Gefitinib (ZD1839) combined with weekly epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase I study with biological correlate

Prognostic and predictive value of EGFR and EGFR-ligands in blood of breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) serves as a co-target for dual/pan-EGFR-inhibitors in breast cancer. Findings suggest that EGFR and EGFR-ligands are involved in resistance towards certain breast cancer treatments. The aim is to explore the validity of EGFR and EGFR-ligands in blood as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. The systematic review was conducted in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted to identify publications exploring correlations between EGFR/EGFR-ligands in serum/plasma of breast cancer patients and prognostic/predictive outcome measures. Sixteen publications were eligible for inclusion. Twelve studies evaluated EGFR, whereas five studies evaluated one or more of the EGFR-ligands. Current evidence indicates associations between low baseline serum-EGFR and shorter survival or reduced response to treatment in patients with advanced breast cancer, especially in patients with estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive tumors. The prognostic and predictive value of EGFR and EGFR-ligands in blood has only been investigated in highly selected subsets of breast cancer patients and most studies were small. This is the first systematic review evaluating the utility of EGFR and EGFR-ligands as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in blood in breast cancer. Further exploration in large well-designed studies is needed.

Impact of Serum HER2 Levels on Survival and Its Correlation with Clinicopathological Parameters in Women with Breast Cancer

Purpose

The aims of our study were to assess the correlation between serum HER2 and clinicopathologic factors, the effect of serum HER2 on survival rate, and the effect of changes in serum HER2 levels between pre- and post-adjuvant chemotherapy on survival rate.

Methods

The study subjects, 200 women with breast cancer, were a subset of patients operated on between January 2005 and December 2006. We evaluated changes in serum HER2 levels between pre- and post-adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Being estrogen receptor (ER) negative was also correlated with high serum HER2 (p=0.017). The number of patients with changes in serum HER2 (>20% increased level during the follow-up period) was correlated with advanced T-stage (p=0.010), advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (p=0.015) and poor histologic grade (p=0.001). Univariate analysis for prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) revealed that the difference in DFS between those with serum HER2 level <15 ng/mL and those with levels ≥15 ng/mL was statistically significant (p=0.0129) and the changes in serum HER2 levels were also statistically significant (p=0.001). Prognostic factors associated with overall survival revealed that the changes in serum HER2 levels between pre- and post-adjuvant chemotherapy were statistically significant (p=0.0012).

Conclusion

Serum HER2 level is associated with a more advanced degree of axillary lymph node involvement and associated with ER negativity. And Changes in serum HER2 levels are associated with more advanced AJCC staging and histologic tumor grade. There are significant associations between serum HER2 level, changes in serum HER2 levels and 5-year DFS.

The epidermal growth factor receptor conundrum

Soluble epidermal growth factor receptor (sEGFR), a cell surface and serum protein derived from an alternately spliced human EGFR transcript, is recognized by 2 therapeutic antibodies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: cetuximab and panitumumab. Therefore, circulating sEGFR is an unanticipated first target for both of these therapeutic antibodies, adding a new level of complexity to the understanding of EGF receptor biology that should be considered in the design of future clinical studies.

Antiangiogenic strategies in breast cancer management

Angiogenesis is considered one of the key mechanisms of tumour growth and survival. Therefore it represents an ideal pharmaceutical target. Many antiangiogenic agents have been developed so far in several solid tumours and also in breast cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEFG) is the main target and both monoclonal antibodies and small molecules belonging to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against VEGF(R) have been developed. Some other therapeutic approaches have shown to exert some antiangiogenic activity, such as hormonal agents, metronomic chemotherapy, bisphosphonates and others. In this paper we provide an introduction of the current data supporting the angiogenesis in breast cancer and a review of the most relevant antiagiogenic therapies which have been investigated so far.

Epidermal growth factor receptor in triple-negative and basal-like breast cancer: promising clinical target or only a marker?

Triple-negative breast cancers represent a subset of breast cancers with a particularly aggressive phenotype and poor clinical outcomes. Recent molecular profiling of these tumors has revealed a high frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) dysregulation, among other abnormalities. EGFR status correlates negatively with survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancers, and thus focus has turned on this receptor as a potential clinical target. Two classes of EGFR inhibitors are currently in clinical use: the monoclonal antibodies and the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Trials of these drugs in breast cancer, however, have been largely disappointing. It remains to be seen whether advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of EGFR dysregulation and effects of multiple compensatory pathways in breast cancer, coupled with improved targeting to appropriate patient populations, will yield meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes.

Value and Limitations of Measuring HER-2 Extracellular Domain in the Serum of Breast Cancer Patients

The human epidermal receptor-2 (HER-2) is overexpressed or amplified in 15% to 25% of breast cancers. Determination of HER-2 tumor status offers clinically useful information, as it selects patients who may benefit from treatment with trastuzumab, the monoclonal antibody against HER-2. Currently approved methods for HER-2 testing include immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in situ hybridization using tumor tissue. A fragment of HER-2 composed of its extracellular domain (ECD) can also be detected in the serum of some patients with breast cancer. As an easily accessible tumor marker, it could offer additional useful prognostic or predictive information. This review will briefly address the biology of the circulating HER-2 ECD and discuss the evidence to support the role, if any, for measuring HER-2 ECD levels in women with breast cancer. In particular, we focus on the value and limitations of serum ECD in both early and advanced breast cancer in the following clinical contexts: as a marker of HER-2 tumor tissue status; clinical implications of raised levels in women who have a tumor not overexpressing HER-2; as a prognostic indicator and as a predictor of response to treatment; and as a monitoring tool for early recurrence. On the basis of our review of the literature, we conclude that there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of serum HER-2 ECD in the routine management of individual patients with breast cancer. This conclusion is in agreement with the 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines on the use of biomarkers in breast cancer.

Tolerability of and adherence to combination oral therapy with gefitinib and capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This phase I study explored gefitinib (G) and capecitabine (C) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Sequential cohorts (n = 3) received G and escalating C on a 14 day on/7 day off schedule, with a validation cohort (n = 10) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in cycle 1. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included response and adherence.

RESULTS

About 19 patients were treated for a median of 5 cycles. No patients in sequential cohorts experienced DLT; C MTD was 2,000 mg/m(2)/day when paired with daily G 250 mg. In the validation cohort, four experienced serious toxicities, including diarrhea, mucositis, and palmarplantar dysesthesia. At the MTD, 6 (46%) required a C dose reduction, and 3 (23%) came off study for toxicity. One partial response was observed (8%, 95% CI 0.2-38.5%); five had stable disease >24 weeks (26, 95% CI 9-51%). Patients missed few drug doses, with the suggestion of overadherence to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this phase I study of G and C in MBC, a C MTD was identified, and significant toxicity was observed. About 8% demonstrated a response, with 26% maintaining stable disease. The possibility of overadherence, as suggested in this study, may have implications for other trials of oral antineoplastic therapy.

EGFR/HER2 in breast cancer: a biological approach for molecular diagnosis and therapy

Novel cancer therapies have focused on specific molecular markers present in malignant tumors. The rationale of targeted therapy relies on the knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved in carcinogenesis and their influence in clinical outcome allied to a more specific and less toxic treatment. Activation of EGF receptor and HER2 is an important factor for initiation and progression of malignancies, including breast cancer where the status of HER2 is an essential step in the diagnostic workup; EGFR overexpression has been associated to the so-called basal-like breast carcinomas, which opens a new avenue for diagnosis and therapeutic approach in these tumors. This review will focus on mechanisms of HER2 and EGF receptor upregulation, the targeted therapies that are currently in use for these receptors, possible combined therapies, as well as the approach for molecular diagnosis from the pathologist's point of view.

Central nervous system metastases in HER-2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: a treatment challenge

With improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic options and a corresponding improvement in survival, central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is becoming a more frequent diagnosis in breast cancer patients. It can be assumed that up to 30% of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients may experience CNS metastasis during the course of their disease. Moreover, it has been reported that patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-overexpressing MBC are at a higher risk for CNS involvement. Whereas locoregional treatment modalities such as surgery, radiosurgery, and whole-brain radiotherapy still must be considered as the treatment of first choice, the armamentarium of systemic treatment modalities has been expanded by the introduction of small molecules such as the tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Rather than analyzing the risk factors for the development of CNS metastasis and reviewing the standard diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with CNS involvement, this review focuses specifically on systemic treatment modalities in patients suffering from CNS metastasis from HER-2-overexpressing MBC.

Gefitinib combined with endocrine manipulation in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: quality of life and surrogate markers of activity

We investigated efficacy of gefitinib in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Between March 2003 and December 2004, 23 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer were assigned to receive 250 mg oral gefitinib daily in addition to antiandrogen and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue for at least 2 months or until disease progression. Patients with progression stopped antiandrogen therapy, and received gefitinib and the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue. Serum HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor extracellular domain were evaluated every 2 months. Gefitinib treatment did not result in any objective measurable response or responses in prostate-specific antigen. Median time to progression was 70 days (33-336). Median overall survival was 293 days (25-75 percentile: 235-349). HER2 extracellular domain mean value was 9.6 ng/ml (range 6.9-13.3) at basal time and was 10.1 (range 6.0-14.1) after 2 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor mean basal value was 51.0 ng/ml (range 41.4-75.3). After 2 months of treatment the mean value was 51.1 ng/ml (range 41.5-61.4). One patient had reduction in the pain score from baseline without an increase in the analgesic score. Four patients (17%) out of 23 had pain progression with an increase from baseline of at least 25% in the analgesic score. The study was discontinued before target accrual was reached owing to lack of efficacy of the drug. Our results do not support the efficacy of gefitinib in combination with endocrine treatment for hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Phase II, randomized trial of preoperative epirubicin-paclitaxel +/− gefitinib with biomarker evaluation in operable breast cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the in vivo effect of adding gefitinib to preoperative chemotherapy on the EGFR-dependent p42/44 MAPK in operable breast cancer (BC) patients. Secondary aims: to evaluate EGFR, (p)-EGFR, Ki67, apoptotic index (TUNEL test) and VEGFR2 expression from baseline to surgery, percentage of pathologic complete response (pCR), and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

90 patients with stage II-IIIA BC have been randomized to receive epirubicin 90 mg/sqm and paclitaxel 175 mg/sqm on day 1 plus: gefitinib 250 mg daily from day 5 to 16 (Arm A, intermittent), gefitinib 250 mg daily from day 1 to 21 (Arm B, continuous), or placebo (Arm C). Treatment plan: 4 courses every 3 weeks, followed by surgery.

RESULTS

After preoperative therapy, 86/90 patients underwent surgery; 46 patients (51%) received breast conservative surgery. A pCR was observed in 4 patients. No significant differences in the expression of p42/44 MAPK, EGFR, (p)-EGFR, VEGFR2, proliferation index and apoptosis were observed comparing the combined Arms A + B vs C, and comparing Arm A vs B. Hematologic toxicities were not significantly different comparing Arms A + B vs Arm C, and comparing Arm A vs B. Significantly higher skin and mucosal toxicities were observed when comparing the two gefitinib Arms (A + B) vs Arm C (32% vs 9.6%, P = 0.018; 57% vs 29%, P = 0.009 respectively), while no significant differences were observed comparing Arm A vs B.

CONCLUSION

Adding gefitinib to chemotherapy did not result in different effects on the EGFR-dependent pathway, proliferation, apoptosis and VEGFR2 expression as compared to placebo, while enhancing skin and mucosal toxicity. The two schedules of gefitinib (intermittent vs continuous) did not result in different biologic effects.

A phase II placebo-controlled trial of neoadjuvant anastrozole alone or with gefitinib in early breast cancer

PURPOSE

Increased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression may promote breast cancer resistance to endocrine therapy. We have therefore investigated whether neoadjuvant gefitinib, an EGFR inhibitor, might overcome biologic and clinical resistance to neoadjuvant anastrozole in a phase II placebo-controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Postmenopausal women with stage I to IIIB hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer received anastrozole 1 mg daily for 16 weeks and were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:5:5 to receive, in addition, gefitinib 250 mg/d orally for 16 weeks: placebo 1 tablet/d orally for 2 weeks and then gefitinib for 14 weeks or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary end point was biologic change in proliferation as measured by Ki67 at 2 and 16 weeks; the main secondary end point was overall objective response (OR).

RESULTS

Two hundred six women were randomly assigned. Mean changes in Ki67 with anastrozole and gefitinib versus anastrozole alone were -77.4% and -83.6%, respectively, between baseline and 16 weeks (geometric mean ratio = 1.37; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.39; P = .26), -80.1% and -71.3% between baseline and 2 weeks (geometric mean ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.25; P = .22) and -19.3% and -43% (geometric mean ratio = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.86 to 2.35; P = .16) between 2 and 16 weeks. ORs in the combination and anastrozole alone groups were 48% and 61% (estimated difference = -13.1%; 95% CI, -27.3% to 1.2%), respectively, with a nonsignificant trend against the combination (P = .08) and 48% versus 72% (estimated difference = -24.1%; 95% CI, -45.3% to -2.9%) in the progesterone-receptor-positive subgroup, which was significant (P = .03) and consistent with Ki67 changes. Common treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea, rash, alopecia, dry skin, and nausea. There was no evidence of a pharmacokinetic interaction.

CONCLUSION

Addition of gefitinib to neoadjuvant anastrozole had no additional clinical or biologic effect, failing to support our original hypothesis.

EGFR associated expression profiles vary with breast tumor subtype

Background

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1) and its downstream signaling events are important for regulating cell growth and behavior in many epithelial tumors types. In breast cancer, the role of EGFR is complex and appears to vary relative to important clinical features including estrogen receptor (ER) status. To investigate EGFR-signaling using a genomics approach, several breast basal-like and luminal epithelial cell lines were examined for sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors. An EGFR-associated gene expression signature was identified in the basal-like SUM102 cell line and was used to classify a diverse set of sporadic breast tumors.

Results

In vitro, breast basal-like cell lines were more sensitive to EGFR inhibitors compared to luminal cell lines. The basal-like tumor derived lines were also the most sensitive to carboplatin, which acted synergistically with cetuximab. An EGFR-associated signature was developed in vitro, evaluated on 241 primary breast tumors; three distinct clusters of genes were evident in vivo, two of which were predictive of poor patient outcomes. These EGFR-associated poor prognostic signatures were highly expressed in almost all basal-like tumors and many of the HER2+/ER- and Luminal B tumors.

Conclusion

These results suggest that breast basal-like cell lines are sensitive to EGFR inhibitors and carboplatin, and this combination may also be synergistic. In vivo, the EGFR-signatures were of prognostic value, were associated with tumor subtype, and were uniquely associated with the high expression of distinct EGFR-RAS-MEK pathway genes.

Emerging targeted therapies for breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common neoplasia among women in the world. For the last few years there has been an increasing interest in the development of agents against molecular targets considered to be involved in the process of malignant transformation or tumor progression. Experimental data indicate that various intracellular signaling pathways may be activated or overexpressed in patients who have breast cancer. Targeted therapies against these pathways have recently become one of the most active and promising areas of development in oncology.

Serum EGFR and serum HER-2/neu are useful predictive and prognostic markers in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with metronomic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Metronomic chemotherapy has been demonstrated to be of value in patients with advanced breast cancer. No reliable markers of response are available. In breast tumor, HER-2/neu is a prognostic factor, whereas no definite data exist for EGFR. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive role of serum HER-2/neu and serum EGFR in breast cancer patients treated with low-dose chemotherapy.

METHODS

Serum levels of HER-2/neu (n = 135) and of EGFR (n = 113) were prospectively determined before the start of chemotherapy, after 2 months of treatment, and when progressive disease was diagnosed.

RESULTS

Elevated (>15 ng/mL) serum HER-2/neu before the start of chemotherapy was not associated with response rate, whereas elevated serum HER-2/neu at 2 months was significantly associated with reduced long-term clinical benefit (24 weeks) (P < .001), as well as changes in HER-2/neu levels between baseline and 2 months (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis identified a >or=20% increase of serum HER-2/neu as an independent factor for progression-free survival (PFS). Kinetics of serum HER-2/neu were significantly associated with PFS (P < .0001) and overall survival (OS) (P = .015). Low baseline serum levels of EGFR (<45 ng/mL) were predictive of reduced response rate both at 2 months (P = .031) and after 24 weeks (P = .022). Moreover, they were significantly associated with reduced PFS (P = .016) and OS (P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HER-2/neu and EGFR may represent useful markers for early prediction of probability of response, PFS, and OS in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with metronomic chemotherapy.

Gene expression profiling in the discovery, optimization and development of novel drugs: one universal screening platform

With recent advances in robotics and high-content screening and analysis methods, transcriptional profiling can now be utilized as a comprehensive forward chemical genomics platform for drug discovery, lead selection and lead optimization. It can be used to define the state of a cell on the basis of gene networks, and to search for drugs that can shift cellular states in a manner predicted at the genome level to be therapeutically beneficial. The treatment of cells with compounds produces transcriptional 'fingerprints' that reveal mechanism-of-action, and enable discrimination between individual compounds based on drug behaviors important to all phases of drug discovery and development.

Expression biomarkers for clinical efficacy and outcome prediction in cancer

Progress in cancer treatment has been slow, and the outlook for curing cancer is only marginally different from the situation a decade ago. Paradoxically, although the pharmaceutical industry has stepped up costly discovery research and drug development, approvals are on the decline and pipelines are dwindling. In an effort to reduce the number of drug failures and curtail burgeoning R&D costs, drug companies are exploring the use of biomarkers to evaluate toxicity and efficacy earlier in the development process. Biomarkers hold promise for optimization in dosing, adverse event prediction, efficacy evaluation, lead prioritization, and mechanism-of-action profiling of drug candidates. Furthermore, clinicians can use biomarkers to monitor patient response in clinical trials. In this perspective article, the authors explore the applications of cancer-related expression biomarkers in drug discovery and discuss how this will impact the industry and benefit the patient.