Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: the evidence and the future

Breast Cancer: An Overview of Current Therapeutic Strategies, Challenge, and Perspectives

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of death among female patients, which seriously threatens the health of women in the whole world. The treatments of breast cancer require the cooperation of a multidisciplinary setting and taking tumor load and molecular makers into account. For early breast cancer, breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy or mastectomy alone remains the standard management, and the administration of adjuvant systemic therapy is decided by the status of lymph nodes, hormone receptors, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2. For metastatic breast cancer, the goal of treatments is to prolong survival and maintain quality of life. This review will present the current advances and controversies of surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, gene therapy, and other innovative treatment strategies in early-stage and metastatic breast cancer.

Finding an easy way to harmonize: a review of advances in clinical research and combination strategies of EZH2 inhibitors

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors (EZH2i) have garnered increased attention owing to their anticancer activity by targeting EZH2, a well-known cancer-promoting factor. However, some lymphomas are resistant to EZH2i, and EZH2i treatment alone is ineffective in case of EZH2-overexpressing solid tumors. The anti-cancer efficacy of EZH2i may be improved through safe and effective combinations of these drugs with other treatment modalities. Preclinical evidence indicates that combining EZH2i with other therapies, such as immunotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, has complementary or synergistic antitumor effects. Therefore, elucidating the underlying mechanisms of the individual constituents of the combination therapies is fundamental for their clinical application. In this review, we have summarized notable clinical trials and preclinical studies using EZH2i, their progress, and combinations of EZH2i with different therapeutic modalities, aiming to provide new insights for tumor treatment.

Association between Immunohistochemical Expression of Topoisomerase IIα, Her2 and Hormone Receptors and Response to Primary Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between immunohistochemical expression of topoisomerase IIα, HER2 and hormone receptors and response to primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer. We analyzed 109 medical charts of patients treated with primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the Women's Integral Health Care Center from 1996 to 2004. The clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy was associated with topoisomerase IIα and HER2 expression and hormone receptor negativity. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact test and Mann-Whitney test. No statistical association between clinical response and expression of topoisomerase IIa, HER2 and hormone receptor negativity was found. However, there was an association between complete pathological response and hormone receptor negativity (P = 0.0289). The present study suggested that these markers should not be considered predictors of response to primary anthracycline-based chemotherapy, and prospective studies must be designed for this purpose.

BMI and Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Study and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is only limited data from clinical practice on the relevance of body mass index (BMI) on pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with breast cancer (BC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The impact of BMI on pCR and survival outcome was examined in 324 patients with primary non-metastatic BC. An additional meta-analysis was performed on the current data and relevant previously published studies in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis identified lymph vascular invasion (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.18; P = .0000), grading 3 (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.59-6.12; P = .0009), and HER2/neu status (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 1.86-12.18; P = .011) as independent factors for pCR after NAC. There was no association between pCR and continuous or categorical BMI. Various additional subgroup analyses of molecular BC subtypes (triple-negative, luminal-like, HER2-luminal, HER2-like) and BMI also showed no association. These findings were confirmed by the meta-analysis. Except for one subgroup analysis in which overweight and obese patients were combined as one group, no association between BMI and pCR as well as survival outcome was found.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI was not established as a relevant clinical factor. Only lymph vascular invasion, grading 3, luminal-like, and HER2/like BC subtype showed predictive and prognostic impact in patients with BC receiving NAC.

Breast Cancer: Influence of Taxanes on Response Assessment with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

PURPOSE

To prospectively investigate the influence of taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T-NACT) versus non-taxane-containing NACT (NT-NACT) on the contrast material enhancement of breast cancers, benign enhancing lesions (BELs), and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved study was performed in 62 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent multiagent NACT with (n = 49) or without (n = 13) taxanes between 2008 and 2011. Written informed consent was obtained. Patients underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging according to a standardized protocol before and 2 weeks after completing NACT. The percentage reduction of enhancement of breast cancers, BELs, and BPEs was calculated for patients undergoing NT-NACT versus those undergoing T-NACT. Final surgical pathologic results served as standard of reference. Changes in mean enhancement of breast cancers, BELs, and BPEs between the regimens were compared by using the Student t test for unpaired samples; for intraindividual comparison, the Student t test for paired samples was used.

RESULTS

Similar rates of complete pathologic response were observed after T-NACT and NT-NACT (28 [57.2%] of 49 vs eight [61.5%] of 13). T-NACT was associated with an almost complete suppression of enhancement in not only breast cancers but also BELs and BPE in the same patients, with an average reduction of enhancement of -89.9% ± 9.3, -90.2% ± 11.8, and -91.2% ± 7.5, respectively. After T-NACT, cancers with partial (n = 21) or complete (n = 28) pathologic response exhibited a similar reduction of enhancement (-81.8% ± 17.5 vs -93.9% ± 2.3; P = .22). The reduction of enhancement of cancers after NT-NACT was significantly less pronounced than that after T-NACT (-41.1% ± 22.8 vs 88.1% ± 13.9; P < .0001), and effects on enhancement of BELs and BPE were significantly less pronounced compared with effects on enhancement of cancers in the same women (P < .0001). MR imaging led to an overestimation of response (yielded false-negative results for residual disease) in 66.7% (14 of 21) of patients after T-NACT, versus in 20% (one of five) of patients after NT-NACT.

CONCLUSION

The reduction of enhancement observed in breast cancers after T-NACT is, in part, unrelated to their oncologic response. MR imaging-detectable effects of taxanes represent a combination of specific antimitotic and nonspecific antiangiogenic effects. This impacts the accuracy with which dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging helps predict complete pathologic response to T-NACT. (©) RSNA, 2015 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Second-line neoadjuvant vinorelbine and gemcitabine combination in locally advanced breast cancer showing no early response to TAC

Due to socioeconomic issues, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is still a common presentation of breast cancer in the third world. It was found that LABC patients showing a clinical response after two to four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher probability of obtaining a pathological complete response at surgery than patients without an early response. In the present work, the short-term effects and toxicity of the neoadjuvant second-line vinorelbine and gemcitabine combination were evaluated in the treatment of LABC who did not show early response to anthracyclines and taxanes-containing regimen. The use of vinorelbine and gemcitabine was based on their use in metastatic breast cancer cases who had been treated before with anthracyclines and taxanes. This was a prospective phase II study accomplished at the Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department of Mansoura University, Egypt. Seventy LABC patients not suitable for breast conservative surgery who failed to achieve early response to two cycles of a combination of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) were treated with a 3-weekly regimen of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 8 by intravenous infusion as a second-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Response was assessed after the second cycle. Stable and progressed patients were operated upon while responding cases received up to four cycles before the operation. Patient accrual was from June 20, 2007, to October 20, 2009. The objective response was evaluated clinically with breast sonography before every new cycle and before operation while the pathological response was determined postoperatively. The toxicity was evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute--Common Toxicity criteria version 3. The end points of this study were clinical response rate, pathological response rate, and treatment toxicity. Clinical response rate was achieved in 35 cases (50%) while pathological response rate was reported in 4 cases (5.7%). Breast conservative surgery (BCS) became possible in 31 cases (44%). The most common severe toxicities (grades 3 and 4) were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 25.7 and 22.8% of cases, respectively. Toxicities were reversible and did not cause death. It is possible to achieve objective clinical and pathological responses of LABC with potentially non-cross-resistant neoadjuvant second-line therapy, leading to BCS in a high proportion of patients. Thus, preoperative second-line chemotherapy appears to be justified when breast conservation is an important treatment goal.

[Neoadjuvant treatment and breast conserving surgery - a success of clinical research in breast cancer]

Breast cancer is, with more than 5200 newly diagnosed cases, the most frequent malignancy of women in Austria. Screening programs have helped to improve early detection and breast conservation, also clinical trials have made possible some decisive progress in breast cancer treatment. For women affected it is of utmost importance that we meanwhile can offer breast-conserving surgery also for large tumors without risking more local recurrences. The trials of the ABCSG, particularly those dealing with neoadjuvant therapy, were instrumental in this development.

Recurrence rates after DCE-MRI image guided planning for breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy results in a significant increase in breast-conserving surgery. However, traditional imaging methods are unable to accurately predict the extent of viable residual disease leading to uncertainty in surgical planning and some previous studies have shown a disproportionately high incidence of locoregional recurrence. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) has been shown to provide a potentially more accurate prediction of residual disease.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in our unit are staged with the DCE-MRI of the breast performed at 1.5 T before, during and after treatment and the final result was used to plan surgery. Two hundred and four patients with breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 1996 and April 2005. Eighteen of these patients had distant metastases at the time of initial diagnosis and so were excluded from the present study. Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 186 patients underwent surgical treatment. Of these, 68 patients had breast-conserving surgery. At a median follow up of 30 months (range: 5.6-72 months) 21 patients in this group developed subsequent recurrence (21/68 - 30%) of whom 9 (9/68 - 13%) had locoregional recurrence, 7 had local recurrence (7/68 - 10%), and 17 (17/68 - 25%) had distant recurrence. Logistic regression analysis revealed only vascular invasion (p=0.006) of the tumour to be significantly associated with overall recurrence. None of the pathological factors (ER, PR status, vascular invasion, lymph node metastases, pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy) showed a significant association with locoregional recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Breast-conserving surgery with DCE-MRI planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides an acceptable level of local recurrence without the need for mastectomy.

Early breast cancer

Breast cancer remains a common disease throughout the world. Here we review new knowledge about early breast cancer obtained during the past 5 years. The prognosis of early breast cancer is generally favorable. Especially, ductal carcinoma in situ has been regarded as a non-life-threatening disease. Therefore, early diagnosis and early onset of the treatment has been important. Early age at menarche, late age at first birth, and late age at menopause are related to breast cancer risk. Examination by mammography and ultrasonography is still the most effective means of detection for premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively. Additionally, there have been important advances in MRI, sentinel lymph node biopsy, breast-conserving surgery, partial breast irradiation, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and adjuvant systemic therapy. Another approach to keeping the disease under control is the elucidation of breast cancer's molecular biological features. Assessment of potential molecular targets can lead to early diagnosis and molecular targeted treatment.

DNA arrays as predictors of efficacy of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: current data and issues on study design

Chemotherapy provides variable benefit to patients with breast cancer, with usually modest but occasionally severe side effects. Hence, there is a need to identify predictive biomarkers for its efficacy. DNA arrays have been used in this setting as potential novel predictive diagnostic tools. Several gene signatures and single gene markers were proposed to predict response to chemotherapy. Although this technology offers interesting perspectives through large-scale analysis of the transcriptome, its ability to identify clinically relevant predictors is highly dependent on study design. In the present manuscript, we will review currently available results of breast cancer pharmacogenomics and focus on aspects of study design that are critical to reliably identify predictive biomarkers using DNA array technology. We will discuss whether studies should be done in the overall, unselected breast cancer population or in specific homogeneous molecular subclasses. Next, we will compare advantages and limitations of cohort-based and case-control studies. The choice of end-point to discriminate between sensitive and resistant patients will also be examined.

Primary systemic therapy in operable breast cancer: clinical data and biological fall-out

Primary systemic chemotherapy (PST) was first used in early 1970s for the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer; in this setting primary chemotherapy was administered to allow for radical surgery and the objective response rates were high with a substantial proportion of patients amenable to surgery. On the basis of this activity, PST was subsequently used to treat operable locally advanced or large primary tumors to increase the rate of conservative surgery. First generation clinical trials demonstrated that breast conservation rates were improved, that a proportion of patients experienced a complete pathologic response and that response to PST was a good predictor of long term outcome. Second generation of clinical trials were designed to compare PST to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy: here again the rate of conservative surgery was significantly improved and the pathologic response rate demonstrated its prognostic value, however no progression free or survival improvement was obtained in comparison with postoperative treatments. Another interesting observation from these trials was that some tumor parameters (histology, grade, hormone receptor status) can predict the likelihood of achieving a pathologic complete response. On the basis of these data, PST can now be considered the standard of care for locally advanced disease, an reasonable option in case of large primary breast tumors not eligible for conservative surgery and an acceptable alternative for all the patients who are candidate to adjuvant treatment. It however clear that PST represents an excellent in vivo model to test new regimens, to evaluate biomarkers with predictive value and to evaluate the treatment induced modifications in tumor biology. Availability of new technologies able to measure the expression of thousands of genes and of new molecularly directed drugs will increase further the interest in this treatment strategy.

Vinorelbine in the management of breast cancer: New perspectives, revived role in the era of targeted therapy

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid that has been shown active in many tumour types and is currently registered for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This agent has a generally favourable safety profile, and may be suitable for use in special populations such as the elderly and/or frail patient. However, with the taxanes firmly established as standard second line treatment for ABC after failure of an anthracycline, vinorelbine has been generally relegated for use as third line therapy, in competition with the oral compound capecitabine. More recently, the exciting results observed with the combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with Her-2 overexpressing/amplified tumours, as well as the development of a reliable formulation and revised schedule of oral vinorelbine with proven activity in ABC appear to have revived the interest in this compound in the management of this disease. There are still a number of unanswered questions that will have to be addressed by properly designed, adequately powered randomised clinical trials.

Preoperative Profiling of Symptomatic Breast Cancer by Diagnostic Core Biopsy

BACKGROUND

Precise preoperative profiling of breast tumors could facilitate fuller consideration of (neo)adjuvant therapies.

METHODS

Diagnostic core biopsy (DCB) accuracy in profiling the primary tumor was prospectively studied in 95 patients with operable breast cancer. The histological type and grade (hematoxylin and eosin staining) and membrane receptor status (semiquantitative immunohistochemistry for estrogen [ER] and progesterone [PR] receptors, as well as Her-2 antigen expression) were assigned by the DCB before surgery. These measures were then compared with those of the definitive surgical specimen available after operation.

RESULTS

DCB correctly ascribed tumor type and grade and ER, PR, and Her-2 receptor status in most cases (correlating exactly in 97.5%, 77%, 68%, 71%, and 60%, respectively) with at least moderate concordance (weighted kappa, >.41). When miscategorized, DCB consistently tended to upscore the receptor stain intensity compared with the surgical specimen (22%, 19%, and 27% had higher ER, PR, and Her-2 categorical scores, respectively). ER H-scores correlated best in specimens that stained strongly (224.4 +/- 3 vs. 215.5 +/- 5) and were significantly higher on DCB in those that stained either moderately (195.6 +/- 8.2 vs. 156.8 +/- 5.1; P < .0001) or weakly (157.1 +/- 24.8 vs. 81.4 +/- 4; P = .02). DCB accurately identified all tumors with clinically important ER and Her-2 expression. Furthermore, it promoted three patients into the therapeutically significant range of ER (n = 1) or Her-2 (n = 2) expression. ER negativity on DCB (n = 25) indicated a high-grade tumor (88%), although 11 (44%) patients also overexpressed Her-2. Significant Her-2 expression (n = 16) on DCB predicted the tumor as being poorly differentiated (80%) and both ER and PR negative (67%).

CONCLUSIONS

DCB accurately profiles clinically relevant measures of primary tumor cell differentiation. It also reliably categorizes patients with regard to (neo)adjuvant therapy before radical surgery is attempted.

Preoperative gefitinib versus gefitinib and anastrozole in postmenopausal patients with oestrogen-receptor positive and epidermal-growth-factor-receptor-positive primary breast cancer: a double-blind placebo-controlled phase II randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Some oestrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancers express epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but whether inhibition of EGFR can suppress proliferation of breast cancer cells and ER function is not known.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial of 56 postmenopausal patients with ER-positive and EGFR-positive primary breast cancer, 27 women were randomly assigned to the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor of EGFR gefitinib (250 mg given orally once a day) and the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (1 mg given orally once a day), and 29 women to gefitinib (250 mg given orally once a day) and placebo of identical appearance to anastrozole given orally once a day, all given for 4-6 weeks before surgery. Primary outcome was inhibition of tumour-cell proliferation, as measured by Ki67 antigen labelling index. Secondary outcomes were reduction in EGFR phosphorylation at Tyr 845, reduction in ER phosphorylation at Ser 118, tumour size, and toxic effects. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Patients assigned gefitinib and anastrozole had a greater reduction from pretreatment values in proliferation-related Ki67 labelling index than did those assigned gefitinib alone (mean % reduction 98.0 [95% CI 96.1-98.9] vs 92.4 [85.1-96.1]; difference between groups 5.6% [5.1-6.0], p=0.0054). Tumour size was reduced by 30-99% (partial response) in 14 of 28 patients assigned gefitinib and [corrected]in 12 of 22 assigned gefitinib, as assessed by ultrasonography. Reduction in phosphorylation of ER at Ser 118 was similar for both groups. Treatment was well tolerated and much the same for both groups.

INTERPRETATION

Single-agent gefitinib and gefitinib combined with anastrozole are well-tolerated and effective treatments for reducing the size of breast tumours and levels of ER phosphorylation when given as neoadjuvant therapy.

Breast cancer

Breast cancer remains a public-health issue on a global scale. We report new information about the disease from the past 5 years. Early age at first birth, increasing parity, and tamoxifen use are related to long-term lifetime reduction in breast-cancer risk. Ductal carcinomas in situ has been suggested to be renamed ductal intraepithelial neoplasia to emphasise its non-life-threatening nature. An alternative approach, the progenitor/stem cell theory, predicts that only some tumour cells cause cancer progression and that these should be targeted by treatment. Mammography and ultrasonography are still the most effective for women with non-dense and dense breast tissues, respectively. Additionally, MRI, lymphatic mapping, the nipple-sparing mastectomy, partial breast irradiation, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and adjuvant treatments are promising for subgroups of breast-cancer patients. Although tamoxifen can be offered for endocrine-responsive disease, aromatase inhibitors are increasingly used. Assessment of potential molecular targets is now important in primary diagnosis. Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and other drugs with anti-angiogenesis properties are currently undergoing preclinical investigations.

Locally advanced breast cancer in octogenarian women

Elderly patients are more likely to present with locally advanced breast cancer than younger patients. Furthermore, due to the accelerated aging of the western population, the incidence of breast cancer in this population is expected to steadily rise in the coming decades. So far, no guidelines are available for the management of octogenarian patients presenting with inoperable disease, what frequently results in a dilemma for the treating physician. For the time being, these patients should be ideally treated within the context of a clinical trial. In all other cases, the treatment has to be individualised, frequently based on data extrapolated from different population of patients, or retrospective series. This article reviews the current evidence, options, and most promising approaches for these patients.