A phase II study of cisplatin and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Retrospective study of the efficacy and toxicity of lobaplatin in combined chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and adverse reactions of lobaplatin combined with other chemotherapy drugs in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis enrolled 114 patients who were diagnosed with advanced breast cancer from January 2010 to December 2015. Lobaplatin and another chemotherapeutic agent were given to patients. The efficacy and side effects were evaluated after at least two cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions could be evaluated in 112 patients with 2 complete response (CR) patients, 31 cases of partial response (PR), 52 cases of stable disease (SD) and 27 cases of progressive disease (PD). The overall response rate (ORR) was 29.5% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 75.9%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 7.7 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was expected to be 28.0 months. The main side effects were myelosuppression. Twenty five patients (21.9%) had grade 3/4 neutrophil suppression, 18 patients (15.8%) had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included gastrointestinal reaction, peripheral neuropathy, stomatitis, hepatic dysfunction, fatigue and skin rashes, which were alleviated by symptomatic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Lobaplatin-based regimen chemotherapy for advanced metastatic breast cancer patients is effective and well tolerated.

Efficacy and Safety of Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin vs. Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Failure with Anthracyclines and Taxanes

BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine plus cisplatin (NP regimen) vs. gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP regimen) for treatment of metastatic TNBC after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 48 patients with metastatic TNBC that failed in anthracyclines and taxanes treatment were enrolled and randomly grouped. Patients in the NP group (n=22) were given 25 mg/m² vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and 25 mg/m² cisplatin on days 2-4 of each 21-day cycle, while subjects in the GP group (n=26) were administered 1000 mg/m² gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 and 25 mg/m² cisplatin on days 2-4 of each 21-day cycle. The treatment response and adverse events were compared between the 2 groups every 2 cycles. RESULTS The ORR, DCR, and median TTP were 45.5%, 77.3%, and 5 months in the NP group, and 46.2%, 80.8%, and 5.2 months in the GP group, and no significant differences were observed in ORR, DCR, and median TTP between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The major adverse events included grade I-II bone marrow inhibition, gastrointestinal reactions, and phlebitis, and a lower incidence of thrombocytopenia and rash and a higher incidence of phlebitis was found in the NP group than in the GP group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Either NP or GP regimen is active and tolerated in treatment of metastatic TNBC with anthracyclines and/or taxanes resistance, which may be used as a salvage treatment for metastatic TNBC.

Phase I Study of Veliparib (ABT-888) Combined with Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and/or BRCA Mutation-Associated Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin is synergistic with vinorelbine and the PARP inhibitor veliparib, and has antineoplastic activity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. This phase I study assessed veliparib with cisplatin and vinorelbine.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A 3+3 dose-escalation design evaluated veliparib administered twice daily for 14 days with cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1, 8) every 21 days, for 6 to 10 cycles, followed by veliparib monotherapy. Pharmacokinetics, measurement of poly(ADP-ribose) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and preliminary efficacy were assessed. IHC and gene-expression profiling were evaluated as potential predictors of response.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients enrolled in nine dose cohorts plus five in an expansion cohort at the highest dose level and recommended phase II dose, 300 mg twice daily. The MTD of veliparib was not reached. Neutropenia (36%), anemia (30%), and thrombocytopenia (12%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. Best overall response for 48 patients was radiologic response with 9-week confirmation for 17 (35%; 2 complete, 15 partial), and stable disease for 21 (44%). Germline BRCA mutation presence versus absence was associated with 6-month progression-free survival [PFS; 10 of 14 (71%) vs. 8 of 27 (30%), mid-P = 0.01]. Median PFS for all 50 patients was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1-6.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Veliparib at 300 mg twice daily combined with cisplatin and vinorelbine is well tolerated with encouraging response rates. A phase II randomized trial is planned to assess veliparib's contribution to cisplatin chemotherapy in metastatic TNBC and BRCA mutation-associated breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2855-64. ©2016 AACR.

Assessing the role of platinum agents in aggressive breast cancers

As anticipated by their structure and mechanism of action, platinum analogs exhibit clinically significant antitumor activity in the more aggressive forms of breast cancer, both alone and in combination with other cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies. In early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, the administration of carboplatin together with a taxane (usually docetaxel) and trastuzumab (and pertuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting) is a standard of care regimen. In BRCA1 mutation carriers, neoadjuvant treatment with single-agent cisplatin results in a high pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. In both BRCA-mutated and sporadic triple-negative breast cancer, the addition of carboplatin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increases pCR rates. Despite these encouraging results, many questions remain about the role of platinum analogs in these patient populations, including their optimal doses and schedules, and utility in patients with advanced stage disease. A number of these questions are addressed by ongoing trials.

Platinum-based compounds for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

The role of platinum-based compounds (PBCs) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been extensively studied. As single agents, high response rates have been observed in first-line therapy, while results in pretreated patients were discouraging. Regimens containing cisplatin/carboplatin together with taxanes showed the highest efficacy and safety as both first-line and second-line therapy. When administered with vinorelbine, the combination was also active and well tolerated in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated patients. Combining PBCs with etoposide or nucleoside analogues showed moderate activity, yet high toxicity in the case of etoposide. The overall results for the combination with anthracyclines were disappointing. Addition of trastuzumab to PBC combinations showed remarkable activity and good tolerability in patients with HER2/neu overexpression. The use of cisplatin or carboplatin alongside novel targeted therapeutics for patients with triple-negative MBC seems promising and is being further evaluated. The use of PBCs against MBC requires careful patient selection and combination with the right chemotherapeutic agent.

A phase II study of lipoplatin (liposomal cisplatin)/vinorelbine combination in HER-2/neu-negative metastatic breast cancer

We assessed the efficacy and safety of a liposomal cisplatin (lipoplatin) and vinorelbine combination in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Thirty-five patients were treated. The objective response rate was 53.1% and the median survival time was 22 months. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 44% of cycles, and febrile neutropenia was seen in 4 patients (11.4%). No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity or neuropathy was noted. This combination is effective and well tolerated in patients with MBC and it warrants investigation as first-line treatment.

BACKGROUND

Liposomal cisplatin (lipoplatin) has a mechanism of action similar to that of cisplatin, with reduced toxicities and enhanced or similar efficacy. We wanted to assess the efficacy and safety of a lipoplatin/vinorelbine combination in a phase II clinical trial in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with HER-2/neu-negative (HER-2/neu(-)) MBC were enrolled. Lipoplatin 120 mg/m(2) (days 1, 8, and 15) and vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) were administered in a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 32 patients were evaluable for response. The objective response rate was 53.1%. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 3 patients (9.4%), partial response (PR) was seen in 14 patients (43.8%), stable disease (SD) was obtained in 12 patients (37.5%), and progressive disease (PD) was seen in 3 patients (9.4%). Median time to disease progression was 8 months (range 6-10 months). After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, 18 patients were still alive; the median survival time was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14-30). A total of 174 cycles were administered. Neutropenia was the most frequent hematologic toxicity, with grade 3/4 neutropenia observed in 44% of cycles. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 4 patients (11.4%). No grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity or neuropathy was noted. Grade 1/2 nephrotoxicity occurred in 8 patients (22.9%) and grade 3 vomiting was seen in 3 patients (8.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this trial reveal that vinorelbine/lipoplatin is effective in treating patients with MBC. This regimen is well tolerated with no grade 3/4 nephrotoxicity or neuropathy. The investigation of this regimen as first-line treatment in MBC is warranted.

Serine phosphorylation of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) by PKCα enhances GSTP1-dependent cisplatin metabolism and resistance in human glioma cells

Recently, we reported that the human GSTP1 is phosphorylated and functionally activated by the PKC class of serine/threonine kinases. In this study, we investigated the contribution of this post-translational modification of GSTP1 to tumor cisplatin resistance. Using two malignant glioma cell lines, MGR1 and MGR3, the ability of PKCα-phosphorylated GSTP1 to catalyze the conjugation of cisplatin to glutathione was assessed and correlated with cisplatin sensitivity and cisplatin-induced DNA interstrand cross-links and apoptosis of the cells. The results showed PKCα activation and associated phosphorylation of GSTP1 to correlate significantly with increased glutathionylplatinum formation, decreased DNA interstrand cross-link formation and increased cisplatin resistance. Following PKC activation, the IC(50) of cisplatin increased from 13.63μM to 36.49μM in MGR1 and from 20.75μM to 38.45μM in MGR3. In both cell lines, siRNA-mediated GSTP1 or PKCα transcriptional suppression similarly decreased cisplatin IC(50) and was associated with decreased intracellular levels of glutathionylplatinum metabolite. Combined inhibition/transcriptional suppression of both PKCα and GSTP1 was synergistic in enhancing cisplatin sensitivity. Although, cisplatin-induced apoptosis was associated with the translocation of Bax to mitochondria, release of cytochrome c and caspase-3/7 activation, the levels of relocalized Bax and cytochrome c were significantly greater following GSTP1 knockdown. These results support a mechanism of cisplatin resistance mediated by the PKCα-dependent serine phosphorylation of GSTP1 and its associated increased cisplatin metabolism, and suggest the potential of simultaneous targeting of GSTP1 and PKCα to improve the efficacy of cisplatin therapy.

Low dose Gemcitabine plus cisplatin in a weekly-based regimen as salvage therapy for relapsed breast cancer after taxane-anthracycline-containing regimens

PURPOSE

Cisplatin-gemcitabine is a synergistic chemotherapy (CT) combination highly proven in a broad spectrum of epithelial neoplasms and shows a non-cross-resistance profile with the most active drugs in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We have conducted an exploratory study to determine if treatment with low doses of a combination of fixed-rate gemcitabine infusion and cisplatin was clinically meaningful in women relapsing after a minimum of 2 prior lines of CT for advanced disease (range 2-6), which had to have necessarily included both anthracyclines and taxanes. Another goal was to find the optimal individual schedule by adjusting frequency and dosage according to patient tolerability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From May 2002 to November 2003, 22 patients with relapsed advanced BC and a minimum of two prior CT lines were offered treatment with gemcitabine (G) (initial dose 750 mg/m(2), or 600 mg/m(2) if the patient had received more than two previous CT lines) plus cisplatin (P) (initial dose 30 mg/m(2), or 20 mg/m(2) in case of > or =3 prior CT lines) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment was postponed to day 15 if it could not be given on day 8, without dose reduction. If treatment could not be given on day 15, a 20% dose reduction was allowed and treatment given the next week. Further dose reductions were allowed as needed up to a maximum of three. Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Median age was 54.5 years (35-75). Median Karnofsky was 90 (range 80-90). Median number of prior CT lines was 3 (2-6). 90.9% of patients had received adjuvant CT. All had prior anthracyclines and taxanes. Other agents used included 5-FU/eniluracil, MTA, RPR 109881A, trastuzumab, cisplatin, VP16, vinorelbine, capecitabine and irinotecan. 72.7% had received radiotherapy and 68.1% hormonal therapy (median 2 lines, range 1-4).

RESULTS

Partial responses (PR) were seen in 9.1% of patients and stable disease (SD) in 36.4%. Clinical Benefit Rate (PR+SD) was derived in 45.5% of patients. Median time to progression was 4 months (95% CI, 3-5) in general and 6 months (95% CI, 4-8) in patients with clinical benefit. Median survival for the entire group was 8 months (95% CI, 5-11) and 19 months when clinical benefit was obtained (95% CI, 11-25). Patients received a median of 8.5 CT administrations (range, 2-45). Forty-three percent of doses were delayed. Sixteen out of 22 patients needed a delay and/or reduction of initial dose. Cisplatin and gemcitabine doses were reduced in 75% and 62% of all cycles, respectively. Sixteen out of 22 patients needed a delay and/or reduction of initial dose. Toxicities grade >3 were neutropenia 35% and thrombocytopenia 15%. All other toxicities were grade 2 or less, including sensorial neuropathy (30%), asthenia (34%), nausea/vomiting (20%) and oral mucositis (15%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Reasons for discontinuation were progression (18 patients), death (3 patients) and patient decision (1 patient).

CONCLUSION

Weekly cisplatin-gemcitabine with flexible downwards individual tailoring is a safe and effective salvage treatment in heavily pretreated MBC patients with good PS.

Vinorelbine in the management of breast cancer: New perspectives, revived role in the era of targeted therapy

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid that has been shown active in many tumour types and is currently registered for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This agent has a generally favourable safety profile, and may be suitable for use in special populations such as the elderly and/or frail patient. However, with the taxanes firmly established as standard second line treatment for ABC after failure of an anthracycline, vinorelbine has been generally relegated for use as third line therapy, in competition with the oral compound capecitabine. More recently, the exciting results observed with the combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with Her-2 overexpressing/amplified tumours, as well as the development of a reliable formulation and revised schedule of oral vinorelbine with proven activity in ABC appear to have revived the interest in this compound in the management of this disease. There are still a number of unanswered questions that will have to be addressed by properly designed, adequately powered randomised clinical trials.

A Clinical Phase II Study of Cisplatinum and Vinorelbine (PVn) in Advanced Breast Carcinoma (ABC)

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of cisplatinum and vinorelbine (PVn) as a salvage regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer was reported in previous studies. This report is a pilot study assessing the antitumor efficacy and safety of this regimen as first line therapy for advanced breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled: 22 with metastatic breast carcinoma and 13 with locally advanced breast carcinoma (stage III). A total of 4 cycles of PVn were planned. After the 4th cycle, patients with metastatic breast cancer received vinorelbine biweekly until disease progression or for a total of 12 cycles, whereas those with locally advanced breast cancer who showed complete or partial response underwent curative surgery.

RESULTS

The overall response rate of our whole population was 74.29%. For the metastatic breast cancer group, the overall response rate was 64%, with a median survival of 19 months (range 2-36). For the locally advanced breast cancer group, the overall response rate was 92.3% with a median time to disease progression of 26 months (range 25-27). Toxicity was acceptable, and no treatment-related mortality was encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

PVn is effective as first line treatment of advanced breast cancer with overall response rate of 64% in metastatic breast cancer and 92.3% in locally advanced breast cancer, and acceptable toxicity.

Mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP): an active and well-tolerated salvage regimen for advanced breast cancer

This phase II study assessed the clinical efficacy and tolerability of a combination of mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with chemotherapy. A total of 87 patients with MBC, most of whom had been exposed to anthracyclines (92%) and/or taxanes (29%) in the adjuvant and/or metastatic setting, were treated with mitomycin C (8 mg m⁻² day 1 cycles 1, 2, 4 and 6), vinblastine (6 mg m⁻² day 1) and cisplatin (50 mg m⁻² day 1) repeated each 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32% (95% CI: 22–42%) with 31% partial response (PR) and one complete response (CR). Stable disease (SD) rate was 21% (95% CI: 12–29%). There was no statistically significant difference in the ORR when MVP was given as the first-line treatment for MBC vs second or subsequent line (38 vs 30%, P=0.6), or between patients with an early (<6 months) vs late (>6 months) relapse post-anthracyclines (30 vs 52%, P=0.3). Toxicity profile was mild. This platinum-based chemotherapy is an effective, well-tolerated and low-cost regimen for patients with MBC, including those pretreated with anthracyclines.

Cisplatin plus vinorelbine (PVn) as a salvage regimen for refractory breast cancer

Breast cancer is regarded as a systemic disease even when tumors are completely resected. In patients with advanced breast cancer the overall prognosis is poor, but the disease is not uniformly fatal. Vinorelbine has proved to be effective when given as a single agent in this setting. Since it has a moderate to severe myelotoxic effect, a combination of vinorelbine with cisplatin, which is a weak myelotoxic drug, is ideal for the treatment of patients with advanced disease. In this paper, we report on a patient with advanced breast cancer who attained complete response of 14 months duration to a cisplatin/vinorelbine combination after progression during treatment with paclitaxel and doxorubicin.

Phase I trial of concomitant vinorelbine, cisplatin, and pelvic irradiation in cervical carcinoma and other advanced pelvic malignancies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine in combination with weekly cisplatin and pelvic radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Eligible patients included those with bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer. Women with other advanced gynecologic malignancies were also eligible. All patients received cisplatin 40 mg/m(-2)/week (maximum dose, 70 mg) during pelvic RT. Vinorelbine was administered on the same day as cisplatin at a starting dose of 10 mg/m(-2)/week and escalated in 5 mg/m(-2)/week increments. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, or any toxicity which required > or =1 week delay in RT or an omission of >1 dose of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between April 2001 and September 2002, 12 women with pelvic malignancies (11 cervical, 1 recurrent ovarian) were enrolled. Cohorts of 3, 6, and 3 patients were treated at 10, 15, and 20 mg/m(-2)/week dose levels of vinorelbine. At the 20 mg/m2 level, DLT was observed. Two of three patients missed >1 cycle of chemotherapy secondary to predominantly hematologic toxicity. One patient at the 20 mg level developed a creatinine clearance <50 ml/min and missed 1 dose of cisplatin. Another developed transient grade 3 diarrhea. No grade 4 toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD of vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and pelvic RT in patients with cervical cancer is 15 mg/m(-2)/week.

Platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: current status

Cisplatin and carboplatin are active in previously untreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with mean response rates (RRs) of 50 and 32%, respectively. In pretreated patients the RR to cisplatin/carboplatin monotherapy declines markedly to <10%. Cisplatin and carboplatin have been combined with many other cytotoxics. In first-line setting high activity has been observed in combination with taxanes or vinorelbine (RRs consistently approximately 60%). It appears that these newer combinations are superior to older regimens with etoposide (RRs 30 to 50%) or 5-fluorouracil (RRs 40 to 60%). Cisplatin-/carboplatin-based regimens with infusional 5-FU and epirubicin/paclitaxel/vinorelbine achieve high RRs of around 60 to 80%. However these regimens are difficult to administer in all patients because they require central venous access for continuous 5-FU infusion. In pretreated MBC the combinations of cisplatin-taxane/vinorelbine/gemcitabine or carboplatin-docetaxel/vinorelbine yield RRs of 40 to 50%, which are higher than those achieved with platinum-etoposide/5-FU. In locally advanced disease cisplatin-based regimens achieve very high RRs (>80%). This would suggest that in chemotherapy-naïve patients platinum-based therapy might have an important role to play. Additionally the synergy demonstrated between platinum compounds, taxanes and herceptin, in preclinical and clinical studies is of immense importance and the results of the two ongoing Breast Cancer International Research Group randomized phase III studies are eagerly awaited. These studies may help clarify the role of platinum compounds in the treatment of metastatic and possibly early breast cancer.

A phase II study of epirubicin, vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced breast cancer

Our objective was to evaluate the activity and safety of the combination of cisplatin, epirubicin and vinorelbine (CEV) in advanced breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast cancer, locally advanced or metastatic, received epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 8. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 35 patients were treated. Thirty-one patients were evaluated for response. One hundred and fifty-five cycles of chemotherapy were administered overall. The objective response rate (ORR) was 84%, including complete response in 13% of patients. All stage III patients achieved a downstaging, with a pathological complete response in two out of 10 patients. Patients with stage IV disease obtained objective response in 67% of cases. Toxicity was mild to moderate. The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was febrile neutropenia, which occurred in 17% of patients. We conclude that CEV combination represents an effective treatment for patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer, allowing an important ORR. Moreover this regimen appears to be well tolerated.