Mortality and Cancer Incidence in Carriers of Balanced Robertsonian Translocations: A National Cohort Study

Trisomy 21 with Maternally Inherited Balanced Translocation (15q;22q) in a Female Fetus: A Rare Case of Probable Interchromosomal Effect

Chromosomal rearrangements can interfere with the disjunction and segregation of other chromosome pairs not involved in the rearrangements, promoting the occurrence of numerical abnormalities in resulting gametes and predisposition to trisomy in offspring. This phenomenon of interference is known as the interchromosomal effect (ICE). Here we report a prenatal case potentially generated by ICE. The first-trimester screening ultrasound of the pregnant woman was normal, but the NIPT indicated a high risk for three copies of chromosome 21, thus suspecting trisomy 21 (T21). After a comprehensive clinical evaluation and genetic counseling, the couple decided to undergo amniocentesis. The prenatal karyotype confirmed T21 but also showed a balanced translocation between the long arm of chromosome 15 (q22) and the long arm of chromosome 22. The parents' karyotypes also showed that the mother had the 15;22 translocation. We reviewed T21 screening methods, and we performed a literature review on ICE, a generally overlooked phenomenon. We observed that ours is the first report of a prenatal case potentially due to ICE derived from the mother. The recurrence risk of aneuploidy in the offspring of translocated individuals is likely slightly increased, but it is not possible to estimate to what extent. In addition to supporting observations, there are still open questions such as, how frequent is ICE? How much is the aneuploidy risk altered by ICE?

A working model for the formation of Robertsonian chromosomes

Robertsonian chromosomes form by fusion of two chromosomes that have centromeres located near their ends, known as acrocentric or telocentric chromosomes. This fusion creates a new metacentric chromosome and is a major mechanism of karyotype evolution and speciation. Robertsonian chromosomes are common in nature and were first described in grasshoppers by the zoologist W. R. B. Robertson more than 100 years ago. They have since been observed in many species, including catfish, sheep, butterflies, bats, bovids, rodents and humans, and are the most common chromosomal change in mammals. Robertsonian translocations are particularly rampant in the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, where they exhibit meiotic drive and create reproductive isolation. Recent progress has been made in understanding how Robertsonian chromosomes form in the human genome, highlighting some of the fundamental principles of how and why these types of fusion events occur so frequently. Consequences of these fusions include infertility and Down's syndrome. In this Hypothesis, I postulate that the conditions that allow these fusions to form are threefold: (1) sequence homology on non-homologous chromosomes, often in the form of repetitive DNA; (2) recombination initiation during meiosis; and (3) physical proximity of the homologous sequences in three-dimensional space. This Hypothesis highlights the latest progress in understanding human Robertsonian translocations within the context of the broader literature on Robertsonian chromosomes.

A Novel Constitutional t(3;8)(p26;q21) and ANKRD26 and SRP72 Variants in a Child with Myelodysplastic Neoplasm: Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND

Childhood myelodysplastic neoplasm (cMDS) often raises concerns about an underlying germline predisposition, and its verification is necessary to guide therapeutic choice and allow family counseling. Here, we report a novel constitutional t(3;8)(p26;q21) in a child with MDS, inherited from the father, the ANKRD26 and SRP72 variants from the maternal origin, and the acquisition of molecular alterations during MDS evolution.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 4-year-old girl showed repeated infections and severe neutropenia. Bone marrow presented hypocellularity with dysplastic features. The patient had a t(3;8)(p26;q21)c identified by G-banding and FISH analysis. The family nucleus investigation identified the paternal origin of the chromosomal translocation. The NGS study identified ANKRD26 and SRP72 variants of maternal origin. CGH-array analysis detected alterations in PRSS3P2 and KANSL genes. Immunohistochemistry showed abnormal p53 expression during the MDS evolution.

CONCLUSION

This study shows for the first time, cytogenetic and genomic abnormalities inherited from the father and mother, respectively, and their clinical implications. It also shows the importance of investigating patients with constitutional cytogenetic alterations and/or germline variants to provide information to their family nucleus for genetic counseling and understanding of the pathogenesis of childhood MDS.

Chromosomal instability (CIN) in HAP1 cell lines revealed by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridisation (M-FISH)

BACKGROUND

HAP1, a near-haploid human leukemic cancer cell line is often used in combination with CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology for genetic screens. HAP1 carries the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) and an additional ~ 30 Mb fragment of chromosome 15 inserted into chromosome 19. The potential use of an in vitro cell line as a model system in biomedical research studies depends on its ability to maintain genome stability. Being a cancer cell line with a near-haploid genome, HAP1 is prone to genetic instability, which is further compounded by its tendency to diploidise in culture spontaneously. Moreover, CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing coupled with prolonged in-vitro cell culturing has the potential to induce unintended 'off-target' cytogenetic mutations. To gain an insight into chromosomal instability (CIN) and karyotype heterogeneity, 19 HAP1 cell lines were cytogenetically characterised, 17 of which were near-haploids and two double-haploids, using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridisation (M-FISH), at single cell resolution. We focused on novel numerical (N) and structural (S) CIN and discussed the potential causal factors for the observed instability. For each cell line we examined its ploidy, gene editing status and its length of in-vitro cell culturing.

RESULTS

Sixteen of the 19 cell lines had been gene edited with passage numbers ranging from 10 to 35. Diploidisation in 17 near-haploid cell lines ranged from 4 to 35% and percentage of N- and S-CIN in [1n] and [2n] metaphases ranged from 7 to 50% with two cell lines showing no CIN. Percentage of cells with CIN in the two double-haploid cell lines were 96% and 100% respectively. The most common S-CIN observed was deletion followed by translocation of both types, non-reciprocal and Robertsonian. Interestingly, we observed a prevalence of S-CIN associated with chromosome 13 in both near-and double-haploid cell lines, with a high incidence of Robertsonian translocation involving chromosome 13. Furthermore, locus-specific BAC (bacterial artificial chromosome) FISH enabled us to show for the first time that the additional chromosome 15 fragment is inserted into the p-arm rather than the q-arm of chromosome 19 of the HAP1 genome.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a high incidence of CIN leading to karyotype heterogeneity in majority of the HAP1 cell lines with the number of chromosomal aberrations varying between cell lines. A noteworthy observation was the high frequency of structural chromosomal aberrations associated with chromosome 13. We showed that CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology in combination with spontaneous diploidisation and prolonged in-vitro cell culturing is potentially instrumental in inducing further chromosomal rearrangements in the HAP1 cell lines with existing CIN. We highlight the importance of maintaining cell lines at low passage and the need for regular monitoring to prevent implications in downstream applications. Our study also established that the additional fragment of chromosome 15 in the HAP1 genome is inserted into chromosome 19p rather than 19q.

A Balanced Robertsonian Translocation in a Patient with a Janus Kinase 2-Positive Polycythemia Vera

A male patient with a persistent, combined erythrocytosis, leukocytosis, and thrombocytosis without representative evidence of reactive increase emerged as having a myeloproliferative disorder. Molecular-biological assessment yielded Janus kinase 2-positive results, and the patient was diagnosed with polycythemia vera. In addition to these findings, further karyotyping accounted for a Robertsonian translocation. Because this rearrangement was a balanced variant, we concluded that this cytogenetic result might not significantly alter the diagnosis of polycythemia vera.

Prevalence and Phenotypic Impact of Robertsonian Translocations

Robertsonian translocations (RTs) result from fusion of 2 acrocentric chromosomes (e.g., 13, 14, 15, 21, 22) and consequential losses of segments of the p arms containing 47S rDNA clusters and transcription factor binding sites. Depending on the position of the breakpoints, the size of these losses vary considerably between types of RTs. The prevalence of RTs in the general population is estimated to be around 1 per 800 individuals, making RTs the most common chromosomal rearrangement in healthy individuals. Based on their prevalence, RTs are classified as "common," rob(13;14) and rob(14;21), or "rare" (the 8 remaining nonhomologous combinations). Carriers of RTs are at an increased risk for offspring with chromosomal imbalances or with uniparental disomy. RTs are generally regarded as phenotypically neutral, although, due to RTs formation, 2 of the 10 ribosomal rDNA gene clusters, several long noncoding RNAs, and in the case of RTs involving chromosome 21, several mRNA encoding genes are lost. Nevertheless, recent evidence indicates that RTs may have a significant phenotypic impact. In particular, rob(13;14) carriers have a significantly elevated risk for breast cancer. While RTs are easily spotted by routine karyotyping, they may go unnoticed if only array-CGH and NextGen sequencing methods are applied. This review first discusses possible molecular mechanisms underlying the particularly high rates of RT formation and their incidence in the general population, and second, likely causes for the elevated cancer risk of some RTs will be examined.

Genetic mutations contributing to non-obstructive azoospermia

Non-obstructive azoospermia is a distinct diagnosis within male infertility in which no sperm is found in the ejaculate as a result of spermatogenesis failure. Because of the increased prevalence of genetic abnormalities in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, male infertility guidelines recommend screening for karyotype abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions in this population. Numerous karyotype abnormalities may be present resulting in impaired spermatogenesis, including: Klinefelter syndrome, translocations, and deletions. Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb, AZFc subregions all can also result in non-obstructive azoospermia with the possibility of sperm being present if only the AZFc subregion is deleted. While these are the two genetic tests recommended by the guidelines, nearly 50%-80% of non-obstructive azoospermia has no identifiable cause and is deemed idiopathic. Several other genetic defects can lead to non-obstructive azoospermia including Kallmann syndrome, mild androgen insensitivity syndrome, and TEX11. While many additional candidate genes have been proposed, many have yet to be verified or are so infrequent in the population that screening is cost-ineffective. Much research is still required in the genetics of non-obstructive azoospermia and will require multi-institutional initiatives to better understand the genetics of condition.

How much, if anything, do we know about sperm chromosomes of Robertsonian translocation carriers?

In men with oligozoospermia, Robertsonian translocations (RobTs) are the most common type of autosomal aberrations. The most commonly occurring types are rob(13;14) and rob(14;21), and other types of RobTs are described as 'rare' cases. Based on molecular research, all RobTs can be broadly classified into Class 1 and Class 2. Class 1 translocations produce the same breakpoints within their RobT type, but Class 2 translocations are predicted to form during meiosis or mitosis through a variety of mechanisms, resulting in variation in the breakpoint locations. This review seeks to analyse the available data addressing the question of whether the molecular classification of RobTs into Classes 1 and 2 and/or the type of DD/GG/DG symmetry of the involved chromosomes is reflected in the efficiency of spermatogenesis. The lowest frequency value calculated for the rate of alternate segregants was found for rob(13;15) carriers (Class 2, symmetry DD) and the highest for rob(13;21) carriers (Class 2, DG symmetry). The aneuploidy values for the rare RobT (Class 2) and common rob(14;21) (Class 1) groups together exhibited similarities while differing from those for the common rob(13;14) (Class 1) group. Considering the division of RobT carriers into those with normozoospermia and those with oligoasthenozoospermia, it was found that the number of carriers with elevated levels of aneuploidy was unexpectedly quite similar and high (approx. 70%) in the two subgroups. The reason(s) that the same RobT does not always show a similar destructive effect on fertility was also pointed out.