Diagnostic procedures for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): recommendations of the European Expert Group

BACKGROUND

There is currently no Europe-wide consensus on the appropriate preanalytical measures and workflow to optimise procedures for tissue-based molecular testing of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To address this, a group of lung cancer experts (see list of authors) convened to discuss and propose standard operating procedures (SOPs) for NSCLC.

METHODS

Based on earlier meetings and scientific expertise on lung cancer, a multidisciplinary group meeting was aligned. The aim was to include all relevant aspects concerning NSCLC diagnosis. After careful consideration, the following topics were selected and each was reviewed by the experts: surgical resection and sampling; biopsy procedures for analysis; preanalytical and other variables affecting quality of tissue; tissue conservation; testing procedures for epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase and ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) in lung tissue and cytological specimens; as well as standardised reporting and quality control (QC). Finally, an optimal workflow was described.

RESULTS

Suggested optimal procedures and workflows are discussed in detail. The broad consensus was that the complex workflow presented can only be executed effectively by an interdisciplinary approach using a well-trained team.

CONCLUSIONS

To optimise diagnosis and treatment of patients with NSCLC, it is essential to establish SOPs that are adaptable to the local situation. In addition, a continuous QC system and a local multidisciplinary tumour-type-oriented board are essential.

Parallel screening for ALK, MET and ROS1 alterations in non-small cell lung cancer with implications for daily routine testing

OBJECTIVES

ALK, MET and ROS1 are prognostic and predictive markers in NSCLC, which need to be implemented in daily routine. To evaluate different detection approaches and scoring systems for optimal stratification of patients eligible for mutation testing in the future, we screened a large and unselected cohort of NSCLCs for all three alterations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using tissue microarrays, 473 surgically resected NSCLCs were tested for ALK and MET expression by IHC and genomic alterations in the ALK, MET and ROS1 gene by FISH. For MET IHC, two different criteria (MetMAb and H-score), for MET FISH, three different scoring systems (UCCC, Cappuzzo, PathVysion) were investigated.

RESULTS

ALK and ROS1 positivity was seen in 2.6% and 1.3% of all ADCs, respectively, but not in pure SCCs. One ROS1 translocated tumor showed additional ROS1 amplification. MET IHC+/FISH+ cases were found in both histological subtypes (8.6% in all NSCLCs; 10.6% in ADCs; 5.0% in SCCs) and were associated with pleural invasion, lymphatic vessel invasion and lymph node metastasis. MET altered ADCs more frequently showed a papillary growth pattern. Whereas ALK testing revealed homogenous results in IHC and FISH, we saw discordant results for MET in about 10% of cases. Both METIHC scoring systems revealed almost identical results. We did not encounter any combined FISH positivity for ALK, MET or ROS1. However, three ALK positive cases harbored MET overexpression.

CONCLUSION

In daily routine, IHC could support FISH in the identification of ALK altered NSCLCs. Further research is needed to assess the role of discordant MET results by means of IHC and FISH as well as the relevance of tumors with an increased ROS1 gene copy number.

Crizotinib: a review of its use in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Crizotinib (Xalkori(®)) is an orally active, small molecule inhibitor of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, including anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor and c-ros oncogene 1. In the EU, crizotinib has been conditionally approved for the treatment of adults with previously treated, ALK-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This approval has been based on objective response rate and tolerability data from two ongoing phase I/II studies (PROFILE 1001 and PROFILE 1005); these results have been substantiated and extended by findings from an ongoing phase III study (PROFILE 1007) in patients with ALK-positive, advanced NSCLC who had received one prior platinum-based regimen. Those treated with crizotinib experienced significant improvements in progression-free survival, objective response rate, lung cancer symptoms and global quality of life, as compared with those treated with standard second-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed or docetaxel). The relative survival benefit with crizotinib is unclear, however, as the data are still immature and likely to be confounded by the high cross-over rate among chemotherapy recipients. Crizotinib treatment was generally well tolerated in the three PROFILE studies, with liver transaminase elevations and neutropenia being the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Crizotinib is the standard of care in terms of the treatment of patients with ALK-positive, advanced NSCLC; while the current EU approval is for second (or subsequent)-line use only, the first-line use of the drug is being evaluated in ongoing phase III studies. Key issues relating to the use of crizotinib in clinical practice include identifying the small subset of eligible patients, the almost inevitable development of resistance and the high cost of treatment.