differences from classical MCL by L-MCL16 assays and MCL35 assays, an unmutated P16 status, few defects in ATM, no NOTCH1/2 mutation, Amp 11q gene mutation, no chr9 deletion, microRNA upregulation/downregulation, and low expression of several genes that have been valued in recent years (SPEN, SMARCA4, RANBP2, KMT2C, NSD2, CARD11, FBXW7, BIRC3, KMT2D, CELSR3, TRAF2, MAP3K14, HNRNPH1, Del 9p and/or Del 9q, SP140 and PCDH10). Based on the above molecular characteristics, we may distinguish indolent MCL from classical MCL. If so, indolent MCL will not be overtreated, whereas the treatment of classical MCL will not be delayed.

MYC rearrangement but not extra MYC copies is an independent prognostic factor in patients with mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with MYC rearrangement (MYC-R) is rare and little is known about the importance of MYC extra copies (EC) in the absence of MYC-R in MCL patients. This study includes 88 MCL patients with MYC tested by fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or conventional cytogenetics, including 27 with MYC-R, 21 with MYC-EC, and 40 with normal (NL) MYC. MCL patients with MYC-R more often had blastoid/pleomorphic morphology; a higher frequency of CD10, MYC, and simultaneous MYC and BCL2 expression; a higher level of MYC; and a higher Ki67 proliferation rate (p<0.05) than those without MYC-R. Although patients with MYC-R more frequently received aggressive chemotherapy (p=0.001), their overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter than those without MYC-R. Compared with patients with MYC/BCL2 double hit lymphoma (DHL), patients with MYC-R MCL had a similar OS but more commonly had bone marrow involvement, stage 4 disease, and a different immunophenotype. MCL patients with MYC-EC showed an OS intermediate between those with MYC-R and MYC-NL, either all or only blastoid/pleomorphic MCL patients included. Multivariate analysis showed that MYC-R, but not MYC-EC, had an independent and negative impact on OS. In conclusion, MYC-R but not MYC-EC showed a higher MYC expression and is an adverse prognostic factor for MCL patients. Although the OS of MCL patients with MYC-R is similar to that of MYC/BCL2 DHL patients, these groups have different clinicopathologic features supporting the retention of MCL with MYC-R in the category of MCL, as recommended in the revised World Health Organization classification.