Endothelin-1 and Parameters of Systolic Blood Pressure in Hemodialysis

Endothelin-1, Extracellular Volume Overload, and Hemodynamics in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Extracellular volume (ECV) overload and endothelial cell dysfunction are mortality risk factors in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Endothelin-1 (ET-1), an endothelium-derived vasoconstrictive peptide, is associated with poor outcomes in HD patients. We hypothesized there would be associations between ET-1 and ECV overload in hypertensive HD patients.

METHODS

We obtained pre-HD ET-1, ECV/weight (bioimpedance spectroscopy), pre-HD hemodynamics, and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in an HD cohort. Following appropriate transformations, we conducted correlation and linear regression analyses idendifying associations between ET-1, ECV overload, total peripheral resistance index (TPRI), cardiac index (CI), and ambulatory BP.

RESULTS

Among 66 patients, median ET-1 was 1.93 (1.49-2.56) pg/ml. Median pre-HD ECV/weight, median TPRI, mean CI, and mean systolic ambulatory BP were 0.25 (0.22-0.30) l/kg, 3,161 (2,711-3,642) dynes × s/cm-5/m2, 2.92 (0.6) l/min/m2, and 143 (14) mm Hg, respectively. After reciprocal-transformation, ET-1 correlated with reciprocal-transformed ECV/weight (r = 0.3, P = 0.01), log-transformed TPRI (r = -0.3, P = 0.006), CI (r = 0.3, P = 0.009), and ambulatory BP (r = -0.3, P = 0.02). These associations persisted in linear regression analysis (β = 0.15, P = 0.002; β = -0.8, P = 0.002; β = 0.2, P = 0.002; β = -19, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive HD patients, ET-1 associates with ECV overload higher TPRI and ambulatory BP, and lower CI. Further research is necessary to determine if ECV reduction lowers ET-1 or if pharmacologic ET-1 antagonism can improve outcomes in HD patients with refractory ECV overload.

Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Perspectives of Intradialytic Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Individuals with end-stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis (HD) may encounter numerous HD-associated complications, including intradialytic hypertension (IDHYPER). Although blood pressure (BP) follows a predictable course in the post-HD period, BP levels during the session may vary across the individuals. Typically, a decline in BP is noted during HD, but a significant proportion of patients exhibit a paradoxical elevation.

SUMMARY

Several studies have been conducted to understand the complexity of IDHYPER, but much remains to be elucidated in the future. This review article aimed to present the current evidence regarding the proposed definitions, the pathophysiologic background, the extent and clinical implications of IDHYPER, as well as the possible therapeutic options that have emerged from clinical studies.

KEY MESSAGES

IDHYPER is noted in approximately 15% of individuals undergoing HD. Several definitions have been proposed, with a systolic BP rise >10 mm Hg from pre- to post-dialysis in the hypertensive range in at least four out of six consecutive HD treatments being suggested by the latest Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Concerning its pathophysiology, extracellular fluid overload is a crucial determinant, with endothelial dysfunction, sympathetic nervous system overdrive, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, and electrolyte alterations being important contributors. Although its association with ambulatory BP in the interdialytic period is controversial, IDHYPER is associated with adverse cardiovascular events and mortality. Moving to its management, the antihypertensive drugs of choice should ideally be nondialyzable with proven cardiovascular and mortality benefits. Finally, rigorous clinical and objective assessment of extracellular fluid volume is essential. Volume-overloaded patients should be instructed about the importance of sodium restriction, while physicians ought to alter HD settings toward a greater dry weight reduction. The use of a low-sodium dialysate and isothermic HD could also be considered on a case-by-case basis since no randomized evidence is currently available.

Association of Different Definitions of Intradialytic Hypertension With Long-Term Mortality in Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is common in hemodialysis patients. A subset of patients experience systolic blood pressure increases from prehemodialysis to posthemodialysis (intradialytic hypertension), which are associated with adverse outcomes. However, little consensus exists on an evidence-based definition.

METHODS

In 3198 hemodialysis patients, Cox models were fit to examine the association of various definitions of intradialytic hypertension (≥30% of baseline sessions with an increase in prehemodialysis to posthemodialysis systolic blood pressure of (1) ≥0 mm Hg [Hyper0]; (2) ≥10 mm Hg [Hyper10], or (3) ≥20 mm Hg increase [Hyper20]) with all-cause mortality. Effect modification was assessed using interaction terms according to prespecified variables.

RESULTS

At baseline, mean age was 62±15 years, 57% were male, and 14% were Black. During the baseline period, 47% of individuals met the Hyper0 definition and experienced 32% (hazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.05-1.66]) higher adjusted risk of death, compared with no systolic blood pressure increase. Hyper10 was present in 21.2% and associated with 18% higher adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.94-1.48]). Hyper20 was present in 6.8% and associated with 3% higher adjusted risk of death (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% CI, 0.74-1.44]). Effect modification by age and peripheral vascular disease was observed (P interaction=0.04 for age and 0.02 for peripheral vascular disease), with higher associated risk of death for those aged 45 to 70 years and those without peripheral vascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with any systolic blood pressure increase from prehemodialysis to posthemodialysis had the highest adjusted risk of mortality, compared with other threshold-based definitions.