The impact of induction chemotherapy on the outcome of second-line therapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Second-line erlotinib after failure of pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Real-world effectiveness, safety and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Little data is available on patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC treated with erlotinib specifically after failure of first-line pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy. We assessed the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of erlotinib in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Prospective single-arm, open-label, multicenter, non-interventional study of erlotinib (150mg daily) in inoperable stage III/IV NSCLC after progression on first-line pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy without EGFR-mutation selection. Patients were followed according to routine practice and response assessment was performed using RECIST 1.1. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included best confirmed overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS). Adverse events were recorded. An independent dataset was used to validate the results.

RESULTS

In all, 59 patients were screened, 57 enrolled, and 54 (36 men; median age 65 years) included in the per-protocol analysis. Median PFS was 1.8 (95% CI 1.4-2.6) months, with 11% (95% CI 5-21%) alive and progression-free at 6 months. The ORR was 0.0% (97.5% CI 0.0-6.8%) and the DCR 34.6% (95% CI 21.9-49.0%). Median overall survival was 5.8 (95% CI 3.3-8.6) months with 28% (95% CI 17-42%) alive at one year. Rash occurred in 60.7% (95% CI 46.7-73.5%), with severe rash in 12.5% (95% CI 5.1-24.1%). Any grade diarrhea was observed in 42.8% (95% CI 29.7-56.8%), with grade 3 occurring in 7.1% (95% CI 1.9-17.2%). Erlotinib was stopped in 21.0% (95% CI 11.3-33.9%) of patients due to adverse events, which were treatment related in 7%.

CONCLUSION

Second-line erlotinib after pemetrexed treatment results in similar real-world outcomes as reported after non-pemetrexed containing first-line therapy. However, the overall duration of response in unselected patients remains limited and other effective treatments have in the meantime been introduced. No new safety signals were detected.

Defining aggressive or early progressing nononcogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer: a separate disease entity?

A substantial proportion of patients with nononcogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has 'aggressive disease', as reflected in short time to progression or lack of disease control with initial platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, clinical correlates of aggressive disease behavior during first-line therapy have been shown to predict greater benefit from addition of nintedanib to second-line docetaxel in adenocarcinoma NSCLC. Positive predictive effects of aggressive disease have since been reported with other anti-angiogenic agents (ramucirumab and bevacizumab), while such features may negatively impact on outcomes with nivolumab in nonsquamous NSCLC with low PD-L1 expression. Based on a review of the clinical data, we recommend aggressive nonsquamous NSCLC should be defined by progression within <6-9 months of first-line treatment initiation.

Drug Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Potential for NOTCH Targeting?

Drug resistance is a major cause for therapeutic failure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) leading to tumor recurrence and disease progression. Cell intrinsic mechanisms of resistance include changes in the expression of drug transporters, activation of pro-survival, and anti-apoptotic pathways, as well as non-intrinsic influences of the tumor microenvironment. It has become evident that tumors are composed of a heterogeneous population of cells with different genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic characteristics that result in diverse responses to therapy, and underlies the emergence of resistant clones. This tumor heterogeneity is driven by subpopulations of tumor cells termed cancer stem cells (CSCs) that have tumor-initiating capabilities, are highly self-renewing, and retain the ability for multi-lineage differentiation. CSCs have been identified in NSCLC and have been associated with chemo- and radiotherapy resistance. Stem cell pathways are frequently deregulated in cancer and are implicated in recurrence after treatment. Here, we focus on the NOTCH signaling pathway, which has a role in stem cell maintenance in non-squamous non-small lung cancer, and we critically assess the potential for targeting the NOTCH pathway to overcome resistance to chemotherapeutic and targeted agents using both preclinical and clinical evidence.

Polymorphisms of Genes Encoding Multidrug Resistance Proteins as a Predictive Factor for Second-Line Docetaxel Therapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Multidrug resistance (MDR) remains a substantial problem in chemotherapy. The purpose of the study was to investigate potential factors, including MDR genes polymorphisms, that could be used in qualification for second-line docetaxel therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after failure of platinum based chemotherapy. Study group comprised of 58 Caucasian subjects. Evaluation of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) of ABCC2/MRP2 and ABCB1/MDR1 genes was performed using the High Resolution Melting (HRM) technique. TUBB3 gene expression was evaluated on RNA isolated from tumor tissue. Results with p value of <0.05 were considered significant. Factors associated with reduced risk of disease progression included good performance status (PS), long period between diagnosis and docetaxel treatment, and smoking for <10 pack-years. Disease control occurred more often in patients with G/G genotype of the ABCC2/MRP2 gene. Median overall survival was 4.25 months. Factors such as: good PS, disease control after docetaxel, long period from diagnosis to docetaxel, lack of significant weight loss, and third-line treatment were associated with prolongation of patients survival. Overall survival probability was significantly lower in patients with significant weight loss, poor PS, lack of disease control after docetaxel, and without third-line treatment. Factors that characterized the highest risk of survival shortening were: inability to apply third-line treatment, lack of best response to first-line therapy, poor PS, and C/G or G/G genotypes of ABCC2/MRP2 gene. We concluded that assessed factors had mainly prognostic and not predictive value. Finding reliable molecular predictors for second line docetaxel therapy requires further clinical trials.

Identifying Subsequent Therapies in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Factors Associated with Overall Survival

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To identify subsequent therapies used after first-line therapies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compare overall survival (OS) associated with subsequent therapies, and evaluate factors associated with OS in these patients.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB/IV) who were initiated on first-line therapy from January 1, 2008, through September 30, 2013, and afterward given subsequent chemotherapy (index date). Patients had to be 18 years or older at the time of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC. Patients were followed from the index date until one of the following end points: end of the study (September 30, 2014), disenrollment from the health plan, or death-whichever came the earliest. The primary outcome was OS. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze OS and evaluate the factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1280 patients on subsequent therapies. The most common subsequent therapies were pemetrexed (284 patients [22%]), erlotinib (216 patients [17%]), and docetaxel (139 patients [11%]). Patients from the singlets group had a lower OS at 6.3 months compared with all other groups: pemetrexed based, combination of pemetrexed and bevacizumab based, bevacizumab based, doublets, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (p<0.0001). Factors associated with greater OS included age younger than 65 years, female gender, and a longer time between initiation of first and subsequent therapies. Factors associated with a reduction in OS were pemetrexed-based or singlet regimens for subsequent therapy, diagnosis of squamous histology, and a higher number of adverse events prior to subsequent therapy.

CONCLUSION

We found that a subsequent therapy consisting of singlets is associated with reduced OS compared with other chemotherapy groups. Patient characteristics such as female gender, age younger than 65 years, diagnosis of nonsquamous histology, and/or a longer time frame between initiation of first-line and subsequent chemotherapy are associated with longer survival.

A comprehensive review of nongenetic prognostic and predictive factors influencing the heterogeneity of outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

While there have been advances in treatment options for those with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, unmet medical needs remain, partly due to the heterogeneity of treatment effect observed among patients. The goals of this literature review were to provide updated information to complement past reviews and to identify a comprehensive set of nongenetic prognostic and predictive baseline factors that may account for heterogeneity of outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A review of the literature between 2000 and 2010 was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. All relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected and data elements were abstracted. A classification system was developed to evaluate the level of evidence for each study. A total of 54 studies were selected for inclusion. Patient-related factors (eg, performance status, sex, and age) were the most extensively researched nongenetic prognostic factors, followed by disease stage and histology. Moderately researched prognostic factors were weight-related variables and number or site of metastases, and the least studied were comorbidities, previous therapy, smoking status, hemoglobin level, and health-related quality of life/symptom severity. The prognostic factors with the most consistently demonstrated associations with outcomes were performance status, number or site of metastases, previous therapy, smoking status, and health-related quality of life. Of the small number of studies that assessed predictive factors, those that were found to be significantly predictive of outcomes were performance status, age, disease stage, previous therapy, race, smoking status, sex, and histology. These results provide a comprehensive overview of nongenetic prognostic and predictive factors assessed in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer over the last decade. This information can be used to inform the design of future clinical trials by suggesting additional subgroups based on nongenetic factors that may be analyzed to further investigate potential prognostic and predictive factors.

Outcomes of second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in one institution

Background

This study analyzed the negative prognostic factors in patients who received second-line chemotherapy for advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 137 patients with inoperable stage III-IV NSCLC who received second-line chemotherapy. The effects of clinical parameters on survival were analyzed and the hazard ratios (HR) for mortality were identified by a Cox regression analysis.

Results

Sex, age older than 65 years, smoking history, cell type, T-stage, best response to first-line chemotherapy and first-line chemotherapy regimen were significant negative predictors in univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis showed that patients older than 65 years (HR, 1.530; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.020-2.297), advanced T stage (T4 vs. T1; HR, 2.273; 95% CI, 1.010-5.114) and non-responders who showed progression with first-line chemotherapy (HR, 1.530; 95% CI, 1.063-2.203) had higher HR for death.

Conclusion

The age factor, T stage and responsiveness to first-line chemotherapy were important factors in predicting the outcome of patients with advanced NSCLC who received second-line chemotherapy. The results may help to predict outcomes for these patients in the future.

Retrospective analysis of the clinical and demographic variables on the outcomes after second-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Platinum based doublets chemotherapy are the standard of care for metastatic or advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. This leads to modest survival advantage and improve quality-of-life. However, patients with advanced or metastatic disease eventually present disease progression and needs second-line systemic therapy in a selected group of patients or other supportive measures. There is very little knowledge available from the literature about the prognostic variables in patients, who receive second-line therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 329 patients received second-line treatment from July 2007 to September 2011 in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital. For statistical analysis, 12 potential prognostic variables included. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis carried out to identify the prognostic variables associated with survival.

RESULTS

The results of univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) and survival after second-line therapy identified to have prognostic significance: Age, sex, performance status, smoking history, serum lactate dehydrogenase, histopathology, first-line chemotherapy and its response and second-line therapy except the stage at diagnosis and site of failure after first-line therapy. The multivariate Cox regression analysis has shown that only performance and second-line therapy were independent prognostic variables for survival after second-line treatment and above these prognostic factors; age, smoking status and progression free survival also for OS.

CONCLUSION

The performance status has shown consistent result as a prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis for OS and survival after second-line therapy. These findings may also facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and be used for selecting patients for the correct choice of cytotoxic therapy.

Efficacy of pemetrexed as second-line therapy in advanced NSCLC after either treatment-free interval or maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib in IFCT-GFPC 05-02 phase III study

INTRODUCTION

Maintenance therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might lead to resistance to subsequent treatments. IFCT-GFPC 0502 study showed a progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with gemcitabine or erlotinib maintenance compared with observation after cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy. The trial included a pre-defined pemetrexed second-line therapy, allowing post-hoc assessment of its efficacy according to previous maintenance treatment or treatment-free interval.

METHODS

Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients were randomized after four cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy to either observation or to receive maintenance therapy with gemcitabine or erlotinib. Pemetrexed was given as second-line treatment on disease progression in all arms. PFS and overall survival (OS) were assessed from the beginning of pemetrexed therapy according to randomization arm.

RESULTS

Of the 464 randomized patients, 360 (78 %) received second-line pemetrexed (130 [84%], 114 [74%], and 116 [75%] in observation, gemcitabine, and erlotinib arm, respectively). Median number of pemetrexed cycles was 3 (1-40) in all arms. Median PFS did not differ between gemcitabine and observation arms (4.2 versus 3.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 [0.62-1.06]) or between erlotinib and observation arms (4.2 versus 3.9 months, HR 0.83 [0.64-1.09]). OS data showed a non-significant improvement with gemcitabine arm versus observation arm (8.3 versus 7.5 months, HR 0.81 [0.61-1.07]) or erlotinib arm versus observation arm (9.1 versus 7.5 months, HR 0.80 [0.61-1.05]). Results were similar for non-squamous patients. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were comparable in all arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance therapy with gemcitabine continuation or erlotinib does not seem to impair efficacy of second-line pemetrexed comparatively to administration after a treatment-free interval.

Treatment and outcome of patients with metastatic NSCLC: a retrospective institution analysis of 493 patients

Background

Most patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will face treatment with systemic therapy. Current clinical studies are demonstrating improvements in chemotherapy and overall survival. However, it remains unclear whether these results are translated into clinical practice.

Methods

We reviewed all stage IV NSCLC patients without second malignancies that were diagnosed from 2004 to 2006 at our institution. 493 consecutive patients were included into this retrospective analysis and were followed-up until end of 2011.

Results

352 patients (71.4%) received systemic therapy for up to 7 lines. For most patients, adjustments of dosages or applications had to be made at some point of the treatment, but the total applied dose remained generally close to the intended dose. The best disease control (BDC) rate decreased with increasing therapy lines from 59.7% to about 35%. Patients with palliative local therapy but no systemic treatment demonstrated inferior survival (median 2.9 versus 8.7 months, p < 0.001). The median interval between last treatment and death was 50 days and 15 days for chemotherapy and anti-EGFR therapy, respectively. BDC to the previous therapy lines was predictive for improved BDC to third- but not second-line therapy. Performing multivariate analysis, BDC to previous therapy, never-/ former-smoking status, and age > 70 years were associated with improved survival performing third-line therapy.

Conclusions

Stage IV NSCLC patients may receive substantial systemic therapy resulting in response and median survival rates that are comparable to data from clinical studies. However, preselection factors are increasingly important to improve therapy outcome and life quality.

Clinical benefit for patients with non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in phase I trials

AIM

To analyze the clinical features and outcomes of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated in phase I trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical characteristics, efficacy and toxicity data of 70 pretreated NSCLC patients enrolled in 17 phase I trials between January 2005 and June 2010 were analyzed at our institution.

RESULTS

The histological types were: adenocarcinoma (79%), squamous cell carcinoma (13%), and others. Patients received a median number of 3 prior lines of treatment before inclusion. 1 complete response (CR), 11 (16%) partial responses (PRs), and 29 (41%) stable diseases (SDs) were observed (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)). The median overall survival (OS) time was 18 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 4.1 months. The median PFS of these patients within their prior therapy line before phase I inclusion was 4.3 months. A performance status score of 0 and the number of prior lines of treatment were significant for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities were observed in 20 (27%) patients, and there was 1 treatment-related death.

CONCLUSION

Patients in good general condition and with limited pretreatment derived an improved benefit, suggesting that phase I studies may be a valid option for pretreated NSCLC patients.

Post-study therapy as a source of confounding in survival analysis of first-line studies in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Clinical trials exploring the long-term effects of first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer generally disregard subsequent treatment although most patients receive second and third-line therapies. The choice of further therapy depends on critical intermediate events such as disease progression and it is usually left at the physician's discretion. Time-dependent confounding may then arise with standard survival analyses producing biased effect estimates, even in randomized trials. Herein we describe the concept of time-dependent confounding in detail and discuss whether the response to first-line treatment may be a potential time-dependent confounding factor for survival in the context of subsequent therapy. A prospective observational study of 406 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer served as an example base. There is evidence that time-dependent confounding may occur in multivariate survival analysis after first-line therapy when disregarding subsequent treatment. In the light of this important but underestimated aspect some of the large and meaningful recent clinical first-line lung cancer studies are discussed, focussing on subsequent treatment and its potential impact on the survival of the study patients. No recently performed lung cancer trial applied adequate statistical analyses despite the frequent use of subsequent therapies. In conclusion, effect estimates from standard survival analysis may be biased even in randomized controlled trials because of time-dependent confounding. To adequately assess treatment effects on long-term outcomes appropriate statistical analyses need to take subsequent treatment into account.

Prognostic factors for second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: retrospective analysis at a single institution

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still considered the first choice, presenting a modest survival advantage. However, the patients eventually experience disease progression and require second-line therapy. While there are reliable predictors to identify patients receiving first-line chemotherapy, very little knowledge is available about the prognostic factors in patients who receive second-line treatments. The present study was therefore performed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 107 patients receiving second-line treatments from August 2002 to March 2012 in the Dicle University, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology. Fourteen potential prognostic variables were chosen for analysis in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify prognostic factors associated with survival.

RESULT

The results of univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) were identified to have prognostic significance: performance status (PS), stage, response to first-line chemotherapy, response to second- line chemotherapy and number of metastasis. PS, diabetes mellitus (DM), response to first-line chemotherapy and response to second-line chemotherapy were identified to have prognostic significance for progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis showed that PS, response to first-line chemotherapy and response to second- line chemotherapy were considered independent prognostic factors for OS. Furthermore, PS and response to second-line chemotherapy were considered independent prognostic factors for PFS.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PS, response to first and second-line chemotherapy were identified as important prognostic factors for OS in advanced NSCLC patients who were undergoing second-line palliative treatment. Furthermore, PS and response to second-line chemotherapy were considered independent prognostic factors for PFS. It may be concluded that these findings may facilitate pretreatment prediction of survival and can be used for selecting patients for the correct choice of treatment.

Pemetrexed versus docetaxel in second line non-small-cell lung cancer: results and subsets analyses of a multi-center, randomized, exploratory trial in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed and docetaxel are established therapies in second line non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Comparative data, concerning the two agents in the designated settings, however, are lacking in Chinese patients who account for the largest lung cancer population in the world.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We designed and performed a multi-center, randomized, exploratory clinical trial of pemetrexed compared with docetaxel in second line chemotherapy in Chinese NSCLC patients. Eligible patients with histological or cytological diagnosis of stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, who were not suitable for curative therapy and had failed from prior first line chemotherapy regimen for at least 4 weeks, were randomized to receive either pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1 with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone, or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1 with dexamethasone. Both regimens were implemented once every 21 days for 2 cycles. This study was designed to be a non-inferiority trial that compared tumor response for overall response rate (ORR) between the two drugs as primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores and toxicities.

RESULTS

260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy of either pemetrexed (132 patients) or docetaxel (128 patients). 106 patients in pemetrexed arm and 102 patients in docetaxel arm were evaluable for efficacy. The efficacy of pemetrexed was equivalent to that of docetaxel in the second-line treatment for Chinese NSCLC (ORR: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 9.4% vs. 4.9, p = 0.285, DCR: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 67.2% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.685). And pemetrexed seemed to slightly promote patients' average KPS score when comparing with docetaxel, although the difference was without statistical significance (changes of average KPS scores: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 0.28 ± 5.93 vs. -1.67 ± 8.57, p = 0.149). Patients receiving pemetrexed experienced significantly lower incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (7.0% vs. 27.6%, p < 0.001) and leucocytopenia (4.7% vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001) than those who received docetaxel. Also, there were lower incidences of alopecia, stomatitis, and neural abnormality for patients receiving pemetrexed than those receiving docetaxel. Incidence of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase elevation, however, was higher in pemetrexed arm than in docetaxel arm (32.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.013). In addition, age ≥ 60 patients benefit from pemetrexed with equivalent efficacies yet much lower toxicities compared to docetaxel (DCR: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 66.67% vs. 81.58%, p = 0.146; grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 17.25% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in equivalent efficacy outcomes and better safety profiles compared with docetaxel in second-line therapy for advanced NSCLC in Chinese lung cancer population. And age ≥ 60 patients may benefit from second-line single pemetrexed.

Prognostic evaluation and choice of second-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Patients with progressive disease after first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer have a limited life expectancy. In the second-line setting, a better understanding of prognostic factors and the availability of a prognostic score can contribute to a sensible evaluation of the risks and benefits associated with treatment. We previously showed that the prognosis of patients receiving second-line treatment is significantly conditioned by gender, performance status, histology, stage, previous platinum use and response to first-line treatment. A prognostic score based on these factors allows for the classification of patients into three categories. The score is simple to calculate because all of the variables considered are routinely collected as part of the baseline clinical evaluation of patients. For the majority of non-small-cell lung cancer patients, in the absence of known molecular predictive factors, the choice of second-line treatment among drugs with demonstrated efficacy should necessarily take into account prognosis and the risk:benefit ratio of patients.

Third CECOG consensus on the systemic treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The current third consensus on the systemic treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) builds upon and updates similar publications on the subject by the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG), which has published such consensus statements in the years 2002 and 2005 (Zielinski CC, Beinert T, Crawford J et al. Consensus on medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer--update 2004. Lung Cancer 2005; 50: 129-137). The principle of all CECOG consensus is such that evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment are given upon which all participants and authors of the manuscript have to agree (Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20 (11): 1771-1785). This is of particular importance in diseases in which treatment options depend on very particular clinical and biologic variables (Zielinski CC, Beinert T, Crawford J et al. Consensus on medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer--update 2004. Lung Cancer 2005; 50: 129-137; Beslija S, Bonneterre J, Burstein HJ et al. Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20 (11): 1771-1785). Since the publication of the last CECOG consensus on the medical treatment of NSCLC, a series of diagnostic tools for the characterization of biomarkers for personalized therapy for NSCLC as well as therapeutic options including adjuvant treatment, targeted therapy, and maintenance treatment have emerged and strongly influenced the field. Thus, the present third consensus was generated that not only readdresses previous disease-related issues but also expands toward recent developments in the management of NSCLC. It is the aim of the present consensus to summarize minimal quality-oriented requirements for individual patients with NSCLC in its various stages based upon levels of evidence in the light of a rapidly expanding array of individual therapeutic options.

Factors associated with long-term survival of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Only a small proportion of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a life expectancy greater than 2 years. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with long-term survival of patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients who had received chemotherapy for stage IIIb or IV NSCLC that was not amenable to radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. Data were gathered prospectively from a comprehensive database. Long-term survivors (>2 years) were compared with the other patients, with respect to clinical, biological and tumour-node-metastasis criteria.

RESULTS

Data for 245 consecutive patients were collected. Thirty nine patients (15.9%) survived for more than 2 years. Long-term survivors were more likely to have had metastases at fewer sites (P = 0.008), an absence of bone metastases (P = 0.01), a performance status (PS) of 0-1 at first progression of the tumour (P = 0.002), a tumour that was controlled with first (P < 0.0001) and second-line (P = 0.004) chemotherapy, maintenance therapy (P = 0.001), curative surgery (P < 0.0001), time to first progression of the tumour of >3 months (P < 0.0001), normal LDH levels at diagnosis (P = 0.049), and a haemoglobin concentration >110 g/L at first progression of the tumour (P = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, surgery, maintenance treatment, time to first progression of the tumour of >3 months, a PS of 0-1 at first progression, the number of chemotherapy agents received, and LDH levels, were significant predictors of long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

  Assessment of these factors, and the use of maintenance therapy, when possible, may identify a population of patients with NSCLC that is likely to have a prolonged life expectancy.

Prognostic score for second-line chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: external validation in a phase III trial comparing vinflunine with docetaxel

A prognostic index for second-line chemotherapy of NSCLC was previously developed, based on individual patient data (IPD) of nine randomized trials. In order to validate the prognostic score in an external dataset, we analysed IPD of a non-inferiority phase III trial comparing vinflunine vs. docetaxel in second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Primary endpoint of this analysis was overall survival (OS). The following variables were considered for survival analysis and score calculation: gender, performance status, stage of disease, tumour histology, type of first-line treatment, response to first-line treatment. Cox model, stratified by treatment arm, was used for multivariate analysis. Individual prognostic scores were derived, and patients were divided into 3 categories: <5 (best), 5-9 (intermediate), >9 (worst). All 551 patients enrolled in the trial had complete information for the calculation of prognostic score. Median OS in the whole group was 6.9 months, with similar efficacy in the two treatment arms. Median OS was 12.9, 6.9 and 3.8 months in the best, intermediate and worst category, respectively. Cox model showed a significant effect comparing intermediate vs. best category (Hazard Ratio 1.79, 95%CI 1.31-2.47, p=0.0003) and comparing worst vs. best category (Hazard Ratio 3.25, 95%CI 2.18-4.83, p<0.0001). The C-index of the model was high (0.926), indicating a good discrimination according to the proposed three risk categories. Prognostic ability of our score for candidates to second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC was successfully validated, allowing the identification of subgroups of patients with more vs. less favourable outcome. Prognostic score could be useful in daily decision-making in clinical practise, because a better understanding of factors conditioning life expectancy of patients could greatly help a careful evaluation of risks and benefits associated with therapeutic decisions.

Long-term chemotherapy may prolong survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer among responders to first-line chemotherapy

Survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has substantially improved. Long-term chemotherapy with epidermal growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and other agents has been associated with long survival. We retrospectively examined the associations between overall survival (OS) and clinical variables in patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose or course of outpatient chemotherapy in our institution. Of 360 patients who received first-line chemotherapy between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2007, 185 subsequently received additional outpatient chemotherapy and 175 underwent inpatient chemotherapy only. Of the 185 patients, 147 (79.5%), 96 (51.9%), and 60 (32.4%) received second-line, third-line, and fourth-line chemotherapy, respectively. Patients who received outpatient chemotherapy had significantly longer median OS (22.3 months) than did those undergoing inpatient chemotherapy only (7.6 months; P < 0.0001). In univariate analysis of the 185 patients, sex, performance status (PS), smoking status, stage, best response to first-line chemotherapy, use of docetaxel, and EGFR-TKIs were significantly associated with OS (P values: 0.0019, 0.0066, 0.0001, 0.0231, 0.0011, 0.0250, and 0.0023, respectively). In multivariate analysis, PS, stage, best response to first-line chemotherapy, and use of docetaxel were significantly associated with OS (P values: 0.0272, 0.0030, 0.0022, and 0.0376, respectively). Survival was significantly longer among patients who responded to docetaxel and/or EGFR-TKIs. Long-term chemotherapy did not increase cumulative hospitalization. In patients with advanced NSCLC, an effective long-term chemotherapy regimen might prolong survival in responders to first-line chemotherapy.

Pemetrexed as second-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

NSCLC accounts for 80% of all cases of lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer mortality. The majority of NSCLC patients present with advanced, unresectable disease, which remains incurable. In advanced disease, chemotherapy with platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) in combination with a third-generation cytotoxic drug (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, or docetaxel) can provide a modest improvement in survival without impairing quality of life. In chemotherapy-naïve, advanced, non-squamous NSCLC patients, the combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy was shown to produce better outcomes than chemotherapy alone. Response rates of 20%–40% can now be expected, with a median survival of 8–11 months and a 1-year survival rate of 30%–40%. In second-line treatment, docetaxel has shown superiority to best supportive care in terms of survival and quality of life. A pooled analysis comparing docetaxel administered weekly versus 3-weekly found similar survival rates between the schedules and a non-significant reduction in febrile neutropenia for the weekly regimen. Pemetrexed, a multitargeted antifolate agent, has shown clear activity in several tumors, including mesothelioma and NSCLC. In a phase III trial, second-line treatment with pemetrexed demonstrated overall survival comparable to docetaxel, with a more manageable toxicity profile.

[Analysis of prognostic factors in 541 female patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer]

背景与目的

随着女性肺癌发病率的攀升，其独特的临床和流行病学特征及良好预后引起了学界的关注。本研究通过回顾性分析女性晚期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC）患者的临床资料，探讨其预后相关因素。

方法

收集541例女性晚期NSCLC患者的临床资料，并随访至死亡。主要观察指标为总生存（overall survival, OS）。采用SPSS 11.0统计软件进行生存分析。

结果

全组腺癌占80.2%（434/541），总体中位OS为15个月（95%CI: 13.87-16.13），1年、2年、5年生存率分别为58.8%、23.7%和3.20%。单因素分析显示，临床分期、ECOG评分、体重下降、临床症状、血行转移和一线治疗后化疗方案数>1、一线化疗有效、曾接受靶向治疗或放疗均与中位OS明显相关（P值均 < 0.05）。治疗前体重下降、ECOG评分、靶向治疗及一线化疗有效为生存的独立预后因素（P值均 < 0.05）。

结论

女性晚期NSCLC患者的病理类型以腺癌为主，体重下降、ECOG评分、接受靶向治疗及一线化疗有效可能成为女性晚期NSCLC患者生存的独立预后指标。

Survival benefit with erlotinib maintenance therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) according to response to first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In the placebo-controlled phase III SATURN study, maintenance erlotinib after first-line chemotherapy demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the overall study population of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

After four cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, patients without progressive disease (PD) were randomised to erlotinib (150 mg/day) or placebo until PD or unacceptable toxicity. In this pre-planned analysis, data are assessed according to response to first-line chemotherapy (complete/partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD]).

RESULTS

Following first-line chemotherapy, 889 non-PD patients were included in the intention-to-treat population (55% SD; 44% CR/PR; <1% unknown response). Erlotinib maintenance therapy significantly prolonged PFS in both the SD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68; P < 0.0001) and CR/PR (HR = 0.74; P = 0.0059) groups, while OS was significantly prolonged in the SD group only (HR = 0.72; P = 0.0019). The erlotinib-related OS benefit in the SD group remained significant across subgroups, irrespective of tumour histology and/or EGFR mutation status. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the SD group and the overall population, and erlotinib treatment did not negatively impact quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced NSCLC and SD following first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy derive a significant OS benefit from maintenance erlotinib therapy.

Predictors and impact of second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: real-world considerations for maintenance therapy

INTRODUCTION

: Recent clinical trials incorporating maintenance chemotherapy into the initial treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have highlighted the benefits of exposing patients to second-line therapies. We, therefore, determined the predictors and impact of second-line chemotherapy administration in a contemporary, diverse NSCLC population.

METHODS

: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC from 2000 to 2007 at clinical facilities associated with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Demographic, disease, treatment, and outcome data were obtained from hospital tumor registries. The association between these variables was assessed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

: A total of 406 patients in this cohort received first-line chemotherapy and were included in the analysis. Mean age was 59 years, 28% were women, and 59% were white. Among these patients, 197 (49%) received second-line chemotherapy. Among those patients who had not progressed after four to six cycles of first-line chemotherapy, 67% received second-line chemotherapy. Receipt of second-line chemotherapy was significantly associated with patient insurance type (p = 0.007), number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and receipt of prechemotherapy palliative radiation therapy (p = 0.005) but was not associated with patient age, gender, race, histology, or year of diagnosis. In a multivariate model, second-line chemotherapy administration remained associated with insurance type (p = 0.003), number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.001), and receipt of prechemotherapy palliative radiation therapy (p = 0.008). The number of cycles of first-line chemotherapy and administration of second-line chemotherapy were associated with overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

: In this unselected, contemporary, and diverse cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC, 67% of individuals whose disease had not progressed after four to six cycles of first-line chemotherapy eventually received second-line chemotherapy. Markers of socioeconomic status, symptom burden, and response to and tolerance of first-line chemotherapy were associated with receipt of second-line chemotherapy. These factors may assist in the selection of patients most likely to benefit from maintenance chemotherapy.

The applicability of a predictive index for second- and third-line treatment of unselected non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of EGFR (TKI-EGFR) induced response in only 10% of Caucasian non-small-cell lung cancer patients in second- or third-line treatment. Independent predictive factors for qualification to TKI-EGFR treatment have not been assessed. In 2008, a prognostic index was reported for patients treated with erlotinib in the BR.21 trial, but its application for real, unselected patients is limited.

OBJECTIVES

Based on clinical and molecular factors of patients treated with erlotinib, we tried to create a predictive index which could be applied in real treatment practice.

METHODS

In a Cox regression model, we established 6 factors which affected overall survival for erlotinib treatment: performance status, erlotinib-induced rash, time from diagnosis to treatment, gender, weight loss and LDH level. We analyzed the risk factors of early progression and survival shorter than 6 months. In addition we included: time from first-line chemotherapy to erlotinib treatment, smoking status, mutation status in EGFR and anemia.

RESULTS

Our model consisted of 10 factors that were assigned points according to HR or χ2 and p value. The score was used to separate patients into 4 risk categories of unfavorable disease course based on 10th, 50th and 90th percentiles: low risk (I), intermediate low risk (II), intermediate high risk (III) and high risk (IV). Survival probability was significantly higher for group I, intermediate for groups II and III, and significantly lower for group IV (χ2 = 49.5, p < 0.0001). Based on the previously reported index we could not qualify our patients for the low risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model could be useful for qualification for erlotinib treatment of patients with numerous adverse factors and limited access to genetic examination.

Second-line therapy for NSCLC in clinical practice: baseline results of the European SELECTTION observational study

OBJECTIVE

Although the efficacy of a number of drugs for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated in Phase III trials, very limited evidence exists on optimal duration of second-line treatment or the reasons why this treatment is stopped in standard clinical practice. SELECTTION (Survey in European Lung Cancer Evaluating Choice of Treatment and Tolerability In Observed NSCLC) was designed to assess the time from initiation of second-line treatment for NSCLC to treatment discontinuation for any reason, the reasons for discontinuation, and the impact of discontinuation on outcomes.

METHODS

From October 2006 to January 2008, 1012 patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who completed or discontinued first-line treatment were enrolled in a multi-national, prospective observational cohort study (SELECTTION). Treatment cohorts were constructed based on the patients' distribution across second-line treatments that were assigned by physician decision (pemetrexed, docetaxel, erlotinib, other treatments). This report presents a descriptive analysis of the baseline data collected, including patient/disease characteristics, treatment history and planned second-line treatments. Factors that may have affected treatment choice, selected by physicians from a range of options, were also identified.

RESULTS

Overall, 468 patients (46.2%) were enrolled in the pemetrexed cohort, 232 (22.9%) in docetaxel cohort, 206 (20.4%) in erlotinib cohort and 106 (10.5%) received other treatments. The profile of patients enrolled in the erlotinib cohort differed from those of patients enrolled in the pemetrexed or docetaxel cohorts in that erlotinib was more frequently planned for women, never-smokers and patients with adenocarcinomas. The primary reasons physicians gave for selection of the second-line treatment were tolerance and efficacy for pemetrexed, and preferred regimen for the particular patient and efficacy for the other treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, pemetrexed, then docetaxel and erlotinib were the most frequently prescribed second-line treatments, which is in line with international guidelines. Erlotinib was most commonly prescribed to that subset of patients expected to gain the greatest benefit (those with adenocarcinoma, never-smokers and females). Pemetrexed was more frequently prescribed than docetaxel, with physicians most commonly choosing to prescribe the former agent because of its tolerability profile.

First-line therapy and methylation status of CHFR in serum influence outcome to chemotherapy versus EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors as second-line therapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients

The potential differential effect of first-line treatment and molecular mechanisms on survival to second-line chemotherapy or EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been fully investigated. In particular, CHFR is frequently methylated in NSCLC and may influence outcome. We analyzed the outcome of second-line chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs in 179 of 366 patients who had been treated in an ERCC1 mRNA-based customized cisplatin trial and correlated the results with CHFR methylation status. CHFR methylation in circulating DNA was examined by methylation-specific assay. A panel of seven human EGFR wild-type NSCLC cell lines was characterized for their sensitivity to sequential treatment with cisplatin and erlotinib, and the results were correlated with CHFR. Patients who had received first-line docetaxel/cisplatin attained an overall survival of 19.2 months when treated with second-line EGFR TKIs, in comparison with 10.7 months when treated with second-line chemotherapy (P = 0.0002). However, for patients who had received first-line docetaxel/gemcitabine, overall survival was 14.8 months with EGFR TKIs and 10.8 months with chemotherapy (P = 0.29). For patients with unmethylated CHFR overall survival to EGFR TKIs was 21.4 months, and 11.2 months for those with treated with chemotherapy (P = 0.0001). In the only lung tumor cell line not expressing CHFR, pretreatment with cisplatin was antagonistic to erlotinib, while it was synergistic in the other six lines. Second-line EGFR TKIs improved survival in patients receiving first-line cisplatin-based treatment. Unmethylated CHFR predicts increased survival to EGFR TKIs.

The relationship between response to previous systemic treatment and the efficacy of subsequent pemetrexed therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We sought to identify the relationship between response to previous systemic treatment and the efficacy of subsequent pemetrexed therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and fifty clinical stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed as a second-line or further-line treatment between April 2007 and June 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Prior therapies were divided into four types (gemcitabine-based [G], paclitaxel-based [P], docetaxel-based [D], and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor [I]). Objective response rates (ORR) and progression-free survivals (PFS) for pemetrexed therapy were analyzed according to the response outcome with each previous treatment.

RESULTS

The ORR of pemetrexed therapy was higher for patients who had achieved partial response with previous [G] therapy than others (15.0% vs. 4.3%, p=0.02). In addition, median PFS for pemetrexed therapy was greater for responders to [G] than for nonresponders (3.0 months vs. 1.7 months, p=0.004). The longer PFS for responders to [G] was also shown in the analysis among patients with squamous cell carcinoma (3.2 months vs. 1.7 months, p=0.056). By univariate analyses, the variables of the responder to [G] therapy, female, adenocarcinoma, never smoking status, and ECOG performance status of 0-1 were good predictive factors for pemetrexed therapy in terms of PFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that only response to [G] had statistical significance (hazard ratio=0.62, p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Response outcome to prior [G] therapy might predict the efficacy of subsequent pemetrexed therapy in advanced NSCLC.

Clinical predictive factors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving third-line therapy: Selecting the unselectable?

A not negligible proportion of NSCLC patients may be considered eligible for a third-line therapy with a palliative intent. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon to observe toxic side-effects with lack of efficacy. Aim of our study was to analyse clinical factors potentially influencing the global outcome of advanced NSCLC patients receiving third-line therapy. Patients with histologically proven inoperable (IIIB) or metastatic (IV) NSCLC, who received a second- and third-line treatment (either with EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy), were eligible for our analysis. 143 patients received a second-line treatment after failing a first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. 52 patients from this series were offered a third-line treatment. In the third-line setting, a better overall survival (months) was related to sex and to response to second-line. Globally, our findings seem to indicate that an improved overall survival in third-line is more strictly dependent on response to second-line, thus suggesting that when planning a third-line treatment, response to second-line should be considered as a relevant factor for the decision making process.

Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer in relation to expression of predictive and prognostic biomarkers

Chemotherapy (platinum-based doublet) remains a key component of treatment for early, locally advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. In the last decade, several important studies, including randomized clinical trials involving the use of new chemotherapeutic agents or targeted therapies, have been published. Targeted therapies have been tried as an alternative to, in conjunction with or following failure of standard chemotherapy regimens. Biomarkers have also been identified that predict responsiveness to and outcomes with commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, as well as targeted therapies. A trend for individualizing therapy for each patient based on baseline demographic characteristics, especially tumor histology and expression of predictive biomarkers, has been witnessed in the recent past. In this article, we have summarized the available literature on the role of histology and molecular markers of clinical relevance in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

The similar survival benefits of stable disease and partial response to pemetrexed in previously treated non-small cell carcinoma patients

PURPOSE

Pemetrexed is a recognized active agent for the second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical benefits of pemetrexed and to identify patient characteristics that predict response to pemetrexed.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with histologically proven stage IIIB or IV NSCLC who were treated with pemetrexed after the failure of prior chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The objective response rate for the 99 enrolled patients was 13.1% and 22 patients achieved stable disease (SD)-a disease control rate of 35.4%. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.32-2.28) and 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.23-8.97), respectively. The patients who achieved SD and pemetrexed-responders showed similar OSs (14.6 vs. 14.8 months, P = 0.55). However, a squamous cell carcinoma histology showed no significant OS difference between those that achieved disease control or progression (8.1 vs. 5.6 months, P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis of OS revealed that histology and response to first-line therapy predicted response to pemetrexed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed has comparable survival benefits in NSCLC patients that show objective response or stable disease.

Third-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: identifying the candidates for routine practice

BACKGROUND

The interest of first- and second-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated by successive randomized trials. Improvements in lung cancer care have routinely allowed a significant proportion of patients to be considered for third-line treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed, including all consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC, who received at least three lines of systemic antineoplastic treatment at our institution.

RESULTS

From a population of 613 patients treated with first-line treatment, a total of 173 patients received third-line treatment (cytotoxic chemotherapy in 131 patients; epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors in 42 patients). Only 13 patients (8%) received less than 75% of the theoretical dose intensity; 22 patients (13%) presented with severe toxicities. Symptom relief and performance status (PS) improvement were observed in 121 (92% of the 131 patients with symptoms) and 90 patients (52%), respectively. Using multivariate analysis, survival after third-line treatment was significantly increased in patients younger than 70 years-old (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.99, p = 0.047), who smoked less than 10 pack-years (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57-0.93, p = 0.036), with no cancer-related symptoms (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.92, p = 0.007), a weight loss inferior to 5 kg since the beginning of second-line (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.75, p = 0.013), a PS 0 to 1 (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.86, p = 0.008), and no extrathoracic tumor spread at initiation of third-line treatment (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.94, p = 0.042). Disease control after both first- and second-line treatments was the strongest predictor of prolonged survival after third-line treatment (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.67, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced NSCLC may benefit from third-line treatment. The best candidates can be identified using standard prognostic factors, such as PS, and disease control after first- and second-line treatments.

Clinical assessment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer eligible for second-line chemotherapy: a prognostic score from individual data of nine randomised trials

PURPOSE

Knowledge of prognostic factors for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients eligible for second-line treatment is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic role of a number of routinely collected clinical variables and to provide a summary index to discriminate patients according to probability of survival.

METHODS

Individual data from nine randomised trials of second-line treatment in advanced NSCLC were analysed. Primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Cox model, stratified by trial, was used for multivariate analyses, and a prognostic index was provided and validated according to an internal/external procedure.

RESULTS

Out of 1239 patients, 1197 patients (97%) had complete information. Median OS was 7.4months. At multivariate analysis, prognosis was significantly influenced by gender (worse in males), performance status (PS), tumour histology (worse in squamous and other histology versus adenocarcinoma), stage (worse in IV versus IIIB), type of previous treatment (worse for patients pretreated with platinum) and response to first-line (worse for patients not obtaining objective response). Prognostic score values range from 0 to 14. When three categories were derived, median overall survival values were equal to 11.6, 7.5 and 3.0months for best (<5), intermediate (5-9) and worst (>9) categories, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prognosis of patients eligible for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC is significantly conditioned by gender, PS, histology, stage, previous use of platinum and response to first-line. A prognostic score was derived that discriminates well subjects with a relatively more favourable prognosis and those with very short life expectancy.

New data integrating multitargeted antifolates into treatment of first-line and relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 80% of all lung cancers. With modern platinum- based combination regimens, overall median survival has reached 9-12 months. Antifolates are active against several solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. The cytotoxic action of antifolates is mainly related to their ability to inhibit several different folate-dependent enzymes involved in DNA synthesis. Pemetrexed is a novel multitargeted antifolate that inhibits at least 3 of the enzymes involved in purine and pyrimidine synthesis: thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT). Pemetrexed was approved for the treatment of relapsed NSCLC as it produced equivalent response and survival rates and less toxicity compared with docetaxel. Pemetrexed in combination with platinum analogues or with gemcitabine showed equivalent clinical impact compared with standard combinations of platinum plus third-generation agents. We analyze the potential implications of pemetrexed's role in first-line chemotherapy of NSCLC as well as hints of differential cytotoxic action according to histology, new schedules of vitamin supplementation, and target enzymes expression levels. Issues of pharmacogenomics are becoming relevant in defining pemetrexed efficacy. Chemosensitivity was significantly linked to low levels of TS, GARFT, and DHFR in preclinical models. Consequently, the differential expression of TS according to histology might explain the different activity of pemetrexed according to histology, as recently postulated.

Treatment paradigms for advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer in the era of multiple lines of therapy

The duration of first-line and the timing of second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer has been an area of recent investigation. Five trials have been performed that have investigated shorter (3-4 cycles) versus longer duration of platinum-based therapy; four trials revealed an equivalent overall survival with the shorter duration of therapy, and one trial revealed superior survival with the longer duration of therapy. The toxicity and quality of life data has either been equivalent or favored the shorter duration of therapy. Two trials have investigated the timing of a second-line therapy after completion of four cycles of platinum-based therapy versus the standard treatment paradigm of initiating second-line therapy upon disease progression. Both of these trials have revealed a statistically significant improvement in the progression-free survival, and a trend towards improved survival for the earlier use of second-line therapy. Only 50 to 60% of patients on the standard treatment arm initiated second-line therapy, and the promising results observed are most likely related to the fact that a higher percentage of patients received second-line therapy on the experimental arm. Several trials have investigated maintenance chemotherapy, and these trials have not revealed a survival benefit probably due to the fact that many patients experience disease progression or unacceptable toxicity during the initial or maintenance therapy. The addition of a targeted agent (bevacizumab or cetuximab) to the initial chemotherapy and the continuation of the targeted agent after completion of the chemotherapy have yielded superior overall survival in comparison to chemotherapy alone. The incremental benefit of the maintenance therapy with the targeted agent is unknown.

Second-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer. A systematic review of literature and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

To assess the efficacy of second-line treatments in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A systematic review of literature with metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was independently performed by three authors. A primary analysis included all RCTs comparing any approach (chemotherapy or therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] inhibitors) with placebo; a secondary analysis included all RCTs comparing any treatment with docetaxel therapy every 3 weeks. The 1-year survival rate (SR) of the primary analysis was the primary outcome of the study; the 1-year SR of the secondary analysis, response rate (RR), and time to progression of primary and secondary analyses were the secondary end points.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs met the selection criteria. The outcomes of 2,627 and 5,952 patients were analyzed in the primary and secondary analysis, respectively. A significant heterogeneity was documented in the primary analysis for 1-year SR with odd ratio [OR] = 0.763 (p = 0.029). No heterogeneity was documented for RR in the primary analysis, with OR = 0.165 (p < 0.001). A modest heterogeneity was documented in the secondary analysis for 1-year SR and RR, with 1-year SR OR = 0.924 (p = 0.122) and RR OR = 1.069 (p = 0.643).

CONCLUSION

Second-line treatments in NSCLC seem to improve the main outcomes better than supportive care. Docetaxel administration every 3 weeks probably remains the "gold standard" because at present the data in literature are not enough to support a greater efficacy of other alternative options. Further trials are needed to identify a clinical and biological profile that could predict the response to treatments and a criterion to select the patients to be treated with chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors.

Efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed as a third-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Pemetrexed has been approved for second-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the role of third-line pemetrexed therapy in NSCLC has not yet been generally accepted. We attempted to validate third-line pemetrexed therapy and evaluate predictive factors for pemetrexed therapy for NSCLC.

METHODS

Medical records of NSCLC patients who received pemetrexed therapy that progressed after systemic therapy were reviewed retrospectively. We stratified patients according to clinicopathologic characteristics to find predictive factors for pemetrexed therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were eligible for analysis, and overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.03 months. The objective response rate was 12%, and the toxicity profile was favorable. Pemetrexed was used as a second-line treatment in 30% of patients, and as third- or further-line treatment in 70%. Comparing the efficacy of pemetrexed in these two settings (second-line versus third- or further-line), there was no significant difference in terms of PFS (3.07 versus 2.83 months, P = 0.86). When we evaluated predictive factors by multivariate analysis, performance status significantly influenced PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed is a suitable third-line treatment option with good efficacy and tolerable toxicity profile for NSCLC.

Does an optimal therapeutic sequence exist in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

BACKGROUND

A growing percentage of patients affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer who progressed after first-line chemotherapy still have a good performance status and require second-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE

An overview of the state of the art of second-line therapeutic options is presented.

METHODS

The scope of the review is to give an update on the therapeutic options currently available for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Among chemotherapeutic drugs docetaxel and pemetrexed have been approved for second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Although the drugs are equiactive in terms of response rate and survival parameters the latter has a clear-cut advantage in terms of tolerability and quality of life. Therefore, pemetrexed is considered the best second-line therapeutic option in order to avoid severe side effects. Among biologic agents the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefinitib and erlotinib have been largely tested, but only the latter has been approved for second- and third-line treatment. Erlotinib has been reported to be particularly active in patients with adenocarcinoma, in females, in patients of Asian ethnicity and in epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and it is also active in the third-line setting. At present, no direct head to head comparison of erlotinib with any chemotherapeutic agent has been performed. A rational decision tree may therefore include pemetrexed or docetaxel (the former preferred for tolerability) or erlotinib as standard second-line therapy. Erlotinib has been also shown to be active as third-line treatment: however, in cases of patients with clinical characteristics suggesting a good response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib may be employed in an earlier phase.