EFFECT OF ETHANOL ON MORPHINE STATE-DEPENDENT LEARNING IN THE MOUSE: INVOLVEMENT OF GABAERGIC, OPIOIDERGIC AND CHOLINERGIC SYSTEMS

Repeated pre-exposure to morphine inhibited the amnesic effect of ethanol on spatial memory: Involvement of CaMKII and BDNF

Evidence has suggested that addiction and memory systems are related, but the signaling cascades underlying this interaction have not been completelyealed yet. The importance of calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the memory processes and also in drug addiction has been previously established. In this present investigation, we examined the effects of repeated morphine pretreatment on impairment of spatial learning and memory acquisition induced by systemic ethanol administration in adult male rats. Also, we assessed how these drug exposures influence the expression level of CaMKII and BDNF in the hippocampus and amygdala. Animals were trained by a single training session of 8 trials, and a probe test containing a 60-s free-swim without a platform was administered 24 h later. Before training trials, rats were treated with a once-daily subcutaneous morphine injection for 3 days followed by a 5-day washout period. The results showed that pre-training ethanol (1 g/kg) impaired spatial learning and memory acquisition and down-regulated the mRNA expression of CaMKII and BDNF. The amnesic effect of ethanol was suppressed in morphine- (15 mg/kg/day) pretreated animals. Furthermore, the mRNA expression level of CaMKII and BDNF increased significantly following ethanol administration in morphine-pretreated rats. Conversely, this improvement in spatial memory acquisition was prevented by daily subcutaneous administration of naloxone (2 mg/kg) 15 min prior to morphine administration. Our findings suggest that sub-chronic morphine treatment reverses ethanol-induced spatial memory impairment, which could be explained by modulating CaMKII and BDNF mRNA expressions in the hippocampus and amygdala.

Cross state-dependent memory retrieval between tramadol and ethanol: involvement of dorsal hippocampal GABAA receptors

RATIONALE

Tramadol and ethanol, as psychoactive agents, are often abused. Discovering the molecular pathways of drug-induced memory creation may contribute to preventing drug addiction and relapse.

OBJECTIVE

The tramadol- and ethanol-induced state-dependent memory (SDM) and cross-SDM retrieval between tramadol and ethanol were examined in this study. Moreover, because of the confirmed involvement of GABAA receptors and GABAergic neurotransmission in memory retrieval impairment, we assessed cross-SDM retrieval between tramadol and ethanol with a specific emphasis on the role of the GABAA receptors. The first hypothesis of this study was the presence of cross-SDM between tramadol and ethanol, and the second hypothesis was related to possible role of GABAA receptors in memory retrieval impairment within the dorsal hippocampus. The cannulae were inserted into the hippocampal CA1 area of NMRI mice, and a step-down inhibitory avoidance test was used to evaluate state dependence and memory recovery.

RESULTS

The post-training and/or pre-test administration of tramadol (2.5 and 5 mg/kg, i.p.) and/or ethanol (0.5 and 1 g/kg, i.p.) induced amnesia, which was restored after the administration of the drugs 24 h later during the pre-test period, proposing ethanol and tramadol SDM. The pre-test injection of ethanol (0.25 and 0.5 g/kg, i.p.) with tramadol at an ineffective dose (1.25 mg/kg) enhanced tramadol SDM. Moreover, tramadol injection (1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg) with ethanol at the ineffective dose (0.25 g/kg) promoted ethanol SDM. Furthermore, the pre-test intra-CA1 injection of bicuculline (0.0625, 0.125, and 0.25 μg/mouse), a GABAA receptor antagonist, 5 min before the injection of tramadol (5 mg/kg) or ethanol (1 g/kg) inhibited tramadol- and ethanol-induced SDM dose-dependently.

CONCLUSION

The findings strongly confirmed cross-SDM between tramadol and ethanol and the critical role of dorsal hippocampal GABAA receptors in the cross-SDM between tramadol and ethanol.

Pentylenetetrazol and Morphine Interaction in a State-dependent Memory Model: Role of CREB Signaling

Introduction:

State-dependent (STD) memory is a process, in which the learned information can be optimally retrieved only when the subject is in the state similar to the encoding phase. This phenomenon has been widely studied with morphine. Several studies have reported that Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) impairs memory in experimental animal models. Due to certain mechanistic interactions between morphine and PTZ, it is hypothesized that PTZ may interfere with the morphine-STD. The cyclic adenosine monophosphate Response Element-Binding (CREB) is considered as the main downstream marker for long-term memory. This study was designed to determine the possible interaction between PTZ and morphine STD and the presumable changes in CREB mRNA.

Methods:

In an Inhibitory Avoidance (IA) model, posttraining morphine (2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg/ kg-i.p.) was used. The pre-test morphine was evaluated for morphine-induced STD memory. Moreover, the effect of a pre-test PTZ (60 mg/kg-i.p.) was studied along with morphine STD. Locomotion testing was carried out using open-field. Eventually, using real-time-PCR, the CREB mRNA changes in the hippocampus were evaluated.

Results:

Posttraining MOR (7.5 mg/kg-i.p.) impaired IA memory (P<0.001). The pre-test injection of similar doses of morphine recovered the morphine-induced memory impairment (P<0.001). The pre-test PTZ impaired the IA memory recall (P<0.001); however, the pre-test PTZ along with morphine STD potentiated the morphine-induced STD (P<0.001). Alterations in CREB mRNA were observed in all groups. No difference was seen in the locomotor activity.

Conclusion:

Presumably, the certain interactive effect of PTZ on morphine-induced STD is mediated through gamma-aminobutyric acid and opioid systems via CREB signaling.

State-dependent memory and its modulation by different brain areas and neurotransmitters

The state-dependent memory defines as a state that the retrieval of recently obtained information may be potential if the subject exists in a similar physiological situation as for the period of the encoding stage. Studies revealed that exogenous and endogenous compounds could induce state-dependent memory. The state-dependent memory made it probable to differentiate the effects of drugs per se on learning from the effects due to alterations in drug state during the task. Studies proposed the role of regions beyond the limbic formation and illustrated that state-dependent memory produced by various neurotransmitter systems and pharmacological compounds. Our review of the literature revealed that: (a) re-administration of drugs on the same state induce state-dependent memory; (b) many neurotransmitters induce endogenous state-dependent memory; (c) there are cross state-dependent learning and memory between some drugs; (d) some sites of the brain including the CA1 areas of the hippocampus, central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), septum, ventral tegmental area (VTA), and nucleus accumbens (NAC) are involved in state-dependent memory. See also Figure 1(Fig. 1).

Nitric oxide blockade in mediodorsal thalamus impaired nicotine/ethanol-induced memory retrieval in rats via inhibition of prefrontal cortical pCREB/CREB signaling pathway

Reciprocal connections between the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD) and the prefrontal cortex (PFC) are important for memory processes. Since the co-abuse of nicotine and ethanol affects memory formation, this study investigated the effect of nitric oxide inhibition in the MD on memory retrieval induced by co-administration of nicotine and ethanol. Subsequently, western blot analysis was used to evaluate how this change would alter the PFC pCREB/CREB signaling pathway. Male Wistar rats were bilaterally cannulated into the MD and the memory retrieval was measured by passive avoidance task. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of ethanol (1 g/kg, i.p) 30 min before the test impaired memory retrieval and caused ethanol-induced amnesia. Subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of nicotine (0.05-0.2 mg/kg, s.c.) prevented ethanol-induced amnesia and improved memory retrieval. Intra-MD microinjection of a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, L-NAME (0.5-1 μg/rat) inhibited the improving effect of nicotine (0.2 mg/kg, s.c.) on ethanol-induced amnesia, while intra-MD microinjection of a precursor of nitric oxide, l-arginine (0.25-1 μg/rat), potentiated such effect. Noteworthy, intra-MD microinjection of the same doses of L-NAME or l-arginine by itself had no effect on memory retrieval. Furthermore, intra-MD microinjection of L-NAME (0.05, 0.1 and 0.3 μg/rat) reversed the l-arginine improving effect on nicotine response. Successful memory retrieval significantly increased the p-CREB/CREB ratio in the PFC tissue. Ethanol-induced amnesia, however, decreased this ratio in the PFC while the co-administration of nicotine and ethanol increased the PFC CREB signaling. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of L-NAME and the potentiating effect of l-arginine on nicotine response were associated with the decrease and increase of the PFC p-CREB/CREB ratio respectively. It can be concluded that MD-PFC connections are involved in the combined effects of nicotine and ethanol on memory retrieval. The mediodorsal thalamic NO system possibly mediated this interaction via the pCREB/CREB signaling pathways in the PFC.

Applied shared log-normal frailty Cox-proportional hazard model to evaluating the effect of vitamin A on the rat passive avoidance memory

In this research, the Cox-proportional hazard model is used to investigate the effect of various values of vitamin A (3000, 4500 and 6000 IU kg(-1)) and sesame oil on the passive avoidance memory of rats by shuttle box. Present results confirm that various values of vitamin A do not improve the passive avoidance memory of rats (p < 0.05). We found that the animals are clustered (p < 0.001) and applying shared log-normal frailty for clustering improves present results (p < 0.05) such that sesame oil improves the passive avoidance memory task (p < 0.05). Therefore we should consider clustering in the analysis of biological data or we should use cloned animals.

Effects of Clozapine and Sulpiride on Morphine State-Dependent Memory in the Step-Down Passive Avoidance Test

The effects of antipsychotic drugs sulpiride and clozapine on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance task were examined in mice. Post-training administration of morphine (5 mg/kg) led to state-dependent learning with impaired memory retrieval on the test day which was reversed by pre-test administration of the same dose of the opioid (5 mg/kg). In animals where memory was impaired by post-training morphine, the administration of either sulpiride or clozapine before pre-test morphine reduced the improvement of memory produced by the opioid. Co-administration of sulpiride with clozapine did not potentiate their antagonistic response. In conclusion, the inhibition of improvement of memory retrieval by morphine treatment on the test day by the two dopamine receptor antagonists seems to be induced through two different receptor mechanisms.

Influence of intracerebroventricular administration of cannabinergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory in the step-down passive avoidance test

The effects of cannabinergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance task were examined in mice. Pre-training (0.25, 0.5 and 5 mg/kg) and post-training (5 mg/kg) administration of morphine impaired memory retrieval on the test day. Impairment of memory retrieval by morphine (5 mg/kg) on the test day was reversed by pre-test administration of the same dose of the opioid. The pre-test intracerebroventricular administration of the cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonist (WIN55,212-2) (0.75 and 1 microg/mouse) not only mimicked the effect of pre-test morphine treatment, but also increased this action of the opioid. Furthermore, the pre-test intracerebroventricular administration of CB1 receptor antagonist (AM251) (20 and 100 ng/mouse) prevented the restoration of memory by morphine. Pre-training administration of WIN55,212-2 (1 microg/mouse) led to state-dependent learning with impaired memory retrieval on the test day as well, which was reversed by pre-test administration of the drug (0.5, 0.75 and 1 microg/mouse) or morphine (1 and 5 mg/kg). Restoration of impairment induced by WIN55,212-2 was decreased by both the opioid receptor antagonists, naloxone (0.01 microg/mouse) and AM251 (20 and 100 ng/mouse). In conclusion, the improvement of memory retrieval by morphine treatment on the test day seems to be induced, at least in part, by the cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

Effects of intracerebroventricular administration of ultra low doses of histaminergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice

The effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ultra low doses (ULDs) of histamine, clobenpropit and pyrilamine are studied on morphine state-dependent (STD) memory in mice. Although pre-test administration of different doses of histamine and clobenpropit showed no effect on impairment of memory induced by pre-training morphine, when the above drugs were co-administered with morphine, they inhibited the restoration of memory by morphine. These effects were opposite to microgram doses of the same drugs.

Effects of morphine on the plus-maze discriminative avoidance task: role of state-dependent learning

RATIONALE

The amnesic effects of morphine may be related to its action on nociception, anxiety, or locomotion. This effect is also suggested to be related to state dependency.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to verify the effects of morphine on mice tested in the plus-maze discriminative avoidance task (DAT) that uses light and noise as aversive stimuli and allows the concomitant evaluation of learning, memory, anxiety, and locomotion and also to verify the possible role of state-dependent learning in the effects of morphine.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The DAT was conducted in a modified elevated plus-maze. In the training, the aversive stimuli were applied when mice entered in one of the enclosed arms, whereas in the test, no stimuli were applied. The main results showed that (1) pretraining morphine (5-20 mg/kg i.p.) induced retrieval deficits (evaluated by the time spent in the aversive arm in the test) but not acquisition deficits (evaluated by the decrease in aversive arm exploration along the training); (2) pretest morphine (5-10 but not 20 mg/kg) counteracted this deficit; (3) morphine induced hypolocomotion (decreased number of entries in the arms), irrespective of memory alterations; and (4) morphine did not alter anxiety-like behavior (evaluated by the time spent in the open arms) during the training.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphine given before training induces retrieval deficits in mice tested in the DAT, and these deficits could be related to morphine-induced state-dependent learning. Neither the memory deficit induced by pretraining morphine nor the reversal of this deficit by pretest morphine seems to be related to anxiety levels or locomotor alterations.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2004

This paper is the 27th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2004 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.

Discrepancy between effects of milligram and nanogram doses of a COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice

This experiment examined and compared the effects of pre-test administration of a selective COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib), at the doses in the range of mg/kg and ng/kg on morphine state-dependent learning in step-down passive avoidance task in mice. Pre-training administration of 5mg/kg of morphine-impaired memory retrieval tested 24h later, which was restored by pre-test administration of the same dose of the drug. Pre-test administration of celecoxib (12.5, 25 and 50mg/kg), alone or in combination with morphine (1mg/kg) prevents morphine-induced memory impairment. Ultra-low doses (ULDs) of celecoxib (2, 10 and 50 ng/kg) produced no change in morphine-induced memory impairment. However, co-administration of nanogram doses of celecoxib with 5mg/kg of morphine in the test day prevented morphine-induced memory improvement, an action different from mg/kg doses. These findings implicate the involvement of COX-2 in memory retrieval and demonstrate that the effect of celecoxib ULD is different from that of mg/kg doses.

Influence of Intracerebroventricular Administration of Histaminergic Drugs on Morphine State-Dependent Memory in the Step-Down Passive Avoidance Test

The effects of histaminergic drugs on morphine state-dependent memory of a passive avoidance task were examined in mice. Pre-training administration of morphine (5 mg/kg) led to state-dependent learning with impaired memory recall on the test day which was reversed by pre-test administration of the same dose of the opioid. The pre-test intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the H(1) blocker (pyrilamine) prevented the restoration of memory by morphine. The H(2) blocker (ranitidine) was ineffective in this regard and the H(3) blocker (clobenpropit) potentiated the effect of morphine on memory recall. The pre-test i.c.v. administration of histamine alone (5, 10, and 20 microg/mouse) not only mimicked the effect of pre-test morphine treatment, but also increased this action of the opioid. The effect of histamine on memory recall was not changed by the pre-test administration of mu-opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone. In conclusion, the improvement of memory recall by morphine treatment, on the test day, seems to be, at least in part, through the release of histamine followed by the stimulation of H(1) receptors. Histamine by itself, when administered on the test day, mimicked morphine-induced memory improvement by a mechanism independent of the mu-opioid receptors.

Effects of ultra-low doses of morphine, naloxone and ethanol on morphine state-dependent memory of passive avoidance in mice

This experiment examined and compared the effects of pre-test administration of morphine, naloxone and ethanol, at doses in the range of milligram/kg to those of nanogram/kg, on morphine state-dependent learning in a step-down passive avoidance task in mice. Morphine (5 mg/kg) administered before training impaired retention tested 24 hours later, but when the same dose of morphine was also administered before the test, the retention was significantly restored. Pre-training administration of 10 or 20 ng/kg (i.p.) of morphine had no effect, but when co-administered with the same drug at 5 mg/kg (s.c.), it prevented significantly the memory recall improvement after the administration of morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) alone. In a parallel experiment, naloxone (5 mg/kg) prevented the memory recall improvement by morphine. However, the effects of naloxone at doses in the range of ng/kg were opposite to those of milligram doses of the same drug. Pre-test administration of ethanol (1 mg/kg) improved memory recall and mimicked the effects of pre-test morphine administration. At doses in the nanogram range, the effects of ethanol were opposite those of mg/kg of the drug. A review of the literature indicates that, for several drugs and chemicals, the effects of nanogram doses are the opposite of the effects of milligrams, because different doses have different sites as well as mechanisms of actions. In conclusion, from the above results one may suggest that, in determination of the dose-response of at least some drugs, the study of the effects of doses much lower than two orders of magnitude of the minimum effective dose are warranted.