Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma

In spite of the high mortality in pancreatic cancer, significant progress is being made. This review discusses multimodality therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. Surgical therapy currently offers the only potential monomodal cure for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, only 10-20% of patients present with tumors that are amenable to resection, and even after resection of localized cancers, long-term survival is rare. The addition of chemoradiation therapy significantly increases median survival. To achieve long-term success in treating this disease it is therefore increasingly important to identify effective neoadjuvant/adjuvant multimodality therapies. Preoperative chemoradiation for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer has the following advantages: (1) neoadjuvant treatment would eliminate the delay of adjuvant treatment due to postoperative complications; (2) neoadjuvant treatment could avoid unnecessary surgery for patients with metastatic disease evident on restaging after neoadjuvant therapy; (3) down-staging after neoadjuvant therapy may increase the likelihood of negative surgical margins; and (4) neoadjuvant treatment could prevent peritoneal tumor cell implantation and dissemination caused during surgery. This review systematically summarizes the current status, controversies, and prospects of neoadjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Treatment strategy for patients with middle and lower third bile duct cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with middle and lower third bile duct carcinoma remains poor. This study was conducted to identify independent predictors for survival, as well as the patterns of recurrence after curative resection.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with pathologically verified middle and/or lower third bile duct carcinoma were analysed retrospectively by Cox regression analysis for predictors of survival.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate after resection was 39 per cent, and 0 per cent for patients who did not undergo resection. The 5-year survival rate was 63 per cent in 26 patients without microscopic residual disease (R0), 16 per cent in 25 patients with microscopic residual tumour (R1) and 0 per cent in six patients with macroscopic residual tumour (R2); ten patients did not undergo resection. Radiotherapy improved the 5-year survival rate in eight patients who had R1 resection compared with the rate in 17 patients who underwent resection alone (8 versus 0), but not significantly so (P = 0.137); however, median survival was significantly longer (P = 0.004) in six patients who had R2 resection compared with that in ten inoperable patients (11.4 versus 3.5 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that the primary tumour and tumour node metastasis (TNM) stage were independent predictors of survival; 13 clinicopathological factors were not independent prognostic factors. Of 26 patients having R0 resection, one had a locoregional relapse only, six had distant metastases only, and five had both types of recurrence. The liver was the most frequent site for metastasis, and microscopic venous invasion (MVI) in the primary tumour was a significant predictor of liver metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Curative (R0) resection is only one step in curing cancer, and radiotherapy may play a beneficial role in controlling locoregional residual tumour. MVI could be a useful indicator of when systemic adjuvant therapy should be implemented to prevent liver metastasis after R0 resection, although no effective systemic treatment has yet been developed.

Benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical resection of locally advanced main hepatic duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical resection of locally advanced main hepatic duct carcinoma (Klatskin tumor).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective review of 63 patients who underwent surgical resection of Stage IVA Klatskin tumor. Of the 63 patients, 47 had microscopic tumor residue (RT1). Twenty-eight of the 47 patients with RT1 were treated by adjuvant radiotherapy and the remaining 19 patients were treated exclusively by surgical resection. Seventeen of the 28 patients with RT1 were treated by both intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT); of the remaining 11 patients with RT1, 6 underwent resection and IORT, and 5 underwent resection and PORT.

RESULTS

The major complication and 30-day operative death rates were significantly lower in the radiation group (9.5% and 0.0%, respectively) than in the resection alone group (28.5% and 9.5%, respectively). Of the eight 5-year survivors with RT1, 6 had adjuvant radiotherapy and the remaining 2 had resection alone. Adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with RT1 yielded significantly (p = 0.0141) higher 5-year survival rates (33.9%) than in the resection alone group (13.5 %). The best 5-year survival rate (39.2 %) was found in patients who underwent a combination of IORT and PORT after resection. The local-regional control rate was significantly higher in the adjuvant radiation group than in the resection alone group (79.2% vs. 31.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our data clearly suggest the improved prognosis of patients with locally advanced Klatskin tumor by integrated adjuvant radiotherapy with IORT and PORT to complete gross tumor resection with acceptable treatment mortality and morbidity.