Ovarian cancer: optimal chemotherapy in relapsed disease

Alternate dosing schedules for topotecan in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

Topotecan has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of both platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. However, the optimal dosing for topotecan has not been established. The standard dosing regimen is 1.5 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle, with response rates ranging from 13%-33%. Although the resulting hematologic toxicities are reversible and noncumulative, this schedule is associated with significant myelosuppression. Ongoing clinical phase I and II trials have evaluated alternative dosing schedules such as the 21-day 24-hour continuous intravenous (c.i.v.), the 3-day i.v. bolus, the weekly 72-hour c.i.v., the weekly 24-hour c.i.v., and the weekly bolus i.v. regimens. Prolonged exposure to topotecan has been shown to increase the efficacy of topotecan, whereas shorter regimens decrease exposure to the drug and therefore decrease toxicity. Preliminary studies investigating the weekly bolus i.v. regimen have demonstrated response rates comparable with those achieved with the standard dosing regimen, with a lower frequency of severe toxicity. Although randomized, controlled comparative trials are necessary to determine relative efficacy, results from studies utilizing other alternative regimens are less encouraging, especially for lower-risk patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer who are likely to tolerate higher doses of topotecan. Optimizing the dosing regimen will also increase the quality of life for the patient through increased efficacy, decreased toxicity, and increased convenience of administration. Continued investigation of the weekly i.v. bolus is needed to fully elucidate the contribution of this regimen to the current armamentarium used in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer.

A phase II trial of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer

The primary aim of this phase II trial was to assess the antitumour activity of ZD0473 in ovarian cancer patients who had failed initial platinum-based therapy. Patients (n=94) were classified as either platinum-sensitive (n=35) or platinum-resistant (n=59) depending on whether they had relapsed or progressed within 26 weeks of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients initially received 120 mg/m(2) ZD0473 as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 of a 3-week cycle. If well tolerated, the dose could be escalated to 150 mg/m(2). Few patients (9%) withdrew because of treatment-related adverse events and no clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Objective response rates for platinum-resistant and sensitive patients were 8.3 and 32.4%, respectively, and clinical benefit was observed in 76.5% of the sensitive patients. Median time to progression was 57 and 180 days, and median time to death was 242 and 402 days, for resistant and sensitive patients, respectively. In conclusion, ZD0473 has a manageable toxicity profile and encouraging activity in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer patients.

Results of ZD0473 in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer: analysis according to platinum free interval

Resistance to platinum-containing regimens can develop in many women with ovarian cancer and may lead to relapse in > 80% of patients. ZD0473 is a new-generation platinum agent that, in preclinical studies, shows evidence of antitumour activity and overcomes platinum-resistance mechanisms. This Phase II trial has evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of ZD0473 in second-line ovarian cancer patients. Patients received ZD0473 120 mg/m2 (1-h iv infusion, day 1 q 3-weeks); the starting dose was increased to 150 mg/m2 after a safety review. We report here on results when patients are divided into four cohorts depending upon whether they were considered platinum-resistant or -sensitive. Patients were placed into one of 3 cohorts if they were platinum resistant (relapsed/progressed < or = 26 weeks after completion of prior platinum-based chemotherapy) or cohort 4 if this period was > 26 weeks (sensitive). Ninety-four patients were recruited to the trial (59 resistant, 35 sensitive; median age 58 [range 27-75] years; 86 with performance status [PS] < or = 1). Forty-nine patients received a starting dose of 120 mg/m2, of which 15 escalated to 150 mg/m2, and 45 received a starting dose of 150 mg/m2. Overall, the median number of treatment cycles received was 3 (range 1-8). Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was the most common haematological adverse event occurring in 62% of patients overall. Grade 3/4 lethargy, vomiting and nausea were the most common non-haematological toxicities. No clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. Overall response rates for all platinum-resistant and -sensitive patients were 8.3% and 32.4%, respectively. Stable disease occurred in 17 resistant and 15 sensitive patients.