Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin in advanced gynecologic tumors: a prospective phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR)

Chemotherapy regimen for recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare gynecological malignancy, the limited literature indicated that doxorubicin alone or gemcitabine/docetaxel combination is the preferred chemotherapy regimen. Given the rarity of the disease and the lack of high-level clinical evidence, there is no consensus on the best treatment.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a patient with uterine leiomyosarcoma who recurred after adjustment treatment with doxorubicin, gemcitabine, docetaxel, and anlotinib; and required a new chemotherapy regimen.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES

The follow-up chemotherapy regimen was doxorubicin-liposome 40 mg/m2 on one day in combination with dacarbazine 250 mg/m2 on one to five days of intravenous infusion every 21 days. We monitored adverse effects during chemotherapy and the process was smooth.

DISCUSSION

It is important to comprehensively consider the patient's condition, and fully consider the efficacy, dosage, and adverse reactions of the chemotherapy regimen to determine the appropriate plan, in order to achieve the best therapeutic benefits for patients.

Real world effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer: a Korean multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with carboplatin (CD) compared with those of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer in a real-world setting in Korea.

METHODS

We enrolled relevant patients from 9 institutions. All patients received CD or CP as the second- or third-line chemotherapy in routine clinical practice during 2013-2018. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. The secondary endpoint included the objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Overall, 432 patients (224 and 208 in the CD and CP groups, respectively) were included. With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the median PFS was not different between the groups (12.7 vs. 13.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.161; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-1.460; p=0.202). The ORR was 74.6% and 80.1% in the CD and CP group, respectively (p=0.556). Age and surgery at relapse were independent prognostic factors. More patients in the CD group significantly experienced a grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and hand-foot syndrome (13.8% vs. 6.3%), whereas grade 2 or more alopecia (6.2% vs. 36.1%), peripheral neuropathy (4.4% vs. 11.4%), and allergic/hypersensitivity reaction (0.4% vs. 8.5%) developed more often in the CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy with CD in a real-world setting were consistent with the results from a randomized controlled study. The different toxicity profiles between the 2 chemotherapy (CD and CP) regimens should be considered in the clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03562533.

Phase II Study Evaluating PegLiposomal Doxorubicin and Carboplatin Combination Chemotherapy in Gynecologic Sarcomas and Mixed Epithelial-Mesenchymal Tumors A Phase II Protocol of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Study Group (AGO-GYN 7)

Background

Gynecologic sarcomas are rare diseases with still undefined optimal treatment. Platinum and anthracyclines were reported as active agents in gynecologic sarcoma and carcinosarcoma. So far, data regarding the combination of carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for this patient population are missing.

Methods

This prospective single-arm multicenter phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of carboplatin AUC 6 in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 q28 in 40 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent gynecologic sarcoma or carcinosarcoma.

Results

Twenty patients with carcinosarcoma and 20 patients with leiomyosarcoma or endometrial stromal sarcoma were included. The percentage of patients with grade 3/4 neutropenia was 50%, but we did not observe any febrile neutropenia. The rates of grade 1 and 2 palmo-plantar erythema were moderate with 25% and 10%, respectively. Response rate was 33.3%. The 12-month progression-free and overall survival times were 32.5% and 77.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is feasible and has activity within the investigated study cohort.

Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems in Cancer Therapy: What Is Available and What Is Yet to Come

Cancer is a leading cause of death in many countries around the world. However, the efficacy of current standard treatments for a variety of cancers is suboptimal. First, most cancer treatments lack specificity, meaning that these treatments affect both cancer cells and their normal counterparts. Second, many anticancer agents are highly toxic, and thus, limit their use in treatment. Third, a number of cytotoxic chemotherapeutics are highly hydrophobic, which limits their utility in cancer therapy. Finally, many chemotherapeutic agents exhibit short half-lives that curtail their efficacy. As a result of these deficiencies, many current treatments lead to side effects, noncompliance, and patient inconvenience due to difficulties in administration. However, the application of nanotechnology has led to the development of effective nanosized drug delivery systems known commonly as nanoparticles. Among these delivery systems, lipid-based nanoparticles, particularly liposomes, have shown to be quite effective at exhibiting the ability to: 1) improve the selectivity of cancer chemotherapeutic agents; 2) lower the cytotoxicity of anticancer drugs to normal tissues, and thus, reduce their toxic side effects; 3) increase the solubility of hydrophobic drugs; and 4) offer a prolonged and controlled release of agents. This review will discuss the current state of lipid-based nanoparticle research, including the development of liposomes for cancer therapy, different strategies for tumor targeting, liposomal formulation of various anticancer drugs that are commercially available, recent progress in liposome technology for the treatment of cancer, and the next generation of lipid-based nanoparticles.

Reinvention of chemotherapy: drug conjugates and nanoparticles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advances in nanotechnology have addressed some of the issues related to lack of selectivity and nonspecific toxicities associated with conventional chemotherapy. Nanoparticles are therapeutic carriers that can be fine tuned for specific application and for passive or active tumor targeting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the nanoparticle field is rapidly expanding, there are to date only six nanoparticle-based drug delivery platforms and two antibody-drug conjugates that are clinically approved for cancer therapy. Here, we review the clinical data of liposomal anthracyclines, nanoparticle formulations of paclitaxel and trastuzumab emtansine. We then briefly comment on efficacy and safety issues of nanoparticles, as well as on the next-generation nanoparticles for cancer therapy.

SUMMARY

The emerging development of cancer nanotechnology offers the opportunity of reinvestigating the potential of cytotoxic agents, improving tumor targeting and drug delivery, leading to better safety profile and antitumor activity. Adding specificity to nanoparticles may allow personalization of cancer therapy using chemotherapy.

Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/074, August 2015)

Purpose: Official guideline published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). Due to their rarity and their heterogeneous histopathology uterine sarcomas remain challenging tumors to manage and need a multidisciplinary approach. To our knowledge so far there is no evidence-based guideline on the appropiate management of these heterogeneous tumors. Methods: This S2k-guideline is the work of an representative committee of experts from a variety of different professions who were commissioned by the DGGG to carry out a systematic literature review of uterine sarcoma. Members of the participating scientific societies developed a structured consensus in a formal procedure. Recommendations: 1. The incidence and histopathologic classification of uterine sarcoma. 2. The clinical manifestations, diagnosis and staging of uterine sarcoma. 3. The management of leiomyosarcoma. 4. The management of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. 5. The management of adenosarcoma as well as carcinosarcomas. 6. The management of morcellated uterine sarcoma.

Are there candidates for high-dose chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma?

Background

Prognosis of advanced ovarian carcinomas (AOC) remains poor with a 5-year survival of 30%. Benefit from high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) in this disease has not been demonstrated to date.

Methods

To evaluate the value of HDC as consolidation treatment after surgery and platinum/taxane-based therapy, we designed a monocentric retrospective comparative study. We used a subset approach to identify parameters associated with HDC efficacy.

Results

One hundred and three AOC patients treated with conventional chemotherapy alone (CCA) were compared to 60 patients receiving HDC plus hematopoietic stem cell support. After a median follow-up of 47.5 months there was no overall survival (OS) advantage for the HDC group in the whole population (p=0.29). Nevertheless, HDC was associated to a better outcome in young patients (≤50 years), both in term of progression-free survival (p=0.02, log-rank test) and OS (p=0.05, log-rank test). Median OS was 54.6 and 36 months in the HDC and CCA groups, respectively.

Conclusions

Although randomized trials failed to demonstrate any benefit for HDC in AOC patients, this study suggests that young patients may derive a substantial advantage from receiving it after the standard treatment. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm this gain and to search for the biological processes associated with this improvement.

Outcomes after multiple lines of chemotherapy for platinum-resistant epithelial cancers of the ovary, peritoneum, and fallopian tube

BACKGROUND

Platinum-resistant and refractory cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum have a poor prognosis, yet in some cases, they can respond to multiple lines of chemotherapy. Uncertainty remains over optimal drug choice and when therapeutic focus should be switched from active therapy to supportive care.

METHODS

A retrospective case note review was performed on 274 women treated for platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal carcinoma at the Christie Hospital between 2004 and 2008. Baseline data at onset of platinum resistance and outcomes from subsequent lines of therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 689 lines of therapy were administered with a median overall survival from initiation of first-line therapy for platinum-resistant disease of 61 weeks. Twenty-eight percent of women commenced cytotoxic therapy in the last 3 months of life. Treatment efficacy declined rapidly with successive lines of therapy particularly if disease progression occurred during first-line therapy. Factors independently associated with worse overall survival at recognition of platinum resistance were performance status, presence of stage IV disease, elevated cancer antigen 125, and platinum-refractory disease.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of women who were treated received therapy within the last few months of life with little clinical benefit. Disease progression on 2 consecutive lines of therapy should be used as a guide to discontinue cytotoxic treatment. A subset of patients with poor prognosis at the onset of platinum resistance, who may have little gain from anticancer treatment, can be identified.

Pharmacokinetic and toxicity considerations for the use of anthracyclines in ovarian cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Safe and effective treatments are needed for ovarian cancer. While there are many drugs currently available, there has recently been a renewed novel interest in the use of anthracyclines.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the available evidence on pharmacokinetic (PK) and toxicology implications of anthracyclines and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in the clinical management of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. This article consists of material obtained via Medline, PubMed and EMBASE literature searches, up to September 2010.

EXPERT OPINION

PLD is a liposomal formulation of doxorubicin (DXR), with a distinct pharmacokinetic profile, characterized by extended circulation time and a reduced clearance and volume of distribution with respect to the free drug. PLD is effective and well tolerated in relapsed ovarian cancer. The toxicity profile of PLD is characterized by dose-limiting mucosal and cutaneous toxicities, mild myelosuppression and decreased cardiotoxicity compared to free DXR. The good response rate, toxicity profile and pharmacokinetic profile of PLD suggest that PLD could be an option in first-line and second-line treatment in ovarian cancer; especially in those who had experienced taxane-induced toxicity or had a poor performance status.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the management of ovarian cancer

Among the pharmaceutical options available for treatment of ovarian cancer, much attention has been progressively focused on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), whose unique formulation, which entraps conventional doxorubicin in a bilayer lipidic sphere surrounded by a polyethylene glycol layer, prolongs the persistence of the drug in the circulation and potentiates intratumor drug accumulation. These properties enable this drug to sustain its very favorable toxicity profile and to be used safely in combination with other drugs. PLD has been already approved for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients failing first-line platinum-based treatment. Moreover, phase III trials have been already completed, and results are eagerly awaited, which hopefully will expand the range of PLD clinical application in this neoplasia both in front-line treatment, and in the salvage setting in combination with other drugs. Moreover, attempts are continuing to enable this drug to be combined with novel cytotoxic drugs and target-based agents. This review aims at summarizing the available evidence and the new perspectives for the clinical role of PLD in the management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

A randomized phase II study of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer patients: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based combinations are the standard second-line treatment for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (OC). This randomized phase II study was undertaken in order to compare the combination of carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (LD) with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in this setting.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed recurrent OC, at the time of or more than 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy, were randomized to six cycles of CP (carboplatin AUC5 + paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, d1q21) or CLD (carboplatin AUC5 + pegylated LD 45 mg/m2, d1q28).

RESULTS

A total of 189 eligible patients (CP 96, CLD 93), with a median age of 63 years, median Performance Status (PS) 0 and a median platinum free interval (PFI) of 16.5 months, entered the study. Discontinuation due to toxicity was higher in the CP patients (13.5% versus 3%, P = 0.016). The overall response rate was similar: CP 58% versus CLD 51%, P = 0.309 (Complete Response; CR 34% versus 23%) and there was no statistical difference in time-to-progression (TTP) or overall survival (OS; TTP 10.8 months CP versus 11.8 CLD, P = 0.904; OS 29.4 months CP versus 24.7 CLD, P = 0.454). No toxic deaths were recorded. Neutropenia was the most commonly seen severe toxicity (CP 30% versus CLD 35%). More frequent in CLD were severe thrombocytopenia (11% versus 2%, P = 0.016), skin toxicity and Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) grade 1-2 (38% versus 9%, P< 0.001), while grade 3 neurotoxicity and alopecia were higher in CP (7% versus 0%, P = 0.029, 20% versus 5%, P = 0.003). PS and PFI were independent prognostic factors for TTP and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pegylated LD with carboplatin is effective, showing less neurotoxicity and alopecia than paclitaxel-carboplatin. It thus warrants a further phase III evaluation as an alternative treatment option for platinum-sensitive OC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000436279.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian cancer

The encapsulation of doxorubicin in a pegylated liposomal matrix led to a reformulated agent with a different toxicity profile and improved clinical utility. Liposomal doxorubicin is devoid of the cardiac toxicity associated with doxorubicin, but is associated with predictable muco-cutaneous toxicity. The liposomal formulation leads to improved delivery to the target tumor tissue, allowing enhanced uptake by cancer cells. These properties translate into clinical utility in recurrent ovarian cancer as demonstrated by phase II and III trials, this proven clinical efficacy leading to FDA approval in second-line therapy for ovarian cancer. New combinations with cytotoxics, in particular with carboplatin, have demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and clinical utility in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. A favorable toxicity profile renders liposomal doxorubicin an ideal partner for combination regimens with other cytotoxics, and more recently with biological agents. Such combinations are the subject of ongoing clinical trials.

Combination therapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin in gynecologic malignancies: a prospective phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and Kommission Uterus (AGO-K-Ut)

OBJECTIVE

A multicenter non-randomized phase II study was initiated to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination with carboplatin in gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

One hundred forty women with recurrent or advanced endometrial (n=31), cervical or vaginal cancer (n=31), uterine sarcomas (n=11), or recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (n=67) received six courses of PLD 40 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC 6) every 28 days.

RESULTS

Hematological toxicities with NCI-CTC grade 3/4 were anemia in 8%, thrombocytopenia in 14%, neutropenia in 24%, and febrile neutropenia in 2% of 652 cycles. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (14% of patients), pain (10%), dyspnea (9%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (7%), and nausea/vomiting (7%). Dose intensity reached 87.2% for PLD and 88.2% for carboplatin. Seventy-four percent of all non-progressive patients received at least 5 cycles. Overall response rates were (116 patients evaluable for response): ovarian cancer (n=54) 68%, endometrial cancer (n=27) 44%, uterine sarcomas (n=9) 33%, and cervical/vaginal cancer (n=26) 12%. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95%CI 9.6-14.1) for ovarian cancer and 9.5 months (95%CI 6.6-12.6) for endometrial cancer. Median overall survival was 23.8 months (95%CI 19.0-30.2) and 21.4 months (95%CI 11.9-), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PLD and carboplatin was well tolerated and feasible in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Efficacy was low in cervical/vaginal cancer, but promising in patients with endometrial cancer. Efficacy was within the expected range in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and is currently under further investigation in a prospective randomized phase III trial comparing PLD/carboplatin with paclitaxel/carboplatin (CALYPSO-trial; AGO-OVAR 2.9).

A multicentre phase II study of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: the END-1 study of the MITO (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer and Gynecologic Malignancies) group

Anthracyclines and platinum derivates are active drugs for advanced endometrial carcinoma (AEC), but new schedules with higher efficacy and better tolerability are needed. A phase II study was conducted to describe activity and tolerability of carboplatin (C)+pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with AEC. Patients with chemonaive AEC, PS ⩽2, aged <75 years, with at least one measurable lesion were eligible. Treatment was C (area under curve 5)+PLD (40 mg m⁻²) on day 1 every 4 weeks, up to six cycles. Forty-two patients were needed in a single-stage design, with at least 13 objective responses to define the treatment active. Forty-two patients were enrolled. Median age was 64 years (31–74). A total of 64% of patients were recurrent while 36% were advanced. Three complete (7%) and 22 partial responses (52%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 59.5% (95% exact CI: 43.3–74.3). One death potentially related to treatment was recorded (death at home for unknown reasons after 6th cycle). Other relevant toxicities (% of patients) were grade 3/4 neutropaenia 33%/14%, febrile neutropaenia 5%, grade 3/4 thrombocytopaenia 17%/5%, grade 3/4 anaemia 31%/2%. Skin toxicity was mild: grade 1 14%, grade 2 10%, grade 3 5%. Hair loss: complete 5%, partial 12%. The combination of carboplatin and PLD shows good activity and favourable toxicity as first-line chemotherapy of patients with AEC, deserving further studies in this setting.

Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer: a systematic review of Cochrane collaboration

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic chemotherapy has a limited place in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. Commonly used agents include cisplatin and doxorubicin, but the side-effect profile may be unacceptable for many patients. The feasibility of administration of combination chemotherapy is limited in many patients on account of significant co-morbidity. While early-stage endometrial adenocarcinoma is a common gynaecological cancer with a favourable prognosis, advanced or recurrent disease presents a difficult management problem. The platinum and anthracycline compounds have been widely used for many years, but their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) is not clear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate both the benefits and adverse effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy in these women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out systematic searches for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy with another intervention. Data were extracted from trial reports or supplied by investigators. Where possible, hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for OS and PFS and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for acute toxicity. The impact of more versus less intensive chemotherapy on OS, PFS and acute toxicity was assessed in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven eligible RCTs were identified that recruited 2288 patients. A meta-analysis of six of these trials found that PFS [HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.90; P = 0.004], but not OS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.03; P = 0.12), was significantly improved when more intensive chemotherapy was compared with less intensive chemotherapy. OS was improved when doxorubicin, cisplatin and other drugs were compared with doxorubicin and cisplatin. Toxicity was generally higher with more chemotherapy. There was insufficient evidence to assess the effect of chemotherapy on symptom control or quality of life (QoL). Platinums, anthracyclines and taxanes were the most studied in phase II trials and combinations gave the best responses, but patient selection and pre-treatment was very variable.

CONCLUSIONS

More intense combination chemotherapy significantly improves the disease-free survival and the data indicate a modest improvement in OS. The addition of anthracyclines (e.g. doxorubicin) or the taxanes [e.g. paclitaxel (Taxol)] to cisplatin increases the response rate. More intensive regimens are associated with the gain in survival. However, grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity are also increased. Future developments are likely to exploit specific molecular characteristics of endometrial cancers, including their hormone dependence, growth factor target overexpression and PTEN loss. While no one drug or regimen offers a clear benefit for women with advanced endometrial cancer, platinum drugs, anthracyclines and paclitaxel seem the most promising agents. Future trials should address the impact of such agents on QoL and symptom control in addition to survival. Chemotherapy and endocrine therapy need to be compared directly in an RCT.

Second-line chemotherapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin is highly effective in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in late relapse: a GINECO phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard second-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) in late relapse. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has significant single-agent activity in this setting. Therefore, we evaluated the use of PLD plus carboplatin in this patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PLD 30 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin at area under the curve (AUC) 5 mg.min/ml, repeated every 28 days for a maximum of nine cycles, was administered to 104 women with AOC relapsing >or=6 months after completion of first- or second-line therapy with platinum-taxane-based regimens.

RESULTS

Overall response was 63%, with a 38% complete response, median progression-free survival of 9.4 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 32 months. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 51% of patients, but febrile neutropenia in only 3%. Nonhematologic toxic effects were primarily grades 1 and 2, with low rates of alopecia and neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

PLD plus carboplatin is highly effective, prolongs OS, and is well tolerated in women with AOC in late relapse previously treated with both platinum and taxanes. Evaluation of this regimen in phase III trials is warranted.

Safety of a 3-weekly schedule of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first line chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer: preliminary results of the MITO-2 randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The MITO-2 (Multicentre Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer) study is a randomized phase III trial comparing carboplatin plus paclitaxel to carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in first-line chemotherapy of patients with ovarian cancer. Due to the paucity of published phase I data on the 3-weekly experimental schedule used, an early safety analysis was planned.

METHODS

Patients with ovarian cancer (stage Ic-IV), aged < 75 years, ECOG performance status

RESULTS

The pre-planned safety analysis was performed in July 2004. Data from the first 50 patients treated with carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin were evaluated. Median age was 60 years (range 34-75). Forty-three patients (86%) completed 6 cycles. Two thirds of the patients had at least one cycle delayed due to toxicity, but 63% of the cycles were administered on time. In most cases the reason for chemotherapy delay was neutropenia or other hematological toxicity. No delay due to palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was recorded. No toxic death was recorded. Reported hematological toxicities were: grade (G) 3 anemia 16%, G3/G4 neutropenia 36% and 10% respectively, G3/4 thrombocytopenia 22% and 4% respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was infrequent: pulmonary G1 6%, heart rhythm G1 4%, liver toxicity G1 6%, G2 4% and G3 2%. Complete hair loss was reported in 6% of patients, and G1 neuropathy in 2%. PPE was recorded in 14% of the cases (G1 10%, G2 2%, G3 2%).

CONCLUSION

This safety analysis shows that the adopted schedule of carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin given every 3 weeks is feasible as first line treatment in ovarian cancer patients, although 37% of the cycles were delayed due to haematological toxicity. Toxicities that are common with standard combination of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (neurotoxicity and hair loss) are infrequent with this experimental schedule, and skin toxicity appears manageable.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Aged
• Agranulocytosis/chemically induced
• Alopecia/chemically induced
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
• Carboplatin/administration & dosage
• Carboplatin/adverse effects
• Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/etiology
• Combined Modality Therapy
• Doxorubicin/administration & dosage
• Doxorubicin/adverse effects
• Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives
• Drug Administration Schedule
• Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology
• Feasibility Studies
• Female
• Humans
• Liposomes/administration & dosage
• Middle Aged
• Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
• Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery
• Ovariectomy
• Paresthesia/chemically induced
• Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage
• Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects
• Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Sandro Pignata Medical Oncology B, National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy
Giovanni Scambia Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
Antonella Savarese Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena Institute, Rome, Italy
Enrico Breda Medical Oncology, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy
Paolo Scollo Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
Rocco De Vivo Medical Oncology, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
Emanuela Rossi Medical Oncology C, National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy
Vittorio Gebbia Medical Oncology I, La Maddalena Clinic, Palermo, Italy
Donato Natale Medical Oncology, S. Massimo Hospital, Penne (PE), Italy
Filomena Del Gaizo Medical Oncology, S. Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, Avellino, Italy
Emanuele Naglieri Medical and Experimental Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Bari, Italy
Antonella Ferro Medical Oncology, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
Pietro Musso Gynecologic Oncology, M. Ascoli Hospital, Palermo, Italy
Alfonso Maria D'Arco Medical Oncology, Umberto I Civil Hospital, Nocera Inferiore (SA), Italy
Roberto Sorio Medical Oncology C, National Cancer Institute – Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano (PN), Italy
Carmela Pisano Medical Oncology B, National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy
Massimo Di Maio Clinical Trials Unit, National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy
Giuseppe Signoriello Department of Medicine and Public health, Second University of Naples, Italy
Annalisa Annunziata Department of Medicine and Public health, Second University of Naples, Italy
Francesco Perrone Clinical Trials Unit, National Cancer Institute, Naples, Italy

Collapse