Surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone: comparison of two strategies to treat diffuse large B-cell gastric lymphoma

The Effect of Surgery on the Prognosis of Gastric Lymphoma: A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgery is an effective clinical approach that has been used for the treatment of gastric lymphoma. However, its specific effect on the prognosis of patients with gastric lymphoma remains largely unknown. The current meta-analysis aimed to identify the effect of surgery on the prognosis of gastric lymphoma.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases to obtain relevant studies investigating the influence of surgery on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). We extracted the hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of each included report for pooled analysis. We assessed heterogeneity (I2 statistic) and funnel plots to select the data models and evaluate publication bias.

RESULTS

Ultimately, we included 12 studies containing 26 comparisons in the current quantitative meta-analysis. The analysis revealed that surgery had no significant effect on OS (HR .83, P = .13) or RFS (HR .78, P = .08). However, subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of surgery on OS differed significantly between the surgery plus conservative therapy subgroup and the conservative therapy alone groups, with HR = .69 (P = .01). No significant publication bias was detected regarding the main outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Surgery had a limited effect on the prognosis of patients with gastric lymphoma. However, the use of surgery as an additional therapy may confer potential benefits. This was an interesting research direction, and additional high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials should be conducted.

Advances in diagnosis, treatment and prognostic factors of gastrointestinal DLBCL

Gastrointestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GI-DLBCL) is an extremely aggressive form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (BNHL) which has complex histological characteristics and manifests a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of clinical, morphological, immunological, and genetic features. GI-DLBCL mainly spreads by infiltrating neighboring lymph nodes, and common gastrointestinal complications (GICS) such as obstruction, perforation, or bleeding, frequently arise during the progression of the disease, posing significant challenges in both diagnosing and treating the condition. Meanwhile, the incidence of GI-DLBCL has been gradually increasing in recent years, and its strong invasiveness makes it prone to being misdiagnosed or completely missed. In clinical practice, over half of the patients diagnosed with the disease are in stage III or stage IV. What makes it worse is that certain patients may not exhibit a favorable response to chemotherapy. All these lead to intricacies in management of this disease. Unfortunately, there is currently no large prospective study or evidence-based medical evidence to provide clear guidance on treatment decisions for this specific type of lymphoma. Neither do physicians have a consensus regarding the optimal approach to address this condition. Recent studies have identified the presence of various prognostic factors that significantly impact survival in GI-DLBCL, which demonstrates the unique particularity of GI-DLBCL, and could help optimize the clinical decision.

The prognostic impact of lymphoma perforation in patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma - a single-center analysis

Patients with primary gastrointestinal (GI) lymphoma are at risk of GI perforations. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of non-traumatic GI perforations. 54 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of primary GI lymphoma were included. Non-traumatic lymphoma perforation occurred in ten patients (19%). Perforations occurred only in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma. In patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma, the median overall survival (mOS) was 52 months (95% CI 9.88-94.12) and 27 months (95% CI 0.00-135.48) in patients with and without GI perforation, respectively. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 30 months (95% CI 5.6-54.4) in patients with GI perforations. In patients without lymphoma perforation, mPFS was not reached. Both mOS and mPFS did not significantly differ. In conclusion, despite the need for emergency surgery and delay in lymphoma-directed treatment, lymphoma perforation did not negatively impact our study population's OS or PFS.

A Novel and Validated Inflammation-Based Prognosis Score (IBPS) Predicts Outcomes in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Purpose

We aimed to create a novel prognostic score, the inflammation-based prognosis score (IBPS). In addition, we attempted to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with DLBCL.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively investigated the data of 213 patients with DLBCL diagnosed and treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University and used these data to develop nomograms. At the same time, 89 patients diagnosed and treated in Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University from January 2015 to June 2021 were collected as an external validation cohort. We developed IBPS through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression method was used to develop the nomogram. We used the concordance index (C-index), calibration chart, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), and the Kaplan-Meier curve were used to assess the nomogram.

Results

The systemic immune inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutrition index (PNI), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) were used to construct IBPS. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), IBPS, response to treatment, and whether accept surgery were used to construct the nomogram to predict the OS of DLBCL patients. The C-index in the training and validation cohorts were 0.844 and 0.828, respectively. According to the time-dependent ROC curve and DCA, the nomogram has good predictive accuracy and clinical net benefit. The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that according to the nomogram score, patients in the training and validation cohorts could be classified into three risk groups.

Conclusion

In patients with DLBCL, baseline IBPS was a reliable predictor of OS. The survival probability of DLBCL patients can be precisely predicted using the prognosis nomogram based on IBPS.

Predictors and Long-Term Outcomes for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients Undergoing Surgery Prior to Systemic Therapy: A Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergo surgery before the initiation of systemic therapy. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of patients undergoing surgery prior to systemic therapy (surgfirst), the predictors for surgfirst, and the survival outcomes.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with DLBCL diagnosed between 2006 and 2015, and we performed a subgroup analysis of patients that received surgfirst. Time-to-initial therapy (TTI) was defined as the time in days (d) from diagnosis to systemic therapy. Overall survival was measured from the day of diagnosis in terms of months (m).

RESULTS

Factors associated with lower likelihood of surgfirst were non-Hispanic Black race (p-value<0.005), rural location (p-value<0.005), treatment at academic center (p-value<0.005), Medicaid insurance (p-value=0.01), comorbidity score >=3 (p-value 0.007), year of diagnosis, advanced stages of disease, and presence of B-symptoms. The TTI of systemic therapy was delayed in the surgfirst group - 34 (IQR 22-52) days vs. 23 (IQR 13-38) days, p-value<0.005. The five-year overall survival was 62.7% (95% CI 62.1-63.2%) vs. 58.3% (95% CI 57.7-60.0%) - HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), p-value<0.005. The factors associated with higher mortality were advanced comorbidities, lower educational status, disease primarily located in the bone, brain, and spinal cord, advanced clinical stage, presence of B-symptoms, and advanced age.

CONCLUSION

Despite the delay in systemic therapy, we could not identify a detrimental impact of surgfirst on survival. This needs to be confirmed in large-scale multicenter studies. We identified clinical and socioeconomic factors that affect treatment selection and survival.

Surgery and Chemotherapy versus Chemotherapy Only in Older Persons with Primary Intestinal Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Background

The management of primary intestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (PI-DLBCL) in elderly patients (aged >60 years) remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the efficacy of different treatment strategies and prognostic factors for elderly Chinese patients with PI-DLBCL.

Patients and Methods

Forty-six untreated elderly patients with PI-DLBCL were included in this retrospective study. Twenty-four patients were treated with surgery (prior to chemotherapy) plus chemotherapy (SCT). The other 22 patients did not undergo surgery before chemotherapy (CT).

Results

Patients treated with SCT had a higher overall response rate of 91.7% than patients receiving CT, but the difference between groups was not significant (P=0.581). Regarding survival, SCT resulted in a greater 3-year overall survival (OS) rate (87.3% vs 56.9%, P=0.130) and significantly higher 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate (74.1% vs 27.3%, P=0.002) than CT. The univariate analysis showed that male sex, advanced Lugano stage, poor performance status and chemotherapy alone were associated with a shorter EFS. Only the male sex was correlated with a shorter OS. The multivariate analysis showed that sex (P=0.040) and treatment strategy (P=0.022) were independent prognostic factors for EFS.

Conclusion

Surgery plus chemotherapy produced a better outcome for EFS, but not OS, than chemotherapy alone in elderly Chinese patients with PI-DLBCL.

Surgery shows survival benefit in patients with primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PI-DLBCL) are rarely reported. We aimed to explore the role of surgery in patients with PI-DLBCL.

METHODS

Adult PI-DLBCL patients were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The effect of surgery was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression analyses. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reinforce our results. Lasso regression was utilized to determine independent risk factors of overall survival (OS) for a nomogram and a novel web-based calculator. The performance of the model was measured via concordance index, receiver operating characteristic curve, and calibration plots in both cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 1602 patients with PI-DLBCL were analyzed. Surgery significantly improved survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.007, p < 0.001, respectively). Before PSM, local tumor destruction (LTD) displayed a survival advantage over resection in patients without chemotherapy (p = 0.034). After PSM, surgery was still identified as a beneficial factor for OS (p = 0.0015). However, there was no statistical difference between LTD and resection (p = 0.32). The nomogram for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS predictions exhibited dependable consistency between internal and external validation.

CONCLUSION

This study approves the beneficial effect of surgery on clinical endpoints in PI-DLBCL patients. For those who are not suitable for resection, LTD may also be a practical option. The predictive nomogram and the web-based calculator could help clinicians individually evaluate the prognosis and optimize personalized treatment decisions for these patients.

R-CHOP immunochemotherapy plus surgery is associated with a superior prognosis in Chinese primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

AIM

The aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic strategies and prognostic factors of patients with primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PI-DLBCL).

METHODS

A total of 50 PI-DLBCL patients who accepted standard first-line treatment at National Cancer Center in China were included in this retrospective study. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic risk factors.

RESULTS

The 3-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire group were 76.0% and 65.9%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that B symptom, advanced Lugano stage, elevated LDH status, poor ECOG PS and immunochemotherapy alone were significantly correlated with a poor PFS. Elevated LDH status, poor ECOG PS, advanced Lugano stage, high IPI score and immunochemotherapy alone were significantly correlated with a poor OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that ECOG PS (P= 0.035; HR = 0.233; 95% CI, 0.060-0.905), LDH level (P = 0.010; HR = 0.223; 95% CI, 0.072-0.693) and surgery (P = 0.002; HR = 5.584; 95% CI, 1.883-16.563) were independent prognostic factors for OS. LDH level (P = 0.035; HR = 0.210; 95% CI, 0.049-0.894) and surgery (P = 0.003; HR = 6.410; 95% CI, 1.903-21.593) were independent risk factors for PFS in PI-DLBCL. R-CHOP immunochemotherapy combined surgery treatment was also associated with a lower rate of refractory/relapsed (R/R) disease (P = 0.004). Furthermore, stratified analysis revealed that partial resection or radical resection combined with immunochemotherapy had no significantly difference which affect OS (P = 0.338) and PFS (P = 0.207).

CONCLUSION

R-CHOP immunochemotherapy plus surgery was associated with a superior prognosis compared with R-CHOP alone in Chinese PI-DLBCL population.

Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as acute appendicitis: A report of 2 cases and a literature review

Primary appendiceal lymphomas (PAL) are a type of primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (PGINHL) with an incidence of <1%. There is considerable discordance with regard to the optimal management of PGINHL. We describe two cases of PAL, perform a literature review, and discuss the available evidence for optimal treatment.

The Impact of Surgery on Long-Term Survival of Patients with Primary Gastric Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A SEER Population-Based Study

Background

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the long-term survival of patients receiving conservative with surgical treatment to analyze the prognostic factors and the impact of surgery on oncological outcomes of patients with primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Methods

A total of 2647 patients diagnosed with primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from 1998 to 2014 were extracted from SEER database. Propensity matching was performed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups. Based on the recursive partitioning analysis, the patients were divided into three risk subgroups: low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk.

Results

After propensity score matching, patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of the surgical group and the conservative treatment group were, respectively, 60% and 59.2% (P = 0.952) before propensity matching and 64.2% and 58.6% (P = 0.046) after propensity matching. According to the multivariate analysis, age, tumor stage, and chemotherapy and surgery were independent risk factors for long-term survival. The 5-year cancer-specific survival rates differed significantly between the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients (76.2% vs. 57.4% vs. 25.5%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of the surgical group was significantly higher than that of the conservative treatment group in the low-risk patients. However, it did not differ significantly in the intermediate-risk and high-risk patients (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

A prognostic model was constructed based on the independent risk factors of age, tumor stage, and chemotherapy. The prognostic model indicated that low-risk patients (age < 75 years, stage I/II, with/without chemotherapy) undergoing surgical treatment may benefit from long-term survival, while intermediate- and high-risk patients (age ≥ 75 years, stage I/II, with/without chemotherapy or III/IV patients, with/without chemotherapy) gain no significant benefit from surgery.

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of Primary Gastric Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of 272 Cases from the China Lymphoma Patient Registry

Background: The respective and combinatorial roles of surgery, Rituximab and chemotherapy in primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (PGDLBCL) therapy remained unclear. The purpose of the study was to evaluate present treatment strategies and prognostic factors of PGDLBCL. Methods: 272 cases (from 1994-1 to 2015-12) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the therapy regimen, patients were classified into four groups: chemotherapy (C), chemotherapy + surgery (C+S), Rituximab + chemotherapy (R+C), and Rituximab + chemotherapy + surgery (R+C+S). Results: The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 3-year overall survivals (OS) of the entire cohort were 77.0% and 81.2% respectively (median follow-up time: 44.3 months). Survival of surgery-treated patients was superior to the survival of those receiving drug therapy alone (PFS: 82.6% vs. 74.7%, p=0.015; OS: 87.8% vs. 78.6%, p=0.036). Rituximab showed significant clinical benefit in OS (87.1% vs. 75.0%, p=0.007), especially in advanced-stage or high risk (IPI 3-5) patients. Group C had the lowest PFS and OS among the four groups, while the survival of other three groups were similar (Group C vs. Group C+S vs. Group R+C vs. Group R+C+S: 3-year PFS: 67.2% vs. 81.4% vs. 81.2% vs. 81.8%, p=0.002; 3-year OS: 68.4% vs. 85.4% vs. 87.2% vs. 88.6%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that IPI and therapy regimens were highly predictive for both PFS and OS. Conclusions: Our results suggested that the combinations of chemotherapy and surgery, or chemotherapy and Rituximab, are superior to other treatment strategies for PGDLBCL. IPI and therapy regimens are independent predictors of outcomes. Future prospective trial is warranted.

The clinical manifestation, survival outcome and predictive prognostic factors of 137 patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma (PGIL): Strobe compliant

This retrospective study aimed to investigate clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma (PGIL) of Chinese population.From January 2001 to December 2015, 137 patients diagnosed with PGIL were recruited. The clinical features, treatment, and follow-up information were analysed.The median patient age was 62.3 years. With 18.47 months follow-up, the 2-year progress-free survival and overall survival rate was 74.9% and 75.5%, respectively. The overall response rate was 33.6%. Age≥60 years, advanced Lugano staging (≥stage IIE), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, ≥2 extra-nodal involved sites, National Comprehensive Cancer Network International Prognostic Index (NCCN-IPI)≥4, Ki-67≥50% were associated with worse prognosis in univariate analysis (P < .05). By multivariate analyses, we determined that the involvement of extra-nodal involved sites was the only statistically significant poor prognostic factor in PGIL.Age, staging, LDH levels, NCCN-IPI, Ki-67 especially involvement of multiple extra-nodal sites were associated with poor overall survival of PGIL.

Concurrent Primary Gastric and Pulmonary Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

The primary pulmonary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PPDLBCL), a kind of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, itself is a rare entity. Its association with primary B-cell gastric lymphoma has not been established yet. Herein we present a case of PPDLBCL along with a literature review. This case is special and extremely rare as it has concurrent primary gastric B-cell lymphoma.

Successful hemihepatectomy following chemotherapy for primary liver lymphoma: case report and review of literature

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) comprise a heterogeneous group of B-cell and T-cell neoplasms. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common type of NHL, accounts for around 30-40% of NHL cases. However, primary hepatic location of NHLs is rare and constitutes 0.01% of all NHL cases. Due to this rarity and a lack of large randomized trails, it is still unclear what treatment should be used for primary hepatic DLBCLs. In this study, we report of a female patient with primary hepatic DLBCL who was successfully treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. We also shortly review the literature regarding surgical treatments for primary GI tract NHLs. Taking into account our experience and the current literature, surgical treatment with postoperative chemotherapy seems to be a feasible option for patients with focal primary hepatic DLBCLs.

Retrospective analysis of primary gastric diffuse largeB-cell lymphoma: a single center study from Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIM

Diffuse large B-cell primary gastric lymphomas (DLBC-PGLs) are treated with different therapies. Their optimal treatment is not well documented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 51 patients diagnosed with DLBC-PGL in the previous 10 years. All patients were treated with R-CHOP as first line. Radiotherapy was added to chemotherapy in 8 patients. Surgery was performed in 5 patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of the 51 patients was 45.5 (range 5-144) months and the complete response (CR) rate was 90.2%. CR was achieved in 34 (89.4%) of 38 patients treated with single chemotherapy, in all (100%) 5 patients treated with chemotherapy plus surgery, and in 7 (87.5%) of 8 patients treated with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 85.8% and 89.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS and EFS rates were not significantly different between patients treated with single chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy/surgery (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

R-CHOP chemotherapy is as effective as R-CHOP plus radiotherapy/surgery in the treatment of DLBC-PGL patients. Prospective randomized large cohort studies are needed to generate guidelines for the treatment of DLBC-PGL.

[Efficacy of surgery and rituximab in primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma]

目的

探讨手术联合化疗与单纯化疗对原发胃弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤（PGDLBCL）患者生存的影响，并分析化疗过程中联合应用利妥昔单抗（R）对其预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析83例PGDLBCL患者的临床资料，并分析外科手术及利妥昔单抗对患者生存的影响。

结果

83例患者中男43例，女40例，中位年龄52 (20~76）岁，中位随访时间为36 (4~59）个月。手术联合化疗组（40例）和单纯化疗组（43例）患者的5年总生存（OS）率分别为68.4%、85.9%（P=0.117），疾病无进展生存（PFS）率分别为66.7%、82.6%（P=0.258），差异均无统计学意义。手术联合化疗患者中R-CHOP方案组（23例）和CHOP方案组（17例）患者的5年OS率分别为73.6%、64.2%（P=0.113），PFS率分别为71.2%、62.5%（P= 0.147）；单纯化疗患者中R-CHOP方案组（24例）和CHOP方案组（19例）患者的5年OS率分别为85.7%、83.5%（P=0.152），PFS率分别为83.4%、81.8%（P=0.307）。单纯化疗组和手术联合化疗组Lugano分期早期（Ⅰ~Ⅱ1期）患者的5年OS率分别为86.4%、78.7%，差异无统计学意义（P=0.283）；晚期（Ⅱ2~Ⅳ期）患者分别为74.6%、58.5%，差异有统计学意义（P=0.040）。多因素分析显示IPI评分是影响预后的独立因素（RR=0.370，95% CI 0.089~3.537，P=0.015）。

结论

单纯化疗或手术联合化疗对PGDLBCL患者长期生存的影响差异无统计学意义，但由于手术可能造成患者生存质量的下降，因此对于无手术指征者更倾向于推荐单纯化疗。本研究中利妥昔单抗的联合应用未能使大部分这类患者的生存显著获益，但这需要进一步多中心、大样本的研究来证实。

CD4+Foxp3-IL-10+ Tr1 Cells Promote Relapse of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma by Enhancing the Survival of Malignant B Cells and Suppressing Antitumor T Cell Immunity

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common B cell malignancy. Complete remission can be achieved in most patients by conventional treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy. However, a subset of remission individuals will develop a relapsed disease for obscure reasons. CD4⁺Foxp3^-IL-10⁺ cell (Tr1) is a novel cell subtype with the capacity to suppress pro-inflammatory responses, but has not been extensively studied in most tumors. In this study, we investigated the potential role of Tr1 cells in DLBCL. We found that compared to that in healthy controls, the frequency of Tr1 cells was significantly increased in DLBCL patients, even during complete remission. Further study showed that these Tr1 cells were enriched in the CD25^low/-Foxp3^-CD49b⁺LAG-3⁺ fraction and could be developed in vitro from naive CD45RA⁺ CD4⁺ T cells. To examine the effect of Tr1 upregulation, we cocultured the enriched in vitro-induced Tr1 cells (iTr1) with autologous primary DLBCL cells and CD3⁺ T cells and found that iTr1 cells both enhanced the survival of CD20⁺ DLBCL tumor cells and suppressed the antitumor response of CD3⁺ T cells through the production of IL-10. Furthermore, the frequency of CD4⁺Foxp3^-IL-10⁺ Tr1 cells in DLBCL patients during complete remission is directly associated with the risk of relapse. Together, these results suggested that Tr1 cells contributed to tumor cell maintenance and may serve as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target.

Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of primary gastric lymphoma: A retrospective study with 165 cases

Primary gastric lymphoma (PGL) is the most common extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and roles of different treatment modalities in patients with PGL.From January 2003 to November 2014, 165 patients who were diagnosed with PGL at West China Hospital were enrolled in this study. The clinical features, treatment, and follow-up information were analyzed.In this study, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (108, 65.5%) and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (52, 31.5%) were two predominant histological subtypes. One-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 95.2% and 79.5%, respectively; in whom 110 (66.7%) underwent surgery, 110 (66.7%) received chemotherapy, 12 (7.3%) received radiotherapy, and 10 (6.1%) received Helicobacter pylori eradication. And 75 patients (45.5%) were treated with at least 2 different types of therapies. Elevated lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, poor performance status (PS), advanced stage, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥3, conservative treatment, and high-grade histological subtype were associated with worse prognosis in univariate analysis. Cox regression analysis showed that LDH levels, PS, staging, and histological subtype were independent predictors of survival outcomes. In the DLBCL type, 5-year OS was significantly better in the surgically treated group (80.1%) than that of patients conservatively treated (49.8%) (P = 0.001). Surgical treatment had almost no impact on OS in the MALT type than conservative treatment (P = 0.597). The proportion of patients received conservative treatment increased from 4.5% in period 1 to 51.7% in period 4.High LDH levels, poor PS, advanced staging, and malignant pathological type at diagnosis are significantly associated with poor OS. Our data suggest that surgery is superior in prognosis over conservative treatment in the DLBCL type, but not in the MALT type. Recently, conservative treatment is becoming more preferred approach in patients with PGL.

Therapeutic comparison of Surgery combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone for Primary Gastrointestinal Lymphoma: A single center study

Objectives There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment for primary gastrointestinal lymphoma (PGIL). The aim of this study was to compare surgery combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in PGIL. Methods We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the treatment outcomes of 107 patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma diagnosed between March 1999 and December 2009 at Kosin University Gospel Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: 35 patients who underwent surgery combined with chemotherapy (group A) and 72 patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone (group B). And we analyzed prognostic factors associated with short survival. Results The 5-year progression free survival rates (PFS) of group A and B were 86.7% and 66.1%, respectively (P = 0.037), while the 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 86.8% and 68.4%, respectively (P = 0.129). In multivariate analysis, Both PFS and OS were not changed by treatment strategies (surgery combined with chemotherapy or chemotherapy only). The international prognostic index (IPI) was the only independent predictive factor for PFS. Conclusions In our study, surgery combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy only make no difference of survival rate. And further randomized prospective studies are needed to confirm a treatment strategies at improving survival outcomes in PGIL patients.

[Gastric perforation caused by primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma]

Spontaneous gastric perforation is a rare complication of gastric lymphoma that is potentially life threatening since it can progress to sepsis and multi-organ failure. Morbidity also increases due to prolonged hospitalization and delay in initiating chemotherapy. Therefore prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment is critical to improve prognosis. A 64-year-old man presented to the emergency department with severe abdominal pain. Chest X-ray showed free air below the right diaphragm. Abdominal CT scan also demonstrated free air in the peritoneal cavity with large wall defect in the lesser curvature of gastric lower body. Therefore, the patient underwent emergency operation and primary closure was done. Pathologic specimen obtained during surgery was compatible to diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Fifteen days after primary closure, the patient received subtotal gastrectomy and chemotherapy was initiated after recovery. Patient is currently being followed-up at outpatient department without any particular complications. Herein, we report a rare case of gastric lymphoma that initially presented as peritonitis because of spontaneous gastric perforation.

Treatment modalities in primary gastric lymphoma: the effect of rituximab and surgical treatment. A study by the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology

Aim of the study

Gastrointestinal lymphoma is the most common type of extranodal lymphoma and commonly involved site is the stomach. We have compared the superiority between treatment modalities for primary gastric lymphoma and we want to investigate efficacy of rituximab in gastric lymphoma.

Material and methods

Between April 2002 and December 2011, 146 patients with a histologically confirmed primary gastric lymphoma, initially diagnosed at eight different Cancer Centers within Turkey were evaluated retrospectively. According to the treatment modality, the patients were divided into chemotherapy (CT) alone, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT), surgery and chemotherapy (SCT), surgery along with chemotherapy and radiotherapy (SCRT), and surgery (S) alone groups.

Results

Median follow-up period was 25.5 months. The 5-year EFS (event free survival) and OS (overall survival) rates for the patients were 55% and 62.3% respectively. In Log rank analysis of OS and EFS, we have identified levels of albumin and hemoglobine, IPI score, stage at diagnosis as factors influencing survival. In multivariate analysis of OS and EFS, only albumin and stage at diagnosis were factors independently contributing to survival. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of survival between different treatment modalities (p = 0.707 in EFS and p = 0.124 in OS). In analysis of patients treated with chemotherapy alone, there was no a statistically significant difference in terms of EFS and OS between chemotherapy regimens with or without rituximab in localized and advanced stage groups (p = 0.264 and p = 0.639). There was no statistical difference in survival rate (EFS and OS) between surgical or non-surgical treatment modalities for localized/advanced stage gastric lymphoma groups (p = 0.519 / p = 0.165).

Conclusions

There are several treatment options due to similar results in different treatment modalities. Also benefit of rituximab treatment in gastric lymphoma is still a controversial subject. Additional prospective trials are definitely required in order to clarify use of rituximab in treatment of extranodal gastric lymphoma.

De-escalating therapy in gastric aggressive lymphoma

The treatment of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has changed radically over the last 10–15 years, with the abandonment of routine gastrectomy in favor of more conservative therapies. Low-level evidence suggests that consolidation radiotherapy could be avoided in patients with limited-stage DLBCL of the stomach who achieve complete remission after rituximab-CHOP combination. Small, recent prospective trials suggest that selected patients with limited-stage Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive DLBCL of the stomach and favorable prognostic factors can be managed with antibiotics alone, with excellent disease control and cure rates, keeping chemo-radiotherapy for unresponsive patients. This recommendation should equally regard patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-related or de novo DLBCL. Future studies should be focused on the establishment of reliable variables able to distinguish the best candidates for exclusive treatment with H. pylori eradication from those who need for conventional chemo-immunotherapy.

The role of Helicobacter pylori eradication in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell and marginal zone lymphomas of the stomach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is focused on the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication with antibiotics in patients with primary gastric lymphomas of indolent and aggressive nature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gastrointestinal lymphoma is the most common form of extranodal lymphoma, involving primarily the stomach in 60-75% of cases. The most common histological subtypes are diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type. H. pylori infection has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastric MALT lymphoma; its role in gastric DLBCL remains controversial. Recently, international guidelines established that patients with gastric MALT lymphoma should be treated with upfront H. pylori-eradicating antibiotic therapy and that residual microscopic or molecular disease does not need for additional antiblastic treatment. The excellent prognosis of patients with gastric DLBCL managed with conservative chemo-radiotherapy led some investigators to test H. pylori eradication as exclusive treatment in prospective trials, keeping chemo-radiotherapy for unresponsive patients. This conservative strategy was well tolerated and active in patients with limited-stage DLBCL (±MALT areas) of the stomach.

SUMMARY

H. pylori eradication is a suitable strategy as exclusive upfront treatment for both patients with MALT-type lymphomas or with DLBCL of the stomach. Additional trials are needed to elucidate related controversial issues.

Treatment outcome for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma according to Helicobacter pylori infection status: a single-center experience

Background/Aims

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy has been used as a first-line treatment for H. pylori-positive gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. However, the management strategy for H. pylori-negative MALT lymphoma remains controversial. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the success rate of each treatment option for H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative gastric MALT lymphomas.

Methods

In total, 57 patients with gastric MALT lymphoma diagnosed between December 2000 and June 2012 were enrolled in the study. The treatment responses were compared between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative gastric MALT lymphomas.

Results

Of the 57 patients, 43 (75%) had H. pylori infection. Forty-eight patients received H. pylori eradication as a first-line treatment, and complete remission was achieved in 31 of the 39 patients (80%) with H. pylori-positive MALT lymphoma and in five (56%) of the nine patients with H. pylori-negative MALT lymphoma; no significant difference was observed between the groups (p=0.135). The other treatment modalities, including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, were effective irrespective of H. pylori infection status, with no significant difference in the treatment response between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative MALT lymphomas.

Conclusions

H. pylori eradication therapy may be considered as a first-line treatment regardless of H. pylori infection status.

Analysis of clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of 46 patients with primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (PGI NHL) is one of the most common types of extranodal lymphoma, accounting for ~30-50% of all extranodal lymphomas. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients with PGI NHL. A total of 46 patients with PGI NHL (mean age, 50 years) were enrolled in this study, with a male:female ratio of 1.3:1. The most common site of PGI NHL was the stomach (52.2%), followed by the colon (34.8%) and small intestine (8.7%). The most common symptoms of PGI NHL included abdominal pain or discomfort (91.3%), loss of appetite (65.2%) and weight loss (56.5%) and the most common pathological subtype of PGI NHL was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (78.3%). Lesions were identified in 95.7% of PGI NHL patients under preoperative endoscopic examination, whereas the diagnosis rate was only 21.7% during preoperative endoscopic biopsy. All 46 patients underwent surgical treatment and 36 also received postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The follow-up time was 6-70 months in 37 PGI NHL patients, with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 81.1, 62.16 and 50.0%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate differed significantly according to clinical stage (P=0.002) and tumor size (P=0.0017) among patients with PGI NHL. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between patients who received surgery alone and those who received surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy (P=0.1371). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences in gender (P=0.127), clinical stage (P=0.828), histological subtype (P=1.000) and surgical modality (P=0.509) between patients with primary gastric non-Hodgkin lymphoma (PG NHL) and those with primary intestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (PI NHL). In conclusion, PGI NHLs are a heterogeneous group of diseases, whereas clinical stage and tumor size were identified as adverse prognostic factors of PGI NHL. Further studies, including a larger number of patients treated with surgery alone, are required in order to elucidate the precise role of surgery combined with postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the prognosis of PGI NHL.

The management of perforated gastric ulcers

INTRODUCTION

Perforated gastric ulcers are potentially complicated surgical emergencies and appropriate early management is essential in order to avoid subsequent problems including unnecessary gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to examine the management and outcome of patients with gastric ulcer perforation undergoing emergency laparotomy for peritonitis.

METHODS

Patients undergoing laparotomy at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh for perforated gastric ulcers were identified from the prospectively maintained Lothian Surgical Audit (LSA) database over the five-year period 2007-2011. Additional data were obtained by review of electronic records and review of case notes.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (25 male, 19 female) were identified. Procedures performed were: 41 omental patch repairs (91%), 2 simple closures (4.5%) and 2 distal gastrectomies (4.5%; both for large perforations). Four perforated gastric tumours were identified (8.8%), 2 of which were suspected intra-operatively and confirmed histologically, 1 had unexpected positive histology and 1 had negative intra-operative histology, but follow-up endoscopy confirmed the presence of carcinoma (1 positive biopsy in 21 follow-up endoscopies); all 4 were managed without initial resection. Median length of stay was 10 days (range 4-68). Overall 7 patients died in hospital (15.9%) and there were 21 morbidities (54.5%). Registrars performed the majority of the procedures (16 alone, 21 supervised) with no significant difference in post-operative morbidity (P = 0.098) or mortality (P = 0.855), compared to consultants.

CONCLUSION

Almost all perforated gastric ulcers can be effectively managed by laparotomy and omental patch repair. Initial biopsy and follow-up endoscopy with repeat biopsy is essential to avoid missing an underlying malignancy.

A retrospective analysis of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with or without concomitant mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma components

Primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease entity that includes patients with (DLBCL/MALT) and without detectable mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma components (de novo DLBCL). We sought to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcome of this disease in a large number of cases. Patients with primary gastric DLBCL (n=162) seen on 2001-2011 at the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital and the First affiliated Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The distribution of sex, age, Lugano staging, and other main clinical characteristics was similar between the de novo DLBCL and DLBCL/MALT groups (p>0.05). However, the proportion of patients with a stage-modified international prognostic index (m-IPI) ≥ 2 was higher in the de novo DLBCL (34 %) than the DLBCL/MALT group (17 %) (p=0.026). In addition, the Helicobacter pylori infection rates were higher in the DLBCL/MALT (75 %) than the de novo DLBCL group (36 %) (p<0.001). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates were similar for patients in the de novo DLBCL (p=0.705) and DLBCL/MALT groups (p=0.846). Surgical treatment did not offer survival benefits when compared with chemotherapy for 5-year PFS (p=0.607) and OS estimates (p=0.554). There were no significant differences in 5-year PFS and OS estimates for patients treated with rituximab-chemotherapy (p=0.261) or conventional chemotherapy (p=0.227). Non-GCB subtype and m-IPI ≥ 2 were independently associated with shorter OS, and advanced stages of lymphoma were independently associated with shorter PFS.

Long-term follow-up of localized, primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab and CHOP

The addition of rituximab to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone [CHOP (i.e., R-CHOP)] is considered to be the standard regimen for treating localized, primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL). However, few studies have reported the long-term efficacy of R-CHOP therapy in the management of localized PG-DLBCL. In the present study, we performed a retrospective analysis of 11 patients with localized PG-DLBCL, who were treated with R-CHOP at Nihon University Itabashi Hospital and Kasukabe Municipal Hospital (Japan) from 2001 to 2008. Limited stage cancer was defined as stage I/II according to the Lugano staging system for gastrointestinal (GI) lymphomas. The relative dose intensity (RDI) of CHOP therapy was calculated for each patient. The median age of the patients was 68 years (range, 48-82). Gastralgia and anemia were common symptoms at initial presentation. All patients except 1 received 6 cycles of R-CHOP treatment without consolidative radiation therapy or prior surgery. RDI was maintained at over 80% in 9 out of 11 patients. All patients achieved complete remission and the estimated overall survival with a median follow-up of 54 months (range, 39-103) was 100%, without relapse or significant GI adverse effects, such as perforation or bleeding during R-CHOP treatment. No long-term adverse effects of rituximab were recorded during the observation period. Helicobacter pylori infection was diagnosed in 72.7% (8 cases) of the patients, but was eradicated in a limited number of patients. Our data suggest the feasibility and effectiveness of the addition of rituximab to conventional CHOP therapy in the management of localized PG-DLBCL.

Emergency surgery for perforated gastric malignancy: An institution's experience and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for perforated gastric malignancies.

METHODS

A review of all patients who underwent surgery for perforated gastric malignancy was performed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (nine gastric adenocarcinoma and three B-cell lymphoma) formed the study group. Ten (83.3%) had subtotal gastrectomy performed, while two (16.7%) underwent total gastrectomy. All eight patients with adenocarcinoma who survived the initial operation fared poorly. The two patients with lymphoma who survived the surgery underwent subsequent chemotherapy has no disease recurrence currently.

CONCLUSION

Surgery in perforated gastric malignancy is fraught with numerous challenges.

The comparison between CHOP and R-CHOP in primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma

The combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP) plus rituximab is the standard treatment for patients with primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, a few trials comparing CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) with CHOP have been conducted in primary gastric DLBCL. Among 93 consecutive patients receiving CHOP or R-CHOP as a first-line chemotherapy at our institution, 38 patients received CHOP and 55 patients received R-CHOP. With a median follow-up time of 48 months, the complete response (CR) rate, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) did not differ between two treatment groups (P = 1.000, P = 0.744, and P = 0.213, respectively). The CR rates were 93.9% for patients receiving CHOP and 92.5% for patients receiving R-CHOP. The 3-year EFS rates were 86.0% for patients receiving CHOP and 81.7% for patients receiving R-CHOP; the 3-year OS rates were 94.7 and 84.7%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, The CR rate was affected by the number of extranodal involvements (P = 0.011). The EFS and OS rates were affected by the Lugano stage (P = 0.067 and P = 0.008, respectively). High serum level of β₂-microglobulin was associated with worse EFS and OS in patients receiving R-CHOP (P = 0.018 and P = 0.015, respectively). In conclusion, the addition of rituximab was not found to have an impact on patients' outcomes with primary gastric DLBCL. The β₂-microglobulin in primary gastric DLBCL might be able to discriminate the patients' prognosis who are treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy.

Treatment of gastrointestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma in China: a 10-year retrospective study of 114 cases

Gastrointestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common subtype of extranodal lymphoma. There has been uncertainty about the clinical efficacy of combination therapy (surgery and chemotherapy) for gastrointestinal DLBCL. We retrospectively analyzed 114 patients with newly diagnosed gastrointestinal DLBCL from six medical centers. We evaluated four groups based on whether they were treated with or without surgery as the initial treatment for DLBCL, followed by either a regimen with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP with rituximab (R-CHOP). For all patients, treatment with R-CHOP resulted in significantly greater overall survival (OS; 93.2 vs. 74.5%, p = 0.008) and progression-free survival (89.8% vs. 72.7, p = 0.029). Tumor resection did not improve OS (84.0 vs. 85.0%, for surgery and chemotherapy alone, respectively, p = 0.980). However, for younger patients, overall survival was greater (p = 0.005) for patients treated with surgery plus chemotherapy (83.9%) than for patients treated with chemotherapy alone (40.0%). Elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level (p = 0.004) and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; p = 0.003) were independent predictors of survival in patients with gastrointestinal DLBCL. Stage-modified IPI was recognized as the best prognostic tool. There were significant differences among patients with low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups in 50-month OS (94.2 vs. 84.0 vs. 66.7%, p = 0.008). The results of this large-scale study suggest that R-CHOP regimen is the first-line treatment for gastrointestinal DLBCL. The benefit of surgery for these patients remains controversial. Further prospective analyses are warranted.

Surgical treatment of primitive gastro-intestinal lymphomas: a systematic review

Primitive Gastrointestinal Lymphomas (PGIL) are uncommon tumours, although time-trend analyses have demonstrated an increase. The role of surgery in the management of lymphoproliferative diseases has changed over the past 40 years. Nowadays their management is centred on systemic treatments as chemo-/radio- therapy. Surgery is restricted to very selected indications, always discussed in a multidisciplinary setting. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the actual role of surgery in the treatment of PGIL.

A systematic review of literature was conducted according to the recommendations of The Cochrane Collaboration. Main outcomes analysed were overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS).

There are currently 1 RCT and 4 non-randomised prospective controlled studies comparing surgical versus medical treatment for PGIL. Seven hundred and one patients were analysed, divided into two groups: 318 who underwent to surgery alone or associated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (surgical group) versus 383 who were treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (medical group).

Despite the OS at 10 years between surgical and medical groups did not show relevant differences, the DFS was significantly better in the medical group (P = 0.00001). Accordingly a trend was noticed in the recurrence rate, which was lower in the medical group (6.06 vs. 8.57%); and an higher mortality was revealed in the surgical group (4.51% vs. 1.50%).

The chemotherapy confirms its primary role in the management of PGIL as part of systemic treatment in the medical group. Surgery remains the treatment of choice in case of PGIL acutely complicated, although there is no evidence in literature regarding the utility of preventive surgery.

Comparison of treatment strategies for patients with intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: surgical resection followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to analyze the impact of surgery on the outcomes and qualities of life (QOL) in patients with intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We assessed 345 patients with either localized or disseminated intestinal DLBCL and compared them according to treatment: surgical resection followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. In patients with localized disease (Lugano stage I/II), surgery plus chemotherapy yielded a lower relapse rate (15.3%) than did chemotherapy alone (36.8%, P < .001). The 3-year overall survival rate was 91% in the surgery plus chemotherapy group and 62% in the chemotherapy-alone group (P < .001). The predominant pattern in the chemotherapy group was local relapse (27.6%). When rituximab was used with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP), there was no improvement of the outcomes in patients treated with primary surgical resection. The QOL of patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy was lower than chemotherapy alone, but its difference was acceptable. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical resection plus chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Surgical resection followed by chemotherapy might be an effective treatment strategy with acceptable QOL deterioration for localized intestinal DLBCL. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01043302.

[Primary digestive tract lymphoma in central region of Tunisia: anatomoclinical study and therapeutic results about 153 cases]

Primary gastro-intestinal lymphoma (PGIL) is the most common type of extra-nodal non Hodgkin's lymphoma. Their clinical and histological presentations are heterogeneous depending on the site of the lesion. There is no consensus regarding the role of surgery and chemotherapy in the therapeutic approach. In our country epidemiology of the disease is unknown with IPSID being the most frequent type. We report anatomo-clinical features and prognostic factors of PGIL and compare intestinal to gastric forms in our region. This is a retrospective study of 153 cases of PGIL in adults diagnosed and treated in the department of medical oncology in Farhat Hached Hospital between 1994 and 2006. The median age was 52 years and the sex-ratio 2.1. Tumor sites were gastric (67%), intestinal (26%) and gastrointestinal (7%). Abdominal pain (87%) followed by vomiting and diarrhoea (37 and 15%) were the most common symptoms. Performance status (PS) < 2 was seen in 80% of patients, high grade lymphoma in 70.5% of cases and B phenotype was noted in 85%. MALT lymphoma accounts for 50% of cases, and IPSID for only 5% of PGIL. About 47.5% of cases were stage IE, 138 patients had chemotherapy with an objective response rate of 77%. Only 46% of patients had surgery (14 for surgical complication, 6 for residual tumor after chemotherapy and 22 to have histological diagnosis). The five-year overall survival (OS) was 62%. In high grade lymphoma patients favorable prognostic factors for OS included young age < or = 60 years, PS < 2, normal serum LDH, hemoglobin > 12 g/dL, B phenotype, localised stage (IE-IIE1), anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimen, achieving complete or partial response to induction chemotherapy and no relapse. In multivariate study only relapse and PS were significant prognostic factors for OS. In low-grade lymphoma patients, none of these factors had a significant correlation with OS: age < or = 60 years, PS < 2, stage (IE-IIE1), response to induction chemotherapy, relapse. Compared to gastric lymphomas, intestinal cases occurred at a younger age, frequently with diarrhoea, weight loss, and occlusion. They are more often high-grade, T phenotype and have locally advanced stage (IIE); surgery is more common in this group. We conclude that stomach is the main site of PGIL in our region, intestinal lymphoma is less frequent and IPSID has become rare. Recent progress in chemotherapy has allowed good therapeutic results with a conservative approach. Surgery may be performed in case of emergency or for residual lesions after medical treatment.

Primary gastric diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): analyses of prognostic factors and value of pretreatment FDG-PET scan

OBJECTIVES

We report a single institution experience with gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in an attempt to evaluate the roles of different treatment modalities, to assess the value of pretreatment positron emission tomography (PET) scan, and to identify potential prognostic factors.

METHODS

Among 384 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 1995 and 2008, 75 patients had primary gastric DLBCL and were reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age was 66. International prognostic index (IPI) risk was low in 52%, low-intermediate in 23%, high-intermediate in 9%, and high in 16%. Pretreatment PET scan was highly sensitive in detecting gastric lesions except stage I gastric DLBCL without detectable mass by CT or gastroscopy. As a general rule, patients with limited-stage disease were treated with three times of CHOP (with or without rituximab) and radiotherapy, and those with advanced-stage disease were treated with eight cycles of CHOP (with or without rituximab), and radiotherapy was given to residual diseases after chemotherapy. Three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 78%. Multivariate analysis revealed that low albumin, hemoglobin <12.0 g/dL, and treatment without rituximab were independently associated with shorter OS. Low albumin, hemoglobin <12.0 g/dL,and advanced stage were independently associated with shorter progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

We showed the survival benefit of rituximab and potential prognostic value of pretreatment hemoglobin and serum albumin levels in gastric DLBCL.

Early stage gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphomas: results of a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy + involved field radiotherapy. (IELSG 4). [corrected]

Here, we present the results of a randomised clinical trial carried out between 1998 and 2004, evaluating the possible role of radiotherapy (RT) as consolidation treatment after induction chemotherapy (CT) in diffuse large B-cell (DLBC) gastric lymphoma. Fifty-four patients were enrolled and all received anthracycline containing regimens as induction CT. Patients were evaluated after four to six cycles and those in complete remission (CR) were randomised to receive gastric involved field (IF) RT or two addition cycles of the same CT. Forty-five patients (83%) were randomised after the induction CT. Clinical results of patients allocated to the RT arm showed a significant reduction in incidence of local relapse versus patients who received CT alone. However, overall survival was not different between the two arms. Our results confirm that CT could be considered as first line therapy for newly diagnosed gastric DLBC lymphoma; IF RT delivered in those patients achieving CR after induction CT is able to prevent local relapse.

Rituximab and chemotherapy in primary gastric lymphoma

PURPOSE

We performed a phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the addition of rituximab and conventional chemotherapy in primary gastric lymphoma (PGL).

METHODS

Forty-two (42) patients with PGL, stage IE and IIE, and with low- or low-intermediate clinical risk were treated in a prospective longitudinal study with standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) chemotherapy and rituximab (375 mg/m2, intravenously) on day 1 of each cycle administered every 21 days, for 6 cycles. The endpoint was to assess improvement in outcome measured by prolongation in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Complete response was achieved in 40 cases (95%) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88%-102%). Relapse was observed in 2 cases. Two (2) patients died secondary to tumor progression. Thus, actuarial 5-year EFS was 95% (95 % CI: 87%-104%) and OS was 95% (95% CI: 88%-101%), which was not statistically different to historic controls. Acute toxicity was minimal and well tolerated, 4 cases developed late toxicity, 2 cases of herpes zoster infection, and 2 cases with granulocytopenia; in 1 case, the patient continued with mild granulocytopenia 3 years after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy did not improve outcome in early-stage PGL.

Management of gastric lymphoma with chemotherapy alone

PURPOSE

The optimal therapy for gastric lymphoma except MALToma has not yet been established. This study was undertaken to investigate whether gastric lymphoma can be managed effectively and safely with chemotherapy alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 58 patients (median age 56 years) with newly diagnosed gastric lymphoma between 1989--2001 at Seoul National University Hospital and who were initially managed with chemotherapy alone were evaluated. MALToma was excluded from the pathologic review.

RESULTS

All patients received initially anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. ECOG performance scale 0--1 was 88% and B symptoms were present in 41.4%. Diffuse large B cell type was the most common (74.1%). Stage IE, II1E accounted for 51.7% and II2E, IIIE, IV for 48.3%. The international prognostic index (IPI) of risk was low in 39.7%, low-intermediate in 22.4%, high-intermediate in 15.5% and high in 22.4%. The complete response rate after first-line chemotherapy was 71.4% and the partial response rate was 12.2%. (overall response rate: 83.6%). Among patients who did not reach the complete response, a further complete response was achieved by second-line chemotherapy including etoposide-based regimen. Ultimately, the maximum complete response rate by chemotherapy was 83.7% (92% in stage IE, II1E, 75% in stage II2E, IIIE, IV). Median overall survival was 47.4 months (84.7 months in stage IE, II1E, 32.5 months in stage II2E, IIIE, IV) and the 5-year survival rate was 46%. Bleeding as a complication occurred in 3 of 58 patients (5.6%) and these cases were controlled by embolization or conservative management. No perforation episode occurred and surgical intervention due to complication was not necessary. Organ preservation was possible in 57 of 58 patients (98%). The one gastrectomy was performed due to a partial clinical response to chemotherapy but the specimen showed pathologic CR. Multivariate analysis revealed that only IPI had a significant influence on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric lymphoma except MALToma can be managed effectively and safely with chemotherapy alone.

[The value of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive and localised gastric lymphomas]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the treatment results of localised aggressive gastric lymphomas with favourable prognosis using chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 1993 and December 2004, nine patients with primary gastric high-grade lymphoma have been treated by the Lymphoma Committee of Sfax (Tunisia). The sex ratio was 1.5. The mean age was 44.9 years. Histological type was the large cell B lymphoma in 100% of the cases. Disease was stage I in eight cases and stage II in one case (Ann Arbor Classification). The treatment consisted in primary chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy of the stomach with or without regional nodes (40 Gy).

RESULTS

After treatment, all patients had complete remission. With a mean follow-up of 55.7 months, one patient was lost to follow-up; the other patients were alive with complete remission. No major acute toxicities or late effects were found. Overall survival was 100% at five years.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy associated with radiotherapy can be proposed to patients having localised and aggressive primary gastric lymphoma with favourable prognosis, since this treatment is well tolerated and provides satisfactory control of the disease.

Quality of life one year after chemoradiotherapy for localized primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

We assessed the quality of life (QOL) at least one year after sequential chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of localized gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We used the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire for Stomach Cancer (EORTC QLQ-STO22). Among the 45 patients available at the one-year follow-up after radiation therapy, 40 patients completed the EORTC QLQ-STO22 questionnaire. Their median age was 54.5 (range, 20-70 years). Social functioning was most adversely affected among the respondents with a score of 59, whereas other functions and the global scales were preserved above a score of 70 by linearly transformed values. Fatigue, the financial impact and specific emotional problems such as "thinking about their illness" (STO-ANX) and "worry about weight loss or future health" (STO-BI) were persistently bothersome for some patients. Other stomach-related symptoms such as dysphagia, pain, or reflux were negligible at 1 year after treatment. Therefore, this organ-preserving combined approach was effective for the maintenance of the QOL and minimization of stomach abnormalities in patients with gastric lymphoma.

High grade B-cell gastric lymphoma with complete pathologic remission after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: report of a case and review of the literature

Background

Treatment of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is still controversial. The treatment of localized disease was based on surgery alone, or followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. High-grade gastric lymphomas are generally believed to be Helicobacter pylori (HP)-independent growing tumors. However a few cases of regression of high-grade gastric lymphomas after the cure of Helicobacter pylori infection had been described.

Case presentation

We report here a case with primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma that showed a complete pathologic remission after HP eradication and we reviewed the literature. A computerized literature reach through Medline, Cancerlit and Embase were performed, applying the words: high grade gastric lymphoma, or diffuse large B cell, MALT gastric lymphoma, DLBCLL (MALT) lymphoma and Helicobacter. Articles and abstracts were also identified by back-referencing from original and relevant papers. Selected for the present review were papers published in English before January 2007.

Conclusion

Forty two cases of primary high grade gastric lymphoma that regressed with anti HP treatment were found. There were anedoctal cases reported and patients belonging to prospective studies; four trials studied the effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori as first line therapy in high grade gastric lymphoma: 22 of a total of 38 enrolled patients obtained complete remission. Depth of gastric wall infiltration and clinical stage were important factors to predict the response to antibiotic therapy. Our case and the review of the literature show that high-grade transformation is not necessarily associated with the loss HP dependence. In early stage, for high-grade B-cell HP-positive gastric lymphomas, given the limited toxicity of anti-HP therapy, this treatment may be considered as one of the first line treatment options.