Strategic approach to the management of Hodgkin's disease incorporating salvage therapy with high-dose ifosfamide, etoposide and epirubicin: a Northern Region Lymphoma Group study (UK)

Optimizing salvage therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: progress and future challenges

INTRODUCTION

Despite clear advancements in the management of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) over the past decade including better risk stratification, the usage of 18F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-guided approaches and incorporation of novel agents, approximately one-third of the patients will relapse. Important themes have been recently explored in the first salvage setting including the recognition of the positive prognostic value of a negative pre-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) FDG-PET response and the incorporation of novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) as salvage regimens to improve patient outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

The evolving treatment paradigm in optimizing salvage therapy in relapsed refractory cHL (RR-cHL) is discussed, including a vision to the future. The methodology included a literature search on PubMed using keywords. Selected articles were screened and evaluated by the authors of this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Achieving a complete remission by FDG-PET pre-ASCT is the most important prognostic factor in obtaining disease control and subsequent cure, and therefore should be a key goal of any salvage regimen. Although data from randomized controlled trials are currently lacking, retrospective evidence demonstrate superior event free survival with CPI-based regimens compared to conventional chemotherapy or BV-based therapy.

Clinico-Epidemiological Profile, Prognostic Factors and Treatment Outcome of Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Approximately 5-10% of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma are refractory to initial treatment. The aim of our study was to assess the clinico-epidemiological profile, prognostic factors and treatment outcome. A retrospective study was conducted over a period of 12 years between June 2006 and January 2018 at the oncology department of Salah Azaïz Institute. Thirty-one patients were included. The median age was 27 years with a female predominance (sex ratio = 0.93).The majority had an advanced stage (61%). IGEV regimen was the most commonly used salvage chemotherapy (n = 14). Age above 30 years was predictive of treatment failure after salvage therapy (p = 0.003). IGEV regimen showed better results than ICE protocol in terms of response to salvage therapy (p = 0.048). Seven patients had salvage radiotherapy. Four patients had autologous stem cell transplant. Progressive disease (n = 12) was the main cause of non-eligibility of autologous stem cell tansplant. Overall survival and progression free survival at 3 years were 50% and 5% respectively. The prognostic factors influencing the overall survival were age above 30 years (p = 0.001), advanced Ann Arbor stage before progression (p = 0.02), advanced Ann Arbor stage of refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (p = 0.001), histological subtype (p = 0.001), CD20 expression (p = 0.027) and non-response to salvage therapy (p = 0.004). The prognostic factor influencing progression free survival was the non-response to salvage therapy (p = 0.045). The prognosis of refractory Hodgkin lymphoma remains poor. The current standard secondary treatment consists of combination therapy, usually followed by autologous stem cell transplantat. Innovative therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-021-01463-4.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes in Children, Adolescents, and Young-adults with Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a KPHOG Lymphoma Working-party, Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) constitutes 10%-20% of all malignant lymphomas and has a high cure rate (5-year survival, around 90%). Recently, interest has increased concerning preventing secondary complications (secondary cancer, endocrine disorders) in long-term survivors. We aimed to study the epidemiologic features and therapeutic outcomes of HL in children, adolescents, and young adults in Korea.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of 224 patients aged < 25 years diagnosed with HL at 22 participating institutes in Korea from January 2007 to August 2016.

RESULTS

A higher percentage of males was diagnosed at a younger age. Nodular sclerosis histopathological HL subtype was most common, followed by mixed cellularity subtype. Eighty-one (36.2%), 101 (45.1%), and 42 (18.8%) patients were classified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively. Doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine was the most common protocol (n = 102, 45.5%). Event-free survival rate was 86.0% ± 2.4%, while five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 96.1% ± 1.4%: 98.7% ± 1.3%, 97.7% ± 1.6%, and 86.5% ± 5.6% in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively (P = 0.021). Five-year OS was worse in patients with B-symptoms, stage IV disease, high-risk, splenic involvement, extra-nodal lymphoma, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase level. In multivariate analysis, B-symptoms and extra-nodal involvement were prognostic factors for poor OS. Late complications of endocrine disorders and secondary malignancy were observed in 17 and 6 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study on the epidemiology and treatment outcomes of HL in children, adolescents, and young adults in Korea. Future prospective studies are indicated to develop therapies that minimize treatment toxicity while maximizing cure rates in children, adolescents, and young adults with HL.

Improving outcomes after autologous transplantation in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a European expert perspective

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established approach to treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) recommended by both the European Society for Medical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network based on the results from randomized controlled studies. However, a considerable number of patients who receive ASCT will progress/relapse and display suboptimal post-transplant outcomes. Over recent years, a number of different strategies have been assessed to improve post-ASCT outcomes and augment HL cure rates. These include use of pre- and post-ASCT salvage therapies and post-ASCT consolidative therapy, with the greatest benefits demonstrated by targeted therapies, such as brentuximab vedotin. However, adoption of these new approaches has been inconsistent across different centers and regions. In this article, we provide a European perspective on the available treatment options and likely future developments in the salvage and consolidation settings, with the aim to improve management of patients with HL who have a high risk of post-ASCT failure. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that early intervention with post-ASCT consolidation improves outcomes in patients with R/R HL who require ASCT. Future approvals of targeted agents are expected to further improve outcomes and provide additional treatment options in the coming age of personalized medicine.

Salvage Therapy for Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Review of Current Regimens and Outcomes

Relapse/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma patients are still a clinical concern. Indeed, despite more effective first-line chemotherapy regimens and better stratification of unresponsive patients by clinical factors and use of early PET, roughly one-third of such patients need salvage chemotherapy and consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy. In this paper, the authors review the different salvage treatments, with special emphasis on newer combinations with brentuximab vedotin or check point inhibitors. The overall response rate is constantly increasing, with a complete remission rate approaching 80%. Functional response evaluation by PET imaging is a strong predictive factor of longer survival, and more sophisticated tools, such as detection of circulating tumour DNA, are emerging to refine the disease-status assessment after treatment. Consolidation by high-dose chemotherapy is still considered the standard of care in chemosensitive patients, leading to a high fraction of patients towards long-term disease control. Maintenance therapy with BV is now approved, reducing disease relapse/progression. An increasing number of Hodgkin lymphoma patients will be cured after first- and second-line therapy, and long-term toxicity needs to be continuously assessed and avoided.

CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen compared with CEOP as the first-line therapy for newly diagnosed patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma: results from a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy is widely used in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Here we conducted a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, comparing the efficacy and safety of CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen with CEOP in newly diagnosed PTCL.

METHODS

PTCL patients, except for anaplastic large cell lymphoma-anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive, were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive CEOP/IVE/GDP (CEOP, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, epirubicin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1, and prednisone 60 mg/m2 [maximum 100 mg] on days 1-5 every 21 days, at the first and fourth cycle; IVE, ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2 on days 1-3, epirubicin 70 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 21 days, at the second and fifth cycle; and GDP, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 every 21 days, at the third and sixth cycle) and CEOP (every 21 days for 6 cycles). Analysis of efficacy and safety was of the intent-to-treatment population. The primary endpoint was a complete response rate at the end of treatment. Meanwhile, whole exome sequencing and targeted sequencing were performed in 62 patients with available tumor samples to explore prognostic biomarkers in this cohort as an exploratory post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Among 106 patients, 53 each were enrolled to CEOP/IVE/GDP and CEOP. With 51 evaluable patients each in two groups, a complete response rate of the CEOP/IVE/GDP group was similar to that of the CEOP group (37.3% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.532). There was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS; 15.4 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.122) or overall survival (OS; 24.3 months vs. 21.9 months, p = 0.178). Grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were comparable. Histone modification genes were most frequently mutated (25/62, 40.3%), namely KMT2D, KMT2A, SETD2, EP300, and CREBBP. Multivariate analysis indicated that CREBBP and IDH2 mutations were independent factors predicting poor PFS and OS (all p < 0.001), while KMT2D predicting poor PFS (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen showed no remission or survival advantage to standard chemotherapy. Future clinical trials should aim to develop alternative regimen targeting disease biology as demonstrated by recurrent mutations in epigenetic factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02533700) on August 27, 2015.

Risk and Response Adapted Treatment Guidelines for Managing First Relapsed and Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in Children and Young People. Recommendations from the EuroNet Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Group

The objective of this guideline is to aid clinicians in making individual salvage treatment plans for pediatric and adolescent patients with first relapse or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). While salvage with standard dose chemotherapy followed by high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant is often considered the standard of care in adult practice, pediatric practice adopts a more individualized risk stratified and response adapted approach to salvage treatment with greater use of non-transplant salvage. Here, we present on behalf of the EuroNet Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma group, evidence and consensus-based guidelines for standardized diagnostic, prognostic and response procedures to allocate children and adolescents with R/R cHL to stratified salvage treatments.

Brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma: an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial

Background:

The major objective of this study was to explore the safety and clinical activity of Brentuximab vedotin (Bv) and bendamustine in combination in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. Bv produces high response rates and durable progression-free survival (PFS) in CD30-expressing lymphomas and is approved for the treatment of relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and relapsed ALCL. Bendamustine (B) is active agent across the lymphoproliferative malignancies, though the PFS among patients with HL and PTCL is modest.

Methods:

This was an international, multicenter, single-arm, Phase 1–2 study of BvB in patients with relapsed or refractory HL and ALCL. Eligible patients were required to have relapsed/refractory CD30+ biopsy proven HL or ALCL and an ECOG Performance Status ≤2. In the Phase 1, HL patients were deemed eligible if they developed progressive disease following or after declining ASCT, or had at least 2 prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens. In the Phase 2, patients with HL were eligible if they had relapsed or refractory disease after one line of therapy. Eligible ALCL patients were required to have relapsed after at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen and if they were not eligible for or have declined ASCT. The primary objective of the Phase I portion of this study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT). The primary endpoint of the Phase 2 portion was to determine the overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR])) based on an intention to treat analysis (ITT). Secondary objectives of Phase 1–2 included assessing for duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival. Response was evaluated using International Harmonization Project Group 2007 Revised Response Criteria. Bv was escalated from 1.2mg/kg Day 1, and B from 70mg/m2 Days 1 and 2 every 21 days until the MTD or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was reached. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01657331.

Findings:

65 patients (only 1 ALCL) were treated, 28 on the Phase 1 and 37 on the phase 2. While the MTD of the combination was not reached, the single agent MTD of Bv (1.8mg/kg Day 1) and RP2D of B (90mg/m2 Days 1 and 2) were identified as the RP2D of the combination. Patients were heavily treated, 65% (42 of 65) had an autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant or both. The Phase 1 revealed modest toxicity. The major Grade 3/4 toxicities included Grade 3 lung infection in 5 (14%) patients in the Phase 2, and Grade 3/4 neutropenia in 13 (24%) patients across the Phase 1 and 2. The Phase 1 and 2 overall response rates (ORR) were 61% and 78% respectively, with 43% (16 of 27) patients treated in the Phase 2 attaining a complete remission (CR). In the Phase 2, the median PFS has not been reached and duration of response (DOR) was 3.4 months. There was a total of 23 deaths with 21 due to progression of disease, 2 occurring after being transplanted, and none of which were treatment related.

Interpretation:

This demonstrates that BvB might be an effective salvage regimen for patients with HL, with a favorable safety profile.

Funding:

Seattle Genetics, The Lymphoma Research Fund of Columbia University and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant Number UL1TR001873 provided support for this investigator initiated sponsored trial. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Dose-Modified Ifosfamide, Epirubicin, and Etoposide is a Safe and Effective Salvage Therapy with High Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Capacity for Poorly Mobilized Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients

A dose modified ifosfamide, epirubicin, and etoposide (IVE) regimen was prospectively assessed for its efficacy in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation. Two patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma and two with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were undergoing stem cell therapy were studied. All patients had a history of multiple treatments with insufficient stem cell mobilization. The dose modified IVE regimen consisted of ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) intravenously (IV) administered on days 1-2 in combination with epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and etoposide 200 mg/m(2) (100 mg/m(2) in two patients with complete remission) IV on days 1-3. The ifosfamide dosage was reduced to two-thirds of the original protocol. A substantial high yield of CD34(+) cells was achieved when patients were treated with a dose-modified IVE regimen, compared with that during the previous regimen (two with the ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide [ICE] regimen, one with high-dose cyclophosphamide and one with the original IVE regimen). Two patients who had refractory and residual disease received a 200 mg/m(2) dose of etoposide, which resulted in tumor reduction (one patient with complete remission and one with further reduction in tumor size). After the IVE regimen, all four patients had a sufficient yield of CD34(+) cells in total, which was available for stem cell transplantation. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were comparable in all regimens. This single-center prospective study demonstrated that the dose-modified IVE regimen can be used as a safe treatment with high mobilizing efficacy in heavily pretreated lymphoma patients.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in secondary prophylaxis for advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with neutropenia. We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare the cost-effectiveness of secondary prophylaxis with G-CSF to a strategy of 'no G-CSF' in response to severe neutropenia for adults with advanced-stage HL treated with ABVD. A Canadian public health payer's perspective was considered and costs were presented in 2013 Canadian dollars. The quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) attained with the G-CSF and 'no G-CSF' strategies were 1.403 and 1.416, respectively. Costs for the strategies with and without G-CSF were $38,971 and $33,982, respectively. In the base case analysis, the 'no G-CSF' strategy was associated with cost savings and improved QALYs; therefore, 'no G-CSF' was the dominant approach. For patients with severe neutropenia during ABVD chemotherapy for advanced-stage HL, a strategy without G-CSF support is associated with improved quality-adjusted outcomes, cost savings, and is the preferred approach.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is one of the most common malignancies in young adults and has become curable for the majority of patients, even in advanced stage. After first-line therapy, 15% to 20% do not respond to treatment and relapse. For those patients, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a frequently used therapy option.

OBJECTIVES

To find the best available treatment with HDCT followed by ASCT for patients with relapsed or refractory HL after first-line treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and relevant conference proceedings up to January 2013 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also contacted experts for unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing HDCT followed by ASCT versus conventional chemotherapy without ASCT, or versus additional sequential HDCT (SHDCT) followed by ASCT. We also included RCTs with different HDCT regimens before ASCT in patients with relapsed or primary refractory HL after any first-line therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (MR, NS) independently selected relevant studies, extracted data and assessed trial quality. We used hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and we calculated risk ratios (RR) for the other outcomes. We presented all measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI).We assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Our search resulted in 1663 potentially relevant references, of which we included three trials with 14 publications, assessing 398 patients. Overall, we judged the quality of the trials as moderate. The trials were all reported as randomised controlled and open-label. We included two RCTs assessing the effect of HDCT followed by ASCT compared with conventional chemotherapy in a meta-analysis. The number of studies was very low, therefore, the quantification of heterogeneity was not reliable. We included one further RCT (one assessing additional SHDCT followed by ASCT versus HDCT followed by ASCT), which was not compatible with our meta-analysis. For this trial, we performed further analyses.Two trials showed a non-statistically significant trend that HDCT followed by ASCT compared to conventional chemotherapy increases OS (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.07; P value = 0.10, 157 patients, moderate quality of evidence). However, the increase in PFS was statistically significant for people treated with HDCT followed by ASCT (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.86; P value = 0.009, 157 patients, moderate quality of evidence). Adverse events were reported in one trial only and did not differ statistically significant between the treatment arms. We were not able to draw conclusions regarding treatment-related mortality (TRM) because of insufficient evidence (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.16 to 2.22; P value = 0.45, 157 patients, moderate quality of evidence).For the second comparison, SHDCT plus HDCT followed by ASCT versus HDCT followed by ASCT there was no difference between the treatment arms regarding OS (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.74; P value = 0.816, three-year OS: 80% SHDCT versus 87% HDCT, 241 patients), or PFS (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.58 to 1.30; P value = 0.505, 241 patients). Seven patients died in the SHDCT arm and one in the HDCT arm due to increased toxicity of the treatment. Adverse events were increased with SHDCT plus HDCT followed by ASCT after two cycles of dexamethasone plus high-dose cytarabine plus cisplatin (DHAP) (88% SHDCT versus 45% HDCT, 223 patients, P value < 0.00001). Overall, more statistically significant World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3/4 infections occurred with SHDCT (48% SHDCT versus 33% HDCT; P value = 0.002, 223 patients).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The currently available evidence suggests a PFS benefit for patients with relapsed or refractory HL after first-line therapy, who are treated with HDCT followed by ASCT compared to patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. In addition, data showes a positive trend regarding OS, but more trials are needed to detect a significant effect.Intensifying the HDCT regime before HDCT followed by ASCT did not show a difference as compared to HDCT followed by ASCT, but was associated with increased adverse events.

Current status of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma

Despite the relatively high long-term disease-free survival (DFS) rate for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with modern combination chemotherapy or combined modality regimens, ∼20% of patients die from progressive or relapsed disease. The standard treatment for relapsed and primary refractory HL is salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which has shown a 5-year progression-free survival rate of ∼50%-60%. Recent developments in a number of diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have begun to improve these results. Functional imaging, refinement of clinical prognostic factors, and development of novel biomarkers have improved the predictive algorithms, allowing better patient selection and timing for ASCT. In addition, these algorithms have begun to identify a group of patients who are candidates for more aggressive treatment beyond standard ASCT. Novel salvage regimens may potentially improve the rate of complete remission prior to ASCT, and the use of maintenance therapy after ASCT has become a subject of current investigation. We present a summary of developments in each of these areas.

The Management of Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Past, Present, and Future

The management of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (CHL) is a success story of modern multi-agent haemato-oncology. Prior to the middle of the twentieth century CHL was fatal in the majority of cases. Introduction of single agent radiotherapy (RT) demonstrated for the first time that these patients could be cured. Developments in chemotherapy including the mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisolone (MOPP) and Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) regimens have resulted in cure rates of over 80%. Even in relapse, CHL patients can be salvaged with high dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Challenges remain, however, in finding new strategies to manage the small number of patients who continue to relapse or progress. In addition, the young age of many Hodgkin's patients forces difficult decisions in balancing the benefit of early disease control against the survival disadvantage of late toxicity. In this article we aim to summarise past trials, define the current standard of care and appraise future developments in the management of CHL.

How I treat relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma is a challenging problem for clinicians who treat hematologic malignancies. The standard management of these patients should include the use of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients who are chemotherapy sensitive. Open issues in this area include the role of functional imaging, the specific chemotherapy regimen to be used before ASCT, and the role of consolidative radiotherapy. Some patients will not be eligible for ASCT, and alternative approaches with conventional chemotherapy alone or with salvage radiotherapy should be considered. Prognostic factors for relapsed/refractory disease have been identified but generally are not used as a part of risk-adapted therapy. Allogeneic transplantation may offer the potential of a graft-versus-lymphoma effect, but this therapy has significant toxicity and results in few long-term disease-free survivors; hence, it should only be offered in the context of disease-specific clinical trials. An expanding list of novel drugs has exhibited promising single-agent activity. Patients have effective options beyond primary therapy, and continued progress through controlled trials remains a tangible goal in the treatment of relapsed and refractory disease.

High-dose chemo-radiotherapy for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and the significance of pre-transplant functional imaging

We previously reported that three risk factors (RF): initial remission duration <1 year, active B symptoms, and extranodal disease predict outcome in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Our goal was to improve event-free survival (EFS) for patients with multiple RF and to determine if response to salvage therapy impacted outcome. We conducted a phase II intent-to-treat study of tailored salvage treatment: patients with zero or one RF received standard-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE); patients with two RF received augmented ICE; patients with three RF received high-dose ICE with stem cell support. This was followed by evaluation with both computed tomography and functional imaging (FI); those with chemosensitive disease underwent high-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). There was no treatment-related mortality. Compared to historical controls this therapy eliminated the difference in EFS between the three prognostic groups. Pre-ASCT FI predicted outcome; 4-year EFS rates was 33% vs. 77% for patients transplanted with positive versus negative FI respectively, P = 0.00004, hazard ratio 4.61. Risk-adapted augmentation of salvage treatment in patients with HL is feasible and improves EFS in poorer-risk patients. Our data suggest that normalisation of FI pre-ASCT predicts outcome, and should be the goal of salvage treatment.

Optimal treatment for relapsing patients with Hodgkin lymphoma

Relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) remains a therapeutic challenge. Patients with relapsed HL should be identified according to their prognostic factors at relapse (duration of remission and extranodal disease or stage). Patients with refractory disease, defined as progression during induction treatment or within 90 days after the end of treatment, have the worst prognosis. Following non-crossresistant salvage chemotherapy to achieve cytoreduction, high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to be better than conventional-dose chemotherapy for first-relapse/refractory HL. For patients with very unfavorable relapse or primary refractory HL, outcome remains poor with HDT. For these patients, the role of tandem HDT or allogeneic stem cell transplantation will be discussed. In this setting, novel investigational treatments will be presented.

Standard therapy of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma

ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine) continues to be the standard of care for patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Consolidation of primary chemotherapy with radiation or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has not demonstrated an improvement in overall survival in randomized controlled trials. Regimens such as escalated BEACOPP have more acute and late toxicities and survival benefits have yet to be confirmed.

Despite effective therapy, ultimately 30% to 40% of patients with advanced HL will relapse. ASCT has become the standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory HL based on two randomized trials. The optimal salvage chemotherapy and high dose therapy regimen are not known. Similarly, non-ASCT strategies including salvage radiotherapy or non-ASCT chemotherapy strategies have been reported and have a potential role in selected clinical scenarios.

This review summarizes recent clinical trial results in the initial treatment of advanced HL and will focus on second-line treatment strategies for patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Extreme Hodgkin's lymphoma: current problem areas

In Hodgkin's lymphoma therapy, there remain areas of extreme difficulty. This article briefly explores these areas and provides evidence that risk-related therapy and web-based data collection programmes can facilitate progress. Unpublished data from the northern region of the UK suggest that risk-based therapy among poor-prognosis Hodgkin's lymphoma patients aged 15-19 years is improving outcome. An index developed at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) for patients undergoing salvage therapy shows that new second-line regimens are urgently needed for those with poor prognosis. In primary therapy and relapse, both adolescent and adult patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma should receive treatment tailored to their degree of risk. Elderly patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma are also difficult to treat and fewer than 2% enter randomised clinical trials. We require new means of encouraging international pooling of data and treatment evaluation in such patients. The SHIELD project (Study of Hodgkin's lymphoma in the Elderly Lymphoma Database; www.shieldstudy.co.uk) is now successfully providing on-line registration in the ongoing phase II study of VEPEMB (vinblastine, cyclophosphamide, procarbazine, prednisolone, mitoxantrone and bleomycin) in the elderly and guidance on obtaining ethical approval for participation.