Efficiency of in vivo purging with rituximab prior to autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in B-cellnon-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a single institution study

Efficacy of ex vivo purging with CD34+ selection to maximize the effects of autologous stem cell transplantation in peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are rare and aggressive tumors with uncertain optimal treatment. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after CD34+ selective purging in PTCL patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis included 67 PTCL patients who achieved remission and underwent HDT/ASCT. CD34+ selective purging was performed using CliniMACS® (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Survival outcomes, engraftment, lymphocyte subsets and viral infections were evaluated.

RESULTS

CD34+ selective purged autografts were associated with significantly improved overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with unpurged autografts (5-year OS, 73.3% versus 37.8%, 5-year DFS, 73.8% versus 33.4%). The cumulative incidence of relapse was also lower in the purged group (31.5% versus 73.3%). Subgroup analysis revealed significant survival benefits in the high-risk group receiving purged autografts. Lymphocyte subset analysis showed increased natural killer (NK) cell counts in the purged group after ASCT. Higher post-ASCT lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was associated with improved OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

CD34+ selective purging in PTCL patients undergoing HDT/ASCT improved survival outcomes and reduced relapse risk. The procedure increased NK cell counts and post-ASCT LMR. CD34+ selective purging may minimize autograft tumor cell contamination and enhance efficacy in T-cell lymphomas.

Rituximab for indolent lymphomas before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The most substantial advancement in the treatment of indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), since the advent of combination chemotherapy, has been the introduction of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. However, the optimal schedule, timing, and duration of rituximab therapy remain controversial.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since its initially reported single-agent activity in 1997, the role of rituximab has greatly expanded and it is now ubiquitously integrated in all treatment phases of indolent NHL. Yet, several questions remain to be addressed: should asymptomatic patients be treated at diagnosis with single-agent rituximab or still kept in watchful waiting, what are the optimal first-line treatments to combine with rituximab, what is the role of maintenance therapy, and is there a benefit in incorporating rituximab in autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation schemes for these diseases? Recent and ongoing clinical trials tackling these relevant issues will be presented and critically discussed in this article.

SUMMARY

Excellent outcomes are reported with rituximab therapy in indolent NHL, both early and late in the disease course. Continued study of this most valuable therapeutic agent is warranted to set the optimal treatment approach leading to cure the majority of patients.

Autologous stem cell transplantation with in vivo purged progenitor cells shows long-term efficacy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown effective in the control of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. We evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with ASCT with in vivo purged progenitors cells. We report the long-term results of a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial on 124 relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma patients treated with a program of anthracycline-based debulking chemotherapy, immunochemotherapy, mobilization of in vivo purged PBSC followed by ASCT. Median age was 52 years; 14% of patients had grade 3A histology. Debulking chemotherapy produced CR in 16% and PR in 71%, while 13% of patients progressed. After rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (R-COP), CR was obtained in 60% and PR in 35%; 118 patients successfully mobilized PBSC and 117 proceeded to ASCT. The harvest in all the 32 molecularly informative patients was bcl-2 negative. TRM was 0%. The 5-year PFS was 54% and the 5-year OS was 83%. After a median f-up of 6.7 years (range 1.5-13.6), 54% are still in CR. These data show that prolonged PFS is achievable in relapsed/refractory patients with high dose autologous transplantation of in vivo purged progenitor cells.

Phase II study of immunomodulation with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-2, and rituximab following autologous stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) leads to durable remissions in approximately half of patients with chemosensitive relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphomas; however, many will relapse despite ASCT secondary to persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) or malignant graft contamination. Post-transplant rituximab may eradicate MRD. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) might enhance the efficacy of rituximab by augmenting antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). We hypothesized that given together, rituximab, GM-CSF, and IL-2 might eradicate MRD and improve event-free survival following ASCT. Forty-six patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) were enrolled. Stem cells were mobilized with G-CSF and GM-CSF following chemotherapy. Following BEAM conditioning, patients received GM-CSF until neutrophil engraftment. Between days + 30 and + 120, patients received one dose of rituximab 375 mg/m(2) (cycle 1), followed by three cycles of GM-CSF 250 microg/m(2)/day SQ days 1-5, IL-2 1.5 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day SQ days 6-12, and rituximab 375 mg/m(2) IV day 9, repeated every 21 days. Thirty-eight patients were eligible for post-ASCT immunotherapy. Nine patients completed 1-2 cycles and 21 completed 3-4 cycles; eight patients did not receive post-ASCT immunotherapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the estimated 5-year OS and EFS for all patients eligible for immunotherapy are 65% and 45%, respectively. Post-ASCT immunomodulation with rituximab, IL-2, and GM-CSF was feasible and safe, but not all patients were able to continue on to post-ASCT immunotherapy.

The role of rituximab in autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy has substantially changed the treatment strategies for patients with B-cell lymphomas. Rituximab, combined with standard chemotherapy regimens, shows consistently improved results compared with chemotherapy alone and has been extensively employed in both newly diagnosed and relapsed patients with B-cell lymphoma. Because of its low toxicity profile and its potent antilymphoma activity mediated through direct apoptotic and indirect effector mechanisms, rituximab also has been actively incorporated into stem cell transplantation (SCT) protocols to attain a state of minimal disease, provide a safe and effective method for in vivo purging prior to autologous SCT, and promote graft-versus-lymphoma effects in allogeneic SCT. This review compiles the still immature but rapidly growing data on this combined modality.

Rituximab does not adversely affect the stem cell mobilization and engraftment after high-dose therapy and autologous transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in first complete or partial remission

AIMS AND METHODS

The goal was to investigate the effect of prior combined rituximab (R) and intensive chemotherapy on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and their engraftment after stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 69 patients with poor-risk, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

RESULTS

A statistically comparable median number of CD34+ stem cells was collected in both groups (13.80x10(6)/ kg in the non-R group and 7.81x10(6)/kg in the R group; p = 0.110). A trend toward greater number of CFU-GM was found in the non-R group (98.1x10(4)/kg) compared to the R group (76.6x10(4)/kg; p = 0.068). The non-R patients had a much higher median number of BFU-E (90.9x10(4)/kg) than the R patients (31.3x10(4)/kg; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hematopoietic engraftment was rapid for both groups and no different between them. The 3-year event-free survival was 90.4 % in the R group and 67.2 % in the non-R group (p = 0.04), but there was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival (94,7 % vs 83,5 %; p = 0.179).

Advanced-stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: when should patients receive anthracycline-based chemotherapy?

Follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common subtype of indolent lymphoma, is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage (III-IV), although patients are often asymptomatic. Traditionally, a palliative approach to management has been taken, cycling through watchful waiting, radiotherapy, oral alkylating agents and, eventually, combination chemotherapy, as deemed necessary. However, accumulating evidence suggests that in patients requiring treatment, early initiation of an anthracycline-based regimen may achieve better response rates and progression-free survival compared with reserving such options until late in the course of disease. Delivery of myelosuppressive chemotherapy has been facilitated by the availability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors. Incorporation of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab into upfront chemotherapy regimens further improves outcomes. With a trend towards early use of rituximab chemotherapy combinations, median survival appears to have increased in patients with FL. A number of issues remain to be addressed by ongoing research. These include identification of the most effective rituximab chemotherapy regimen, the impact of treatment on responsiveness to future treatment, the need for rituximab maintenance therapy and the place of newer treatments. Clearly, there are arguments in favour of considering early aggressive rituximab and chemotherapy regimens in patients with FL requiring treatment, and it is hoped that new prognostic tools will help us to more accurately identify which patients are most likely to benefit.

Post-autologous stem cell transplantation administration of rituximab improves the outcome of patients with aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The major cause of treatment failure following high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is persistent disease or recurrence. We describe our experience with the administration of rituximab post-ASCT, either as maintenance therapy or for the treatment of relapsed disease in patients with aggressive B cell NHL. Fifty-six patients achieved complete remission post-transplant, and 19 of them received maintenance with rituximab. Maintenance with rituximab resulted in statistically significant superior outcome in terms of progression free (PFS; p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.011). The median PFS and OS of patients in the maintenance arm has not been reached yet, while the median PFS and OS of patients in the control arm were 29 and 42 months, respectively. Fifty-four patients had disease progression or relapsed post-ASCT, and 15 of them received rituximab in combination with chemo- and/or radiotherapy in order to achieve disease remission. Therapeutic administration of rituximab resulted in statistically significant prolongation of OS (p = 0.021). The median OS of patients treated with rituximab was 17 months, while median OS of patients in the control group was 10 months. We consider that the results of our study are promising but need to be verified within large randomized trials.

High-dose therapy followed by autologous purged stem cell transplantation and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: a randomized multicenter study by the GOELAMS with final results after a median follow-up of 9 years

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line therapy for follicular lymphoma (FL) remains controversial. The multicenter study randomized 172 patients with untreated FL for either immunochemotherapy or high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by purged ASCT. Conditioning was performed with total body irradiation (TBI) and cyclophosphamide. The 9-year overall survival (OS) was similar in the HDT and conventional chemotherapy groups (76% and 80%, respectively). The 9-year progression-free survival (PFS) was higher in the ASCT than the chemotherapy group (64% vs 39%; P = .004). A PFS plateau was observed in the HDT group after 7 years. On multivariate analysis, OS and PFS were independently affected by the per-formance status score, the number of nodal areas involved, and the treatment group. Secondary malignancies were more frequent in the HDT than in the chemotherapy group (6 secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia and 6 second solid tumor cancers vs 1 acute myeloid leukemia, P = .01). The occurrence of a PFS plateau suggests that a subgroup of patients might have their FL cured by ASCT. However, the increased rate of secondary malignancies may discourage the use of purged ASCT in combination with TBI as first-line treatment for FL. This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00696735.

Stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) includes a diverse set of conditions ranging from high-grade aggressive to more indolent low-grade disease. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has a valuable role in the management of these conditions and can provide long-term remission in selected cases. This article presents the current use of allogeneic and autologous HSCT in a number of subtypes of NHL.

Rituximab purging and maintenance combined with auto-SCT: long-term molecular remissions and prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia in relapsed follicular lymphoma

We enrolled 23 patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) in a prospective single-arm study of auto-SCT combined with in vivo rituximab graft purging and post transplant rituximab maintenance. Minimal residual disease was monitored with quantitative PCR testing. With a median follow-up of 74.2 months, neither median overall survival (OS) nor PFS has been reached. Here, 5-year OS and 5-year PFS are 78% (95% confidence interval (CI) 61-95%) and 59% (95% CI 38-80%), respectively. Time to progression (TTP) with the experimental regimen was significantly improved compared with TTP with the last prior treatment (P<0.001). Durable molecular remissions occurred in 11 of 13 assessable patients. PFS was significantly longer in patients who achieved a molecular remission by 3 months post-auto-SCT (P=0.001). Prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in most patients; however, no increase in major infections was observed.

Disease staging with positron emission tomography or gallium scanning and use of rituximab predict outcome for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with autologous stem cell transplantation

Tumor status, as determined by positron emission tomography or gallium scanning (PET/G), may be an important predictor of outcome for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ASCT conditioning regimens that include rituximab may reduce the rate of relapse. We evaluated the influence of rituximab on overall and progression-free survival in patients with DLBCL based on PET/G status before ASCT. A retrospective review of all patients with chemosensitive DLBCL who underwent ASCT in the context of research protocols at our institution between 1995 and 2005 was performed. Our study included 174 patients. Disease status before ASCT, according to PET/G, was negative in 136 patients (78%), positive in 29 patients (17%), and unknown in nine patients (5%). PET/G status and rituximab use were the only factors predictive of progression-free survival in multivariate analyses: the hazard ratios for relapse were 2.9 for PET/G-positive versus -negative patients (P < 0.001) and 0.4 for rituximab versus no rituximab use (P = 0.001). We conclude that evidence of disease on PET/G scanning prior to transplantation is associated with an increased risk for relapse after ASCT. Transplantation regimens containing rituximab can reduce this risk, regardless of PET/G status.

Rituximab improves the efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy with autograft for high-risk follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a multicenter Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei linfomi survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of adding rituximab to intensive chemotherapy with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and follicular lymphoma (FL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 10 centers associated with Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innnovative nei Linfomi for 522 patients with DLB-CL and 223 patients with FL (median age, 47 years) who received the original or a modified high-dose sequential (HDS) chemotherapy regimen. HDS was delivered to 396 patients without (R-) and to 349 patients with (R+) rituximab; 154 (39%) and 178 patients (51%) in the R- and R+ subsets, respectively, underwent HDS for relapsed/refractory disease.

RESULTS

A total of 355 R- (90%) and 309 R+ patients (88%) completed the final PBPC autograft. Early treatment-related mortality was 3.3% for R- and 2.8% for R+ (P = not significant). Two parameters significantly influenced the outcome: disease status at HDS, with 5-year overall survival (OS) projections of 69% versus 57% for diagnosis versus refractory/relapsed status, respectively, and rituximab addition, with 5-year OS of 69% versus 60% in the R+ versus R- groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, these two variables maintained an independent prognostic value. The marked benefit of rituximab was evident in patients receiving HDS as salvage treatment: the 5-year OS projections for R+ versus R- were, respectively, 64% versus 38%, for patients with refractory disease or early relapse and 71% versus 57%, for patients with late relapse, partial response, or second/third relapse.

CONCLUSION

The results of this large series indicate that rituximab should be included in the current practice of PBPC autograft for DLB-CL and FL.

Immunochemotherapy with in vivo purging and autotransplant induces long clinical and molecular remission in advanced relapsed and refractory follicular lymphoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, in vivo purging and high-dose therapy with autotransplant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled in the trial. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were the in vivo purging effect on stem-cell harvest and the impact of molecular response on the outcome.

RESULTS

At enrollment, 59% of patients were PCR+ for bcl-2 rearrangement in bone marrow (PCR-informative). After the immunochemotherapy, before mobilization, 97% obtained complete response or partial response and 87% of patients informative for bcl-2 were molecularly negative. Sixty-one patients proceeded to in vivo purging and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization with rituximab and high-dose AraC. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 16.6 x 10(6)/kg. Of 33 PCR-informative patients, the harvests resulted in PCR- in all. Fifty-eight patients received high-dose therapy and autotransplant of in vivo purged PBSC. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 41 patients are in complete remission. Five-year PFS is 59%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with advanced relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy, in vivo purging and autotransplant may obtain long-lasting PFS. In bcl-2-positive patients, in vivo purging allows the harvest of lymphoma-free PBSC. Absence of the bcl-2 rearrangement after autotransplant is associated with persistent clinical remission.

Immunotherapy in mantle cell lymphoma: anti-CD20-based therapy and beyond

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma characterized by t(11; 14)(q13; q32) chromosomal translocation and overexpression of cyclin D1, has the worst prognosis among all lymphomas. Recent advances in biology, genetics, and immunology have supported the development of immunotherapy in MCL. Rituximab monotherapy in MCL has limited activity. It is more effective when used in combination with chemotherapy such as R-CHOP, R-hyperCVAD/MTX-Ara-C, or R-FCM as front-line or salvage therapy for mantle cell lymphoma. Maintenance with Rituximab was shown to prolong response duration. Although most results have suggested that combining autologous stem cell transplantation with Rituximab may lead to durable remission, the sample size was not sufficient to declare survival benefit. Anti-CD20 radioimmunoconjugates (RICs) (90)Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan and (131)Iodine-tositumomab have been used in mantle cell lymphoma even when patients are relatively resistant to Rituximab-based therapy. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a treatment modality in advanced or relapsed MCL, particularly using reduced-intensity conditioning. MCL may have high response rates and sustained remissions after donor lymphocyte infusion. Dendritic cells (DCs) fused with MCL cells for immunostimulation have preliminarily shown anti-lymphoma effects as well. Idiotype vaccination in MCL patients following Rituximab-containing chemotherapy induced tumor-specific T-cell immunity in the absence of B cells. Other immunotherapy, such as the combination of thalidomide with Rituximab, has shown substantial antitumor activity. A Phase I/II study is ongoing to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the efficacy of lenalidomide in combination with Rituximab for relapsed/refractory MCL. This review summarizes the latest and exciting advances in MCL.

The efficacy of rituximab plus Hyper-CVAD regimen in mantle cell lymphoma is independent of FCgammaRIIIa and FCgammaRIIa polymorphisms

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 3-10% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, with median overall survival not exceeding 3-4 years. Rituximab in combination with the Hyper-CVAD regimen appears the most promising regimen; thus, we adopted it as a first-line treatment strategy in a series of 24 patients. In addition to evaluation of clinical success of the regimen, we investigated a possible role of polymorphism in IgG Fc receptors, FCgammaRIIIa and FCgammaRIIa. The frequencies of FCgammaRIIIa-158 were as follows: V/V=4/24 (17%); V/F=16/24 (66%); F/F=4/24 (17%). Those of the FCgammaRIIa-131 polymorphism were H/H=11/24 (46%), H/R=9/24 (37%), R/R=4/24 (17%). The overall response rate was 62.5%, with 33% of complete responses (CRs) after four cycles of R-Hyper-CVAD. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 78% for 158V/V patients vs 75% for cases carrying phenylalanine (p=0.88). When the FCgammaRIIa polymorphism was assessed, the 2-year PFS was 82% for 131H/H patients vs 75% for those carrying arginine (p=0.26). Eighty-three percent of cases achieved Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-negativity: the progression rate was significantly influenced by the minimal residual disease clearance, with 12% progression in the subgroup of PCR-negative cases versus 67% progression in PCR-positive cases (p=0.008). The achievement of PCRnegativity was not significantly influenced by FCgammaR polymorphisms. Results confirm that rituximab plus Hyper-CVAD is an effective regimen for the induction of prolonged remission in patients with aggressive MCL and suggest that rituximab efficacy is independent of the FCgammaR polymorphisms.

Introduction to B-Cell Disorders

Healthcare professionals have a good understanding of B cells in normal immunity. Although the role of lymphocytes and the lymphoid system in lymphoma is understood, the role of B cells is less clear in several autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and autoimmune hemolytic anemia. This article will present an overview of malignant and nonmalignant B-cell disorders. Experts hypothesize that some monoclonal antibodies can deplete the B-cell population and prevent B- and T-cell responses in autoimmune diseases. Nurses should understand the data surrounding monoclonal therapy, which are not always presented clearly. Nurses' ability to interpret data is important to their patients and colleagues.

Rituximab-ESHAP as a mobilization regimen for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas: a comparison with ESHAP

BACKGROUND

It has previously been shown that ESHAP was an effective mobilization regimen for patients with pretreated lymphoma. To extend these observations, the efficacy and feasibility of rituximab plus ESHAP regimen in CD20+ B-cell NHL were assessed.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The mobilization efficacy and engraftment characteristics were compared in the 22 patients who received the rituximab plus ESHAP (R-ESHAP) with 33 historical controls who received ESHAP.

RESULTS

The two treatment groups were well matched in patient characteristics. In the R-ESHAP group, 62 pheresis procedures were performed. Apheresis procedures were started on median Day 16 (range, Days 13-18). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 10.6 x 10(6) per kg (range, 4.9 x 10(6)-52.6 x 10(6)/kg). Nineteen (95%) patients achieved optimal peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, defined as at least 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to mobilization efficacy. Sixteen patients in the R-ESHAP group (73%) underwent autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (APBPCT). The median time to absolute neutrophil count at least 0.5 x 10(9) per L was 10 days (range, 8-17 days), and the median time to a platelet count of at least 20 x 10(9) per L was 12 days (range, 7-27 days). Lymphocyte recovery was slower in the R-ESHAP group, but the rate of infectious complications was similar in the two groups. In the R-ESHAP group, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival after APBPCT were 63.2 and 57.4 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Addition of rituximab to ESHAP chemotherapy did not have any adverse effects on PBPC mobilization. Further studies are needed, however, to determine whether addition of rituximab improves outcomes.

Prolonged survival in poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following front-line treatment with rituximab-supplemented, early-intensified chemotherapy with multiple autologous hematopoietic stem cell support: a multicenter study by GITIL (Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi)

A prospective multicenter program was performed to evaluate the combination of rituximab and high-dose (hd) sequential chemotherapy delivered with multiple autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support (R-HDS-maps regimen) in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLB-CL) and age-adjusted International Prognostic Score (aaIPI) score 2-3. R-HDS-maps includes: (i) three APO courses; (ii) sequential administration of hd-cyclophosphamide (CY), hd-Ara-C, both supplemented with rituximab, hd-etoposide/cisplatin, PBPC harvests, following hd-CY and hd-Ara-C; (iii) hd-mitoxantrone (hd-Mito)/L-Pam + 2 further rituximab doses; (iv) involved-field radiotherapy. PBPC rescue was scheduled following Ara-C, etoposide/cisplatin and Mito/L-Pam. Between 1999 and 2004, 112 consecutive patients aged <65 years (74 score 2, 38 score 3) entered the study protocol. There were five early and two late toxic deaths. Overall 90 patients (80%) reached clinical remission (CR); at a median 48 months follow-up, 87 (78%) patients are alive, 82 (73%) in continuous CR, with 4 year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) projections of 76% (CI 68-85%) and 73% (CI 64-81%), respectively. There were no significant differences in OS and EFS between subgroups with Germinal-Center and Activated B-cell phenotype. Thus, life expectancy of younger patients with aaIPI 2-3 DLB-CL is improved with the early administration of rituximab-supplemented intensive chemotherapy compared with the poor outcome following conventional chemotherapy.

Rituximab therapy in malignant lymphoma

Rituximab is the first monoclonal antibody to have been registered for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Randomized studies have demonstrated its activity in follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in untreated or relapsing patients. Non-comparative studies have shown an activity in all other lymphomas. Because of its high activity and low toxicity ratio, rituximab has transformed the outcome of patients with B-cell lymphoma. A combination of rituximab plus chemotherapy, rituximab+cyclophosphamide+doxorubicin+vincristine+prednisolone (R-CHOP), has the highest efficacy ever described with any chemotherapy in DLBCL and FL. Some patients are refractory to rituximab but the precise mechanisms of this refractoriness are not understood.

High-dose rituximab does not negatively affect peripheral blood stem cell mobilization kinetics in patients with intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Rituximab, an anti-CD20 human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody has been shown to improve response rates when it is combined with standard salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A vast majority of these patients subsequently undergo high-dose therapy followed by stem cell transplantation. However, the impact of rituximab on stem cell mobilization kinetics is not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to study the effect of high-dose rituximab given with chemotherapy on stem cell mobilization in patients with intermediate-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Thirty-six patients received ifosfamide, etoposide, and rituximab followed by filgrastim for stem cell mobilization. The chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated. Thirty-four of 36 patients (94%) were able to mobilize at least 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight after a median of 2 apheresis procedures. The median CD34+ cell dose collected per kilogram of recipient body weight was 6.5 x 10(6) (range, 4.65-31.15). All patients who subsequently underwent high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation experienced sustained engraftment. In conclusion, high-dose rituximab given during stem cell mobilization does not negatively affect stem cell mobilization kinetics.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Following Myeloablative Therapy and Autologous Transplantation of CD34+-Selected Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells

Graft engineering by CD34(+) selection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) has been used in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with the aim to reduce relapse related to tumor cells within the graft. From September 1995 to January 2000, 39 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 31) or relapsed (n = 8) NHL were treated in our institution with myeloablative therapy followed by CD34(+) selected autologous PBPC transplantation. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with follicular lymphoma, and eight patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. All patients had advanced disease (26% of patients stage III and 74% stage IV, Ann Arbor classification). Induction therapy resulted in a complete remission in 17 patients and a partial remission in 22 patients. PBPC were mobilized after cytotoxic chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. CD34(+) selection was performed using immunomagnetic beads (Baxter Isolex 300SA or 300i Magnetic Cell Separation System). Most patients (85%) received total body irradiation and high-dose cyclophosphamide as myeloablative regimen. Twelve patients also received rituximab 375 mg/m(2) before radiation and before the start of the cyclophosphamide treatment. The mean CD34(+) cell number for transplantation was 6.5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg of body weight. Platelet recovery (>20,000/microl median on day 13) and leukocyte recovery (>1,000/microl median on day 12) were within expected range. The estimated median follow-up was 47 months. The probabilities of freedom from progression, overall survival, and event-free survival 4 years after transplantation were 96%, 90%, and 87%, respectively, for patients with follicular lymphoma and 42%, 63%, and 33%, respectively, for patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. Risk factors for relapse were age and extranodal manifestation of disease. The rate of lethal infections in the 12-month follow-up period was 8%. We conclude that CD34(+) selection of autologous transplants following myeloablative therapy is feasible and results in long-term remission in the majority of patients, but the procedure is probably related to a higher rate of lethal infections.

Monoclonal antibody as therapy for malignant lymphomas

Rituximab was the first monoclonal antibody to have been registered for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Randomized studies have demonstrated its activity in follicular lymphoma, mantle-cell lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in untreated or relapsing patients. Because of its high activity and low toxicity ratio, rituximab has transformed the outcome of patients with B-cell lymphoma. A combination of rituximab plus chemotherapy, R-CHOP, has the highest efficacy ever described with any chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma. The role of radio-labelled antibodies is still to be defined.

Randomised comparison of two B-cell purging protocols for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: in vivo purging with rituximab versus ex vivo purging with CliniMACS CD34 cell enrichment device

We investigated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of two B-cell purging methods in patients with CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving autologous stsem cell transplantation. Myeloid and immune recoveries between the methods were compared. Twenty-seven patients were randomised to either in vivo purging with rituximab or ex vivo purging by CD34+ cell selection. Both purging methods were efficient at eliminating B-cells in infusates. When compared with in vivo purging, ex vivo purging was associated with CD34+ cell loss and delayed median neutrophil (10 d vs. 11 d) and platelet (12.5 d vs. 17 d) count recoveries. Lymphocyte recovery was similar in both groups, but immunoglobulin recovery was delayed after in vivo purging. Late-infectious complications were few in both arms. At a median follow-up of 27 months, 2-year probabilities of event-free survival (EFS) rates were 81% for in vivo purging and 76% for ex vivo purging (P = 0.66). When compared with 53 unpurged patients, all 27 purged patients had improved 3-year probabilities of overall survival (89% vs. 70%, P = 0.014) and a trend for improved EFS (78% vs. 57%, P = 0.075). In conclusion, although both purging methods were feasible and safe, rituximab purging was superior as it did not impair CD34+ cell mobilisation and was associated with faster myeloid recovery. Further studies are needed to determine whether rituximab purging is more effective than the use of unpurged autografts.

Stem cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: if, when and how?

Although the prognosis for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients has improved in recent years, the outlook for those with advanced or recurrent disease remains poor. High-dose chemotherapy and autografting performed early in responding patients appears to be a method to extend progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The use of monoclonal antibody therapy added into the initial therapy and in the peritransplant period may improve on these results. Myeloablative allogeneic transplant appears to be a modality capable of providing curative therapy, but is plagued by a high treatment-related mortality, especially in older patients. Reduced-intensity conditioning allografting have fewer problems associated with the initial phase of transplant and hence may be preferred for those patients for whom an allograft is considered but have comorbid conditions or age issues that preclude a full allograft. Long-term results are lacking and the side effects associated with chronic GVHD may be as significant and debilitating. Trials designed to look at newly diagnosed patients with MCL examining the outcomes after planned autologous and allogeneic transplant as part of the initial management are needed to confirm the role of these various modalities in the overall therapy of this poor-outcome lymphoma.

Autologous transplantation followed closely by reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation as consolidative immunotherapy in advanced lymphoma patients: a feasibility study

We report outcomes in advanced lymphoma patients (n = 32) who enrolled in a trial of prospectively planned combined autologous/reduced-intensity transplantation (RIT) (n = 25) or who received RIT shortly after prior autografting because of high relapse risk or progressive disease (n = 7). Nine patients on the autologous/RIT transplant protocol did not proceed to planned RIT because of patient choice (n = 4), disease progression (n = 3), toxicity (n = 1), or no adequate donor (n = 1). Among the 23 other patients, RIT was started a median of 59 days (range 31-123) after autologous transplant. Fifteen patients had related donors, five patients had unrelated donors, and three patients had cord blood donors. Among all patients completing RIT, the median overall survival time was 385 days (95% CI 272-792), and the median relapse-free survival time was 157 days (95% CI 119-385). At the time of reporting, six patients (26%) remain alive and three patients (13%) remain alive without relapse. The 100-day transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 9% among all patients and was 0% among matched sibling donors. Overall TRM was 43%. Tandem transplant is feasible in advanced lymphoma with low early TRM. However, practical challenges associated with the strategy were significant and high levels of late TRM due to graft-versus-host disease and infections suggest that modifications of the procedure will be needed to improve outcomes and patient retention.

Tolerability and safety of rituximab (MabThera)

Rituximab, a human/mouse chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, has become part of standard therapy for patients with CD20-expressing B-cell lymphoma, and is currently under investigation for other indications including autoimmune diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its characteristic tolerability profile was established soon after clinical testing began and compares favourably with chemotherapy. The majority of patients experience mild to moderate infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first administration of rituximab, but the incidence decreases markedly with subsequent infusions. Current data suggest that the type of adverse events in patients with RA are similar to those in lymphoma, but that adverse events related to the rituximab infusions are less severe and less frequent. Rituximab induces a rapid depletion of normal CD20-expressing B-cells in the peripheral blood, and levels remain low or undetectable for 2-6 months before returning to pretreatment levels, generally within 12 months. Serum immunoglobulin levels remain largely stable, although a reduction in IgM has been described. T-cells are unaffected by rituximab and consequently opportunistic infections rarely occur in association with rituximab therapy. When used in combination with a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, rituximab does not add to the toxicity of chemotherapy, with the exception of a higher rate of neutropenia. However, this does not translate into a higher infection rate. Over 540,000 patients worldwide have now received rituximab and serious adverse reactions have occurred in a small minority of patients, but for the great majority of patients, rituximab is safe and well tolerated.

Primary Allogeneic T-Cell Responses against Mantle Cell Lymphoma Antigen-Presenting Cells for Adoptive Immunotherapy after Stem Cell Transplantation

PURPOSE

In patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), complete sustained remissions have been observed illustrating susceptibility of MCL cells to a graft-versus-lymphoma effect. To potentiate this graft-versus-lymphoma effect, adoptive transfer of in vitro selected MCL-specific CTL can be an attractive approach. The lack of expression of costimulatory molecules on MCL cells hampers the generation of MCL-reactive T-cell responses. The purpose of this study was to modify MCL cells into antigen-presenting cells (APC) and to use these MCL-APCs to induce allogeneic MCL-reactive T-cell responses.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, CpG, and CD40 activation were tested for their capacity to up-regulate costimulatory molecules on MCL cells. Primary MCL cells or the modified MCL-APCs were then used to evaluate the induction of MCL-reactive T-cell responses in HLA-matched donors.

RESULTS

Ligation of CD40 on MCL cells was essential to up-regulate costimulatory molecules and to induce production of high amounts of IL-12. In contrast to primary MCL cells, MCL-APC cells as stimulators were capable of inducing CD8+ CTL lines from HLA class I-matched donors. High numbers of CTL clones could be generated capable of efficiently killing the primary MCL cells and MCL-APC but not donor-specific targets.

CONCLUSION

These results show the feasibility to generate primary allogeneic T-cell responses against MCL-APC, and may provide new immunotherapeutic tools to further exploit the graft-versus-lymphoma effect following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with MCL.

Evolving role of rituximab in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Rituximab is the first monoclonal antibody to have been registered for the treatment of B-cell lymphomas. Randomized studies have demonstrated its activity in follicular lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in untreated or relapsing patients. Rituximab has transformed the outcome of these patients because of its high activity and low toxicity. A combination of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, has the highest efficacy ever described with any chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma.

Follicular lymphoma: time for a re-think?

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a malignancy of follicle centre B cells that have at least a partially follicular pattern, and is the commonest type of indolent Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Except in the subset of patients with localized disease, FL should still be regarded as an incurable malignancy with a relentless relapsing/remitting course. However, the provocative new data covered by this review (including anti-CD20 antibody therapy, BCL-2, radioimmunotherapy, new chemotherapeutic agents and anti-idiotype vaccination), provides much cause for excitement and guarded optimism. Rituximab represents a novel treatment approach for a variety of disease settings, with a proven excellent efficacy and toxicity profile. Long-term data is required to establish whether its use translates into survival benefit. As the clinical activity of rituximab and other new therapeutic approaches becomes established, it will be important to determine how best to integrate these results into the standard care of patients with follicular lymphoma.

Bone marrow transplantation for lymphoma CR1

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite several reports showing the superiority of autologous stem cell transplantation over conventional chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, its use as part of first-line therapy in this disease is still controversial. The review highlights the most relevant studies on autologous stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma at diagnosis published over the past year.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have shown that autologous stem cell transplantation may offer survival benefits in patients with both diffuse large cell lymphoma and follicular cell lymphoma whose prognostic features are poor. An advantage of autologous stem cell transplantation has also been documented for other non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes, in particular mantle-cell lymphoma, in which autologous stem cell transplantation is probably the most effective first-line option presently available. Nevertheless, whether autologous stem cell transplantation is definitely better than conventional chemotherapy is still under discussion, and the issue is still less clear, given the new opportunities offered by rituximab combined with chemotherapy. Autologous stem cell transplantation may also benefit from the addition of rituximab as an in vivo purging agent. Thus, large randomized trials are required to fully define the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in first-line treatment for high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Such trials should compare autologous stem cell transplantation with chemotherapy, both supplemented with rituximab, in the most frequent CD20+ lymphoma subtypes. The up-front use of autologous stem cell transplantation might find support from the recent observation that patients who do not respond to this treatment may still have a good chance of being rescued by reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation.

SUMMARY

Autologous stem cell transplantation remains a valid research strategy in first-line therapy and, along with new agents and nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation, may help to increase the cure rate for high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

B-cell purging in autologous stem-cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Autologous stem-cell transplantation is a common therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. However, a concern with the procedure is the potential of malignant cells to reinfuse with the stem-cell graft. Thus attempts have been made to purge, or eliminate, malignant cells from the graft. The oldest, and most well studied, method for prevention of reinfusion is in vitro use of antibodies against B cells that bind or lyse malignant B cells and healthy cells, while leaving T cells and stem cells to be reinfused. In the past 5 years, investigators have used rituximab, an antibody against CD20, to purge malignant cells in vivo without any manipulation in vitro. Both conventional and new techniques have shown promise, but their exact role remains to be defined. We analysed data on the purging of B cells by use of antibodies in the setting of autologous transplantation, with emphasis on the emerging technique of in vivo purging.

A model of in vivo purging with Rituximab and high-dose AraC in follicular and mantle cell lymphoma

We studied a model of in vivo purging with Rituximab and high-dose (HD) cytarabine in 14 patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma and two with refractory mantle cell lymphoma enrolled in a program of HD chemotherapy and autotransplant. After two courses of debulking immunochemotherapy with Rituximab, Vincristine and Cyclophosphamide, we used a combination of Rituximab, HD cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) mobilization. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 14.69 x 10(6)/kg (range 5.74-73.2). Monitoring of peripheral CD19+ and CD20+ B cells prior to and throughout the purging period showed that a treatment with Rituximab, Vincristine and Cyclophosphamide results in a profound depletion of B cells in peripheral blood. B-cell depletion persists during mobilization with Rituximab and HD cytarabine allowing a collection of PBSC free of B cells (median CD19+ and CD20+ cells counts 0%). Of nine patients PCR positive for bcl-2 or bcl-1 in blood and marrow at the start of immunochemotherapy, all showed PCR-negative PBSC. In conclusion, in patients with indolent lymphoma, the concurrent administration of Rituximab and HD cytarabine is a safe and efficient method to obtain in vivo purged PBSC. Immunochemotherapy prior to mobilization produces B-cell depletion and seems to be a useful preparative step.