Biliopancreatic malignancy: screening the at risk patient with molecular markers

Molecular features of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms: Implications for diagnosis, prognostication, and therapy selection

BACKGROUND

Molecular diagnostics has impacted the diagnosis, prediction of prognosis, and selection of targeted therapy for many tumor types. While pulmonary adenocarcinomas and melanomas are among the neoplasms most associated with molecular diagnostics and targeted therapy, malignancies of the pancreaticobiliary system have also been impacted by precision medicine.

METHODS

We undertook an electronic search using PubMed and Embase to review the published literature to determine what forms of molecular testing, mutations and oncogenetic pathways are associated with neoplasms of the pancreaticobiliary system. Keywords utilized were pancreas, bile duct, mutations, ERCP, FNA, KRAS, SMAD4, TP53, next-generation sequencing, serous cystadenoma, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, cystic mucinous neoplasm, solid pseudo-papillary neoplasm.

RESULTS

A search between 1999 and 2022 yielded 6874 manuscripts. Screening of these yielded 302 more focused manuscripts of which 55 were used for the study. Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is associated with a progression of mutations beginning wit KRAS mutations and ending with a set of mutations in the TP53, SMAD4, and DPC4 genes. Similar mutations are found in neoplastic mucinous cysts. Specific mutations characterize serous cystadenomas, solid, and pseudo papillary neoplasms and adenocarcinomas of the bile ducts.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutational analysis of cytologic specimens obtained by fine-needle aspiration, and duct brushings and washings are helpful in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms and may supply prognostic information.

K-ras gene mutation in the diagnosis of ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsy of pancreatic masses

AIM: To investigate the utility of K-ras mutation analysis of ultrasound guided fine-needle aspirate biopsy of pancreatic masses.

METHODS: Sixty-six ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsies were evaluated by cytology, histology and K-ras mutation. The mutation at codon 12 of the K-ras oncogene was detected by artificial restriction fragment length polymorphisms using BstN I approach.

RESULTS: The presence of malignant cells was reported in 40 of 54 pancreatic carcinomas and K-ras mutations were detected in 45 of the 54 FNABs of pancreatic carcinomas. The sensitivity of cytology and K-ras mutation were 74% and 83%, respectively. The speciality of cytology and K-ras mutation were both 100%. The sensitivity and speciality of K-ras mutation combined with cytology were 83% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: High diagnostic accuracy with acceptable discomfort of FNAB make it useful in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma. Ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsy is a safe and feasible method for diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic carcinoma has the highest K-ras mutation rate among all solid tumors. The mutation rate of K-ras is about 80%-100%. The usage of mutation of codon 12 of K-ras oncogene combined with cytology is a good alternative for evaluation of pancreatic masses.

Timing and extent of surgical intervention in patients from hereditary pancreatic cancer kindreds

Our knowledge of the molecular and genetic etiology of hereditary pancreatic cancer has expanded considerably and is steadily increasing. However, there are only a few hard data available regarding the clinical and surgical management of these patients. Surgery is currently performed when we detect dysplastic changes in the pancreas or when cancer is suspected. Of the available diagnostic modalities, endoscopic ultrasonography has proven so far to be the most useful for detecting dysplastic changes in the pancreases of patients from hereditary pancreatic cancer kindreds. It seems reasonable, once dysplasia has been diagnosed in a high-risk patient, to proceed to total pancreatectomy. The multifocal nature of dysplastic lesions precludes any type of operation that would leave behind pancreatic tissue. Currently, prophylactic whole-organ resection in the absence of premalignant lesions cannot be recommended since we do not know the exact risk for the development of cancer.