Efficacy of the combination of cisplatin with either gemcitabine and vinorelbine or gemcitabine and paclitaxel in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG 0101)

Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases

The problems with anticancer therapy are resistance and toxicity. From 3000 Cisplatin derivatives tested as antitumor agents, most of them have been rejected, due to toxicity. The aim of current study is the comparison of therapeutic combinations of the currently applied in clinical practice: Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin, Nedaplatin, Lobaplatin, Heptaplatin, and Satraplatin. The literature data show that the strategies for the development of platinum anticancer agents and bypassing of resistance to Cisplatin derivatives and their toxicity are: combination therapy, Pt IV prodrugs, the targeted nanocarriers. The very important strategy for the improvement of the antitumor effect against different cancers is synergistic combination of Cisplatin derivatives with: (1) anticancer agents-Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Cytarabine, Fludarabine, Pemetrexed, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan, Topotecan, Etoposide, Amrubicin, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel; (2) modulators of resistant mechanisms; (3) signaling protein inhibitors-Erlotinib; Bortezomib; Everolimus; (4) and immunotherapeutic drugs-Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Bevacizumab, Cemiplimab, Cetuximab, Durvalumab, Erlotinib, Imatinib, Necitumumab, Nimotuzumab, Nivolumab, Onartuzumab, Panitumumab, Pembrolizumab, Rilotumumab, Trastuzumab, Tremelimumab, and Sintilimab. An important approach for overcoming the drug resistance and reduction of toxicity of Cisplatin derivatives is the application of nanocarriers (polymers and liposomes), which provide improved targeted delivery, increased intracellular penetration, selective accumulation in tumor tissue, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The advantages of combination therapy are maximum removal of tumor cells in different phases; prevention of resistance; inhibition of the adaptation of tumor cells and their mutations; and reduction of toxicity.

Algorithm for the treatment of advanced or metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: an evidence-based overview

The treatment of squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) is evolving. In the past, the backbone of treatment was chemotherapy, with very few other options available. Fortunately, that situation is changing, especially with a better understanding of tumour biology. Various strategies have been tried to improve patient outcomes. The most notable advance must be immunotherapy, which has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for lung cancer in patients without a driver mutation. Immunotherapy is now the treatment of choice in patients who have progressed after chemotherapy and is replacing chemotherapy as upfront therapy in a selected population. Other strategies have also been tried, such as the addition of targeted therapy to chemotherapy. Targeted agents include ramucirumab, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and necitumumab, a monoclonal antibody against epithelial growth factor receptor. Recently, advances in molecular profiling have also been applied to tumours of squamous histology, in which multiple genetic alterations, including mutations and amplifications, have been described. Research is actively seeking targetable mutations and testing various therapies in the hopes of further improving prognosis for patients with squamous nsclc. Here, we review the various advances in the treatment of squamous nsclc and present a proposed treatment algorithm based on current evidence.

Metabolic vulnerability of cisplatin-resistant cancers

Cisplatin is the most widely used chemotherapeutic agent, and resistance of neoplastic cells against this cytoxicant poses a major problem in clinical oncology. Here, we explored potential metabolic vulnerabilities of cisplatin-resistant non-small human cell lung cancer and ovarian cancer cell lines. Cisplatin-resistant clones were more sensitive to killing by nutrient deprivation in vitro and in vivo than their parental cisplatin-sensitive controls. The susceptibility of cisplatin-resistant cells to starvation could be explained by a particularly strong dependence on glutamine. Glutamine depletion was sufficient to restore cisplatin responses of initially cisplatin-resistant clones, and glutamine supplementation rescued cisplatin-resistant clones from starvation-induced death. Mass spectrometric metabolomics and specific interventions on glutamine metabolism revealed that, in cisplatin-resistant cells, glutamine is mostly required for nucleotide biosynthesis rather than for anaplerotic, bioenergetic or redox reactions. As a result, cisplatin-resistant cancers became exquisitely sensitive to treatment with antimetabolites that target nucleoside metabolism.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Treatment of Advanced-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Given Cisplatin on Day 8

Aims and Background

Gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment were administered to patients with advanced-stage, non-small-cell lung cancer. During phase II studies, the treatment is performed using a 28-day cycle, with gemcitabine administered on days 1, 8, and 15. Although it is advised that cisplatin not be administered on the first day, gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment is usually performed using a 21-day cycle, with gemcitabine administered on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin is given on the first day in most phase III studies. In contrast with previous phase III studies, cisplatin was administered on day 8 in our study. Dose density, drug toxicity, and efficacy were analyzed.

Methods and Study Design

Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer received gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin (75 mg/m2) on day 8 every 3 weeks (1 cycle contained 2 applications).

Results

Sixty-seven patients received a total of 293 applications. Dose densities were 92.3% for gemcitabine and 93.9% for cisplatin. The types and rates of grade 3 and grade 4 hematologic toxicities were anemia (6%), granulocytopenia (46%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). Complete remission was seen in 2 patients (3%); partial remission was 40%, stable disease was 39%, and progression of disease, 10%. The median overall survival time was 13 months. The median progression-free survival time was 9.5 months. One-year survival rate was 54% and 2-year survival, 10.4%.

Conclusions

In this 21-day treatment regimen, overall survival was longer than 1 year and the 1-year survival rate was more than 50%. Both the severity and rate of observed thrombocytopenia in the study were very low. Other adverse effects in the current study were comparable to those reported in the literature.

The End of Nihilism: Systemic Therapy of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and many other parts of the world. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises 85-90% of lung cancers. Historically, the expected survival of patients with advanced disease has been estimated in months. In recent years, however, lung cancer has come to be seen as a treatable disease with multiple therapeutic options. Enormous advances in the understanding of its pathways and mechanisms have enabled personalized therapy in NSCLC. The evolving approach to therapy focuses on genomic profiling of the tumors to find molecular targets and develop specific agents for individualized therapy. In addition, maintenance therapy has emerged as a valid approach, and the choice of chemotherapy now varies by histology. Most recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results, with impressive durations of response and a tolerable toxicity profile. Together, these discoveries have improved overall survival substantially in patient populations that have access to these advancements. We review the clinical data surrounding these impressive improvements.

C-Jun N-terminal kinase signalling pathway in response to cisplatin

Cisplatin (cis diamminedichloroplatinum II, cDDP) is one of the most effective cancer chemotherapeutic agents and is used in the treatment of many types of human malignancies. However, inherent tumour resistance is a major barrier to effective cisplatin therapy. So far, the mechanism of cDDP resistance has not been well defined. In general, cisplatin is considered to be a cytotoxic drug, for damaging DNA and inhibiting DNA synthesis, resulting in apoptosis via the mitochondrial death pathway or plasma membrane disruption. cDDP-induced DNA damage triggers signalling pathways that will eventually decide between cell life and death. As a member of the mitogen-activated protein kinases family, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) is a signalling pathway in response to extracellular stimuli, especially drug treatment, to modify the activity of numerous proteins locating in the mitochondria or the nucleus. Recent studies suggest that JNK signalling pathway plays a major role in deciding the fate of the cell and inducing resistance to cDDP-induced apoptosis in human tumours. c-Jun N-terminal kinase regulates several important cellular functions including cell proliferation, differentiation, survival and apoptosis while activating and inhibiting substrates for phosphorylation transcription factors (c-Jun, ATF2: Activating transcription factor 2, p53 and so on), which subsequently induce pro-apoptosis and pro-survival factors expression. Therefore, it is suggested that JNK signal pathway is a double-edged sword in cDDP treatment, simultaneously being a significant pro-apoptosis factor but also being associated with increased resistance to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This review focuses on current knowledge concerning the role of JNK in cell response to cDDP, as well as their role in cisplatin resistance.

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over 70 years of age at diagnosis. Despite this fact, these patients are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As a consequence, the most appropriate regimens for these patients are controversial, and the role of single-agent or combination therapy is unclear. In this setting, a critical systematic review of RCTs in this group of patients is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of different cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for previously untreated elderly patients with advanced (stage IIIB and IV) NSCLC. To also assess the impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy on quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 October 2014), EMBASE (1974 to 31 October 2014), and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to 31 October 2014). In addition, we handsearched the proceedings of major conferences, reference lists from relevant resources, and the ClinicalTrial.gov database.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only RCTs that compared non-platinum single-agent therapy versus non-platinum combination therapy, or non-platinum therapy versus platinum combination therapy in patients over 70 years of age with advanced NSCLC. We allowed inclusion of RCTs specifically designed for the elderly population and those designed for elderly subgroup analyses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed search results, and a third review author resolved disagreements. We analyzed the following endpoints: overall survival (OS), one-year survival rate (1yOS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), major adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 51 trials in the review: non-platinum single-agent therapy versus non-platinum combination therapy (seven trials) and non-platinum combination therapy versus platinum combination therapy (44 trials). Non-platinum single-agent versus non-platinum combination therapy Low-quality evidence suggests that these treatments have similar effects on overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.17; participants = 1062; five RCTs), 1yOS (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07; participants = 992; four RCTs), and PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.07; participants = 942; four RCTs). Non-platinum combination therapy may better improve ORR compared with non-platinum single-agent therapy (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.26; participants = 1014; five RCTs; low-quality evidence).Differences in effects on major adverse events between treatment groups were as follows: anemia: RR 1.10, 95% 0.53 to 2.31; participants = 983; four RCTs; very low-quality evidence; neutropenia: RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.65; participants = 983; four RCTs; low-quality evidence; and thrombocytopenia: RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.89; participants = 914; three RCTs; very low-quality evidence. Only two RCTs assessed quality of life; however, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of the paucity of available data. Non-platinum therapy versus platinum combination therapy Platinum combination therapy probably improves OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85; participants = 1705; 13 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence), 1yOS (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96; participants = 813; 13 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence), and ORR (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.85; participants = 1432; 11 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence) compared with non-platinum therapies. Platinum combination therapy may also improve PFS, although our confidence in this finding is limited because the quality of evidence was low (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; participants = 1273; nine RCTs).Effects on major adverse events between treatment groups were as follows: anemia: RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.70 to 3.76; participants = 1437; 11 RCTs; low-quality evidence; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.59, 95% CI 2.22 to 5.82; participants = 1260; nine RCTs; low-quality evidence; fatigue: RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.38; participants = 1150; seven RCTs; emesis: RR 3.64, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.29; participants = 1193; eight RCTs; and peripheral neuropathy: RR 7.02, 95% CI 2.42 to 20.41; participants = 776; five RCTs; low-quality evidence. Only five RCTs assessed QoL; however, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of the paucity of available data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people over the age of 70 with advanced NSCLC who do not have significant co-morbidities, increased survival with platinum combination therapy needs to be balanced against higher risk of major adverse events when compared with non-platinum therapy. For people who are not suitable candidates for platinum treatment, we have found low-quality evidence suggesting that non-platinum combination and single-agent therapy regimens have similar effects on survival. We are uncertain as to the comparability of their adverse event profiles. Additional evidence on quality of life gathered from additional studies is needed to help inform decision making.

Polypeptide-based combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin for enhanced chemotherapy efficacy and reduced side-effects

A novel methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(l-glutamic acid)-b-poly(l-phenylalanine) (mPEG-b-P(Glu)-b-P(Phe)) triblock copolymer was prepared and explored as a micelle carrier for the co-delivery of paclitaxel (PTX) and cisplatin (cis-diamminedichlo-platinum, CDDP). PTX and CDDP were loaded inside the hydrophobic P(Phe) inner core and chelated to the middle P(Glu) shell, respectively, while mPEG provided the outer corona for prolonged circulation. An in vitro release profile of the PTX+CDDP-loaded micelles showed that the CDDP chelation cross-link prevented an initial burst release of PTX. The PTX+CDDP-loaded micelles exhibited a high synergism effect in the inhibition of A549 human lung cancer cell line proliferation over 72 h incubation. For the in vivo treatment of xenograft human lung tumor, the PTX+CDDP-loaded micelles displayed an obvious tumor inhibiting effect with a 83.1% tumor suppression rate (TSR%), which was significantly higher than that of a free drug combination or micelles with a single drug. In addition, more importantly, the enhanced anti-tumor efficacy of the PTX+CDDP-loaded micelles came with reduced side-effects. No obvious body weight loss occurred during the treatment of A549 tumor-bearing mice with the PTX+CDDP-loaded micelles. Thus, the polypeptide-based combination of PTX and CDDP may provide useful guidance for effective and safe cancer chemotherapy.

Biweekly triplet chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine for advanced chemotherapy naïve non-small cell lung cancer

Aims and background

To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of biweekly scheduled triplet chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine for chemotherapy-naïve advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods and study design

Patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer and performance status of 0–2 were eligible. Patients who had brain metastasis and of an older age were also enrolled in the study. The triplet combination chemotherapy consisted of gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine at the doses of 1000 mg/m2, 25 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, were administered on day 1 and 14, every 28 days, up to 6 cycles.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. Median age was 60 years (range, 42–74). Most of the patients (83%) had metastatic disease and 7 patients (23%) had brain metastasis. In assessing 24 patients for response evaluation, none had complete response. Partial responses were achieved in 18 (60%) patients. Four patients (13%) had stable disease and 2 (7%) progressed. Thirteen percent and 20% of the patients developed severe (grade 3–4) neutropenia and anemia, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, severe thrombocytopenia, hepatic and renal toxicity were not seen. Overall and progression-free survival were 8.15 and 7.15 months, respectively. Patients who had no brain metastasis (P = 0.069), who had more than 3 courses of chemotherapy (P <0.001), and who had chemotherapy applied without dose reduction (P = 0.018) had better survivals.

Conclusions

The biweekly schedule of the triplet chemotherapy combination including gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine was effective in advanced, mostly metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with acceptable and manageable side effects.

Personalized medicine for targeted and platinum-based chemotherapy of lung and bladder cancer

The personalized medicine revolution is occurring for cancer chemotherapy. Biomarkers are increasingly capable of distinguishing genotypic or phenotypic traits of individual tumors, and are being linked to the selection of treatment protocols. This review covers the molecular basis for biomarkers of response to targeted and cytotoxic lung and bladder cancer treatment with an emphasis on platinum-based chemotherapy. Platinum derivatives are a class of drugs commonly employed against solid tumors that kill cells by covalent attachment to DNA. Platinum-DNA adduct levels in patient tissues have been correlated to response and survival. The sensitivity and precision of adduct detection has increased to the point of enabling subtherapeutic dosing for diagnostics applications, termed diagnostic microdosing, prior to the initiation of full-dose therapy. The clinical status of this unique phenotypic marker for lung and bladder cancer applications is detailed along with discussion of future applications.

A retrospective study of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Comparable toxicity, better outcome

BACKGROUND

  The outcomes of single-agent regimens as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poor. Pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin has been reportedly well-tolerated and active in chemotherapy-naïve NSCLC. The current study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect and toxicity of the regimen of pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin for pretreated advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

  The clinical records of consecutive patients with metastatic NSCLC who received pemetrexed after failed first-line chemotherapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

  The medical records of 79 eligible patients were examined. Thirty-four of them were treated with a regimen of pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin (PEMOX). Another 45 patients were administered pemetrexed alone (PEM). Both regimens were well-tolerated and there was no therapy-related death. Comparable response rates (15.2% vs. 11.1%) and tumor control rates (63.6% vs. 47.5%) were observed between the two groups. Median time to progression and overall survival of the PEMOX and PEM groups were 18 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.72-22.28 weeks) versus 13 weeks (95%CI: 12.28-13.72 weeks; P= 0.002), and 31 weeks (95%CI: 15.56-46.44 weeks) versus 21 weeks (95%CI: 18.37-23.63 weeks; P= 0.006), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

  The current retrospective study suggests that pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC has comparable safety and response with a pemetrexed alone regimen, but better survival.

[The status and prospects of treatment protocols for elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer]

近年来，老年晚期肺癌发病率和死亡率呈明显上升趋势，但老年患者总体接受积极治疗的人数却明显少于非老年患者，同时因受到社会、经济、家庭等医疗以外诸多因素的影响，老年晚期肺癌患者治疗现状不容乐观。现就当前国内外老年非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗现状和趋势作一综述。

Platinum-based compounds and risk for cardiovascular toxicity in the elderly: role of the antioxidants in chemoprevention

Cancer in elderly patients is an increasingly common problem. Older patients have more co-morbidity, therefore the toxic effects of chemotherapy treatment are less tolerable compared to younger patients. Platinum-based compounds (PBCs) are commonly used cytotoxic agents in the treatment of several solid tumors; however, their application is still limited in elderly patients, due to the risks in cardiovascular toxicity. The increased risk for myocardial ischemia, stroke, and vascular thrombosis linked with PBCs treatment is mainly due to reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the subsequent induction of oxidative stress and switch to a prothrombotic condition. Recently, studies have shown a different genetic susceptibility in cardiovascular toxicity induced by therapy with PBCs. Antioxidants, such as vitamin E, selenium, lycopene, melatonin, and resveratrol, have been implicated in cancer treatment by their property to suppress the oxidant injury. Resveratrol, especially, has been shown to increase the antineoplastic activity of cisplatin. In addition, resveratrol's ability to activate the sirtuin1 (SIRT1) pathway has been heavily implicated in the mechanisms controlling longevity and quality of life in the aged population. This article reviews the current state of treatment with PBCs and their associated risk for cardiovascular disease. It discusses the most powerful antioxidant supplementation options as a possible strategy to reduce the cardiovascular toxicity effects of chemotherapy in the elderly.

[American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer]

本文旨在为Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗提供更新版推荐。本文资料检索源自2002年以来公布的相关随机试验文献。此指南范围限于化疗与生物治疗。更新委员会对这些文献进行了总结并提供了推荐更新。162篇文献符合标准被纳入参考。本推荐基于可改善总生存期的治疗方法。仅改善无进展生存期的治疗方法推动了对毒性及生存质量的监测。对于体力状态评分为0分或1分患者的一线治疗，可推荐以铂类为基础的细胞毒性药物的两药联用。对铂类治疗有禁忌的患者，可采用非铂类细胞毒性两药联合。对于体力状态评分为2分的患者，单一细胞毒性药物即可。对于疾病进展或经过4个周期的治疗仍对治疗无反应的患者，应停止一线细胞毒性化疗。即使在6个周期后患者对治疗仍有反应，亦应停止两药细胞毒性化疗。对于伴有明确的表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）突变的患者，可推荐一线采用吉非替尼治疗；对于EGFR突变为阴性或不明确的患者，细胞毒性化疗更佳。除具有特定临床特征的患者外，可推荐贝伐单抗与卡铂-紫杉醇联用。对于通过免疫组化证实EGFR阳性的肿瘤患者，可推荐西妥昔单抗与顺铂-长春瑞滨联用。多西紫杉醇、厄洛替尼、吉非替尼或培美曲塞被推荐作为二线治疗。对于未曾接受过厄洛替尼或吉非替尼治疗的患者，可推荐厄洛替尼作为三线治疗。现有数据不足以推荐常规三线采用细胞毒性药物。已有的证据也不足以推荐常规应用分子标记物选择化疗。

Carboplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced, nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of consecutive patients with stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous NSCLC were reviewed. All patients receiving at least 1 cycle of the 3-drug regimen (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the curve of 5-6, bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously), were included for assessment of response, safety, and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients received this regimen between February 2008 and July 2009; 63% were women. Median follow-up was 6.3 months (range, 1.6-21.1 months). Median number of cycles was 6 (range, 1-6 cycles); 67% completed 6 cycles; 83% went on to receive maintenance bevacizumab/pemetrexed. Among those who received maintenance, the median number of cycles administered was 4.5 (range, 1-18 cycles). Response rate was 52%; stable disease was observed in another 40%. On the basis of Kaplan-Meier analysis, actuarial overall survival was 83% at 12 months; actuarial progression-free survival was 83% and 63% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Clinical improvement was noted in 41% of the patients, with clinical stability in another 48%. Grade 2 and 3 toxicities from the regimen included anemia (11% and 15%), fatigue (37% and 7.4%), febrile neutropenia (7.4%; grade 3 only), thrombocytopenia (7.4% and 0), and thromboembolic disorders (3.7% and 3.7%). Bevacizumab-induced side effects (any grade) included headaches (22.2%), epistaxis (30%), hemoptysis (3.7%), and hypertension (11%). No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were seen.

CONCLUSION

Combination carboplatin/pemetrexed and bevacizumab followed by maintenance therapy with pemetrexed/bevacizumab is effective, with response rates > 50%, acceptable toxicity, and promising early survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

First-line systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) frequently presents at an incurable stage, and a majority of patients will be considered for palliative chemotherapy at some point in their disease. This article reviews the growing evidence for first-line treatment in NSCLC.

METHODS

Studies of first-line chemotherapy regimens including new agents (docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and vinorelbine) and targeted agents (bevacizumab, erlotinib, and gefitinib) were identified through Medline, Embase, the Cochrane databases, and web sites of guideline organizations.

RESULTS

Two evidence-based guidelines, 10 systematic reviews, and forty-six randomized trials were eligible for inclusion. Randomized studies suggest that platinum-based doublets (platinum plus new agent) are the standard of care for first-line systemic therapy. No one new agent is clearly superior for use in combination with a platinum agent. The survival advantage of platinum-based doublets over nonplatinum combinations or older combinations is modest. The addition of bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel has shown improved survival, although multiple exclusion criteria limit the applicability of these data to a subset of patients. In patients at least 70 years of age or with Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group performance status 2, a new single agent is an alternative. Treatment beyond four to six cycles impedes quality of life without prolonging life. Emerging data suggest that the choice of chemotherapy agent may be influenced by histologic subtype.

CONCLUSION

In NSCLC, a combination of a platinum agent plus a new agent continues to be the standard of care. As differences between regimens are small, toxicity and patient preference should help guide regimen choice.

Refining the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a debilitating and deadly disease with virtually no chance for long-term survival. Chemotherapy has improved both survival and quality of life for patients with advanced disease. Overall survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC has gradually increased from 8 to 12 months over the past three decades with the introduction of new chemotherapeutic drugs and agents directed at novel targets in the cancer cell. Epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor are two such targets. Recent developments also include treatment based on histology and the use of maintenance therapy. It has been recognized that lung cancer is a very complex disease. It is common practice to include a number of scientific correlative studies in the design of clinical trials in order to determine predictive markers of benefit from treatment. This article will review the current approach to the treatment of advanced NSCLC including the use of chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. Future directions including the use of potentially predictive biomarkers and innovative clinical trials aimed at a more individualized approach to treatment will also be discussed.

First-line systemic treatment of advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia: consensus statement from the Asian Oncology Summit 2009

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an increasing global challenge, especially in low-income countries. Most guidelines for the management of advanced-stage NSCLC have limited effect in countries with resource constraints. Following a systematic literature search, we present an overview of the management of advanced-stage NSCLC in the first-line setting, discuss resources required for systemic therapy, and provide treatment recommendations stratified to four resources levels. Treatment guidelines appropriate for different resource levels offer a realistic approach to management of advanced-stage NSCLC, by recognising the limitations of a particular health-care system. Although there are many barriers to cancer control in low-resource countries, these can be overcome by using measures that are culturally appropriate, economically feasible, and evidence-based. Initiatives include strategic planning, tobacco control, training of health-care workers, access to therapeutic agents, acquisition of information, public education, and alliances with established institutions and international organisations.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.

Gemcitabine combined with either pemetrexed or paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II SICOG trial

PURPOSE

To estimate the safety, activity, and impact on quality of life of a combination of gemcitabine and pemetrexed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of a randomized two-stage phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients in stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were randomly allocated to receive either gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 1, and pemetrexed (Alimta) 500 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on day 8 of a 3-weekly cycle (GA arm), or paclitaxel 120 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), both given on days 1 and 8 of a 3-weekly cycle (PG arm).

RESULTS

105 (GA arm, 51; PG arm, 54) eligible patients (stage IV, 32 and 30, respectively) were enrolled into this study; thereafter, accrual was stopped due to first-stage analysis. The response rate was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-33%) in the GA arm, and 32% (95% CI, 20-46%) in the PG arm. Median progression-free survival was 5.1 (95% CI, 3.7-6.5) months in the GA arm, and 8.3 (95% CI, 5.9-10.7) months in the PG arm, while median overall survival was 10.5 (95% CI 7.1-13.9), and 13.3 (95% CI 11.7-14.9) months, respectively. Severe neutropenia (36% vs 22%), and febrile neutropenia (14% vs 7%) were more common with the GA regimen, while hair loss (52% vs 16%) and any grade peripheral neuropathy (31% vs 2%) occurred more frequently with PG regimen. Other severe side effects of GA regimen were diarrhoea (10%), liver enzyme derangement (10%), and fatigue (8%).

CONCLUSION

The GA regimen was tolerated and moderately active in advanced or metastatic NSCLC. However, this combination did not yield any advantage in comparison with the PG regimen, and does not deserve further evaluation.

Phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab with maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB (effusion) or stage IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for six cycles. For patients with response or stable disease, pemetrexed and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up was 13.0 months, and the median number of treatment cycles was seven (range, one to 51). Thirty patients (60%) completed > or = six treatment cycles, and nine (18%) completed > or = 18 treatment cycles. Among the 49 patients assessable for response, the objective response rate was 55% (95% CI, 41% to 69%). Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.5 months) and 14.1 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 19.6 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was modest-anemia (6%; 0), neutropenia (4%; 0), and thrombocytopenia (0; 8%). Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were proteinuria (2%; 0), venous thrombosis (4%; 2%), arterial thrombosis (2%; 0), fatigue (8%; 0), infection (8%; 2%), nephrotoxicity (2%; 0), and diverticulitis (6%; 2%). There were no grade 3 or greater hemorrhagic events or hypertension cases.

CONCLUSION

This regimen, involving a maintenance component, was associated with acceptable toxicity and relatively long survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. These results justify a phase III comparison against the standard-of-care in this patient population.

Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer

Health-related quality-of-life (QOL) endpoints in clinical trials provide decision makers with a more comprehensive picture of a specific treatment than activity-related endpoints alone. Such endpoints are increasingly being reported in cancer clinical trials. We reviewed phase III clinical trials that involved gemcitabine in the treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. A systematic literature search was undertaken and 16 phase III clinical trials were found in which gemcitabine therapy was included in a treatment arm and QOL was an endpoint. Twelve of the 16 trials compared a gemcitabine-based treatment with a non-gemcitabine-based treatment. Not all data were reported in the trials, and the findings are mixed. However, a review of these 12 trials generally shows that gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy treatments had either no different or more favourable QOL outcomes than non-gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy treatments. Ten of the 16 trials that were reviewed had a primary endpoint or objective that was not QOL. Of these ten trials, only four concluded that one treatment arm could be therapeutically favoured over another in terms of the non-QOL primary endpoint. Two of the trials reported no difference in QOL and two reported that QOL favoured the arm that was therapeutically favoured. Many more trials will need to be conducted in order to conclude that gemcitabine-containing arms are associated with a more desirable QOL than non-gemcitabine-containing arms and that QOL necessarily favours the therapeutically favoured arm in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Third generation triplet cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic overview

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analysis on three drugs combination for treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) did not demonstrate an improvement in survival, however many of the trials included in this meta-analysis used older and less effective cytotoxic drugs. We conducted this analysis to compare the relative efficacy of third generation triplet therapy with that of standard double therapy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed using the search terms "lung cancer" and "randomized trials". Trials not utilizing a third generation cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent (paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine) were excluded. Pooled odds ratios (OR) for the objective response and toxicity rates were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel estimate. Pooled median ratios for median survival were calculated using the weighted sum of the log-ratio of median ratios of individual study.

RESULTS

We analyzed six randomized comparative trials involving 1932 patients. Patients receiving triplet therapy had a significantly higher response rate (OR: 1.33; 95% CI, 1.50-2.23; P<0.001). Incidence of grade III/IV hematological toxicity was higher with triplet therapy. Non-hematological toxicities, with the exception of neuropathy, were similar. Median survival of triplet therapy was not significantly different from doublet (MR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.91-1.35; P=0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Triplet therapy with third generation cytotoxic drugs is associated with higher tumor response rate at the expense of increased toxicity. Although triplet therapy had a better overall survival compared to doublet therapy, this did not reach statistical significance.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination in young and elderly patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

We retrospectively assessed tolerability and efficacy of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination in 259 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in three randomized SICOG trials according to their age (<or=70 or >70 years) at study entry. Apart from age, demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. Response rate of paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was similar in younger and in elderly (36% versus 30%). Chemotherapy was well tolerated, but severe neutropenia (12% versus 7%), anaemia (6.6% versus 1.8%), and vomiting (5% versus 0) were more frequent in elderly patients. Both median progression-free survival (PFS, 5.5 months versus 4.2 months), and overall survival (OS, 11.1 months versus 9.1 months) resulted slightly prolonged for younger patients. However, only stage and performance status resulted independently affecting PFS and OS. In conclusion, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine were similarly tolerated and active in younger and elderly patients. This regimen should be considered an option for the management of fit elderly patients.

Prospective phase II trial of a combination of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine with cisplatin and UFT as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE

The standard chemotherapy for non-elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum-based doublet combination therapy. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that infusion at the fixed dose rate (FDR) of 10mg/(m(2)min) may be more effective than a standard 30-min infusion of gemcitabine. In addition, oral uracil-tegafur (UFT) was associated with a survival advantage in the adjuvant setting. Therefore, we performed a phase II study using the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and UFT as first-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with a performance status of 0-2 and were chemotherapy-naive. Gemcitabine (1,250 mg/m(2), 10mg/(m(2)min) on days 1 and 8, respectively) and cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) on day 1) were injected intravenously and UFT (400mg/day) was administered orally on days 1-14. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. Primary endpoint was overall response rate and secondary endpoints were overall survival, time to progression and safety profile.

RESULT

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (range: 44-72 years). The performance status was 0 in 4, 1 in 30, and 2 in 3 patients. Twenty-three patients completed six cycles. Complete response was achieved in one (3%) patient, partial response in 17 (46%) patients, and stable disease in 10 (27%) patients. The overall response rate was 48.6% on an intention-to-treat basis and 54.5% of patients in whom a response evaluation was possible (n=33). The median survival time was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-18.2), the 1-year survival rate was 54% and the median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 4.3-6.4). Toxicities were moderate and mostly hematological adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 37% of patients and four patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 19% and 5% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSION

The combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and UFT is an active and well-tolerated first-line regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Docetaxel weekly regimen in conjunction with RF hyperthermia for pretreated locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and therapeutic effect of chemotherapy combined with regional radio frequency hyperthermia for pretreated locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

29 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled in present study, received chemotherapy up to 4 cycles and radio frequency hyperthermia up to 32 times. The primary end points were grade 3,4 hematological or non-hematological toxicities and progression free survival, the secondary end points were response rate, tumor control rate and overall survival. Method of Kaplan-Meier was used for the survival analysis.

RESULTS

21 patients completed their arranged treatments. The most common grade 3,4 toxicity was neutropenia (24.1%). Median progression free survival was 4 months (range 0-13 months), one year progression free survival rate was 10.3%. Overall response rate was 25.9%, tumor control rate was 66.6%. Median overall survival was 11 months (range 2-18+ months), one year overall survival rate was 44.8%.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of chemotherapy in conjunction with regional hyperthermia was safe and well tolerant, it suggested an impressive tumor control rate and an acceptable one year progression free survival. Further study might be needed.

Intra-patient alternated dose escalation of paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus paclitaxel followed by fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in fit elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to select the best schedule of administration for the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine combination in fit elderly patients affected by locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-eight patients in stage III or IV NSCLC, aged 70 years or more and in ECOG performance status (PS)<or=1, were randomly allocated to receive: paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8, with an intra-patient alternated dose escalation up to 100 and 1200 mg/m(2), respectively, over three cycles (arm A); or paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. (100 min) on days 1 and 8 (arm B). Treatment was repeated in both arms every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles.

RESULTS

With a median of 3 (range, 1-6) delivered cycles, the two schedules yielded a similar response rate (25% versus 26%), failure-free survival (median, 3.3 months versus 3.2 months), progression-free survival (median, 5.1 months versus 5.2 months), and overall survival (median, 9.7 months versus 9.6 months). Survival was independently affected by the PS of patients and by the metastatic spread. Severe side effects were comparable and negligible in both arms.

CONCLUSION

A substantial difference between these two schedules in terms of efficacy and safety can be ruled-out. Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine is an advisable combination for treating fit elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.