1
|
Geersing TH, Pourahmad DM, Lodewijk F, Franssen EJF, Knibbe CAJ, Crul M. Analysis of production time and capacity for manual and robotic compounding scenarios for parenteral hazardous drugs. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2024; 31:352-357. [PMID: 36792350 PMCID: PMC11265554 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing amount of hazardous preparations in combination with shortages leads to a call for more efficient compounding methods. This research aims to evaluate the required amount of time, production capacity and direct labour costs of the manual, manual software-supported and robotic compounding of parenteral hazardous drugs. METHODS This multicentre study was conducted at the clinical pharmacy departments of three Dutch hospitals with different compounding methods: St Antonius hospital (manual software-supported compounding), Amsterdam University Medical Centre (Amsterdam UMC) (both robotic compounding and manual compounding without software support) and OLVG (robotic compounding). Time measurements of individual hazardous drugs were performed in all three hospitals. At Amsterdam UMC and St Antonius hospital, the times per compounding phase, the production capacity and the direct labour costs per preparation were also determined. To reflect real-world situations, the combination of robotic and manual compounding was also studied. RESULTS The total compounding process, including the actions before compounding and the release-time and cleaning time, lasted 6:44 min with robotic compounding and was faster than manual compounding with and without software support (6:48 and 9:48 min, respectively). The production capacity of one full-time equivalent (FTE) on 1 day (P1FTE1day) was 15 preparations per FTE per day with manual compounding with and without software support, and 57 preparations per FTE per day with only robotic compounding. If manual and robotic compounding were combined, the production capacity was 30 preparations per FTE per day. In this setting, the direct labour costs per preparation were €5.21, while these costs were €13.18 with only manual compounding. CONCLUSION Compared with manual compounding, robotic compounding was faster over the total compounding process. A combination of manual compounding and robotic compounding could lead to 100% more preparations per FTE and 2.5 times lower direct labour costs compared with manual compounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tjerk H Geersing
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Demelza M Pourahmad
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Lodewijk
- Pharmaceutical Business Administration, Hogeschool Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Catherijne A J Knibbe
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Crul
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuitunen S, Airaksinen M, Holmström AR. Evolution of Intravenous Medication Errors and Preventive Systemic Defenses in Hospital Settings-A Narrative Review of Recent Evidence. J Patient Saf 2024; 20:e29-e39. [PMID: 38536101 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intravenous drug administration has been associated with severe medication errors in hospitals. The present narrative review is based on a systematic literature search, and aimed to describe the recent evolution in research on systemic causes and defenses in intravenous medication errors in hospitals. METHODS This narrative review was based on Reason's theory of systems-based risk management. A systematic literature search covering the period from June 2016 to October 2021 was conducted on Medline (Ovid). We used the search strategy and selection criteria developed for our previous systematic reviews. The included articles were analyzed and compared to our previous reviews. RESULTS The updated search found 435 articles. Of the 63 included articles, 16 focused on systemic causes of intravenous medication errors, and 47 on systemic defenses. A high proportion (n = 24, 38%) of the studies were conducted in the United States or Canada. Most of the studies focused on drug administration (n = 21/63, 33%) and preparation (n = 19/63, 30%). Compared to our previous review of error causes, more studies (n = 5/16, 31%) utilized research designs with a prospective risk management approach. Within articles related to systemic defenses, smart infusion pumps remained most widely studied (n = 10/47, 21%), while those related to preparation technologies (n = 7/47, 15%) had increased. CONCLUSIONS This narrative review demonstrates a growing interest in systems-based risk management for intravenous drug therapy and in introducing new technology, particularly smart infusion pumps and preparation systems, as systemic defenses. When introducing new technologies, prospective assessment and continuous monitoring of emerging safety risks should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sini Kuitunen
- From the HUS Pharmacy, Hospital Pharmacy of Helsinki University Hospital (HUS)
| | - Marja Airaksinen
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna-Riia Holmström
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith E, Fox A, Willmers G, Wright D, Stuart B. Impact of implementing the aseptic compounding management system, Medcura, on internal error rates within an oncology pharmacy aseptic unit: a mixed methods evaluation. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2024; 31:220-226. [PMID: 36241376 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As cancer survivorship improves, pressure on oncology services to provide safe, timely treatments increases. Traditional manual compounding processes are error prone, putting patients at risk. Additionally, errors have a detrimental impact on service delivery and staff morale. Information technology is increasingly utilised to improve safety and service delivery of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT). The compounding process control system, Medcura, was developed to manage the end-to-end process and reduce transcription and calculation errors. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of implementing Medcura on internal errors and staff perceptions of errors. METHOD An aseptic process control system, Medcura, was implemented in a busy pharmacy chemotherapy production unit. Internal error and severity data were collected and analysed for 14 months before and during implementation, and 24 months after implementation. In addition, one-to-one semi-structured interviews were carried out with pharmacy staff, pre- and post-implementation. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS Error rates decreased after implementation from 2.9% to 2.1%. The types of error detected also changed with a decrease in worksheet and labelling errors, and an increase in assembly errors. The severity of the errors, as a percentage of total errors made, also decreased after implementation. Staff were predominantly positive about Medcura; it reduced the number of errors, eased the preparation of worksheets and labels, reduced pressure and work-related stress, and improved job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Implementing Medcura has resulted in a reduction in both error rate and severity. Specifically, errors related to label and worksheet generation have seen the largest reduction. Staff have viewed these changes positively and report reduced levels of work-related stress. Further development and roll-out will improve patient safety and staff morale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Smith
- Pharmacy, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Andy Fox
- Pharmacy, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Graeme Willmers
- Pharmacy, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Deborah Wright
- Pharmacy, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boyd AM, Sue C, Khandoobhai A, Vinson B, Shaikh H, Sorenson S, Patel V, Snyder B, Bondarenka C, Koukounas Y, Earl M, Jenkins M. Evaluation of oncology infusion pharmacy practices: A nationwide survey. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2024; 30:127-141. [PMID: 37122190 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231170358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oncology care continues to evolve at a rapid pace including provision of infusion-based care. There is currently a lack of robust metrics around oncology infusion centers and pharmacy practice. The workgroup completed a nationwide survey to learn about oncology-based infusion pharmacy services offered. The objective was to highlight consistent, measureable oncology-based infusion pharmacy metrics that will provide a foundation to describe overall productivity including emphasis on high patient-safety standards. METHODS A nationwide survey was developed via a workgroup within the Vizient Pharmacy Cancer Care Group beginning in April 2019 and conducted electronically via the Vizient Pharmacy Network from September to November 2020. The survey was designed to capture a number of key metrics related to oncology-based infusion pharmacy services. RESULTS Forty-one sites responded to the survey. Responses highlighted hours of operation (median = 11.5), number of infusion chairs (median = 45). Staffing metrics included 7.1 pharmacist full-time equivalent (FTE) and 7.6 technician FTE per week. 80.5% of sites had cleanrooms and 95.1% reported both hazardous and nonhazardous compounding hoods. 68.3% of sites reported using intravenous (IV) technology, 50.0% measured turnaround time, and 31.4% prepared treatment medications in advance. CONCLUSION There was variability among oncology infusion pharmacy practices in regard to survey responses among sites. The survey results highlight the need for standardization of established productivity metrics across oncology infusion pharmacies in order to improve efficiency and contain costs in the changing oncology landscape. The survey provides insight into oncology infusion pharmacy practices nationwide and provides information for pharmacy leaders to help guide their practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Boyd
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - C Sue
- Department of Pharmacy, UC Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - A Khandoobhai
- Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - B Vinson
- Department of Pharmacy, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - H Shaikh
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - S Sorenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - V Patel
- Department of Pharmacy, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - B Snyder
- Department of Pharmacy, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company, New York, NY, USA
| | - C Bondarenka
- Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Y Koukounas
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Novartis, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Earl
- Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Seagen, Bothell, WA, USA
| | - M Jenkins
- Department of Pharmacy Services, UVA Health, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lagrange FJ, Lagrange JV. Process performance of a new liquid medication dispensing robot. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2023; 30:340-346. [PMID: 34857643 PMCID: PMC10647870 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Liquid medications provide an alternative to splitting pills and dosages by measuring an amount of liquid rather than crushing tablets or opening capsules. Special attention should also be paid to specific patient groups with swallowing difficulties or requiring enteral feeding administration. Liquid medicines are also often used to ease withdrawal symptoms for people suffering from addiction. Nevertheless, filling liquid medication cups with the right medication and precise doses may be difficult for healthcare professionals. The Nooddis ('Nominative Oral Dose Dispenser'-Pierre Lôo Hospital, France and Packinov, France) is a new robotic system for the automated filling of single dose liquid medications. Since the performance of such a complex piece of equipment depends on compliance of the service provider to our building guidelines, the process performance verification is a necessary prerequisite before starting routine production. METHODS The performance of the Nooddis robot (accuracy, precision, and tapering calculation) and its ability to fill medicine cups was evaluated with 18 different liquid medications using an automatic in-line checkweigher. Microbiological testing was also performed. RESULTS 648 sealed cups were prepared for qualification. The filling accuracy was within the limit of ±10% from 75 µL to 21.25 mL. The repeatability (% relative SD (%RSD) 0.05 to 4.93) and intermediate precision (%RSD 0.01 to 6.59) were validated for all preparations. All medicine cups met the requirements of USP and European Pharmacopoeia acceptance criteria for microbiological quality. Automated tapering calculations allowed for easy production of daily doses for the tapering periods chosen. CONCLUSION Since the system met the required quality standards, the Nooddis robot, with automatic in-line tapering system, is regarded as an accurate technology that can fill the exact amount of liquid oral medication in single dose cups. This may promote closer monitoring, which supports medication tapering as well as medication misuse prevention. With a packaging cost similar to current unit dose cup systems, it is a relevant alternative to fractioned or crushed tablets, as well as opened capsules. Further developments for some sterile liquid medications are yet to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrice Jean Lagrange
- Department of Pharmacy, Lab testing Unit (BSPharm, PhD,Technology Implementation Engineer), Pierre-Lôo Hospital, GHT58, La Charite-sur-Loire, France
| | - Jean Valdomar Lagrange
- Epitech and CSULB (IT Engineer), Le Kremlin-Bicetre Paris and Long Beach, CA, France and USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
[Preparation of injectable anticancer drugs within chemotherapy preparation unit: What levers are available to optimize and secure production?]. Bull Cancer 2023; 110:301-307. [PMID: 36759213 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Preparation of injectable anticancer drugs is centralized within chemotherapy preparation unit of hospital pharmacies under pharmaceutical responsibility. Improving the chemotherapy preparation unit's efficiency in the face of increasing demand, resource constraints and the need to ensure high quality is a challenge. Hospital pharmacists in search of efficiency in order to combine productivity and quality, have several tools to respond to this problem. These are in particular the quality management, whether they go through certification or not, a source of rationalization of activities and which will strengthen the cohesion of the staff through common objectives. The management of production flows, early preparation or dose-banding will allow a smoothing of activity reducing the risk of medication error and patient waiting times. The continuous training of hospital pharmacy technicians is an important lever so that they acquire and then maintain these specific skills. Finally, the use of the most recent technologies constitutes an important part of the possibilities offered to hospital pharmacists : computerization, automated production and quality controls.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fan M, Yang D, Ng B, Jackson J, Bouris K, Eng S, Rolko E, Trbovich P. Impact of technology-assisted versus manual sterile compounding on safety and efficiency in a Canadian community hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022; 79:1685-1696. [PMID: 35700925 PMCID: PMC9494253 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Interventions to improve the safety and efficiency of manual sterile compounding are needed. This study evaluated the impact of a technology-assisted workflow system (TAWS) on sterile compounding safety (checks, traceability, and error detection), and efficiency (task time). Methods Observations were conducted in an oncology pharmacy transitioning from a manual to a TAWS process for sterile compounding. Process maps were generated to compare manual and TAWS checks and traceability. The numbers and types of errors detected were collected, and task times were observed directly or via TAWS data logs. Results Analysis of safety outcomes showed that, depending on preparation type, 3 to 4 product checks occurred in the manual process, compared to 6 to 10 checks with TAWS use. TAWS checks (barcoding and gravimetric verification) produced better traceability (documentation). The rate of incorrect-drug errors decreased with technology-assisted compounding (from 0.4% [5 of 1,350 preparations] with the manual process to 0% [0 of 1,565 preparations] with TAWS use; P < 0.02). The TAWS increased detection of (1) errors in the amount of drug withdrawn from vials (manual vs TAWS, 0.4% [5/1,350] vs 1.2% [18/1565]; P < 0.02), and (2) errors in the amount of drug injected into the final container (manual vs TAWS, 0% [0/1,236] vs 0.9% [11/1,272]; P < 0.002). With regard to efficiency outcomes, TAWS use increased the mean mixing time (manual vs TAWS, 275 seconds vs 355 seconds; P < 0.001), had no significant impact on average visual checking time (manual vs TAWS, 21.4 seconds vs 21.6 seconds), and decreased average physical checking time (manual vs TAWS, 58.6 seconds vs 50.9 seconds; P < 0.001). Conclusion In comparison to manual sterile compounding, use of the TAWS improved safety through more frequent and rigorous checks, improved traceability (via superior documentation), and enhanced error detection. Results related to efficiency were mixed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Fan
- Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danny Yang
- Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Becky Ng
- Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Sharon Eng
- Pharmacy, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Edith Rolko
- Pharmacy, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patricia Trbovich
- Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farcy E, Bui DT, Lebel D, Bussières JF. Use and impact of technology-assisted workflow (TAWF) systems for drug compounding in pharmacy practice: a scoping literature review. PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY IN HOSPITAL PHARMACY 2021. [DOI: 10.1515/pthp-2021-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to review studies describing the use and the impact of technology-assisted workflow (TAWF) systems for drug compounding in hospital pharmacy.
Content
This is a scoping literature review. A search was conducted on studies describing or evaluating the use of TAWF published from January 1st, 2015 to July 31st, 2021. Two databases were searched (PubMed and Embase), followed by a search on Google Scholar.
Summary
218 articles were screened and 17 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. TAWFs all included preparation assistance software (17/17), barcode reader (17/17), photo or video taking (17/17), and some included gravimetric systems (8/17), and the use of robots (2/17). A majority of the studies included used technology for parenteral preparations (15/17, one for oral preparations only (1/17), and one used technology for both types of preparations (1/17). Most of the articles selected presented drugs prepared for adults (10/17), the others presented drugs intended for children (4/17) or for a mix of adults and children (3/17). Four parameters were evaluated: error detection rate (n=15), preparation and validation time (n=7), and costs generated or saved (n=7). Ten studies evaluated the pre-post impact of implantation of a TAWF (10/17).
Outlook
Given the heterogeneity of the data available, the use of TAWF was associated with an increased ability to detect preparation errors, a reduction in preparation time and costs, and increased satisfaction of pharmacy technicians and pharmacists. However, better quality studies are needed to confirm the positive impacts studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Farcy
- Département de pharmacie , Unité de Recherche en Pratique Pharmaceutique , Montréal , QC , Canada
| | - Duc Tâm Bui
- Département de pharmacie , Unité de Recherche en Pratique Pharmaceutique , Montréal , QC , Canada
| | - Denis Lebel
- Département de pharmacie , Unité de Recherche en Pratique Pharmaceutique , Montréal , QC , Canada
| | - Jean-François Bussières
- Département de pharmacie , Unité de Recherche en Pratique Pharmaceutique , Montréal , QC , Canada
- Faculté de pharmacie , Université de Montréal , Montréal , QC , Canada
| |
Collapse
|