SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Tailoring Upfront Therapy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

In this article, we will review current strategies for the front-line management of mantle cell lymphoma, an uncommon and biologically and clinically heterogeneous subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma that remains incurable with current therapies. Patients invariably relapse with time, and as a result, treatment strategies involve persistent therapy over the course of months to years, including induction, consolidation, and maintenance. Topics discussed include the historical development of various chemoimmunotherapy backbones with continued modifications to maintain and improve efficacy while limiting off-target, off-tumor effects. Chemotherapy-free induction regimens were developed initially for elderly or less fit patients though are now being utilized for younger, transplant-eligible patients due to deeper, more prolonged remission durations with fewer toxicities. The historic paradigm of recommending autologous hematopoietic cell transplant for fit patients in complete or partial remission is now being challenged based in part on ongoing clinical trials in which minimal residual disease directed approaches influence the consolidation strategy for any particular individual. The addition of novel agents, namely first and second generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immunomodulatory drugs, BH3 mimetics, and type II glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been tested in various combinations with or without immunochemotherapy. We will attempt to help the reader by systematically explaining and simplifying the various approaches for treating this complicated group of disorders.

Phase II Study of Bortezomib in Combination with Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab for Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has a poor prognosis. The best outcome is achieved in patients who have a partial or complete response to salvage treatment and proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were given a combination regimen of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab at MD Anderson Cancer Center as part of a single-arm, prospective, open-label phase II clinical trial. The median age was 66 years, with a median number of prior treatments of three. Sixty-seven percent had failed intensive chemoimmunotherapy and 43% were intermediate/high risk according to the MCL international prognostic index score, with a median Ki-67 proliferation index of 45% in those who were tested.

RESULTS

The rates of overall and complete response achieved were 74% and 42%, respectively, with median progression-free and overall survivals of 9 months and 36.4 months, respectively. The regimen's toxicity profile was acceptable; only 25% of the cycles resulted in grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, and only 3% of cycles produced grade 3-4 fatigue. There were no episodes of grade 3-4 neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of bortezomib with cyclophosphamide and rituximab is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL. Because of its low toxicity, future combinations of this regimen with other promising drugs that have different mechanisms of action offer a realistic possibility that may improve outcomes for patients who have MCL. The Oncologist 2017;22:549-553 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The combination of bortezomib with cyclophosphamide and rituximab represents an additional effective novel salvage regimen for mantle cell lymphoma. This combination adds to the growing list of treatment options available for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Phase 2 trial of rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus methotrexate-cytarabine for relapsed or refractory aggressive mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma has a very poor prognosis. The authors evaluated the response rates and survival times of patients treated with an intense regimen known to be effective against untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma: rituximab plus hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone) alternating with rituximab plus methotrexate-cytarabine.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, phase 2 study, patients received this combination for 6 to 8 cycles. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles received was 5 (range, 1-7 cycles), and the overall response rate was 93% (45% complete response [CR] or CR unconfirmed [CRu] and 48% partial response [PR]). All 5 patients previously resistant to treatment had a response (1 CR, 4 PR), and both patients whose disease did not change in response to prior therapy had PRs. Toxic events occurring in response to the 104 cycles given included neutropenic fever (11%), grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (74%), and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (63%). There were no deaths from toxicity. At a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 5-48 months), the median failure-free survival time was 11 months with no plateau in the survival curve.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination chemotherapy was effective for refractory/relapsed mantle cell lymphoma.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have in general, lower response rates and overall survival (OS) than those with other B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. The role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in MCL is unclear. Hence we decided to study the clinical course of patients who received autologous and allogeneic HSCT for MCL.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients, (80 patients-autologous; 17 patients-allogeneic) who received a HSCT for mantle cell lymphoma were included in the study.

RESULTS

The complete response rates at day 100 between the two groups were similar (73% vs. 62%). Day-100 mortality was higher in the allogeneic HSCT group (19% vs. 0%) (P < 0.01). The estimated 5-year relapse rates, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and 5-year OS among the allogeneic HSCT patients were 21%, 44% and 49%, respectively, similar to 56%, 39% and 47% in the autologous group. Ten patients received HyperCVAD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone + high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine) +/- rituximab prior to transplant. There have been no relapses or deaths amongst these patients at a median follow-up of 16 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with allogeneic HSCT had a lower relapse rate, but similar EFS and OS to autologous HSCT. Treatment of MCL with HyperCVAD +/- rituximab followed by HSCT seems promising.

B-cell purging in autologous stem-cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Autologous stem-cell transplantation is a common therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a concern with the procedure is the potential of malignant cells to reinfuse with the stem-cell graft. Thus attempts have been made to purge, or eliminate, malignant cells from the graft. The oldest, and most well studied, method for prevention of reinfusion is in vitro use of antibodies against B cells that bind or lyse malignant B cells and healthy cells, while leaving T cells and stem cells to be reinfused. In the past 5 years, investigators have used rituximab, an antibody against CD20, to purge malignant cells in vivo without any manipulation in vitro. Both conventional and new techniques have shown promise, but their exact role remains to be defined. We analysed data on the purging of B cells by use of antibodies in the setting of autologous transplantation, with emphasis on the emerging technique of in vivo purging.

Mantle cell lymphoma: new treatments targeted to the biology

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents a distinct lymphoma subtype. The prognosis of patients with MCL is the poorest among lymphoma patients and the response to conventional treatments is inadequate. New approaches targeted to the biology of MCL and the genetics underlying the disease are being studied. Monoclonal antibodies directed at molecules expressed on MCL cells are already used in the clinical setting. This article reviews the literature on these and other new possible treatment modalities.

Immunotherapy with rituximab following high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma

Advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a disease for which no curative treatment strategy exists. Results with standard combination chemotherapy, with or without an anthracycline, are disappointing, and new and better therapies are needed. High-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) have been performed in patients with MCL both up front and at relapse with varying degrees of success. Rituximab (Rituxan; Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, and IDEC Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA) has shown moderate response rates in patients with MCL. It has also been used safely and effectively as an in vivo purge during ASCT for patients with lymphoma. We are currently investigating an aggressive protocol in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated MCL using a combination of two promising therapeutic modalities, high-dose therapy-ASCT and rituximab. Since 1999, 13 patients with newly diagnosed MCL have been enrolled in this phase II clinical trial. CHOP (cyclophosphamide/prednisone/vincristine/doxorubicin) is used as debulking chemotherapy. Stem cells are mobilized with 5 days of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 10 μg/kg/d, with a single infusion of rituximab 375 mg/m² used as an in vivo purge before stem-cell collection by large-volume leukapheresis. The transplant conditioning regimen is cyclophosphamide/carmustine/etoposide. Post-transplant consolidative immunotherapy consists of rituximab 375 mg/m², administered as two 4-week cycles at 2 and 6 months post-transplant. So far, 12 patients (7 men/5 women) with a median age of 55 years (range, 41 to 65 years) have been transplanted. Patients were first assessed and then transplanted a median of 40 and 201 days, respectively, from diagnosis. International Prognostic Index at diagnosis was low (n = 3), low-intermediate (n = 8), and high-intermediate (n = 1). A median of six cycles of CHOP was required to debulk tumor sufficiently for transplant. Response to CHOP was 100% with six complete responses, one complete response unconfirmed, and five partial responses. Transplantation was well tolerated. Patients engrafted quickly, with a median of 11.5 days to neutrophil engraftment and 10 days to platelet independence. Patients had modest transfusion requirements, requiring a median of four units of packed red blood cells and two and a half platelet transfusions. Six to 8 weeks post-transplant, six patients were in complete response, four in complete response unconfirmed, and two in partial response. Eight patients have received all eight maintenance rituximab treatments, and four have received only their first cycle. Following rituximab, the two patients in partial response and two in complete response unconfirmed converted to complete response. With a median follow-up of 239 days from transplant (range, 61 to 727 days), all patients remain alive and well with no documented relapses. Samples for molecular monitoring have been drawn from the stem-cell graft, and serially from the peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients at baseline, preapheresis, pretransplant, and post-transplant at 3-month intervals. This data shows that ASCT followed by rituximab immunotherapy is feasible and safe in patients with MCL. Although patient numbers are low and follow-up time is short, preliminary results are encouraging. Rituximab may convert partial responders to complete responders. The durability of responses will be determined with longer follow-up. Semin Oncol 29 (suppl 2):56-69. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.