Sequential gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by docetaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter phase II study of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group

The continuing role of chemotherapy in the management of advanced urothelial cancer

Despite intense drug development in the last decade in metastatic urothelial carcinoma and the incorporation of novel compounds to the treatment armamentarium, chemotherapy remains a key treatment strategy for this disease. Platinum-based combinations are still the backbone of first-line therapy in most cases. The role of chemotherapy in the second line has been more ill-defined due to the complexity of this setting, where patient selection remains critical. Nevertheless, two regimens, one in monotherapy (i.e. vinflunine) and one in combination with antiangiogenics (i.e. docetaxel + ramucirumab) have shown efficacy. Immunotherapy through checkpoint inhibition has revealed remarkably durable benefit in a small proportion of patients in the first and second line and is currently the preferred partner for combinations with chemotherapy. Difficult populations such as patients with liver metastases or those progressing to checkpoint inhibition represent a medical challenge and selective ways of delivering cytotoxics, like the antibody-drug conjugates, might represent a valid alternative. This article reviews the current role of chemotherapy in the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma and the ongoing and coming studies involving this treatment strategy.

Sequential chemotherapy using gemcitabine + carboplatin followed by gemcitabine + carboplatin + docetaxel for advanced upper-tract urothelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Retrospective evaluation of the effectiveness and adverse events (AEs) of a sequential chemotherapy regimen using gemcitabine + carboplatin (GCarbo) followed by GCarbo + docetaxel (GCarboD) for advanced upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

METHODS

We treated 56 patients with advanced UTUC. Mean patient age was 68.9 years, creatinine clearance was 51.2 mL/min, and the observation period was 20 months. Patients received two courses of GCarbo comprising 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1, 8, and 15, and carboplatin at an area under the curve of four on day 2. If this regimen was effective, we administered two more courses of GCarbo; if the regimen was ineffective, we switched to two courses of GCarboD (70 mg/m(2)).

RESULTS

Complete (n = 3) and partial response (PR; n = 25) were achieved after GCarbo. Mean response duration was 9.7 months. Two of 17 cases achieved PR after GCarboD treatment (mean duration, 31.5 months). Median survival was 14.0 months with the GCarbo/GCarboD regimen. Responders to GCarbo therapy survived significantly longer. AEs with the GCarbo regimen included 31 instances of G3/4 blood toxicity and 8 instances of G3/4 urticaria; however, there were only 6 instances of G3/4 gastrointestinal complications. AEs with the GCarboD regimen included 16 instances of blood toxicity and 8 instances of gastrointestinal complications. Neither regimen resulted in G3/4 renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

GCarbo and GCarboD chemotherapy may be administered safely to patients with advanced UTUC, with or without renal dysfunction. Response to GCarbo was high (50.0 %) whereas GCarboD was of limited effectiveness for non-responders to GCarbo.

Dual targeting of heat shock proteins 90 and 70 promotes cell death and enhances the anticancer effect of chemotherapeutic agents in bladder cancer

Heat shock proteins (HSPs), which are molecular chaperones that stabilize numerous vital proteins, may be attractive targets for cancer therapy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible anticancer effect of single or dual targeting of HSP90 and HSP70 and the combination treatment with HSP inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents in bladder cancer cells. The expression of HSP90 and the anticancer effect of the HSP90 inhibitor 17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) coupled with cisplatin, docetaxel, or gemcitabine were examined using immunohistochemistry, quantitative real-time PCR, cell growth, flow cytometry, immunoblots and caspase-3/7 assays. The expression of HSP70 under HSP90 inhibition and the additive effect of HSP70 inhibitor pifithrin-μ (PFT-μ) were examined by the same assays and transmission electron microscopy. HSP90 was highly expressed in bladder cancer tissues and cell lines. 17-AAG enhanced the antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of each chemotherapeutic agent. 17-AAG also suppressed Akt activity but induced the upregulation of HSP70. PFT-μ enhanced the effect of 17-AAG or chemotherapeutic agents; the triple combination of 17-AAG, PFT-μ and a chemotherapeutic agent showed the most significant anticancer effect on the T24 cell line. The combination of 17-AAG and PFT-μ markedly suppressed Akt and Bad activities. With HSP90 suppression, HSP70 overexpression possibly contributes to the avoidance of cell death and HSP70 may be a key molecule for overcoming resistance to the HSP90 inhibitor. The dual targeting of these two chaperones and the combination with conventional anticancer drugs could be a promising therapeutic option for patients with advanced bladder cancer.

Novel molecular targets for the therapy of urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

First-line platinum-based combinations are active in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma; however, long-term outcomes including disease-specific and overall survival remain suboptimal. In addition, approximately 40 - 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma have coexisting medical issues that preclude the use of cisplatin-based therapy. Improvements in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of urothelial tumorigenesis have led to first-generation clinical trials evaluating novel agents targeting molecular pathways. These are particularly relevant in regard to subpopulations. Novel trial designs warrant consideration to accelerate accrual.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, novel molecular targets for the therapy of urothelial carcinoma, as well as recently completed and ongoing clinical trials utilizing novel targeted agents, are discussed. A Medline search with key words, abstracts reported at national conferences on urothelial carcinoma and NCI clinical trial identifiers was used for this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Improved understanding of molecular biology has identified a number of new molecular targets, but there is a seeming absence of one dominant molecular driver for urothelial cancer. An adaptive and biomarker-derived strategy may be warranted. Clinical trials utilizing targeted agents are ongoing and results are awaited.

Gemcitabine chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic bladder carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

• To systematically review the literature on gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Onlinedatabase (MEDLINE), the Excerpta Medicadatabase (EMBASE), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database(CIHNAL), the Cochrane database of randomized trials, the Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe emCiências da Saúdedatabase (LILACS), and Web of Science were searched to identify trials of gemcitabine for metastatic bladder cancer. Also searched were international guidelines on metastatic prostate cancer, trial registries, and recent systematic reviews. Data on trial design, survival, tumour response and toxicity outcomes were extracted from relevant studies.

RESULTS

• This review identified six randomized trials of combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine for the management of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. • One trial compared gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GCis) with methotrexate/vinblastine/doxorubicin/cisplatin(MVAC) and found no difference in overall survival (OS; hazard ratio 1.09) but a better safety profile with GCis, which was suggested as the treatment of choice. • A second trial evaluated GCis against gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCarbo) and reported similar median OS (12.8 vs 9.8 months), disease progression (8.3 vs 7.3 months) and tumour response rates (66% vs 56%) for the two patient groups. • A third trial compared GCis with GCis plus paclitaxel (GCisPac) and showed no significant difference in median OS (12.3 vs 15.3 months) and response rates (44% vs 43%) but greater toxicity with GCisPac. • A fourth trial assessed GCarbo against methotrexate plus carboplatin plus vinblastine in patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy and found similar tumour response rates for each regime (38% vs 20%) but the triplet regime was more toxic. • Two other randomized studies compared a 2-weekly maintenance regime of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel with a 3-weelky regime given for a maximum of six cycles and found that the maintenance schedule did not confer any additional survival benefit. • In all, 53 observational studies of gemcitabine chemotherapy were identified that varied considerably in the drug combinations used and schedules. Overall response rates (17-78%) and median OS (6.4-24.0 months) were variable with no combination being clearly superior.

CONCLUSIONS

• Gemcitabine combined chemotherapy is active in the management of metastatic bladder cancer. • GCis may be considered an alternative regime to MVAC. • GCarbo should be considered for patients unfit for cisplatin-based therapy.

Personalized therapy for urothelial cancer: review of the clinical evidence

Despite a detailed understanding of the molecular aberrations driving the development of urothelial cancers, this knowledge has not translated into advances for the treatment of this disease. Urothelial cancers are chemosensitive, and platinum-based combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care for advanced disease, as well as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease. However, nearly half of patients who undergo resection of locally advanced urothelial cancer will relapse and eventually develop platinum-resistant disease. Clinical trials of targeted agents against angiogenesis and growth factors, as well as novel chemotheraputics, have generally been unsuccessful in urothelial cancers. Improvements in the theraputic arsenal for urothelial cancer depend upon identification of new targets and strategies to overcome platinum resistance.