Prognostic Value of Nondipping and Morning Surge in Elderly Treated Hypertensive Patients With Controlled Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Controversies in Hypertension III: Dipping, Nocturnal Hypertension, and the Morning Surge

A comprehensive approach to hypertension requires out-of-office determinations by home and/or ambulatory monitoring. The 4 phenotypes comparing office and out-of-office pressures in treated and untreated patients include normotension, hypertension, white-coat phenomena, and masked phenomena. Components of out-of-office pressure may be equally as important as mean values. Nighttime pressures are normally 10 - 20% lower than daytime (normal "dipping"). Abnormalities include dipping more than 20% (extreme dippers), less than 10 % (non-dippers), or rising above daytime (risers) and have been associated with elevated cardiovascular risk. Nighttime pressure may be elevated (nocturnal hypertension) in isolation or together with daytime hypertension. Isolated nocturnal hypertension theoretically changes white-coat hypertension to true hypertension and normotension to masked hypertension. Pressure normally peaks in the morning hours ("morning surge") when cardiovascular events are most common. Morning hypertension may result from residual nocturnal hypertension or an exaggerated surge and has been associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk, especially in Asian populations. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether altering therapy based solely on either abnormal dipping, isolated nocturnal hypertension, and/or an abnormal surge is justified.

Dipping Status, Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control, Cardiovascular Disease, and Kidney Disease Progression: A Multicenter Cohort Study of CKD

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring allows concurrent evaluation of BP control and nocturnal BP dipping status, both related to adverse outcomes. However, few studies have assessed the prognostic role of combining information on dipping status and achieved ambulatory BP in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

906 patients with hypertension and CKD attending 1 of 3 Italian nephrology clinics.

EXPOSURE

Four groups were defined by simultaneously classifying systolic ambulatory BP levels as being at goal (daytime SBP <135 and nighttime SBP <120 mm Hg) or above goal, and the presence or absence of nocturnal dipping (nighttime to daytime SBP ratio of <0.9 versus ≥0.9).

OUTCOME

The composite of time to initiation of maintenance dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline ≥50%, and the composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate risks of kidney disease progression and cardiovascular disease in the 4 exposure groups where nocturnal dipping with systolic ambulatory BP at goal was the reference group.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 63.8 years, 61% were male, and 26.4% had diabetes; eGFR was 41.1 ± 20.8 mL/min/1.73 m². The dipping prevalence in each of the 4 groups was as follows: nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP at goal, 18.6%; no nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP at goal, 20.5%; nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP above goal, 11.8%; and no nocturnal dipping with ambulatory BP above goal, 49.1%. Among patients with ambulatory BP above goal, the risk of cardiovascular events was greater in the absence (HR, 2.79 [95% CI, 1.64-4.75]) and presence (HR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.10-3.84]) of nocturnal dipping. The same held true for risk of kidney disease progression (HRs of 2.40 [95% CI, 1.58-3.65] and 2.11 [95% CI, 1.28-3.48] in the absence and presence of nocturnal dipping, respectively). Patients at the ambulatory BP goal but who did not experience nocturnal dipping had an increased risk of the cardiovascular end point (HR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.15-3.68]) and the kidney disease progression outcome (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.17-2.82]).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of a diverse cohort (all those enrolled were White). Residual uncontrolled confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

Systolic ambulatory BP above goal or the absence of nocturnal dipping, regardless of ambulatory BP, is associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression among patients with CKD.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring improves the identification of individuals at high risk of clinical disease outcomes. Those with uncontrolled ambulatory BP are known to have a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease and kidney disease progression, particularly when their ambulatory BP does not decline by at least 10% at night. Whether this is also true for patients with presence of optimal ambulatory BP levels but a BP pattern of no nighttime decline is largely unknown. We measured ambulatory BP in 900 Italian patients with CKD and followed them for several years. We found that, independent of ambulatory BP level, the absence of nighttime reductions in BP was associated with worsening of CKD and more frequent cardiovascular events. The absence of nighttime declines in BP is an independent risk factor for adverse events among patients with CKD. Future studies are needed to examine whether treating the absence of nighttime declines in BP improves clinical outcomes.

Influence of depression on the association between colder indoor temperature and higher blood pressure

OBJECTIVES

Cold exposure accounts for more than 7% of all-cause mortality worldwide, and cold-induced blood pressure (BP) elevation and consequent cardiovascular events are partially responsible. For prevention, it is important to identify risk factors for exaggerated temperature-sensitivity of BP but this is not fully understood. This study investigated whether depressive symptoms affect the relationship between indoor temperature and BP.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 1076 community-based individuals who were at least 60 years of age. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale at a cutoff point of 4/5. We performed ambulatory BP monitoring and indoor temperature measurement on two consecutive days during the cold season in Nara, Japan.

RESULTS

When using daytime SBP as a dependent variable, multilevel linear regression analyses showed that lower daytime indoor temperature was significantly associated with higher daytime SBP in the depressive group (n = 216, β = -0.804, P < 0.001) but not in the nondepressive group (n = 860, β = -0.173, P = 0.120); moreover, a significant interaction between depression and daytime indoor temperature was observed (P = 0.014). These relationships were independent of potential confounders including age, gender, BMI, medications, and physical activity. Similar results were obtained for morning SBP, nocturnal SBP dipping, and morning BP surge.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that depressive participants are more likely to have cold-induced BP elevation than nondepressive participants. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to determine whether people with depressive symptoms are at a high risk for cold-related cardiovascular events.

Genetic variants of GRK4 influence circadian rhythm of blood pressure and response to candesartan in hypertensive patients

Background: Genetic variants of coding genes related to blood pressure regulation participate in the pathogenesis of hypertension and determines the response to specific antihypertensive drugs. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 (GRK4) and its variants are of great importance in pathogenesis of hypertension. However, little is known about role of GRK4 variants in determine circadian rhythm of blood pressure and response to candesartan in hypertension. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation of GRK4 variants and circadian rhythm of blood pressure, and to explore their effect on antihypertensive efficiency of candestartan.Methods: In this study, a total of 1239 cases were eligible, completed ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPm) observation and exon sequencing of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 4 (GRK4). ABPm was obtained before and after 4-week treatment of candesartan. Diurnal variation of systolic blood pressure and antihypertensive effect of candesartan were then assessed.Results: Compared to GRK4 wild type (GRK4-WT), patients with GRK4 variants were more likely to be non-dippers (odds ratio (OR) 6.672, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.124-8.688, P < .001), with GRK4 A142V (OR 5.888, 95% CI 4.332-8.003, P < .001), A486V (OR 7.102, 95% CI 5.334-9.455, P < .001) and GRK4 R65L (OR 3.273, 95% CI 2.271-4.718, P < .001), respectively. Correlation analysis revealed that non-dippers rhythm of blood pressure were associated with GRK4 variants (r = .420, P < .001), with GRK4 A142V (r = .416, P < .001), A486V (r = .465, P < .001) and GRK4 R65L (r = .266, P < .001), respectively. When given 4-week candesartan, patients with GRK4 variants showed better antihypertensive effect as to drop in blood pressure (24 h mSBP, 21.21 ± 4.99 vs 12.34 ± 4.78 mmHg, P < .001) and morning peak (MP-SBP, 16.54 ± 4.37 vs 11.52 ± 4.14 mmHg, P < .001), as well as greater increase in trough to peak ratio (SBP-T/P, .71 ± .07 vs .58 ± .07, P < .001) and smoothness index (SBP-SI, 1.44 ± .16 vs 1.17 ± .11, P < .001) than those with GRK4 WT.Conclusion: This study indicates that hypertensive patients with GRK4 variants are more likely to be non-dippers. What's more, patients with GRK4 variants possess a significantly better antihypertensive response to candesartan than those with GRK4 WT.

Chronotherapy of Hypertension with Angiotensin Receptor Blockers-A Meta-Analysis of Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

We performed this meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of chronotherapy of hypertension with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane for all published randomized trials that compare antihypertensive effects of ARBs between bedtime dosing and awakening dosing. Blood pressure (BP) was measured by ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with mild or moderate essential hypertension.

RESULTS

The effects of ARBs on BP were assessed in 805 essential hypertensive patients included in 8 trials with a follow-up of 12 ± 3 weeks. The sleep-time systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) with bedtime dosing greatly decreased as compared with awakening dosing (weighted mean differences [WMD] for SBP WMD -5.23 [95% confidence intervals (CI), -7.27, -3.20] mm Hg, p < 0.001; WMD for DBP -2.94 [95% CI, -4.52, -1.36] mm Hg, p < 0.001). The reduction of daytime SBP (WMD 0.98 [95% CI, -0.20, 2.17] mm Hg, p = 0.10), DBP (WMD 0.11 [95% CI, -0.68, 0.89] mm Hg, p = 0.79), 24 hour SBP (WMD -0.75 [95% CI, -1.93, 0.42] mm Hg, p = 0.21) and DBP (WMD -0. 77 [95% CI, -1.55 0.01] mm Hg, p = 0.05) with bedtime dosing was similar with awakening dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedtime dosing with ARBs is more effective in lowering sleep-time BP than awakening dosing in patients with essential hypertension, suggesting a utilization of chronotherapy of hypertension with ARBs to reduce sleep-time high BP. Larger multi-ethnic studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of chronotherapy of hypertension.

Salt intake impacts sympathetic neural control but not morning blood pressure surge in premenopausal women with a history of normal pregnancy

Salt intake may alter blood pressure (BP) regulation, but no study has investigated the impact of salt reduction versus salt loading on morning blood pressure surge (MBPS) and sympathetic neural control in premenopausal women with a history of normal pregnancy. Nine healthy women (42 ± 3 yr; mean ± SD) were given a low-salt diet (LS; 50 mEq sodium/day) and high-salt diet (HS; 250 mEq sodium/day) for 1 wk each (~2 mo apart with the order randomized), while water intake was ad libitum. Ambulatory BP at 24 h was measured, and the percent change in blood volume (BV) was calculated following LS and HS. MBPS was defined as the morning systolic BP (averaged for 2 h after wake-up) minus the lowest nocturnal systolic BP. Beat-by-beat BP, heart rate, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured during supine rest. Signal averaging was used to characterize changes in beat-by-beat mean arterial pressure and total vascular conductance following spontaneous MSNA bursts to assess sympathetic vascular transduction. Ambulatory BP and MBPS (32 ± 7 vs. 26 ± 12 mmHg, P = 0.208) did not differ between LS and HS. From LS to HS, BV increased by 4.3 ± 3.7% (P = 0.008). MSNA (30 ± 20 vs. 18 ± 13 bursts/100 heartbeats, P = 0.005) was higher, whereas sympathetic vascular transduction was lower in LS than HS (both, P < 0.01). Changes in MSNA from LS to HS were correlated to percent changes in BV (r = -0.673; P = 0.047). Thus, salt intake affects sympathetic neural control but not MBPS in premenopausal women with a history of normal pregnancy. The underlying mechanisms remain unknown; however, alterations in sympathetic vascular transduction may, in part, contribute.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to demonstrate that MBPS and ambulatory BP were not affected by salt intake despite a significant change in sympathetic outflow in healthy premenopausal women with a history of normal pregnancy. This may be due to compensatory adaptations in MSNA and sympathetic vascular transduction during salt reduction versus salt loading.

[Antihypertensives always evenings-absolutely not or sensible?]

The Spanish Hygia study has led to considerable irritation due to the general recommendation to prescribe antihypertensives preferably to be taken in the evening, especially since the lay press as well as medical media made enthusiastic comments. The discussion about the optimal time to take antihypertensive drugs shows once again how dangerous the uncritical handling of study data can be. No possible risks were pointed out. The Hygia study compared 19,084 patients with morning and evening intake of antihypertensive drugs under the control of a 48‑h blood pressure measurement (!). There was a significantly better reduction in blood pressure and the rate of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events with evening intake. The data are scientifically valuable; however, the conclusions are incomprehensible based on the data, contradict many other studies and are dangerous for certain patient groups. There are also methodological shortcomings. Therefore, a general evening intake is not justified and nonsensical due to the diverse, individually very different pathophysiological findings of the nocturnal blood pressure behavior. Basically, the outpatient 24‑h blood pressure measurement (ABPM) enables a better assessment of the individual cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks and prevents an incorrect assessment of the blood pressure and thus unnecessary or sufficient treatment. Instead of a general recommendation, the ABPM offers the option of an individually tailored treatment. Taking antihypertensive drugs in the evening should always be preceded by an ABDM in the case of prognostically unfavorable nocturnal hypertension in order to avoid the risk of nocturnal ischemic risks due to excessive drops in blood pressure.

Clinical applications for out-of-office blood pressure monitoring

Hypertension is one of the most common chronic diseases as well as the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Efficient screening and accurate blood pressure (BP) monitoring are the basic methods of detection and management. However, with developments in electronic technology, BP measurement and monitoring are no longer limited to the physician's office. Epidemiological and clinical studies have documented strong evidence for the efficacy of out-of-office BP monitoring in multiple fields for managing hypertension and CVD. This review discusses applications for out-of-office BP monitoring, including home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), based on recent epidemiological data and clinical studies regarding the following factors: the detection of abnormal BP phenotypes, namely, white coat hypertension and masked hypertension; stronger ability to determine the prognosis for target organ damage and mortality; better BP control; screening for hypotension; and unique approaches to identifying circadian BP patterns and BP variability.

Repeated ambulatory monitoring reveals an evening rise in blood pressure in a Japanese population

Recent studies have revealed 2 peaks in the onset of cardiovascular events, 1 in the morning and another in the evening. We evaluated whether blood pressure (BP) also rises in the morning/evening and identified the determinants of evening BP rise using 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring for 7 consecutive days. We identified 2 BP peaks, 1 in the morning (0-3 hours after waking) and 1 in the evening (9-12 hours after waking). Subjects were subclassified according to the extent of evening BP rise: those in the top quartile (≥6.45 mm Hg, n = 34; ER group) vs all others. After adjustment for age, sex, and 24-hour systolic BP, evening BP rise was associated with the use of antihypertensive medications [odds ratio (OR), 3.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-8.74; P = .01] and estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; P = .04), confirming its association with antihypertensive medication use and renal dysfunction.

Morning surge in blood pressure and blood pressure variability in Asia: Evidence and statement from the HOPE Asia Network

Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. To effectively prevent end-organ damage, maintain vascular integrity and reduce morbidity and mortality, it is essential to decrease and adequately control blood pressure (BP) throughout each 24-hour period. Exaggerated early morning BP surge (EMBS) is one component of BP variability (BPV), and has been associated with an increased risk of stroke and cardiovascular events, independently of 24-hour average BP. BPV includes circadian, short-term and long-term components, and can best be documented using out-of-office techniques such as ambulatory and/or home BP monitoring. There is a large body of evidence linking both BPV and EMBS with increased rates of adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events, and end-organ damage. Differences in hypertension and related cardiovascular disease rates have been reported between Western and Asian populations, including a higher rate of stroke, higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome, greater salt sensitivity and more common high morning and nocturnal BP readings in Asians. This highlights a need for BP management strategies that take into account ethnic differences. In general, long-acting antihypertensives that control BP throughout the 24-hour period are preferred; amlodipine and telmisartan have been shown to control EMBS more effectively than valsartan. Home and ambulatory BP monitoring should form an essential part of hypertension management, with individualized pharmacotherapy to achieve optimal 24-hour BP control particularly the EMBS and provide the best cardio- and cerebrovascular protection. Future research should facilitate better understanding of BPV, allowing optimization of strategies for the detection and treatment of hypertension to reduce adverse outcomes.

Homocysteine is Associated with Exaggerated Morning Blood Pressure Surge in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Considerable researches suggest that high level of homocysteine (Hcy) is associated with the risk of ischemic stroke. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) parameters have also been confirmed associated with cardio-cerebrovascular events. However, the relationship between Hcy and ABPM parameters remains unclear in patients with acute ischemic stroke. In this study, we aim to investigate the association between Hcy level and ABPM parameters in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We enrolled 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke who received ABPM. We calculated ABPM parameters like morning blood pressure surge (MBPS), ambulatory arterial stiffness index, blood pressure variability, and night dipping patterns.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that patients in the top quartile of Hcy level tended to have a higher level of prewaking and sleep-trough MBPS compared with patients in the lower 3 quartiles after adjusted for age and gender (P = .028 and P = .030, respectively). When treating Hcy as a continuous variable, the linear regression showed the association between Hcy level and both MBPS parameters remained significant (prewaking MBPS, r = .356, P = .022; sleep-trough MBPS, r = .365, P = .017, respectively). However, there is no association between Hcy level and ambulatory arterial stiffness index, blood pressure variability or night dipping patterns (P = .635, P = .348 and P = .127 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a relationship between the 2 major cerebrovascular risk factors: MBPS and Hcy.

Morning blood pressure surge: pathophysiology, clinical relevance and therapeutic aspects

Morning hours are the period of the day characterized by the highest incidence of major cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, sudden death or stroke. They are also characterized by important neurohormonal changes, in particular, the activation of sympathetic nervous system which usually leads to a rapid increase in blood pressure (BP), known as morning blood pressure surge (MBPS). It was hypothesized that excessive MBPS may be causally involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular events occurring in the morning by inducing hemodynamic stress. A number of studies support an independent relationship of MBPS with organ damage, cerebrovascular complications and mortality, although some heterogeneity exists in the available evidence. This may be due to ethnic differences, methodological issues and the confounding relationship of MBPS with other features of 24-hour BP profile, such as nocturnal dipping or BP variability. Several studies are also available dealing with treatment effects on MBPS and indicating the importance of long-acting antihypertensive drugs in this regard. This paper provides an overview of pathophysiologic, methodological, prognostic and therapeutic aspects related to MBPS.

Blood-pressure variability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: current perspectives

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is often associated with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Blood pressure (BP) variability is part of the assessment of cardiovascular risk. In OSA, BP variability has been studied mainly as very short-term (beat-by-beat) and short-term (24-hour BP profile) variability. BP measured on consecutive heartbeats has been demonstrated to be highly variable, due to repeated peaks during sleep, so that an accurate assessment of nocturnal BP levels in OSA may require peculiar methodologies. In 24-hour recordings, BP frequently features a "nondipping" profile, ie, <10% fall from day to night, which may increase cardiovascular risk and occurrence of major cardiovascular events in the nocturnal hours. Also, BP tends to show a large "morning BP surge", a still controversial negative prognostic sign. Increased very short-term BP variability, high morning BP, and nondipping BP profile appear related to the severity of OSA. Treatment of OSA slightly reduces mean 24-hour BP levels and nocturnal beat-by-beat BP variability by abolishing nocturnal BP peaks. In some patients OSA treatment turns a nondipping into a dipping BP profile. Treatment of arterial hypertension in OSA usually requires both antihypertensive pharmacological therapy and treatment of apnea. Addressing BP variability could help improve the management of OSA and reduce cardiovascular risk. Possibly, drug administration at an appropriate time would ensure a dipping-BP profile.

Utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the management of hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, affecting nearly 80 million individuals in the United States alone. Accurate measurement of blood pressure (BP) is the crucial first step to reduce the associated cardiovascular risk of hypertension. For decades, clinicians have relied on office BP measurements for the diagnosis and subsequent management of hypertension. However, it has been clearly demonstrated that ambulatory BP measurements are a better predictor of cardiovascular risk and can provide clinicians with important additional information to improve BP control and reduce cardiovascular risk. This article reviews the available data and provides clinical insights into the use of ambulatory BP monitoring for the management of hypertension.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ambulatory BP monitoring is uniquely capable of identifying patients with white-coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension and abnormal nocturnal BP profiles. Recently, ambulatory BP data have demonstrated the negative impact of WCH on right ventricular function, a greater prevalence of masked hypertension than previously recognized and the detrimental impact of nocturnal hypertension even in controlled hypertension.

SUMMARY

Ambulatory BP monitoring provides clinicians with the most comprehensive evaluation of hypertension and the ability to define individual BP phenotypes. Hence, these out-of-office measurements can be utilized to improve hypertension control, translating into a reduction of cardiovascular events.