Phase I/II trial of irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (TTD regimen) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Broccoli extracellular vesicles enhance the therapeutic effects and restore the chemosensitivity of 5-fluorouracil on colon cancer

Broccoli contains an amount of biologically active substances, which bring beneficial effects on human health. Plant extracellular vesicles have been shown to be novel key factors in cancer diagnosis and tumor therapy. To date, the challenge of overcoming chemoresistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to facilitate the clinical management of colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been successful. Nevertheless, the functions of broccoli extracellular vesicles (BEVs) in the progression of CRC and 5-FU resistance are predominantly unclear. Herein, we showed that BEVs isolated from broccoli juice were effectively taken up by colorectal cancer HT-29 cells. The co-administration of BEVs and 5-FU significantly inhibited the proliferation and migration of colorectal cancer HT-29 cells, effectively blocking cell cycle progression. Furthermore, the co-administration of BEVs and 5-FU induced apoptosis by stimulating ROS production and disrupting mitochondrial function. Importantly, we found that BEVs reversed 5-FU resistance in HT-29 cells by suppressing the abnormal activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Collectively, our findings represent a novel strategy for utilizing BEVs to improve the efficacy of colorectal cancer treatment and enhance 5-FU chemosensitivity.

Colorectal cancer metastasis resectability after treatment with the combination of oxaliplatin, irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil. Final results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

To investigate the response rate of the triple combination of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and to assess its impact on secondary resectability of previously non-resectable liver metastasis (LM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients > or = 18 with MCRC, ECOG grade 0-2, and no prior treatment received L-OHP (85 mg/m(2)), CPT-11 (150 mg/m(2)) and 5-FU (2 250 mg/m(2) in 48 h CI) on D1 every 15 days.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients with initially non-resectable metastatic disease were included. Median age 62 years (38-76); 28 males; 26 patients with 0 performance status (ECOG) 40 patients had prior surgery and four adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 for response. Main grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (40%), febrile neutropenia (4%), diarrhea (21%), nausea/vomiting (11%/15%), fatigue (11%), anemia and alopecia (9% each); grade 3-4 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% patients. Secondary surgery was possible in 15 of 47 (31.9%) patients and 12/30 (40%) patients with only LM: in this cohort, median OS has not been reached at 22 months median follow-up, with 2/12 patients having died. Overall response rate was 69% (95% CI, 53-82%); 13 (31%) had stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival (OS) were 10.9 (95% CI, 9.9-13.2) and 19.9 (95% CI, 11.7-TBD) months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This combination has shown promising activity with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in MCRC, and has allowed the resectability of LM in a considerable number of patients, offering them the possibility of long-term survival.

Benefit-risk assessment of irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer

Irinotecan exerts its cytotoxic activity through inhibition of the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. It has been approved in most countries worldwide for treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Activity is seen in previously untreated patients and in patients refractory to fluorouracil treatment, whether it is given alone or in combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Irinotecan was first developed in patients refractory to fluorouracil. Activity in terms of tumour responses and patient benefit was seen in several phase II trials that used either a weekly or a three-weekly schedule. In two randomised trials (irinotecan vs best supportive care, and irinotecan vs an infused fluorouracil-based regimen), irinotecan prolonged median survival by approximately 2.5 months without any deterioration in quality-of-life. It was later studied in previously untreated patients with advanced CRC in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin). In three large randomised trials, median time to tumour progression was prolonged by approximately 2.5 months and overall survival by about 2.5 months compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid alone. Tumour responses were also seen more frequently in the irinotecan arm (35-40% vs 20%). Again, quality-of-life scores were not deteriorated by the addition of irinotecan. Irinotecan has many acute adverse effects. The most prominent and dose limiting being diarrhoea and neutropenia. With irinotecan monotherapy, diarrhoea was seen in 80% of patients and severe grade 3 to 4 diarrhoea occurred in 30-40% of the patients. The severity of diarrhoea can be diminished by preventive actions. Less risk of diarrhoea is generally seen when irinotecan is combined with fluorouracil. Neutropenia is generally short-lived, but may be severe if diarrhoea is also present. This has been noticed particularly when irinotecan has been given in combination with a bolus fluorouracil/folinic acid regimen. Other toxicities include acute cholinergic-like symptoms, nausea and vomiting, and alopecia. In spite of these adverse effects, irinotecan has been accepted as an important first-line treatment for patients with advanced CRC, in combination with, preferably, an infused fluorouracil-based regimen, and has been approved for use as monotherapy in the second-line indication.